Records
23 records where Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite13952answered
France · National Assembly · 31 March 2026
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and Disabled People, responsible for autonomy and disabled people, on the experimentation since March 1, 2026 and in five departments of a new application form from departmental centers for disabled people (MDPH). Established in 2005, the MDPHs are one-stop shops intended to facilitate access to the rights of people with disabilities. They are today an essential link, but are largely weakened by budgetary constraints and the complexity of access to rights. With this in mind, the Government has undertaken a review of the MDPH application form, aiming in particular to shorten and “simplify” it. However, the deployment of this new form raises numerous fears, in particular by user associations, who alert the MP on this subject. The reduction of this form results in the reduction of spaces allowing the description of needs and numerous sections which make it possible to provide essential information about the life of the applicant. Thus, with this new form, the information given to the multidisciplinary evaluation teams will not reflect experiences lived accurately and will frequently lead to errors of assessment. Especially since applicants are not systematically heard during an interview by MDPH staff for access to their rights. This form also reduces the quantity and quality of information given to users about their rights, contributing to increasing non-recourse to rights. It also guides much less users in their request. Thus, only people who are “initiated” or who benefit from quality external support will be able to provide a well-informed file, while others will only be able to rely on themselves, without support, at the risk of losing their rights. Thus, the MP underlines that through this experiment, the priority of the Minister no longer seems to be the effectiveness of rights and a response to the needs of people, but only compliance with budgetary constraints. She believes that rather than preferring to reduce questionnaires, we should seek to improve them and better support users in their procedures. She therefore asks him if an end to the experiment is planned before its end, in order to limit the consequences that this questionnaire could have on the access to the rights of people with disabilities. She would also like to know if an increase in the resources allocated to the MDPHs is planned, in order to greatly improve their operation.
Question· Question écrite11274open
France · National Assembly · 2 December 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to Decree No. 2025-599 of June 30, 2025 relating to the organization of the medical control service (SCM). The latter enshrines the project to transform health insurance through the abolition of the SCM, with the consequence of transferring the employment contracts of nearly 7,200 employees, without their opinion having been given to them. request. From now on, the medical control service is no longer an economic entity in its own right and sees its staff dispersed within the primary health insurance funds (CPAM). This brutal reform directly threatens the functions previously occupied by the medical control service: observation of non-compliance with legislative or regulatory provisions governing the coverage of medical costs, analysis of the activity health establishments, control of the collection of quality and safety indicators of care, management of long-term conditions or even allocation of disability pensions. There are hundreds of medical advisors and thousands of administrative staff who work within these medical services, throughout France, to carry out their missions. So many employees who are today under the threat of this reorganization, carried out despite their total disapproval. Proof of this is the massive resignation of medical advisors since October 1, 2025, as well as the massive rejection of employee representative organizations. In short, 85% of medical service employees do not support this reform or doubt its relevance. Hardly surprising results when we take into account that this reform, imposed without preparation or dialogue, puts jeopardize their social gains. The MP also underlines that this attachment to the CPAM means that the opinions given by the medical control service are no longer given independently, but are now subject to the financial considerations of the paying funds that are the CPAM, relegating the health of the insured to second place. Consulting practitioners completely lose their independence, which goes against the case law of the Council of State, which concludes, in its decision no. 342699, that “consulting practitioners belong to an autonomous body”. Equally worrying is the inclusion of doctors within CPAMs, which poses a major risk for the confidentiality of medical data. She therefore questions him about the relevance of maintaining the provisions of decree no. 2025-599 of June 30, 2025 relating to the organization of the medical control service and asks him if its repeal is on the Government's agenda, as desired by the workers concerned, as well as users.
Question· Question écrite11189answered
France · National Assembly · 25 November 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and Disabled People, responsible for autonomy and disabled people, to the administrative inaction concerning cases of discrimination and in particular ableism, in the public service. Despite the existing legal framework, which prohibits any form of discrimination based on disability and guarantees equality of treatment between public officials, many situations still demonstrate discriminatory practices against people with disabilities, whether it be difficulties in adapting their jobs, obstacles to career development or daily stigmatization. Victim officers too often encounter a lack of response, or even real attempts at degradation on the part of their administration. Thus, the Member of Parliament was contacted by a permanent civil servant, victim of a breach of equal treatment and a clear obstacle to his career, due to his disability. Despite numerous warnings from him, his administration demands that he return to his initial position – the same one which caused his illness and led to his impairment – as a precondition for any professional reconversion, in total contradiction with established medical recommendations. Furthermore, this same administration does not execute or liquidate the payment of the temporary disability allowance (ATI) due to it, in direct violation of its legal obligation of compensation. Such failures constitute serious attacks on the principles of equality and protection of public officials and directly contravene the law of February 11 2005 as well as the State's commitments in terms of disability and inclusion. Unfortunately, this particular case is not isolated. Validist discrimination remains too frequent in the civil service, whether it results from conscious behavior, a failure to adapt workstations or a lack of training for supervisors and line managers. Also, she wishes to know what measures the Government intends to implement to guarantee real effectiveness of the right to non-discrimination and to adapt the working conditions of agents with disabilities and to ensure that public administrations fully respect their legal obligations in terms of repair and inclusion.
Question· Question écrite8163open
France · National Assembly · 1 July 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, about the lack of resources allocated to sexual health centers, in particular to the sexual health and education center in Décines, whose financial situation today threatens its sustainability. While this center, a historic player in prevention, listening and access to rights since 1980, has played a fundamental role in the fight against sexual and gender-based violence, in education for emotional, relational and sexual life (EVARS), as well as in the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, its mission is today jeopardized by insufficient public funding. Free access for minors, as well as vulnerable groups, the practice of third-party payment, confidentiality and the diversity of skills of its team make it an irreplaceable tool in the Lyon Metropolis. More generally, it is the whole of Family Planning – with its 80 departmental associations – which is today weakened financially. The gradual disengagement of the State, a consequence of budget cuts imposed by the Government, combined with the reduction in subsidies paid to communities territorial, endangers the sustainability of this network. If nothing is done, this situation could lead to the closure of many sexual health centers, with serious consequences on access to rights, prevention and sexual health for thousands of people. She therefore wishes to know what concrete measures the Government intends to take to guarantee long-term funding for associative sexual health centers, in particular that of Décines and whether specific resources will be allocated within the framework of public policies to combat sexist and sexual violence, access to sexual health and education about emotional and sexual life.
Question· Question écrite8108answered
France · National Assembly · 1 July 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for autonomy and disability, of the risk of closing the only theater school in sign languages in France. In 2005 and 2016, Parliament passed two laws in favor of the inclusion of people with disabilities and more particularly in the field of cultural life and in the world of work. Unfortunately, these stated principles and the related inclusion public policy obligations are not always effective. Even today, a young deaf person can neither learn theater, because no conservatory is open to him, nor become an actor. This observation is part of a broader dynamic of exclusion from the labor market: according to the Observatory of Inequalities, 12% of people recognized disabled people were unemployed in 2022, 1.7 times more than the national average. It is in this context that two artists, Martin Cros and Alexandre Bernhardt, founded the Universal Theater School (ETU) in 2018, which was to remedy this injustice by making it possible to train deaf artists with courses taught entirely in sign language. This initiative is in danger due to budget cuts decided by the Government, since the accessibility of school fees was only possible through training aid from France Travail and the Association for the management of funds for the professional integration of disabled people (AGEFIPH). Since last year, AGEFIPH has completely withdrawn from financing “training assistance as part of the path to employment” for job seekers in a situation of disability. This sudden cessation of aid has already forced the ETU to part with an employee essential to the coordination of training. The amount of training aid from France Travail will be halved for the class of 2026, which is a direct consequence of the austerity imposed by the Government. These budget cuts jeopardize the very existence of the ETU for years to come, through the drastic increase in fees registration, the reduction in the salary of trainers and great difficulties to be expected in the search for premises for the school, despite agreements made with partners such as the Théâtre du Grand Rond in Toulouse. She asks him if the Government intends to implement the safeguard, preservation and protection of this unique space of cultural inclusion of disabled people that is the ETU, in the service of inclusion people with disabilities in the field of art and culture, in the name of the 2005 law which must be defended and respected.
Question· Question écrite7828answered
France · National Assembly · 24 June 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for autonomy and disability, to the worrying consequences of circular IT 2024-233 from the National Family Allowance Fund (Cnaf) published on December 5, 2024. This new instruction tightens access to supplements 2 to 6 in addition to the basic rate of the AEEH, in prohibiting their accumulation with certain allowances linked to the reduction or cessation of activity, without any clear legal basis. Worse, the circular specifies that in the event of non-payment, it is not even necessary to inform the MDPH, which is the only competent authority to rule on the rights of people with disabilities. Parents may thus find themselves deprived of additional resources essential to cope. needs related to their child’s disability. They reduce or stop their activity out of necessity, faced with the absence or insufficiency of suitable care solutions. Such a provision is contrary to the law, as notably recognized by the Côtes-d'Armor social security court in 2017, affirming that no text opposes the accumulation of the AEEH and the specific solidarity allowance (ASS). These families, already faced with a long and complex administrative process, must also respond to repeated requests for medical supporting documents, resulting in processing times of several months. Their difficulties were also highlighted by a 2020 DREES study, revealing that 24% of AEEH beneficiaries live below the poverty line, with a standard of living 272 euros lower than that of other families with children. The family branch of social security, however, showed a surplus of 1.1 billion euros in 2024. Ignoring the fundamental right to compensation for disability guaranteed in particular by article L. 114-1-1 of the social action and families code, this decision by the Cnaf comes at a time when the recognition of family caregivers and their central role is displayed as a priority of the Government. She asks him therefore, if the Government intends to call into question this circular which unnecessarily weakens families, in the name of the best interests of the child and recognition of the role of caregivers, reestablish the primacy of the decisions of the CDAPH and guarantee fair, stable and transparent access to AEEH supplements for the families concerned.
Question· Question écrite7821answered
France · National Assembly · 24 June 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families to the dramatic consequences of the removal of subsidies to the Rhône federation of Secours populaire français, a fundamental association in the fight against precariousness. Indeed, the departmental directorate of employment, labor and solidarity recently announced that it would put an end to the two subsidies from which the structure benefited, on the grounds of a refocusing of food credits on a limited number of actions with departmental and structural purposes, particularly in white areas. However, this financial aid meets precisely these criteria. One participates in the departmental coordination of food aid and logistics, the other supports the fight against food insecurity among students. This financing is therefore fully consistent with the objectives stated by the administration. Thus, the 27 structures in the Rhône department affiliated with Secours populaire welcomed 19,403 people, including 8,672 children, from more than 60 municipalities, and distributed 182,552 food aids in 2024. These figures demonstrate the indispensable nature of Secours populaire's action in the department. One of these subsidies had also been increased ago two years by the Prefect of Rhône, in recognition of the quality of the work accomplished and to compensate for an amount frozen at 15,000 euros for more than fifteen years. Such a development makes the decision which has just been announced all the more incomprehensible. This decision comes in a context of violent undermining of the right to food in the country. According to a study by the Research Center for the Study and Observation of living conditions (Crédoc), 16% of French people said they would not be able to eat their fill in 2023, while more than 20% of students resort to food aid according to a survey conducted by the National Observatory of Student Life (OVE). Solidarity cannot be sacrificed in the name of budgetary decisions. She asks her if she intends to reverse this decision and maintain the necessary support for Secours populaire français, which Solidarity actions are essential for several thousand citizens.
Question· Question écrite6770open
France · National Assembly · 20 May 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of State, Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research, responsible for higher education and research, to the need to guarantee the protection of academic freedom within the Lumière Lyon 2 University. On Wednesday, May 7, 2025, the special advisor to the President of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region announced the suspension regional aid allocated to the Lumière Lyon 2 University, citing an alleged “Islamo-leftist drift” of the establishment. It is deeply concerning that academics may be subject to pressure or questioning for expressing positions on the dramatic situation unfolding in Gaza. Freedom of expression, like academic freedom, constitutes a pillar of democracy and cannot be weakened by local political decisions. Such interference constitutes a serious attack on fundamental rights and endangers the free exercise of teaching and research missions. Academic freedom constitutes a fundamental principle recognized by the laws of the Republic. The Constitutional Council expressly affirmed this in 1984, recalling that "teaching and research functions not only enable but demand, in the very interest of the service, that the free expression and independence of staff be guaranteed.” Likewise, article L. 141-6 of the education code provides that the public service of higher education is “independent of any political, economic, religious or ideological influence”. In this context, the MP is concerned that a decision of a political nature relating to the financing of an establishment higher education could undermine this fundamental principle and create a dangerous precedent. She questions him on the measures that the Government intends to take to ensure respect for academic freedom and prevent any political interference in the management of universities.
Question· Question écrite5998answered
France · National Assembly · 15 April 2025
Mrs Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi questions the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families on the objective of reducing poverty. Article L. 115-4-1 code of social action and families introduced by the 2008 law on the RSA establishes the obligation for the Government to define a quantified objective for reducing poverty and to report, each year, to Parliament, on the conditions for achieving this objective and the measures and financial means implemented to meet them. The first objective, adopted in 2008 for the duration of the five-year term, was to reduce the number of people in poverty in the country from 7.8 million to 5.2 million. However, 9.1 million people were in poverty in 2022 according to the latest statistics from INSEE. Since 2011, the State has not set itself any poverty reduction objective and it has not not reported on his actions to parliament. Without a clearly defined objective known to all public and private stakeholders, France will not be able to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of existing measures in the fight against poverty in order to be able to complete them. In view of these arguments, she asks her if she will set a poverty reduction objective and on what date the annual report will be submitted to parliament.
Question· Question écrite5516answered
France · National Assembly · 1 April 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Regional Planning and Decentralization, responsible for transport, to the consequences of the removal of the bicycle bonus which came into force on February 15, 2025. However, the bicycle bonus constituted essential aid for access to sustainable and inclusive mobility, in particular for electric bicycles and adapted bicycles. A decree of February 2024 was to make this system of aid for the purchase of a bicycle, electric or not, used or new, sustainable until 2027. This elimination penalizes households with modest incomes, while according to the Active Mobility Observatory, in 2022, 47% of beneficiaries of the electric bicycle bonus had an income of less than 1,500 euros per month. Precarious workers, notably bicycle delivery men, were also beneficiaries of this aid to carry out their activity. This device was also essential for people with disabilities who often have to use specific bicycles, the cost of which can reach several thousand euros. The absence of financial support risks depriving them of an independent means of travel, thus reinforcing their isolation, while public transport otherwise remains largely unsuitable and exclusive. The stopping of a subsidy for soft mobility useful to the most precarious and people with disabilities is worrying in a context of climate emergency. It contravenes essential commitments in favor of sustainable and inclusive mobility. Also, she asks him when this bicycle bonus will be reinstated or if new measures are planned by the Government to compensate for inequalities in access to mobility and ensure that the public most vulnerable are not left behind by this decision.
Question· Question écrite5397answered
France · National Assembly · 25 March 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, to the shortages in the supply of medicinal products based on methylphenidate, indicated in the treatment of attention deficit disorder. These shortages, which have persisted for several years, are notably due to an increase in demand and limited production capacities, depending on the laboratories. The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) indicates that it is monitoring the situation vigilantly and has put in place certain measures, such as the possibility, on an exceptional and temporary basis, of issuing another medicine based on methylphenidate without a new prescription when the treatment initially prescribed is unavailable. However, these solutions remain insufficient to meet the needs of patients. The distribution of the specialties most suitable for certain treatments, in particular those with prolonged release, remains limited and the prescription of a medicine with a shorter release duration can cause side effects which can prove particularly disabling. The covid-19 crisis has highlighted the country's inability to guarantee the supply of essential medicines. Restoring health sovereignty is a necessity, especially as production gaps make France highly dependent on supply chains that it does not control, often located on the other side of the world. The press kit on the relocation of essential medicines, dating from January 6, 2025, stated that “patients in France must be able to have access to all medicines, both mature medicines but also the most recent medicines”. She therefore asks what measures the Government intends to take to guarantee a stable supply of medicines based on methylphenidate in order to better ensure continuity of care for patients with ADHD and whether the Government's desire to localize the production of medicines in France also concerns those with ADHD. methylphenidate base.
Question· Question écrite5254open
France · National Assembly · 25 March 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, to the need for full coverage of bariatric transport costs by health insurance for obese people or people with disabilities. As a member of the evaluation mission of Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005 for equal rights and opportunities, participation and citizenship of disabled people, the MP was indeed alerted to this breakdown in equal access to care. The absence of full coverage for bariatric ambulance transport by health insurance represents a major financial obstacle for hundreds of thousands of people, who must assume out-of-pocket expenses reaching several hundred euros for a trip to the hospital requiring a suitable vehicle. It is to be feared that this state of affairs is at the origin of situations of non-recourse to care, transforming the financial obstacle into an obstacle to the effectiveness of the right to health, while one in four disabled people aged 15 to 59 lives below the poverty line, compared to one in seven among the population who is not disabled. The prospect of such an expense can have an effect dissuasive in the request for a consultation, an examination or hospitalization, despite increased medical needs. However, the Drees has already pointed out the extent of the phenomenon of non-seeking of care among disabled people: in 2022, for example, they were twice as likely to give up seeing a doctor because the doctor was too far away or they encountered transport difficulties to get there. THE Failure to seek care worsens the state of health and contributes to a vicious circle of exclusion and deterioration in quality of life. It is not acceptable that three times as many disabled people are unable, for financial reasons, to receive loved ones to share a friendly moment. Every vector of isolation and precariousness must be combatted. Faced with this worrying situation, she asks him when the Government intends to publish the model for common law coverage of bariatric transport by health insurance, notably mentioned by the previous Minister of Health and Prevention in February 2023.
Question· Question écrite4909answered
France · National Assembly · 11 March 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for autonomy and disability, about the age barrier, set by decree, limiting access to the disability compensation benefit (PCH). In fact, currently, a person whose visual disability is recognized after the age of 60 cannot benefit from this benefit, except in two cases of exemption, which do not only concern a tiny minority of people. Access to rehabilitation and rehabilitation services, although essential to maintaining the autonomy of elderly people with visual disabilities, is also restricted by this age limit. Consequently, the age barrier of 60 years considerably slows down the quality of care for the elderly. According to the Homer study, more than half of people over 60 with irreversible vision loss did not receive any offer of care following the announcement of the diagnosis. Considering people over 60 as belonging to the field of elderly people, rather than to that of disability, creates an additional obstacle to their care. Indeed, beyond the age of 60, they no longer fall within the framework of disability, but that of dependence. This leads to a change in assistance systems, the personalized autonomy allowance (APA) then replacing the disability compensation benefit (PCH). However, the APA reimburses little for technical aids relating to visual disability and its evaluation criteria are not adapted to visually impaired elderly people, which means that the care offered is very often unsuitable for the real needs of the person. Legal provisions in force nevertheless go in the direction of respect for equal treatment between citizens: article L. 114-1-1 of the code of social action and families guarantees every disabled person the right to compensation for their disability, regardless of their age or their lifestyle and article 13 of law no. of five years. Twenty years later, these principles are still not applied. While population projections estimate that one in three people will be over 60 years old in 2050 in France and the WHO highlights that 80% of blind or visually impaired people are over 50 years old, this situation generates discrimination based on age which is no longer tolerable and which ignores a major future public health problem. The disability results above all an unsuitable environment and public policies. The common priority must be to remove these obstacles, which hinder the self-determination and autonomy of the people concerned. France is regularly singled out by international bodies for its repeated violations of agreements relating to the rights of people with disabilities. This situation cannot continue any longer, especially since solutions exist and they are, for some, already enshrined in law. Budgetary austerity cannot justify an increase in the dependence of people with disabilities, to the detriment of their fundamental rights. In this context, she asks what measures she intends to implement to remove the age limit of 60 years, which deprives elderly people with visual disabilities of equal access to aid and rights granted to younger people. In order to provide an immediate response to the urgency of autonomy for these populations, it also requests that the reimbursement of technical aids be treated as a priority and accelerated as quickly as possible.
Question· Question écrite4253answered
France · National Assembly · 18 February 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister of Public Action, Civil Service and Simplification to access to civil service competitions for people with disabilities. Accommodations, essential to guarantee accessibility of the tests, require the presentation of a medical certificate issued by an approved doctor. However, this consultation represents a significant cost, resulting in a balance sometimes high load. This constitutes a real obstacle for people with disabilities wishing to take the civil service exams and constitutes financial inequality with other candidates. The MP has been called upon several times to denounce this inequality. Although article 53 of Decree No. 86-442 of March 14, 1986 relating to the “designation of approved doctors, the organization of medical councils, conditions of physical fitness for admission to public employment and to the sick leave system for civil servants" provides that "the fees and other medical costs resulting from the examinations provided for in this decree and the possible costs of transporting the patient examined, are the responsibility of the budget of the administration concerned", this does not expressly specify that reimbursement by the administration is provided for in the event of medical examination intended to assess the necessary adjustments to the competition, as indicated by the Defender of Rights, in its amicable settlement RA-2019-083 of June 24, 2019. She asks him whether regulatory changes are planned in order to include coverage of the fees of approved doctors in the context of civil service competitions.
Question· Question écrite3998answered
France · National Assembly · 11 February 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for autonomy and disability, to the twenty years of the law of February 11, 2005 for equal rights and opportunities, participation and citizenship of disabled people. If it is one of the great laws of the Republic, its anniversary highlights that it has not had all the effects expected. Indeed, the expectations of the 12 million people with disabilities and their loved ones remain high. In 2025, people with disabilities still cannot live with dignity in the city and act as full citizens. This situation persists despite the new commitments made by France since: the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2010 and the creation of the fifth branch of social security dedicated to supporting autonomy in 2020. On the one hand, French law and public action have still not been fully consistent with international law, despite repeated condemnations from international authorities. On the other hand, the Autonomy branch remains insufficiently resourced and without a coherent multi-annual political vision, preventing it from truly responding to the needs on the ground. The report drawn up by the Collectif Handicaps, bringing together 54 associations defending the rights of people with disabilities and their families, is clear: the urgency must be to make the fundamental rights of people with disabilities effective, throughout the territory, starting with the two pillars of the law, universal accessibility and the right to compensation. Indeed, twenty years after the promulgation of the law, universal accessibility (built environment, transport, communication, digital etc.) is still not a reality. Access to effective and personalized compensation for the consequences of one's disability on daily life is an obstacle course, largely hampering people's life plans. The standard of living of people with disabilities and their loved ones is lower than the rest of the population. population: one in four people with disabilities is poor. The rights to education, employment, housing and even health continue to be violated simply because of the disability situation. The Housing Foundation for the Disadvantaged said in its annual report that only 6% of social housing is both accessible and suitable for people with disabilities. The Elan law of 2018 worsened the situation by limiting the obligation for new accessible housing to 20%. In short, the stigmatization and invisibility of people with disabilities and their caregivers, the precariousness they have to face, the lack of support and care professionals and general inaccessibility are all obstacles, injustices and inequalities which are no longer acceptable in 2025. This is why she wants to know what measures the Government intends to take to translate the promises of the law of February 11, 2005 into action and finally make the rights of people with disabilities effective.
Question· Question écrite3821answered
France · National Assembly · 11 February 2025
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts the Minister of Agriculture and Food Sovereignty to the conditions of killing animals in a public slaughterhouse in the Rhône. An investigation recently revealed a clear non-compliance with the regulations in force, set by the decree of December 12, 1997 relating to the processes of immobilization, stunning and killing of animals and the conditions of animal protection in slaughterhouses. Of the cows are decapitated alive and slaughtered while conscious despite being stunned, the animals are brutalized there, panicked at seeing other animals treated in this way. This slaughterhouse produces 3,200 tonnes of meat per year and plans to increase its capacity by 1,300 tonnes by 2026, while being largely financed by public money. The slaughterhouse today supplies school canteens, supermarkets and butchers in the Rhône, under Label rouge or organic Beaujolais certification. On February 3, 2025, the prefect of Rhône partially suspended the activity of the slaughterhouse, in particular the pork chain following a visit by the departmental population protection directorate which noted “major anomalies in terms of animal protection during slaughter”. She asks him if strict compliance and recovery procedures are planned and whether the generalization of activity suspensions is considered given the scale of the problem.
Question· Question écrite2381answered
France · National Assembly · 26 November 2024
Mme Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerte M. le ministre des sports, de la jeunesse et de la vie associative sur les comportements violents récemment observés au sein des stades de football. Le dimanche 6 octobre 2024, en marge du match de Ligue 1 opposant l'Olympique Lyonnais (OL) au FC Nantes, des groupes de supporters lyonnais sont entrés en altercation aux abords des tribunes du Parc OL. Selon plusieurs médias locaux, un supporter aurait été agressé à l'aide d'une arme blanche et un autre supporter aurait été interpellé en possession d'un cutter. Le jeudi 24 octobre 2024, le match opposant l'OL au club turc du Besiktas s'est soldé par des affrontements entre supporters et huit interpellations malgré les mesures mises en œuvre. À ces débordements entre supporters s'ajoutent la discrimination et les comportements racistes, qui gâchent le spectacle populaire que doit être le sport et ne permet plus à tous et toutes de venir au stade en toute sécurité. Le samedi 19 octobre 2024, des témoins ont par exemple fait état de chants homophobes, lors du match opposant le Paris Saint-Germain au RC Strasbourg. Des cris de singes, saluts nazis, insultes racistes et violences ont largement été documentés par la presse ces dernières années. L'idéologie raciste de l'extrême droite qui se répand dans les tribunes va à l'encontre de toutes les valeurs du sport et de la loi, la xénophobie étant un délit et non une opinion. Pourtant, l'article L. 224-1 du code du sport dispose que « les supporters et les associations de supporters, par leur comportement et leur activité, participent au bon déroulement des manifestations et compétitions sportives et concourent à la promotion des valeurs du sport ». Les clubs de supporter participent à l'avancée des travaux de l'instance nationale du supportérisme, qui est organisée au titre de l’article D. 224-1 du code du sport et elle « présente chaque année au ministre chargé des sports un rapport d'activité qui retrace la contribution de l'instance et celle des différents acteurs du sport, dont la Division nationale de lutte contre le hooliganisme, sur le supportérisme ». D'autre part, depuis novembre 2021, la Ligue de football professionnelle (LFP) s'est engagée dans une campagne annuelle « Dégageons les discriminations, dégageons le racisme ! » avec le lancement d'ateliers sur la question du racisme dans les stades. Depuis, 74 ateliers ont été organisés dans 27 clubs différents d'après la LFP, qui se déplace dans tous les clubs pour sensibiliser directement joueurs, staffs et supporters. Elle souhaite donc connaître les moyens employés par le M. le ministre afin de mettre un terme à la montée des actes et propos xénophobes en agissant sur les leviers de prévention et de sanction en lien avec les clubs et les associations de supporters. Elle souhaite également connaître les mesures qu'il compte prendre à l'égard des membres violents dans les tribunes et aux abords du stade, groupes informels politisés à l'extrême droite qui mettent à mal les valeurs du sport et du supportérisme.
Question· Question écrite2340answered
France · National Assembly · 26 November 2024
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts the Minister of Labor and Employment to the worrying employment situation of people with disabilities in the country. In this European week for the employment of people with disabilities, she wishes to recall that inequalities in access to and retention of employment persist and is concerned that the situation is further degraded by the Government's desire to reduce the resources allocated to Agefiph. In Indeed, according to the Defender of Rights, disability is the primary reason for discrimination and 37% of complaints relate to employment. A situation far removed from equal rights, which contravenes the emancipation and autonomy of people. Pure and simple exclusion from the labor market is the most glaring exclusion: the unemployment rate for people with disabilities is around 12%, almost twice more than in the rest of the population. The employment rate for people with disabilities working in the private sector is 3.5%, far from the 6% set by the 1987 law. Quotas are sometimes circumvented or poorly applied, with employers not sufficiently penalized for their non-compliance with inclusion policies. In addition, a third of people with disabilities work part-time, often suffered, compared to 17% of the population. general, revealing increased precariousness. Disability is also a tool of discrimination used to keep people in low-skilled positions. Only 10% occupy management positions, compared to 22% for the general population. 75% of workers with disabilities believe that their disability has hindered their professional development. Nearly half report having experienced discrimination, particularly in access to promotions or raises. The limited professional opportunities of people with disabilities can also be explained by interrupted school careers due to a lack of inclusive education. In its report of September 16, 2024, the Court of Auditors describes the reception systems as “fragile”, highlighting an obvious lack of investment. This situation clearly proves that incentive policies are not enough to resolve worrying inequalities. It therefore wishes to know its intentions regarding the fight against discrimination in hiring and during the career of people with disabilities as well as the means implemented to make workplaces truly accessible and inclusive.
Question· Question écrite1934answered
France · National Assembly · 12 November 2024
Mrs. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts the Minister of the Interior to the presence and organization of small, far-right identity groups in the “Vieux-Lyon” district, located in his constituency. On the night of October 11, 2024, a woman was severely beaten by around fifteen individuals with hidden faces, under the pretext that she was wearing an anti-racist football club cap. Racist, homophobic and xenophobic attacks linked to The presence of these activists is endemic in the neighborhood and throughout the city of Lyon. Across the country, around ten attacks emanating from the far right have been foiled in recent years. In June 2024, the former Minister of the Interior dissolved the Les Remparts group and other associations, including those present on the rental lease for the premises called La Traboule, a rallying and organizing point for small groups. However, on September 30, 2024, around thirty identity activists marched in the streets, armed, to the rhythm of xenophobic chants. We were then able to see to what extent these dissolutions were proving ineffective: this stroll took place behind a banner previously used by the now dissolved collectives. Solutions exist to concretely combat far-right violence. On June 13, 2019, a parliamentary commission of inquiry rendered partial conclusions on the state of the threat from small far-right groups. Without digging into the links and networks of the extreme right among themselves, institutional and small groups, she was able to identify several thousand individuals preparing for violent acts. It is urgent to implement the recommendations of this transpartisan report, in particular by strengthening means of monitoring members of dissolved small groups and combating the reconstitution of dissolved small groups, by undertaking an additional effort to train agents of the national police and gendarmerie in the fight against hate crimes, by attaching particular importance to the monitoring of members or former members of the armed forces or internal security involved in ultra-right groups and by substantially strengthening Pharos' financial, technical and human resources. She therefore expressed her concern for the safety of the people of Lyon and questioned him about the intentions of the new Government in terms of the fight against small far-right groups who are sowing terror by imposing their violence in the heart of Lyon.
Question· Question écrite1760answered
France · National Assembly · 5 November 2024
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi alerts Mr. Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, about the elimination of positions and budget cuts in the judicial protection of youth (PJJ). The first victims of this budget cut are young people followed by court decision. In 2024, the former Minister of the Economy canceled 37 million euros of credit allocated to this sector. The consequences are dramatic for this administration which is responsible the integration, support and education of under-18s in conflict with the law. The elimination of 500 contract positions represents almost 10% of the sector's workforce and a third of contract positions, including 53 in Lyon. This budget cut particularly targets the positions of educators, psychologists, social workers and even supervisory staff, directly in contact with these young people. This decision comes at a time when juvenile justice and the prison administration are experiencing major difficulties. This lack of staff will have serious consequences on the monitoring, supervision and reintegration of particularly vulnerable young people, while judicial youth protection workers do not have sufficient resources to ensure proper monitoring of young people. The PJJ nevertheless plays a role crucial in a system where the support of minors and young adults must give them a stabilizing and reassuring framework in order to promote their social integration. It is in this sense that the main federations of child protection associations expressed their concern at the announcement of the elimination of 500 positions. It therefore seems essential to protect a vital sector for the future of the country's youth, instead of make it more precarious. She therefore asks him to review the position of his predecessor on this issue by canceling the elimination of these positions in the judicial protection of youth which the sector is sorely lacking.
Question· Question écrite1597answered
France · National Assembly · 29 October 2024
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Employment to the situation of four student inspectors not tenured without justification at the end of their career within the National Institute of Labor, Employment and Vocational Training of Marcy-l'Etoile. These four student inspectors/trainees obtained good grades and positive evaluations during their 18 months of training, which are not without sacrifice for them (moving, financial cost, family distance). Their tenure would make it possible to improve the working conditions of the agents themselves, often faced with an overload of files. In the Rhône for example, 13.85% of labor inspection positions are vacant. Permanent tenure would thus make it possible to guarantee better coverage of the territory, at a time when the general labor directorate lists more than 230 deaths, already making 2024 a dark year. The insufficient number of labor inspectors constitutes a major obstacle to the rigorous application of the labor code and, in fact, to the protection of workers' rights. This situation sometimes causes very long response times, limiting the effectiveness of controls, particularly in the most risky sectors such as construction or industry. manufacturing. During the examination of the finance bill for 2024, Mr. Olivier Dussopt announced the creation of 100 new positions through secondment. A few months later, this creation was buried. In a report dated February 28, 2024, the Court of Auditors reveals that the labor inspectorate is the main contributor to job savings, which lost 16% of its workforce, or nearly 740 FTEs (full-time equivalents). between 2015 and 2021. Today, nearly four million employees do not have access to the public labor inspection service, due to lack of sufficient recruitment in recent years. Given this situation, she would like to know the reasons for blocking the tenure of the four INTEFP trainee students and more broadly the means proposed by the Government to strengthen the workforce of the inspection services. of labor, which ensures the safety and protection of the rights of the country's employees.
Question· Question écrite1150answered
France · National Assembly · 22 October 2024
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi questions the Minister of Higher Education and Research on the situation of twelve students who, having not received a satisfactory assignment proposal from the University of Lyon 2 in October 2024, are unable to continue their higher education. Each year, since the implementation of the Parcoursup selection system within the framework of the law relating to orientation and success students (ORE, “Vidal” law of 2018), the number of students finding themselves in this condition continues to increase. They find themselves unable to continue their studies, pushed aside by a tool with opaque selection criteria. Some even lose their Crous accommodation, which increases the endemic precariousness from which a large proportion of students suffer. On October 16, 2024, the violence experienced by students mobilized at the University of Lyon 2 against this selection reached a new level: the establishment requested the intervention of the police on campus, to dislodge an occupation which was nevertheless peaceful. The images of this deployment of force in a university, a place of intellectual and social emancipation, are revolting. Year after year, universities reduce their admission capacities to adapt to competition. The crisis available places has led to an unacceptable situation: motivated and deserving students find themselves prevented from pursuing their academic and professional ambitions. Selection takes place at all levels of the curriculum, causing split courses and increasing the risks of dropping out of studies. This situation results from an inconsistent map of higher education training. Training offers should be balanced throughout the territory, including in medium-sized towns, in order to relieve congestion in higher education establishments in large university towns. The violation of the right to continue studies feeds the growing resignation of young people who nevertheless represent the future of the country and who must be able to access the highest level of training to face the social and ecological challenges that society expects. She him therefore expresses its concern about the situation of these students and asks about the future directions of this system.
Question· Question écrite443answered
France · National Assembly · 8 October 2024
Ms. Anaïs Belouassa-Cherifi draws the attention of the Minister of Housing and Urban Renewal to the situation of emergency accommodation in the Metropolis of Lyon. In August 2024, two infants aged five and eleven days and their families were returned to the streets. This fact is not isolated: more and more people, including those belonging to priority groups in care, remain homeless. Between 2021 and 2024, we estimates the increase in the number of children left without accommodation after requesting 115 to be 120%. In Lyon, the Jamais Sans Toit association counts 107 children in this situation, a third of whom are accommodated in the city's schools. In the presentation of the latest UNICEF barometer of homeless children, their spokesperson Raphael Vulliez recalled how short-term solutions are disproportionately expensive, ineffective and painful for families. The livelihood of women and children on the streets in the city relies heavily on the action of associations and collectives and depends on the means at their disposal. The emergency unfortunately does not only concern the Rhône but the entire territory. However, the State is responsible for providing shelter via emergency accommodation (art. L345-2-2 and L345-2-3 of the code of social action and families). In a report published Tuesday October 1, 2024, the Court of Auditors criticizes the State for having “chosen to act as if the growth in needs for emergency accommodation was temporary”, which weighs on the quality of this public policy, despite the promise of the President of the Republic, made in the fall of 2022, that there would be no more children on the street the following year. She therefore expresses her concern to him and asks him about the Government's intentions in terms of emergency accommodation and more generally about the means allocated to housing to rehouse people with dignity, the evolution of homelessness resulting directly from the solutions given for social housing.