Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Agriculture

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2024

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0039_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Acqua & Sole Srl v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Locus standi.#Case T-39/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0794_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Dehesa de Los Llanos, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Compliance with the time limit for bringing proceedings – Date on which the applicant became aware of the contested measure – Locus standi.#Case T-794/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0069_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Alan Srl and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Locus standi.#Case T-69/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0794decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Dehesa de Los Llanos, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Compliance with the time limit for bringing proceedings – Date on which the applicant became aware of the contested measure – Locus standi.#Case T-794/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0069decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Alan Srl and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Locus standi.#Case T-69/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0039decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Acqua & Sole Srl v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Locus standi.#Case T-39/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0729decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Complejo Agrícola Las Lomas, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) strategic plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Observance of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings – Date on which the contested act came to the knowledge of the applicant – Locus standi.#Case T-729/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0729_RESdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Complejo Agrícola Las Lomas, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) strategic plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Approval by the Commission – Composite or complex administrative procedure – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Observance of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings – Date on which the contested act came to the knowledge of the applicant – Locus standi.#Case T-729/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2024

Report· DCCELEX 52024DC0454open

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission pursuant to Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture, Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste, Directive 2000/53/EC of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles, Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 on shipments of waste, Directive 2006/66/EC of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and Directive 2008/98/EC of 19 November 2008 on waste

European Union · European Commission · 15 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0228decided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#Association AFAÏA contre Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Production biologique et étiquetage des produits biologiques – Règlement (UE) 2018/848 – Utilisation de certains produits et substances dans la production biologique et liste de ces produits et substances – Dérogation – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2021/1165 – Annexe II – Notions d’“élevage industriel” et d’“élevage hors sol” – Confiance des consommateurs – Bien-être animal – Respect de l’environnement et du climat – Critères.#Affaire C-228/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0240_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Herbaria Kräuterparadies GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Organic production rules – Article 16 – Labelling – Article 30 – Terms referring to organic production – Article 33 – Organic production logo of the European Union – Conditions of use – Compliance of the product with Regulation 2018/848 – Articles 45 and 48 – Import of products from a third country for the purpose of placing them on the market within the European Union as organic products – Equivalence of the production rules of that third country with the rules of Regulation 2018/848 – Use of the third country’s organic production logo.#Case C-240/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0228_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Association AFAÏA v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Use of certain products and substances in organic production and their listing – Derogation – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1165 – Annex II – Concepts of ‘factory farming’ and ‘landless livestock production’ – Consumer confidence – Animal welfare – Respect for the environment and the climate – Criteria.#Case C-228/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0240decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Herbaria Kräuterparadies GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Organic production rules – Article 16 – Labelling – Article 30 – Terms referring to organic production – Article 33 – Organic production logo of the European Union – Conditions of use – Compliance of the product with Regulation 2018/848 – Articles 45 and 48 – Import of products from a third country for the purpose of placing them on the market within the European Union as organic products – Equivalence of the production rules of that third country with the rules of Regulation 2018/848 – Use of the third country’s organic production logo.#Case C-240/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0399decided

Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#Confédération paysanne contre Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire et Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commerciale commune – Accords internationaux – Accord euro-méditerranéen établissant une association entre les Communautés européennes et leurs États membres, d’une part, et le Royaume du Maroc, d’autre part – Modification des protocoles no 1 et no 4 de l’accord euro-méditerranéen – Règlement (UE) no 1169/2011 – Article 9 – Article 26, paragraphe 2 – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 543/2011 – Article 3, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Article 5, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Article 8 – Article 15, paragraphes 1 et 4 – Annexe I – Annexe IV – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 76 – Information des consommateurs sur les denrées alimentaires – Mention obligatoire du pays d’origine ou du lieu de provenance d’une denrée alimentaire – Fruits et légumes récoltés au Sahara occidental – Demande adressée à un État membre d’interdire unilatéralement les importations de ces produits sur son territoire – Mention obligatoire du Sahara occidental en tant que lieu de provenance des tomates et des melons récoltés sur ce territoire.#Affaire C-399/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0399_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Confédération paysanne v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire and Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common commercial policy – International agreements – Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part – Amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Article 9 – Article 26(2) – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 – Article 3(1) and (2) – Article 5(1) and (2) – Article 8 – Article 15(1) and (4) – Annex I – Annex IV – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 76 – Provision of food information to consumers – Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods – Fruit and vegetables harvested in Western Sahara – Request for a Member State unilaterally to ban imports of those goods in its territory – Mandatory indication of Western Sahara as the place of provenance of tomatoes and melons harvested in that territory.#Case C-399/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0350_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Vorstand für den Geschäftsbereich II der Agrarmarkt Austria v T F.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Livestock aid application – Article 53(4) – Conditions for granting coupled support measures for bovine animals – Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 – Article 7 – Registration of bovine animals – Decision 2001/672/EC – Article 2(2) and (4) – Movement of bovine animals to summer grazing in mountain areas – Late notification – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 2, 15, 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Article 30(4)(c) – Animal determined – Reduction in coupled support – Article 15(1) – Article 34 – Administrative penalties – Notification of failure to make an entry.#Case C-350/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0350decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Vorstand für den Geschäftsbereich II der Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Livestock aid application – Article 53(4) – Conditions for granting coupled support measures for bovine animals – Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 – Article 7 – Registration of bovine animals – Decision 2001/672/EC – Article 2(2) and (4) – Movement of bovine animals to summer grazing in mountain areas – Late notification – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 2, 15, 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Article 30(4)(c) – Animal determined – Reduction in coupled support – Article 15(1) – Article 34 – Administrative penalties – Notification of failure to make an entry.#Case C-350/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0123_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Ecocert India Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-123/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0123decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Ecocert India Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-123/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0708_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Asociación Española de Productores de Vacuno de Carne (Asoprovac) v Administración General del Estado.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy – Financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy – Permanent public grassland – Conditions for access to direct payments for farmers – Animals must belong to the farmers’ own agricultural holding.#Case C-708/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0538decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#SB v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 52 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Article 53(1) – Definition of eligibility criteria for coupled support measures – Competence of the Member States – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Distinction between ‘declared animals’ and ‘animals determined’ – Article 30(3) – Support calculated on the basis of animals determined – Article 31(1) to (3) – Administrative penalties for non-compliance among declared animals – Application for coupled support linked to the keeping of suckler cows – Calving rate set in national regulations not reached by all declared animals – Rate achieved by a smaller number of those animals – National practice refusing support.#Case C-538/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0708decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Asociación Española de Productores de Vacuno de Carne (Asoprovac) v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy – Financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy – Permanent public grassland – Conditions for access to direct payments for farmers – Animals must belong to the farmers’ own agricultural holding.#Case C-708/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0538_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#SB v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 52 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Article 53(1) – Definition of eligibility criteria for coupled support measures – Competence of the Member States – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Distinction between ‘declared animals’ and ‘animals determined’ – Article 30(3) – Support calculated on the basis of animals determined – Article 31(1) to (3) – Administrative penalties for non-compliance among declared animals – Application for coupled support linked to the keeping of suckler cows – Calving rate set in national regulations not reached by all declared animals – Rate achieved by a smaller number of those animals – National practice refusing support.#Case C-538/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0731decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#IJ und PO GesbR and IJ v Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Support schemes – Direct payments to farmers – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 4(1)(b) and (c) – Concept of ‘holding’ – Management by a farmer – Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ – Article 33(1) – Concept of ‘agricultural area at the farmer’s disposal on a date fixed by the Member State’, for the purposes of the activation of payment entitlements – Seasonal handover, in return for a fee, of parcels of land owned by the farmer to users who are responsible for the maintenance of those parcels and for the harvest.#Case C-731/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0350decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 June 2024.#Vorstand für den Geschäftsbereich II der Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 – Livestock aid application – Article 53(4) – Conditions for granting coupled support measures for bovine animals – Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 – Article 7 – Registration of bovine animals – Decision 2001/672/EC – Article 2(2) and (4) – Movement of bovine animals to summer grazing in mountain areas – Late notification – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Points 2, 15, 16 and 18 of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Article 30(4)(c) – Animal determined – Reduction in coupled support – Article 15(1) – Article 34 – Administrative penalties – Notification of failure to make an entry.#Case C-350/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0216_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Hauser Weinimport GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Agriculture – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products – Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 – Article 3(4) – Aromatised wine-product cocktail – Definition – Concepts of ‘alcohol’ and of ‘flavouring foodstuffs’.#Case C-216/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0216decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Hauser Weinimport GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Agriculture – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products – Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 – Article 3(4) – Aromatised wine-product cocktail – Definition – Concepts of ‘alcohol’ and of ‘flavouring foodstuffs’.#Case C-216/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0079_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#FJ v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes for farmers – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Single area payment scheme – Article 58 – Reductions and exclusions applicable in the event of over-declarations – Penalty for over-declaration exceeding 50% of the area determined – Recovery of the amount of the penalty during the three calendar years following the calendar year of the finding – Concept of ‘finding’ – Control report finding irregularities in the aid application concerned.#Case C-79/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0079decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#FJ v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes for farmers – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Single area payment scheme – Article 58 – Reductions and exclusions applicable in the event of over-declarations – Penalty for over-declaration exceeding 50% of the area determined – Recovery of the amount of the penalty during the three calendar years following the calendar year of the finding – Concept of ‘finding’ – Control report finding irregularities in the aid application concerned.#Case C-79/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0006_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#X v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Applicability ratione materiae – Applicability ratione temporis – Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 – Article 22 – Support for the setting up of young farmers – Article 71 – Eligibility – Conditions for granting – Legislation of a Member State laying down the obligation to work continuously as a farmer, as a main activity and as a sole trader – Additional eligibility conditions – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 63 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 35 – Eligibility criterion – Commitment.#Case C-6/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0006decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#X v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Applicability ratione materiae – Applicability ratione temporis – Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 – Article 22 – Support for the setting up of young farmers – Article 71 – Eligibility – Conditions for granting – Legislation of a Member State laying down the obligation to work continuously as a farmer, as a main activity and as a sole trader – Additional eligibility conditions – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 63 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 35 – Eligibility criterion – Commitment.#Case C-6/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0007_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Marvesa Rotterdam NV v Federaal Agentschap voor de veiligheid van de voedselketen (FAVV).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Approximation of health legislation – Animal health policy – Veterinary checks – Products of animal origin imported from China – Import ban – Decision 2002/994/EC – Exemption for certain products – Part I of the annex – Fishery products – Definition – Fish oil – Products intended for animal feed – Validity.#Case C-7/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0399decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 21 March 2024.#Confédération paysanne v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire and Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common commercial policy – International agreements – Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part – Amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Article 9 – Article 26(2) – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 – Article 3(1) and (2) – Article 5(1) and (2) – Article 8 – Article 15(1) and (4) – Annex I – Annex IV – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 76 – Provision of food information to consumers – Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods – Fruit and vegetables harvested in Western Sahara – Request for a Member State unilaterally to ban imports of those goods in its territory – Mandatory indication of Western Sahara as the place of provenance of tomatoes and melons harvested in that territory.#Case C-399/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Page 1 of 2Next