Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Agriculture

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2021

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0225_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Euro Delta Danube Srl v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură - Centrul Judeţean Tulcea.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Area-related aid scheme – Single area payment – Eligibility criteria – Concession agreement for agricultural land – Change of use of that land without the agreement of the grantor – Agricultural use of areas intended for aquaculture use – Difference between the area declared and the area determined – Over-declaration – Administrative penalties.#Case C-225/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0225decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Euro Delta Danube Srl v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură - Centrul Judeţean Tulcea.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Area-related aid scheme – Single area payment – Eligibility criteria – Concession agreement for agricultural land – Change of use of that land without the agreement of the grantor – Agricultural use of areas intended for aquaculture use – Difference between the area declared and the area determined – Over-declaration – Administrative penalties.#Case C-225/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2021

Regulation· RCELEX 32021R2117in force

Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products, (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, (EU) No 251/2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and (EU) No 228/2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 2 December 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0273_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021.#WD v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct support schemes – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Article 32(2) – Single area payment application – Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ – Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register – Actual use for agricultural purposes.#Case C-273/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0273decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021.#WD v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct support schemes – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Article 32(2) – Single area payment application – Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ – Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register – Actual use for agricultural purposes.#Case C-273/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0373decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#A.M. v Dyrektor Z. Oddziału Regionalnego Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Szczecinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Common rules – Single payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ – Crop rotation – Natural periodic flooding of meadows and pastures situated in a special environmental protection area.#Case C-373/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 October 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0119decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Līga Šenfelde v Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding – National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Article 19(1)(a) – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Aid for the development of small farms – Cumulation of aid – Possibility to refuse the cumulation.#Case C-119/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0116_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss and Others v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 – Protective measures against pests of plants – List of Union regulated non-quarantine pests – Threshold above which the presence of a Union regulated non-quarantine pest on plants for planting has an unacceptable economic impact – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 – Professional associations – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-116/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0116decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss and Others v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 – Protective measures against pests of plants – List of Union regulated non-quarantine pests – Threshold above which the presence of a Union regulated non-quarantine pest on plants for planting has an unacceptable economic impact – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 – Professional associations – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-116/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0540decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2021.#FL Brüterei M-V GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for damages and for annulment – Organic farming – Livestock production – Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs – Use of non-organic animals – Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-540/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0540_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2021.#FL Brüterei M-V GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for damages and for annulment – Organic farming – Livestock production – Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs – Use of non-organic animals – Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-540/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0783_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne contre GB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Protection des appellations d’origine et des indications géographiques – Caractère uniforme et exhaustif – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous a), ii) – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Évocation – Appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) “Champagne” – Services – Comparabilité des produits – Utilisation de la dénomination commerciale “Champanillo”.#Affaire C-783/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0783decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of designations of origin and geographical indications – Uniform and exhaustive nature – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) – Article 103(2)(b) – Evocation – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Champagne’ – Services – Comparability of products – Use of the trade name ‘Champanillo’.#Case C-783/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0176decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 4(1)(a) and (c) and Article 4(2)(b) – National legislation making direct support conditional on the farmer keeping his own animals – Article 9(1) – Concept of ‘active farmer’ – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 60 – Circumvention clause – Concept of ‘artificially created conditions’.#Case C-176/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0116decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ – Article 35 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – National legislation requiring the production of a legal document establishing the right to use the agricultural parcel made available to the farmer under a concession contract and making the validity of such a contract conditional on the future concessionaire having the status of breeder or owner of animals – Concessionaire of an area of pastureland who has concluded a cooperation contract with animal breeders – Res judicata.#Case C-116/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2021

Proposal· PCCELEX 52021PC0554open

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulations (EU) 2018/841 as regards the scope, simplifying the compliance rules, setting out the targets of the Member States for 2030 and committing to the collective achievement of climate neutrality by 2035 in the land use, forestry and agriculture sector, and (EU) 2018/1999 as regards improvement in monitoring, reporting, tracking of progress and review

European Union · European Commission · 14 July 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0830_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#C.J. v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014 – Young farmers setting up – Farm development – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Conditions of access – Equivalence – Not setting up as sole head of the holding – Upper thresholds – Fixing – Criteria – Standard output of the agricultural holding.#Case C-830/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0830decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#C.J. v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014 – Young farmers setting up – Farm development – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Conditions of access – Equivalence – Not setting up as sole head of the holding – Upper thresholds – Fixing – Criteria – Standard output of the agricultural holding.#Case C-830/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0680_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Irish Wind Farmers' Association Clg and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Energy sector – Irish legislation on business property taxation – Method for calculating the amount of the tax owed by fossil fuel electricity producers – Complaint from wind farm operators – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Serious difficulties – Procedural rights of the interested parties.#Case T-680/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0680decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Irish Wind Farmers' Association Clg and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Energy sector – Irish legislation on business property taxation – Method for calculating the amount of the tax owed by fossil fuel electricity producers – Complaint from wind farm operators – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Serious difficulties – Procedural rights of the interested parties.#Case T-680/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0119decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 June 2021.#Līga Šenfelde v Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding – National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Article 19(1)(a) – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Aid for the development of small farms – Cumulation of aid – Possibility to refuse the cumulation.#Case C-119/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0128decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania v Assessorato della Salute della Regione Siciliana.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agriculture sector – Slaughtering of animals affected by infectious diseases – Compensation for farmers – Notification and standstill requirements – Article 108(3) TFEU – Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Exemptions by categories of aid – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013.#Case C-128/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0011decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – State aid – Aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Article 108(2), second subparagraph, TFEU – Adverse weather conditions – Losses suffered by farmers – Compensation aid – Obligation of recovery – Duty to provide information – Non-implementation.#Case C-11/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0011_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – State aid – Aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Article 108(2), second subparagraph, TFEU – Adverse weather conditions – Losses suffered by farmers – Compensation aid – Obligation of recovery – Duty to provide information – Non-implementation.#Case C-11/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0822_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 May 2021.#Asociación Española de la Industria y Comercio Exportador de Aceite de Oliva (Asoliva) and Asociación Nacional de Industriales Envasadores y Refinadores de Aceites Comestibles (Anierac) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Classification into one of three categories of virgin olive oil – Implementing measures – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-822/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0822decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 May 2021.#Asociación Española de la Industria y Comercio Exportador de Aceite de Oliva (Asoliva) and Asociación Nacional de Industriales Envasadores y Refinadores de Aceites Comestibles (Anierac) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Classification into one of three categories of virgin olive oil – Implementing measures – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-822/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0815decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Article 19(2) – Articles 21 and 23 – Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 – Article 27(1) – Article 28 – Annex IX, point 1.3 – Processing of organic food – Non-organic ingredients of agricultural origin – Lithothamnium calcareum alga – Powder obtained by cleaning, grinding and drying the sediment of that alga – Classification – Use in organic foodstuffs for the purpose of calcium enrichment – Authorisation – Conditions.#Case C-815/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0294decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură - Centrul Judeţean Tulcea v SC Piscicola Tulcea SA and Ira Invest SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură - Centrul Judeţean Tulcea.#References for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Direct support schemes – Eligible hectare – Aquaculture facility – Land use – Actual use for agricultural purposes – Use complying with the entries in the land register.#Joined Cases C-294/19 and C-304/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0783decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 29 April 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of designations of origin and geographical indications – Uniform and exhaustive nature – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) – Article 103(2)(b) – Evocation – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Champagne’ – Services – Comparability of products – Use of the trade name ‘Champanillo’.#Case C-783/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0736decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#ZS “Plaukti”.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 – Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 – Third subparagraph of Article 16(5) – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Articles 4 and 6 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Support for rural development – Agri-environmental payments – Aid for the maintenance of grassland biodiversity – Non-compliance with the conditions for granting those payments – Early mowing – Reduction and exclusion of those payments – Mandatory standards – Statutory management requirements – Minimum requirements for good agricultural and environmental conditions – Commitments that exceed mandatory standards, minimum requirements and other appropriate mandatory requirements established by national legislation.#Case C-736/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0640_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 février 2021.#Azienda Agricola Ambrosi Nicola Giuseppe e.a. contre Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) et Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Organisation commune des marchés – Règlement (CE) no 1234/2007 – Quotas laitiers – Prélèvements sur les excédents – Lait affecté à la production de fromages bénéficiant d’une appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) et destinés à être exportés vers des pays tiers – Exclusion – Article 32, sous a), article 39, paragraphe 1 et paragraphe 2, sous a), article 40, paragraphe 2, et article 41, sous b), TFUE – Principes de proportionnalité et de non-discrimination – Validité.#Affaire C-640/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0640decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2021.#Azienda Agricola Ambrosi Nicola Giuseppe and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) and Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common organisation of markets – Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 – Milk quotas – Surplus levies – Milk used to produce cheeses with a protected designation of origin (PDO) intended for export to non-EU countries – Exclusion – Article 32(a), Article 39(1) and (2)(a), Article 40(2) and Article 41(b) TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non‑discrimination – Validity.#Case C-640/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0830decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 4 February 2021.#C.J. v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014 – Young farmers setting up – Farm development – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Conditions of access – Equivalence – Not setting up as sole head of the holding – Upper thresholds – Fixing – Criteria – Standard output of the agricultural holding.#Case C-830/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0361decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support scheme for farmers – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) – Direct payments – Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules – Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction – Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a).#Case C-361/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0361_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 27 janvier 2021.#De Ruiter vof contre Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique agricole commune – Régime de soutien aux agriculteurs – Règlement (UE) no 1306/2013 – Article 97, paragraphe 1, et article 99, paragraphe 1 – Paiements directs – Réductions et exclusions en cas de non-respect des règles de conditionnalité – Détermination de l’année à prendre en compte afin de déterminer le pourcentage de réduction – Sanctions proportionnées, effectives et dissuasives – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 809/2014 – Article 73, paragraphe 4, premier alinéa, sous a).#Affaire C-361/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2021

Page 1 of 2Next