Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Artificial intelligence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

8,113 records

Records

Question· writtenPQ 470asked

470. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether the AI Office of Ireland has examined the findings of an investigation by an organisation (details supplied)into AI chatbots directing users towards anti-abortion content; whether it will assess if similar risks arise in Ireland and engage with the chatbot providers concerned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65530/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026

470. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether the AI Office of Ireland has examined the findings of an investigation by an organisation (details supplied)into AI chatbots directing users towards anti-abortion content; whether it will assess if similar risks arise in Ireland and engage with the chatbot providers concerned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65530/26]

Question· writtenPQ 456asked

456. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether the Government intends to introduce a regulatory framework governing artificial intelligence tools that market themselves as mental health, counselling, or psychotherapy services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [64482/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026

456. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether the Government intends to introduce a regulatory framework governing artificial intelligence tools that market themselves as mental health, counselling, or psychotherapy services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [64482/26]

Question· writtenPQ 1486asked

1486. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science whether his Department has assessed the future workforce skills that will be required to support increased adoption of artificial intelligence among Irish businesses over the next five years; and whether new training, apprenticeship or micro-credential programmes are planned to address anticipated gaps. [64244/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026

1486. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science whether his Department has assessed the future workforce skills that will be required to support increased adoption of artificial intelligence among Irish businesses over the next five years; and whether new training, apprenticeship or micro-credential programmes are planned to address anticipated gaps. [64244/26]

Question· writtenPQ 1425asked

1425. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Health whether her Department or the HSE has tested the way in which major AI chatbots respond to Ireland-specific questions about unintended pregnancy and abortion; whether users are directed to accurate information, including the HSE’s My Options service; whether she will arrange such testing if none has been undertaken; and if she will publish the findings. [65529/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026

1425. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Health whether her Department or the HSE has tested the way in which major AI chatbots respond to Ireland-specific questions about unintended pregnancy and abortion; whether users are directed to accurate information, including the HSE’s My Options service; whether she will arrange such testing if none has been undertaken; and if she will publish the findings. [65529/26]

Question· writtenPQ 454asked

454. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department is considering the development of new supports, grants, or advisory services to assist SMEs in adopting artificial intelligence technologies; the measures currently under consideration; and the timeline for their introduction. [64243/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 16 September 2026

454. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department is considering the development of new supports, grants, or advisory services to assist SMEs in adopting artificial intelligence technologies; the measures currently under consideration; and the timeline for their introduction. [64243/26]

Question· Question écrite18166open

Question 18166 — numérique

France · National Assembly · 15 September 2026

M. Hervé de Lépinau attire l'attention de Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur la sécurité des données détenues par les administrations et sur les conséquences de la fragilisation des entreprises stratégiques françaises pour la souveraineté numérique de l'État. Le 18 février 2026, la DGFIP a annoncé des accès frauduleux au fichier national des comptes bancaires, concernant potentiellement 1,2 million de comptes. Le 14 août 2026, elle a confirmé de nouvelles intrusions ayant permis la consultation et l'extraction de données concernant, selon le bilan alors communiqué, 678 000 particuliers et professionnels. Parmi les informations concernées figuraient notamment le revenu fiscal de référence, le quotient familial et le taux de prélèvement à la source. Ces intrusions reposaient sur l'usurpation d'identifiants d'un agent et d'un tiers habilité. L'administration a reconnu que ses premiers contrôles n'avaient pas permis de détecter les vols de données. La répétition de tels incidents soulève de sérieuses interrogations sur la maîtrise des habilitations, la sécurisation des accès des partenaires et la capacité à détecter rapidement des consultations ou des extractions anormales. Les Français sont tenus de communiquer à l'administration des informations particulièrement sensibles et attendent en retour une protection renforcée de ces données. Cette exigence appelle également une politique industrielle cohérente. Le groupe Atos et son ancienne filiale Bull occupent une place historique dans l'informatique publique. Dans une réponse parlementaire publiée le 23 septembre 2021, le Gouvernement confirmait notamment l'utilisation de serveurs Bull par la DGFiP et soulignait la rareté des compétences nécessaires à la maîtrise de certaines technologies. Pourtant, dans leur rapport du 30 avril 2024 consacré à Atos, les rapporteurs du Sénat dénonçaient une prise de conscience tardive et insuffisante de l'État face aux difficultés du groupe. Si l'acquisition de Bull par l'État, finalisée le 31 mars 2026, constitue une mesure de protection stratégique, les autres activités d'infogérance d'Atos n'ont pas été sauvées et ce sont ces compétences qui auraient pu permettre d'éviter les déboires informatiques que l'on subit. La préservation des compétences, la continuité de la maintenance et la maîtrise des dépendances technologiques doivent être considérées comme des composantes essentielles de la sécurité des administrations. En conséquence, M. le député demande à Mme la ministre quelles défaillances ont permis les intrusions successives à la DGFiP et quels enseignements peuvent être rendus publics à l'issue de l'audit annoncé en août 2026. Il souhaite connaître le calendrier et les moyens consacrés au renforcement de l'authentification, au contrôle des habilitations et à la détection des extractions anormales, ainsi que les mesures d'accompagnement des usagers concernés. Enfin, il lui demande comment le Gouvernement explique le retard d'intervention relevé par le Sénat dans le dossier Atos, quelle évaluation il a conduit s'agissant des conséquences des restructurations du groupe sur les prestations fournies à l'État et quelles garanties durables il entend apporter à la préservation des compétences et des capacités industrielles indispensables à sa souveraineté numérique.

Question· Question écrite18165open

Question 18165 — nouvelles technologies

France · National Assembly · 15 September 2026

M. Antoine Villedieu attire l'attention de Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur les risques systémiques susceptibles d'être associés au développement des systèmes d'intelligence artificielle les plus avancés. Plusieurs chercheurs travaillant ou ayant travaillé au sein des principaux laboratoires internationaux développant des modèles d'intelligence artificielle ont récemment alerté sur l'hypothèse d'une perte de contrôle de futurs systèmes disposant de capacités d'autonomie, de planification et, à terme, de participation à l'amélioration de systèmes d'intelligence artificielle. Sans préjuger de la probabilité de scénarios extrêmes qui demeure scientifiquement incertaine, ces prises de position soulèvent la question de la capacité des pouvoirs publics à évaluer et à maîtriser des systèmes dont les capacités progresseraient plus rapidement que les dispositifs permettant d'en garantir la sûreté. Il lui demande donc quelle évaluation le Gouvernement porte sur les risques de perte de contrôle associés aux systèmes d'intelligence artificielle les plus avancés et quels dispositifs nationaux permettent aujourd'hui d'évaluer ces risques. Il souhaite également savoir si le Gouvernement entend définir des seuils de capacités ou de dangerosité dont le franchissement entraînerait des obligations renforcées d'évaluation, d'audit ou, le cas échéant, la suspension du développement ou du déploiement d'un modèle. Enfin, il lui demande quelle position la France entend défendre aux niveaux européen et international afin qu'une éventuelle course technologique entre entreprises ou entre puissances ne conduise pas au développement de systèmes dont la sûreté et la maîtrise ne pourraient être suffisamment garanties.

Bill· HRH.R. 10362 (119th)referred

Stop Rogue AI Act

United States · United States Congress · 14 September 2026

Question· Written questionHL HL3438open

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure regulations relating to artificial intelligence are capable of addressing rapid advances in the development of superintelligent artificial intelligence.

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure regulations relating to artificial intelligence are capable of addressing rapid advances in the development of superintelligent artificial intelligence.

Question· Written questionHL HL3439open

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have held with companies specialising in artificial intelligence regarding the potential social, economic, and environmental harms caused by rapid advances in this technology.

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have held with companies specialising in artificial intelligence regarding the potential social, economic, and environmental harms caused by rapid advances in this technology.

Question· Written questionHL HL3440open

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they are holding with other governments about the need for an international regulatory approach to minimise the dangers of superintelligent artificial intelligence.

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they are holding with other governments about the need for an international regulatory approach to minimise the dangers of superintelligent artificial intelligence.

Question· Written questionHL HL3441open

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have held discussions with experts in the field of artificial intelligence who have raised concerns about social, economic, and environmental harm resulting from rapid advances in this technology; and, if so, w

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 September 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have held discussions with experts in the field of artificial intelligence who have raised concerns about social, economic, and environmental harm resulting from rapid advances in this technology; and, if so, w

Record· PetitionPetition 781523open

Seek international agreement not to develop super intelligent AI until safe

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026

UK must ensure that until it is proven that advanced AI can be controlled with a scalable mechanism there must be an agreement between governments not to allow training, building, or progression of general super intelligence. Control must be peer reviewed in the government and scientific community until a broad consensus of safety is reached. Anthropic and former OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon resigned September 2026 with the following statements: “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade…” “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives…” Anthropic Alignment-Science lead Evan Hubinger response: “Jacob is correct here – we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade.”

Bill· Public2026/93current

Artificial Intelligence Companion Services (Protection of Children) Bill 2026

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 September 2026

Bill entitled an Act to prohibit the making available of certain artificial intelligence companion services to children, to provide for age-assurance measures and to confer functions on Coimisiún na Meán; to amend the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act 2022; and to provide for related matters.

Question· Written questionUIN 28905open

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 8 September 2026 to question 22932 on Armed Forces: Artificial Intelligence, how much of the £200 million AI Investment Fund has been allocated to date.

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 8 September 2026 to question 22932 on Armed Forces: Artificial Intelligence, how much of the £200 million AI Investment Fund has been allocated to date.

Question· Written questionUIN 28948open

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment her Department has made of whether domestic resilience measures can protect the UK from risks arising from loss of control of advanced AI systems in the absence of international agreement limitin

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment her Department has made of whether domestic resilience measures can protect the UK from risks arising from loss of control of advanced AI systems in the absence of international agreement limitin

Question· Written questionUIN 28975open

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take steps to update the National Curriculum to prepare children and young people in education for their future employment, in the context of increasing job automation as Artificial Intelligence pro

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take steps to update the National Curriculum to prepare children and young people in education for their future employment, in the context of increasing job automation as Artificial Intelligence pro

Question· Written questionUIN 29022open

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that Artificial Intelligence applications used across the public sector are subject to ongoing assurance, auditing and governance.

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that Artificial Intelligence applications used across the public sector are subject to ongoing assurance, auditing and governance.

Record· PetitionPetition 781421open

Require Children’s Faces to Be Hidden in Monetised and Publicly Shared Content

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026

We want the UK Government to introduce legislation requiring content creators to hide or obscure the faces of children in publicly shared or monetised online content, protecting children’s privacy and preventing them from having a permanent digital identity created without their informed consent. A child cannot consent to having their face permanently placed online. Once shared, images can be copied, redistributed and manipulated by strangers, including being used to create abusive AI images. Most images found in abusive contexts are reported to originate from social media. We believe children should have a legal right to privacy, with creators required to hide children’s faces in publicly shared or monetised content. Children are not content.

Question· Written questionUIN 28425open

Artificial Intelligence: Safety

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential implications for its approach to AI safety of recent evidence of advanced artificial intelligence systems engaging in (a) d

Question· Written questionUIN 28426open

Artificial Intelligence: Safety

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the biosecurity risks arising from increasingly capable artificial intelligence models; and what safeguards are in place to assess and mi

Question· Written questionUIN 28427open

Artificial Intelligence: Safety

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, whether he has made an assessment of the adequacy of existing testing and oversight arrangements for advanced artificial intelligence models in light of recent increases in their c

PreviousPage 13 of 163Next