Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

351 records in EU in 2026

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 114Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0590_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#CG and YN v Pelham GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Article 5(3)(k) – Concept of ‘pastiche’ – Use ‘for the purpose of’ pastiche – Reproduction of parts of a phonogram (sampling) – Fundamental rights – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression – Article 13 – Freedom of the arts – Article 17 – Right to property.#Case C-590/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0590decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#CG and YN v Pelham GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Article 5(3)(k) – Concept of ‘pastiche’ – Use ‘for the purpose of’ pastiche – Reproduction of parts of a phonogram (sampling) – Fundamental rights – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression – Article 13 – Freedom of the arts – Article 17 – Right to property.#Case C-590/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0154open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Technical Committees on Customs Valuation and on Rules of Origin, established under the auspices of the World Customs Organization, with regard to the adoption of advisory opinions, commentaries, explanatory notes, case studies, studies and similar acts concerning the valuation of imported goods for customs purposes under the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and the adoption of advisory opinions, information and advice and similar acts concerning the determination of the origin of goods under the Agreement on Rules of Origin

European Union · European Commission · 14 April 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0130open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, as regards the adoption of a decision concerning the inclusion of active pharmaceutical ingredients as the medicinal products or drugs listed in paragraph 2 of the Annex 1 to the Protocol on the mutual recognition of the compliance and enforcement programme regarding good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products

European Union · European Commission · 10 April 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0683decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 April 2026.#Green Asset, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark hômity – Earlier EU figurative mark DOMITYS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-683/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 April 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D0833in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/833 of 30 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Specialised Committee on Participation in Union Programmes established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the amendments to Protocol I thereto

European Union · EUR-Lex · 30 March 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D0832in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/832 of 30 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Specialised Committee on Level Playing Field for Open and Fair Competition and Sustainable Development established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the adoption of a decision to establish a list of individuals who are willing and able to serve as members of the panel of experts established under Article 409 of that Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 30 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0455_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#UC v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion of the applicant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-455/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0696_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective judicial remedy – Limitations – Principles of legality and proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0338_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 13 – Relationship with the fault-based liability system – Fault by the producer linked to the defective nature of the product – Article 10 – Starting point of the three-year limitation period in the case of damage consisting in a progressive illness – Concept of ‘becoming aware of the damage’ – Article 11 – Extinguishment of the rights of the injured person – Validity – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a court.#Case C-338/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0696decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective judicial remedy – Limitations – Principles of legality and proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0307decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#G GmbH v Hauptzollamt H.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Determining the customs value – Article 32(1)(a)(ii) and (b)(iv) – Adjustment depending on costs incurred by the buyer – Costs arising from intangible services for the design of templates for labels affixed on food cans – Concept of ‘container’ – Intangible services within the European Union.#Case C-307/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0455decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#UC v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion of the applicant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-455/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0338decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 13 – Relationship with the fault-based liability system – Fault by the producer linked to the defective nature of the product – Article 10 – Starting point of the three-year limitation period in the case of damage consisting in a progressive illness – Concept of ‘becoming aware of the damage’ – Article 11 – Extinguishment of the rights of the injured person – Validity – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a court.#Case C-338/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0017_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Team Beverage AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – EU figurative mark TEAM BEVERAGE – Earlier EU word mark TEAM – Request for suspension of the administrative proceedings – Rejection – Article 71(1)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-17/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0183_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#DP and DQ v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Origin of the dispute – Limitation period – Admissibility – Article 339 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-183/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0544_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA SINCE 1940 – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant period – Assessment of the evidence – Exclusive licence agreement – No proof of use in respect of the goods for which the mark is registered – No proper reason for non-use.#Case T-544/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0545_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark OSSA – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant period – Assessment of the evidence – Exclusive licence agreement – No proof of use in respect of the goods for which the mark is registered – No proper reason for non-use.#Case T-545/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0183decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#DP and DQ v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Origin of the dispute – Limitation period – Admissibility – Article 339 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-183/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0221decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 March 2026.#TUI Belgium NV and Others v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Transactions subject to VAT – Supply of services for consideration – Exemptions – Standstill clause – Right of Member States to retain certain taxes during a transitional period – Article 28(3)(a) and (4) of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC and Article 370 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of services by travel agents in relation to travel outside the European Union – Annex E(15) to Sixth Directive 77/388 and Annex X, Part A, point (4), to Directive 2006/112 – Subsequent amendment of the national legislation – No express derogation from the exemption.#Case T-221/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0723_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 24 March 2026.#Juan Costa Pujadas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – European Union design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-723/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0766decided

Order of the Court of 24 March 2026.#Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-766/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0521decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#MJ v AA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań - Stare Miasto w Poznaniu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or of their judicial powers – Obligation for a judge hearing an application for the recusal of another judge to ascertain whether the requirement of a ‘tribunal previously established by law’ has been met – Appointment of judges of the ordinary courts in Poland – Lack of independence of the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) – No effective remedy for candidates for the judicial post concerned – Judge not constituting an ‘independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law’ – Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court.#Case C-521/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0521_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#MJ v AA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or of their judicial powers – Obligation for a judge hearing an application for the recusal of another judge to ascertain whether the requirement of a ‘tribunal previously established by law’ has been met – Appointment of judges of the ordinary courts in Poland – Lack of independence of the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) – No effective remedy for candidates for the judicial post concerned – Judge not constituting an ‘independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law’ – Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court.#Case C-521/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2026

PreviousPage 7 of 8Next