Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

128 records in EU in 2025

All countriesIreland · 74,985United States · 19,023Austria · 8,877France · 7,984Netherlands · 6,595United Kingdom · 5,168European Union · 3,736Germany · 2,171Belgium · 59Estonia · 15Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0480_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles – Directive (EU) 2019/1161 – Failure to transpose and to notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for an order to pay a lump sum.#Case C-480/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0020_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of proving payment.#Case C-20/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0020decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of proving payment.#Case C-20/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0057open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Group of Experts on the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international road transport (AETR) and in the Working Party on Road Transport of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards a proposal to align the AETR with the main recent amendments to Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

European Union · European Commission · 28 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0220_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional „Avram Iancu” Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0220decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional 'Avram Iancu' Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0684_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#SIA ,,Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and VSIA „Autotransporta direkcija”.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by bus – Point (c) of the third subparagraph of Article 5(2) – Award of public service contracts – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus – Award in the form of a service concession contract – Direct award by a competent local authority to an internal operator – Article 5(3) – Competitive tendering procedure – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus by another competent authority – Participation of the internal operator – Conditions.#Case C-684/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0615decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 13 February 2025.#Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v P. S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 73 – Taxable amount – Consideration – Subsidies directly linked to the price of a taxable transaction – Collective public transport services – Compensation paid by a local authority to the service provider to cover the costs incurred – Direct link between the compensation and the services provided.#Case C-615/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0684decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#'Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss' SIA v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and 'Autotransporta direkcija' VSIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by bus – Point (c) of the third subparagraph of Article 5(2) – Award of public service contracts – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus – Award in the form of a service concession contract – Direct award by a competent local authority to an internal operator – Article 5(3) – Competitive tendering procedure – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus by another competent authority – Participation of the internal operator – Conditions.#Case C-684/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0499decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 6 February 2025.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Free movement of goods – Article 35 TFEU – Quantitative restrictions on exports – Measures having equivalent effect – Construction materials – Obligation to notify exports – State’s right of pre-emption – Article 36 TFEU – Justification – Public security – Supply of construction materials for critical infrastructure – Control of exports to third countries – Exclusive competence of the Union – Common commercial policy – Regulation (EU) 2015/479 – Common rules for exports – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Information procedure in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services.#Case C-499/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0743decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Rescue aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Eligibility – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Appropriateness of the aid – Proportionality – Weighing up of the positive and negative effects – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-743/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0783decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 January 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0642decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website.#Case C-642/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0642_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website.#Case C-642/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0516_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#NW and YS v Qatar Airways.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(3) – Travel free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Passenger who has paid only charges and air transport taxes – Reservation in the context of a promotional campaign – Article 8(1)(c) – Right to re-routing at a later date – No requirement of a temporal link between the cancelled flight and the re-routing flight desired by the passenger.#Case C-516/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0516decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#NW and YS v Qatar Airways.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(3) – Travel free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Passenger who has paid only charges and air transport taxes – Reservation in the context of a promotional campaign – Article 8(1)(c) – Right to re-routing at a later date – No requirement of a temporal link between the cancelled flight and the re-routing flight desired by the passenger.#Case C-516/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

PreviousPage 3 of 3