The world's political record
Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
8,119 records
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department's press release entitled AI tech ambition to deliver smarter justice for victims, published on 9 June 2026, what safeguards will be put in place to ensure AI legal assistants will
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of safeguards applied to Anthropic's Mythos artificial intelligence model and other frontier artificial intelligence systems.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential role of artificial intelligence in the development of universal vaccines capable of providing protection against future virus variants and emerging infectious diseases.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 June 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the answer of 31 October 2025 to Question 84244 on Government: Artificial Intelligence, whether his Department has issued guidance to civil servants on using AI to draft answers to written Parl
United States · United States Congress · 11 June 2026
United States · United States Congress · 11 June 2026
United States · United States Congress · 11 June 2026
United States · United States Congress · 11 June 2026
European Union · European Parliament · 11 June 2026
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 June 2026
Motie van het lid Synhaeve c.s. over aandringen bij de Europese Commissie om inbrengen via een AI-lobbytool van tabaksfabrikanten kritisch te bekijken
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 June 2026
Gewijzigde motie van het lid Claassen over bewerkstelligen dat het Groeiplan MedTech als thema wordt omarmd t.v.v. 21501-31-824
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 June 2026
278. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the number of courses, training programmes or apprenticeships that specifically address artificial intelligence skills currently supported by his Department; the number of participants enrolled; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44278/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 June 2026
275. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the measures being taken to support workers whose roles may be affected by the adoption of artificial intelligence technologies; and whether any national reskilling or workforce transition strategy is under development. [44277/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 June 2026
154. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Social Protection whether her Department has conducted any analysis of the potential implications of artificial intelligence-related job displacement for income supports, activation programmes and labour market participation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44279/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 June 2026
69. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department has estimated the number or proportion of jobs in the State that may be significantly altered, displaced or augmented by artificial intelligence technologies over the next ten years; the sectors expected to experience the greatest impact; and the measures being taken to prepare workers and employers for these changes. [44282/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 June 2026
68. Deputy Shónagh Ní Raghallaigh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department has undertaken any assessment of the potential impact of artificial intelligence and automation on employment across the State; the sectors identified as most at risk of job displacement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44276/26]
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether existing liability and regulatory frameworks adequately allocate responsibility for harm arising from the use of artificial intelligence tools in clinical decision-making within the
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, which sectors have been prioritised for support under the AI adoption programme.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of AI-related professional displacement in employment across (a) the South East , (b) Eastbourne and (c) the UK.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps he is taking to help mitigate the potential impact of AI-related professional displacement in employment for those in the late stages of their career.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to help mitigate the potential impact of AI-related professional displacement in employment for graduates and school leavers.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what support she is providing to people facing redundancy due to the impact of AI technology on the employment market.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what the eligibility criteria are for funding through the Sovereign AI programme.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of artificial intelligence on economic growth over the next decade.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of publishing AI-related professional displacement employment data by region and age band.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that artificial intelligence tools used within courts and the wider justice system are subject to appropriate safeguards, oversight and evaluation.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what artificial intelligence systems, including generative artificial intelligence and AI agents, are being utilised by Network Rail; for what operational, maintenance, asset management, customer service and co
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the need for regulatory safeguards to ensure that artificial intelligence systems remain subject to effective human oversight and control.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the number of jobs that could be lost through increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, whether his Department permits (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials to use (i) Chat GPT, (ii) Google Gemini, (iii) Claude, (iv) Deepseek and (v) Grok as part of their official duties.
United States · United States Congress · 10 June 2026
United States · United States Congress · 10 June 2026
European Union · European Parliament · 10 June 2026
Germany · German Bundestag · 10 June 2026
Arbeitsbericht Nr. 217 des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB) zu Sicherheitsrisiken durch den möglichen Missbrauch neuerer biotechnologischer Entwicklungen und ihrer Wechselwirkungen mit Entwicklungen im Bereich der KI: Überblick über relevante Entwicklungen in der molekularen Biologie bzw. der Synthetischen Biologie und der Biotechnologie sowie deren Zusammenspiel mit jüngeren KI-Entwicklungen, mögliche Risiken für die Biosicherheit und Proliferation biologischer Waffen, Regulierungen und Maßnahmen zur Kontrolle von Biowaffen und sicherheitsrelevanter Dual-Use-Forschung, Handlungsoptionen
European Union · European Parliament · 10 June 2026
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 June 2026
AI-gigafabrieken en de klimaatimpact van grootschalige datacenters
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 June 2026
Motie van de leden Rooderkerk en Moorman over een voorstel uitwerken voor een veilige publieke Nederlandse AI-voorziening
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 June 2026
AI-generated works should not qualify for copyright. Mirror U.S. courts that have affirmed that copyright requires human authorship. This petition calls for AI-generated content created without meaningful human creative input to be ineligible for copyright or ownership claims. This aligns with current U.S. legal precedent established in Thaler v. Perlmutter, where federal courts affirmed that copyright requires human authorship. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case, leaving this principle intact. Copyright should protect human creativity, not autonomous machine-generated works.
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence
France · National Assembly · 9 June 2026
M. René Lioret attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la santé, des familles, de l'autonomie et des personnes handicapées sur les dysfonctionnements persistants des maisons départementales des personnes handicapées (MDPH). Vingt ans après leur création, les démarches d'accès aux droits demeurent particulièrement complexes, marquées par des exigences administratives lourdes et parfois redondantes, y compris pour des handicaps irréversibles. Les délais d'instruction dépassent fréquemment les délais légaux, conduisant certains usagers à redéposer des dossiers avant même leur traitement. Par ailleurs, les droits procéduraux des demandeurs apparaissent insuffisamment garantis, notamment en raison de la non-communication de documents essentiels à l'instruction et de conditions d'examen limitant leur participation effective aux décisions. Enfin, des disparités importantes subsistent entre les territoires, entraînant des inégalités de traitement. Il lui demande quelles mesures le Gouvernement entend prendre pour simplifier les démarches, garantir le respect des droits des demandeurs, réduire les délais d'instruction et assurer une application homogène des règles sur l'ensemble du territoire.
France · National Assembly · 9 June 2026
Mme Danièle Obono interroge M. le ministre du travail et des solidarités sur l'usage de l'intelligence artificielle et de l'accessibilité des services numériques pour les demandeurs d'emploi au sein de France Travail. Le recours à l'intelligence artificielle et aux outils numériques s'est progressivement accru dans le service public de l'emploi, comme l'a notamment relevé la Cour des comptes dans son rapport de 2025, soulignant les gains d'efficience possibles ainsi que les évolutions déjà engagées en matière de dématérialisation et d'automatisation de certaines procédures. Si ces évolutions ont permis des gains d'efficacité et une amélioration de certains processus, elles s'accompagnent également de défis en matière d'accessibilité et d'inclusion numérique. Dans le même temps, de nombreux retours de terrain mettent en avant des attentes fortes en matière de personnalisation des parcours. Les demandeurs d'emploi, en particulier les personnes de plus de 50 ans ou celles disposant d'une expérience significative, expriment le besoin d'un accompagnement mieux adapté à leurs compétences, à leur parcours et à leurs projets professionnels. Dans ce contexte, l'intelligence artificielle pourrait constituer un outil complémentaire au travail des conseillers. Elle permettrait d'améliorer la pertinence des propositions de formation et des orientations proposées, sans se substituer à l'accompagnement humain. Par ailleurs, la dématérialisation croissante des démarches administratives peut engendrer des difficultés d'accès aux services numériques. Plusieurs usagers soulignent la complexité du site de France Travail notamment pour les publics les plus éloignés du numérique. Ces obstacles sont susceptibles de créer des ruptures d'accès aux droits et fragilisent l'efficacité de l'accompagnement proposé. Ainsi, elle souhaite connaître les mesures envisagées concernant le développement de l'intelligence artificielle au sein de France Travail. Elle souhaite également savoir comment seront améliorées l'accessibilité et la lisibilité des services numériques pour l'ensemble des usagers, notamment les plus éloignés du numérique.
France · National Assembly · 9 June 2026
Mme Colette Capdevielle attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la culture sur la situation préoccupante des chaînes de télévision locales, confrontées à un manque structurel de soutien dans un contexte de mutation des modèles économiques. Dans les Pyrénées-Atlantiques, la chaîne locale TVPI propose une information de qualité, mais peine à rester à l'équilibre, ne bénéficiant d'aucune subvention publique. Cet exemple ne fait pas figure d'exception. Si l'écosystème de l'information de proximité touche un public large couvrant près de 50 millions de téléspectateurs, sur 65 chaînes locales en France, seules 33 % parviennent à être rentables. Aujourd'hui, contrairement à la presse quotidienne régionale et aux radios locales, qui perçoivent respectivement 175 et 35 millions d'euros d'aides directes par an, aucune aide n'est attribuée aux télévisions locales. Plusieurs propositions d'organisations syndicales pourraient être étudiées, parmi lesquelles la reconnaissance des chaînes locales comme service d'intérêt général (SIG) et la création d'un dispositif de soutien dédié. À ce jour, la délibération ARCOM n° 2024-18 reconnaît 25 chaînes nationales comme SIG, y compris des chaînes de divertissement, mais exclut les 50 chaînes locales. Pourtant, ces dernières font non seulement vivre une culture locale par la promotion de langues régionales et la consolidation du lien social de proximité, mais font aussi figure de rempart démocratique face à la prolifération de désinformations à l'ère de l'intelligence artificielle et des GAFAM. Dans ce contexte, elle l'interroge sur la non-reconnaissance par l'ARCOM des chaînes de télévision locales comme SIG, alors que leur statut correspond à la définition donnée dans l'article 20-7 de la loi du 30 septembre 1986 et qu'elles disposent toutes d'un canal TNT.
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
1004. Deputy William Aird asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport when the Government will publish its updated national strategy on artificial intelligence; the measures that will be included to support Irish creators, artists and media organisations affected by generative AI technologies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43719/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
1003. Deputy William Aird asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport the progress made in developing a national strategy for the use of artificial intelligence across the media, cultural and creative sectors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43718/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
1001. Deputy Robert O'Donoghue asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport whether his Department has undertaken any assessment of the potential impact of artificial intelligence and digital replication technologies on background performers and workers within the Irish film and television sector; and if he will outline any plans to introduce protections, safeguards or regulations in this area as the industry continues to expand. [43349/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
930. Deputy Pádraig O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Youth when the guidance being developed by her Department on the use of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning will be published; the measures being put in place to protect the integrity of student assessment given the move under the Senior Cycle Redevelopment to have 40% of assessment occur outside the exam hall; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [43475/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
718. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the measures their Department intends to implement to support workers whose employment may be adversely affected by artificial intelligence; the funding allocated or planned for AI-related workforce transition, retraining and reskilling programmes; any targets, performance indicators or implementation timelines established in this regard; whether consideration has been given to prioritising workers employed in occupations identified as being at risk from artificial intelligence when designing such supports; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43654/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
717. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether their Department has undertaken, commissioned, received or considered any modelling, forecasts, impact assessments, scenario planning exercises or labour-market analyses regarding the potential impact of artificial intelligence on employment levels, occupational displacement, workforce demand, productivity and job transformation in Ireland; whether any sectors, occupations or regions have been identified as being at elevated risk of disruption; whether any estimates have been made of the number of workers who may require retraining or reskilling; and if they will provide details of any such analysis. [43653/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
702. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department has assessed the operational, commercial and consumer impacts arising from the revised liability framework under Directive (EU) 2024/2853 on liability for defective products, including the extension of liability to online platforms acting beyond an intermediary role, the recognition of psychological harm as recoverable damage, and the inclusion of software and AI systems as products; the steps being taken to transpose the Directive into Irish law ahead of the 9 December 2026 deadline, including whether a dedicated working group or stakeholder consultation process has been established; whether guidance will be issued/has been issued to assist online platforms in understanding when liability may arise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42722/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 June 2026
699. Deputy Paul Nicholas Gogarty asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will assess the extent to which outsourcing, automation, and AI driven restructuring are contributing to job losses in the tech sector; the measures he intends to introduce to protect workers in Ireland from sudden or large-scale displacement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42703/26]