PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Nuclear energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 916United States · 674Germany · 665Netherlands · 545Ireland · 290European Union · 242France · 7Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0625decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of ‘low-carbon activity’ – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with droughts and climate hazards – Precautionary principle – Technical screening criteria – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – Article 290 TFEU – Concept of ‘essential elements’ of a legislative act – Scientific evidence – Commission’s margin of discretion – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-625/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0625_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of ‘low-carbon activity’ – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with droughts and climate hazards – Precautionary principle – Technical screening criteria – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – Article 290 TFEU – Concept of ‘essential elements’ of a legislative act – Scientific evidence – Commission’s margin of discretion – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-625/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0628_RESdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#René Repasi v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Environment – Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities relating to fossil gas and nuclear energy – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Member of the European Parliament – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-628/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0628decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#René Repasi v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Environment – Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities relating to fossil gas and nuclear energy – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Member of the European Parliament – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-628/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0101_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2022 (Extracts).#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#State aid – Nuclear industry – Aid planned by Hungary for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the Paks site – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Inextricable link – Promotion of nuclear energy – First paragraph of Article 192 of the Euratom Treaty – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Distortion of competition – Proportionality of the aid – Need for State intervention – Determination of the aid elements – Public procurement procedure – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-101/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0101decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2022 (Extracts).#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#State aid – Nuclear industry – Aid planned by Hungary for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the Paks site – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Inextricable link – Promotion of nuclear energy – First paragraph of Article 192 of the Euratom Treaty – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Distortion of competition – Proportionality of the aid – Need for State intervention – Determination of the aid elements – Public procurement procedure – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-101/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32020D2253in force

Council Decision (Euratom) 2020/2253 of 29 December 2020 approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Atomic Energy Community for Cooperation on the Safe and Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy and the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 December 2020

Decision· DCELEX 32020D2255in force

Commission Decision (Euratom) 2020/2255 of 29 December 2020 on the conclusion, by the European Commission, and provisional application of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Atomic Energy Community for Cooperation on the Safe and Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy and on the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, and provisional application of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 December 2020

Proposal· PCCELEX 52020PC0857R(01)open

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Atomic Energy Community for Cooperation on the Safe and Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy and the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 27 December 2020

Proposal· PCCELEX 52020PC0857open

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Atomic Energy Community for Cooperation on the Safe and Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy and the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 26 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0594_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0594decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2020

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-004347answered

Nuclear energy research

European Union · European Parliament · 22 July 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0594decided

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 7 May 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 May 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0080decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA) and Others v Administración General del Estado and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Polluter-pays principle — Common rules for the internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3(1) and (2) — Principle of non-discrimination — Financing the tariff deficit — Taxes applying only to undertakings which use nuclear energy to produce electricity.#Joined Cases C-80/18 to C-83/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0411decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL and Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen ASBL v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Espoo Convention — Aarhus Convention — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(3) — Definition of ‘project’ — Assessment of the effects on the site concerned — Article 6(4) — Meaning of ‘imperative reasons of overriding public interest’ — Conservation of wild birds — Directive 2009/147/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — Directive 2011/92/EU — Article 1(2)(a) — Definition of ‘project’ — Article 2(1) — Article 4(1) — Environmental impact assessment — Article 2(4) — Exemption from assessment — Phasing out of nuclear energy — National legislation providing, first, for restarting industrial production of electricity for a period of almost 10 years at a nuclear power station that had previously been shut down, with the effect of deferring by 10 years the date initially set by the national legislature for deactivating and ceasing production at that power station, and second, for deferral, also by 10 years, of the date initially set by the legislature for deactivating and ceasing industrial production of electricity at an active power station — No environmental impact assessment.#Case C-411/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Page 1 of 2Next