Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
Records
Motion· Motie2026Z19154adopted
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 17 September 2026
Motie van het lid Dassen over het oprichten van een AI-Veiligheidsinstituut, in nauwe samenwerking met soortgelijke instituten in Duitsland en Frankrijk
Motion· Motie2026Z19155adopted
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 17 September 2026
Motie van het lid Dassen over samen met het bedrijfsleven investeringendoen en AI-capaciteiten ontwikkelen
Motion· Motie2026Z19156rejected
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 17 September 2026
Motie van het lid Dassen over toewerken naar wereldwijde AI-afspraken
Motion· Motie2026Z19113adopted
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 17 September 2026
Motie van de leden Brekelmans en Bontenbal over het opstellen van een besparingsplan per ministerie en daarin efficiëntieverbetering door AI en de optie van gerichte vacaturestops meenemen
Question· writtenPQ 470asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026
470. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether the AI Office of Ireland has examined the findings of an investigation by an organisation (details supplied)into AI chatbots directing users towards anti-abortion content; whether it will assess if similar risks arise in Ireland and engage with the chatbot providers concerned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65530/26]
Question· writtenPQ 456asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026
456. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether the Government intends to introduce a regulatory framework governing artificial intelligence tools that market themselves as mental health, counselling, or psychotherapy services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [64482/26]
Question· writtenPQ 1486asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026
1486. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science whether his Department has assessed the future workforce skills that will be required to support increased adoption of artificial intelligence among Irish businesses over the next five years; and whether new training, apprenticeship or micro-credential programmes are planned to address anticipated gaps. [64244/26]
Question· writtenPQ 1425asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026
1425. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Health whether her Department or the HSE has tested the way in which major AI chatbots respond to Ireland-specific questions about unintended pregnancy and abortion; whether users are directed to accurate information, including the HSE’s My Options service; whether she will arrange such testing if none has been undertaken; and if she will publish the findings. [65529/26]
Question· writtenPQ 454asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026
454. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department is considering the development of new supports, grants, or advisory services to assist SMEs in adopting artificial intelligence technologies; the measures currently under consideration; and the timeline for their introduction. [64243/26]
Bill· SS. 5417 (119th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 16 September 2026
Bill· HRH.R. 10417 (119th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 16 September 2026
Question· Schriftelijke vragen2026Z18944concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 16 September 2026
Het gebruik van Artificial Intelligence (AI) door de premier
Proposal· Proposition de loi ordinaireDLR5L17N54879open
France · National Assembly · 15 September 2026
Question· Substantive oral questionUIN 901511asked
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 15 September 2026
What steps his Department is taking with Cabinet colleagues to regulate artificial intelligence.
Question· Question écrite18166open
France · National Assembly · 15 September 2026
M. Hervé de Lépinau attire l'attention de Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur la sécurité des données détenues par les administrations et sur les conséquences de la fragilisation des entreprises stratégiques françaises pour la souveraineté numérique de l'État. Le 18 février 2026, la DGFIP a annoncé des accès frauduleux au fichier national des comptes bancaires, concernant potentiellement 1,2 million de comptes. Le 14 août 2026, elle a confirmé de nouvelles intrusions ayant permis la consultation et l'extraction de données concernant, selon le bilan alors communiqué, 678 000 particuliers et professionnels. Parmi les informations concernées figuraient notamment le revenu fiscal de référence, le quotient familial et le taux de prélèvement à la source. Ces intrusions reposaient sur l'usurpation d'identifiants d'un agent et d'un tiers habilité. L'administration a reconnu que ses premiers contrôles n'avaient pas permis de détecter les vols de données. La répétition de tels incidents soulève de sérieuses interrogations sur la maîtrise des habilitations, la sécurisation des accès des partenaires et la capacité à détecter rapidement des consultations ou des extractions anormales. Les Français sont tenus de communiquer à l'administration des informations particulièrement sensibles et attendent en retour une protection renforcée de ces données. Cette exigence appelle également une politique industrielle cohérente. Le groupe Atos et son ancienne filiale Bull occupent une place historique dans l'informatique publique. Dans une réponse parlementaire publiée le 23 septembre 2021, le Gouvernement confirmait notamment l'utilisation de serveurs Bull par la DGFiP et soulignait la rareté des compétences nécessaires à la maîtrise de certaines technologies. Pourtant, dans leur rapport du 30 avril 2024 consacré à Atos, les rapporteurs du Sénat dénonçaient une prise de conscience tardive et insuffisante de l'État face aux difficultés du groupe. Si l'acquisition de Bull par l'État, finalisée le 31 mars 2026, constitue une mesure de protection stratégique, les autres activités d'infogérance d'Atos n'ont pas été sauvées et ce sont ces compétences qui auraient pu permettre d'éviter les déboires informatiques que l'on subit. La préservation des compétences, la continuité de la maintenance et la maîtrise des dépendances technologiques doivent être considérées comme des composantes essentielles de la sécurité des administrations. En conséquence, M. le député demande à Mme la ministre quelles défaillances ont permis les intrusions successives à la DGFiP et quels enseignements peuvent être rendus publics à l'issue de l'audit annoncé en août 2026. Il souhaite connaître le calendrier et les moyens consacrés au renforcement de l'authentification, au contrôle des habilitations et à la détection des extractions anormales, ainsi que les mesures d'accompagnement des usagers concernés. Enfin, il lui demande comment le Gouvernement explique le retard d'intervention relevé par le Sénat dans le dossier Atos, quelle évaluation il a conduit s'agissant des conséquences des restructurations du groupe sur les prestations fournies à l'État et quelles garanties durables il entend apporter à la préservation des compétences et des capacités industrielles indispensables à sa souveraineté numérique.
Question· Question écrite18165open
France · National Assembly · 15 September 2026
M. Antoine Villedieu attire l'attention de Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur les risques systémiques susceptibles d'être associés au développement des systèmes d'intelligence artificielle les plus avancés. Plusieurs chercheurs travaillant ou ayant travaillé au sein des principaux laboratoires internationaux développant des modèles d'intelligence artificielle ont récemment alerté sur l'hypothèse d'une perte de contrôle de futurs systèmes disposant de capacités d'autonomie, de planification et, à terme, de participation à l'amélioration de systèmes d'intelligence artificielle. Sans préjuger de la probabilité de scénarios extrêmes qui demeure scientifiquement incertaine, ces prises de position soulèvent la question de la capacité des pouvoirs publics à évaluer et à maîtriser des systèmes dont les capacités progresseraient plus rapidement que les dispositifs permettant d'en garantir la sûreté. Il lui demande donc quelle évaluation le Gouvernement porte sur les risques de perte de contrôle associés aux systèmes d'intelligence artificielle les plus avancés et quels dispositifs nationaux permettent aujourd'hui d'évaluer ces risques. Il souhaite également savoir si le Gouvernement entend définir des seuils de capacités ou de dangerosité dont le franchissement entraînerait des obligations renforcées d'évaluation, d'audit ou, le cas échéant, la suspension du développement ou du déploiement d'un modèle. Enfin, il lui demande quelle position la France entend défendre aux niveaux européen et international afin qu'une éventuelle course technologique entre entreprises ou entre puissances ne conduise pas au développement de systèmes dont la sûreté et la maîtrise ne pourraient être suffisamment garanties.
Question· Vraag om uitleg5451behandeling uitgesteld
Belgium · Flemish Parliament · 14 September 2026
over het aangekondigde AI-kader voor scholen
Record· EU-Vorlage21/7998open
Germany · German Bundestag · 14 September 2026
Bill· HRH.R. 10362 (119th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 14 September 2026
Question· Schriftliche Frage21/7980open
Germany · German Bundestag · 11 September 2026
Question· Schriftliche Frage21/7980open
Germany · German Bundestag · 11 September 2026
Question· Written questionUIN 29178open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, when she plans to update the AI Opportunities Action Plan Dashboard.
Question· Written questionHL HL3438open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure regulations relating to artificial intelligence are capable of addressing rapid advances in the development of superintelligent artificial intelligence.
Question· Written questionHL HL3439open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have held with companies specialising in artificial intelligence regarding the potential social, economic, and environmental harms caused by rapid advances in this technology.
Question· Written questionHL HL3440open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they are holding with other governments about the need for an international regulatory approach to minimise the dangers of superintelligent artificial intelligence.
Question· Written questionHL HL3441open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have held discussions with experts in the field of artificial intelligence who have raised concerns about social, economic, and environmental harm resulting from rapid advances in this technology; and, if so, w
Record· Brief regering2026Z18707open
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 September 2026
Fiche: Actieplan Cybersecurity en AI
Record· PetitionPetition 781523open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
UK must ensure that until it is proven that advanced AI can be controlled with a scalable mechanism there must be an agreement between governments not to allow training, building, or progression of general super intelligence.
Control must be peer reviewed in the government and scientific community until a broad consensus of safety is reached.
Anthropic and former OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon resigned September 2026 with the following statements:
“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade…”
“They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives…”
Anthropic Alignment-Science lead Evan Hubinger response:
“Jacob is correct here – we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade.”
Bill· Public2026/93current
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 September 2026
Bill entitled an Act to prohibit the making available of certain artificial intelligence companion services to children, to provide for age-assurance measures and to confer functions on Coimisiún na Meán; to amend the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act 2022; and to provide for related matters.
Question· Written questionUIN 28817open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps she is taking to ensure the AI Security Institute is able to access the newest frontier models before their release.
Question· Written questionUIN 28818open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what information her Department holds on the distillation of UK AI models by China.
Question· Written questionUIN 28905open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 8 September 2026 to question 22932 on Armed Forces: Artificial Intelligence, how much of the £200 million AI Investment Fund has been allocated to date.
Question· Written questionUIN 28947open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the loss-of-control scenarios contained in the Government’s AI Risk Register have associated likelihood assessments.
Question· Written questionUIN 28948open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment her Department has made of whether domestic resilience measures can protect the UK from risks arising from loss of control of advanced AI systems in the absence of international agreement limitin
Question· Written questionUIN 28975open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take steps to update the National Curriculum to prepare children and young people in education for their future employment, in the context of increasing job automation as Artificial Intelligence pro
Question· Written questionUIN 29021open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to implement a cross-government Artificial Intelligence Assurance strategy.
Question· Written questionUIN 29022open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that Artificial Intelligence applications used across the public sector are subject to ongoing assurance, auditing and governance.
Question· Written questionUIN 29024open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what measures his Department is taking to ensure the safe development and deployment of agentic AI.
Question· Written questionUIN 29025open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of cross-government coordination on Artificial Intelligence assurance and governance.
Question· Written questionHL HL3425open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to strengthen the resilience of the UK financial system to cyberattacks enabled by increasingly capable artificial intelligence systems.
Question· Written questionHL HL3426open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to strengthen safeguards against artificial intelligence agents collaborating autonomously to conduct cyberattacks.
Question· Written questionHL HL3427open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to support the adoption across the NHS of artificial intelligence systems that can assist surgeons in planning and delivering precision surgery.
Question· Schriftelijke vragen2026Z18543concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 September 2026
De veiligheidsrisico's van geavanceerde kunstmatige intelligentie
Record· Brief commissie2026Z18515open
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 September 2026
Aan minister reactie vragen advies 'Kunstzinnig boven kunstmatig. Naar een waardengedreven toepassing van AI in de culturele en creatieve sector' van RvC
Record· PetitionPetition 781421open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026
We want the UK Government to introduce legislation requiring content creators to hide or obscure the faces of children in publicly shared or monetised online content, protecting children’s privacy and preventing them from having a permanent digital identity created without their informed consent.
A child cannot consent to having their face permanently placed online. Once shared, images can be copied, redistributed and manipulated by strangers, including being used to create abusive AI images. Most images found in abusive contexts are reported to originate from social media. We believe children should have a legal right to privacy, with creators required to hide children’s faces in publicly shared or monetised content. Children are not content.
Question· Substantive oral questionUIN 901366asked
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026
What steps he is taking to help tackle AI-based violence against women and girls crime in online spaces.
Question· Substantive oral questionUIN 901364asked
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026
What steps he is taking to help tackle AI-based violence against women and girls crime in online spaces.
Question· Written questionUIN 28425open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential implications for its approach to AI safety of recent evidence of advanced artificial intelligence systems engaging in (a) d
Question· Written questionUIN 28426open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the biosecurity risks arising from increasingly capable artificial intelligence models; and what safeguards are in place to assess and mi
Question· Written questionUIN 28427open
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, whether he has made an assessment of the adequacy of existing testing and oversight arrangements for advanced artificial intelligence models in light of recent increases in their c
PreviousPage 13 of 163Next