The world's political record
Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
8,119 records
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what measures they are considering to support the responsible deployment of AI across UK financial services.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will set out how the Dismounted Data System will speed up battlefield decision-making using AI.
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 February 2026
De oproep van experts om AI-uitkleedsoftware wereldwijd te verbieden
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 February 2026
Verzoek om uitstel van het rondetafelgesprek over het optimaal benutten van AI-kansen (25 februari 2026 van 13.00 tot 15.30 uur) vanwege mogelijke samenloop met het plenaire debat over de regeringsverklaring
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
We call on the Government to seek a global agreement that bans the development of artificial superintelligence and to encourage the establishment of a globally accepted safe path for developing advanced AI, ensuring strong safety standards and international coordination. Some leaders of major AI companies and top experts have warned that advanced AI could pose significant risks. Some companies are actively pursuing superintelligence despite these warnings. The UK Government should act now to help prevent a dangerous global race and work with other nations to seek a safe, internationally coordinated approach to advanced AI development.
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 February 2026
Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence
France · National Assembly · 10 February 2026
M. Thomas Ménagé interroge Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur les règles applicables au raccordement des logements à la fibre optique, en particulier lorsque plusieurs modes de raccordement sont envisagés. Dans le cadre du déploiement de la fibre optique, des interrogations sont régulièrement soulevées par les particuliers quant au choix du mode de raccordement entre une solution souterraine, via un fourreau téléphonique existant et une solution aérienne. Certains propriétaires expriment notamment des inquiétudes quant à l'utilisation du fourreau existant, par crainte d'une détérioration de la ligne téléphonique en cuivre et souhaitent privilégier un raccordement aérien, y compris lorsqu'aucune infrastructure aérienne n'est présente à proximité immédiate du logement. Ces situations peuvent susciter des incompréhensions, tant pour les usagers que pour les opérateurs, notamment sur les critères techniques permettant de déterminer le mode de raccordement retenu, sur la place laissée au choix du particulier ainsi que sur les conditions dans lesquelles une solution aérienne peut être envisagée, en particulier lorsqu'elle impliquerait la création de nouveaux supports. Ces questionnements prennent une importance particulière dans le contexte de la fermeture progressive du réseau cuivre engagée au niveau national. Dans plusieurs territoires, dont le département du Loiret, cette extinction est annoncée à l'horizon 2028 selon les calendriers communiqués, ce qui conduit à s'interroger sur les conséquences pratiques d'un refus de raccordement à la fibre et sur la pérennité des solutions alternatives. Dans ce contexte, il souhaiterait savoir si le Gouvernement peut préciser le cadre réglementaire et technique applicable au choix du mode de raccordement à la fibre optique, notamment les règles de principe relatives à l'utilisation des infrastructures existantes, les conditions de recours à une solution aérienne ainsi que les obligations et responsabilités respectives des opérateurs et des propriétaires. Il lui demande enfin si des actions d'information ou de clarification sont envisagées afin de prévenir les situations de blocage et de sécuriser les parcours de raccordement des usagers.
France · National Assembly · 10 February 2026
M. Bastien Lachaud interroge M. le ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique sur le projet d'acquisition par les douanes françaises d'un logiciel de renseignement développé par la société israélo-américaine Windward AI. Alors que le Gouvernement multiplie les déclarations sur le retour de la souveraineté économique et numérique de la France, il apparaît que les douanes françaises s'apprêteraient à acquérir un logiciel de renseignement d'origine israélo-américaine, destiné à l'analyse des flux maritimes. Ce choix serait justifié par l'absence d'une solution nationale ou européenne présentant, à ce stade, un niveau d'efficacité comparable. Un tel choix interroge. Il révèle une dépendance persistante de l'État français à des technologies numériques étrangères, en particulier étasuniennes, dans des domaines relevant directement de missions régaliennes, telles que le renseignement douanier. Cette dépendance apparaît en contradiction manifeste avec les objectifs affichés de souveraineté numérique, alors même que la France dispose des capacités industrielles, technologiques et humaines nécessaires pour développer des solutions équivalentes, à condition d'une véritable planification économique et industrielle. Par ailleurs, le recours à un logiciel soumis au droit étasunien pose la question de la maîtrise des données, notamment au regard du Cloud Act , susceptible de porter atteinte à la souveraineté et à la sécurité des informations stratégiques françaises. Dans ce contexte, il lui demande pour quels motifs précis les douanes françaises envisagent l'acquisition de ce logiciel étranger plutôt que le développement ou l'adaptation d'une solution nationale et si le Gouvernement entend lancer un programme public de financement et de développement d'une solution souveraine française de renseignement maritime, afin de mettre fin à cette dépendance stratégique.
France · National Assembly · 10 February 2026
Mme Virginie Duby-Muller alerte Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur l'enjeu stratégique de la souveraineté numérique face au basculement croissant des administrations et des entreprises publiques vers des clouds extra-européens. Alors que la France dépend de plus en plus d'infrastructures numériques critiques, plusieurs opérateurs d'importance vitale engagent des programmes massifs de migration vers des plateformes cloud principalement américaines. Cette trajectoire soulève des risques majeurs en matière de sécurité des données, de continuité des services essentiels, d'exposition aux législations extraterritoriales étrangères et, plus largement, de perte de maîtrise technologique et industrielle. Pourtant, des solutions françaises et européennes existent, notamment avec des acteurs français comme OVHcloud ou Scaleway , qui pourraient garantir à la fois performance, sécurité et indépendance stratégique. Dans un contexte géopolitique incertain, où l'accès aux infrastructures numériques peut devenir un levier de pression politique, il apparaît indispensable que l'État définisse une doctrine claire imposant ou, à tout le moins, orientant fortement les administrations et entreprises publiques vers des solutions cloud souveraines européennes, assortie de mécanismes de contrôle et de plan de réversibilité. Elle lui demande donc quelles mesures le Gouvernement entend prendre pour garantir la souveraineté numérique des opérateurs publics et limiter leur dépendance aux fournisseurs extra-européens.
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 February 2026
594. Deputy Darren O'Rourke asked the Minister for Education and Youth the measures she is taking to address the use of AI tracking software in schools (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [9846/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 February 2026
487. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he is aware data centres located here are being used to run an AI tool (details supplied). [9521/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 February 2026
471. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if Ireland will be represented at the Global AI Summit in India in February 2026; if so, the nature of that representation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9273/26]
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 9 February 2026, to question 110946 on Navy: Artificial Intelligence, what is the full scope of the Maritime Fighting Web.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to ensure that parents have the skills they need to support children's safe use of AI.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help ensure children use AI safely.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 9 February 2026, to question 110946 on Navy: Artificial Intelligence, what assessment has he made of the potential level of need for integration between the Maritime Fighting Web and the
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 9 February 2026, to question 110946 on Navy: Artificial Intelligence, what progress has he made in establishing a Royal Navy Targeting organisation to represent the maritime component of
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the UK's artificial intelligence regulation.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential risk of the widespread use of artificial intelligence systems on children.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her dept is taking to ensure that schools (a) remain up to date with AI technology as it develops and (b) remain equipped to offer support for their pupils.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the report by the Independent Society of Musicians, Brave New World? Justice for creators in the age of Gen AI, published on 30 January; and whether they have made an assessment of the impa
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish where the data collected from users of the AI Skills Hub is held; and which companies will be given access to that data.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that regulation of retail financial markets remains effective as AI adoption in fintech increases.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the of legal action against AI companies in the US relating to copyright when issuing government contracts to, or agreeing memorandums of understanding with, AI companies.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential use of AI in bank payment systems to prevent fraud; and what steps they are taking to ensure that safeguards and consumer protections are effective for the deployment of AI in
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
Ban AI translation applications. Highly trained and qualified translators are losing pay and even their jobs due to the rise of AI translation, despite humans accurately translating language and culture-specific nuances which machines cannot fully grasp. The amount of jobs available for translators is rapidly decreasing, and those which are available are mostly post-editing, which takes the same amount of time or longer, often for less pay. We feel this is an unnecessary threat to a crucial industry which helps connect people across the globe. Furthermore, AI produces lower-quality translations, resulting in the purpose and meaning of source texts being inaccurately conveyed. This can be damaging for the creator of the source text as well as the target audience.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2026 to Question 108459 on Department for Transport: Artificial Intelligence, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of AI-enabled initiatives opera
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, how many projected jobs for each AI Growth Zone are (a) tied to building and construction of data centres, (b) permanent on-site operational jobs in data centres, (c) data-centre roles
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking with Cabinet colleagues to monitor changes in (a) job numbers, (b) job quality and (c) skill requirements across sectors affected by the adoption of
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to promote the use of content authentication technologies to help identify AI-generated content online; and if she will consider regulatory intervent
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment he has made of the potential efficacy of public-private partnerships to (a) promote innovation and (b) integrate artificial intelligence in his Department's new Jobs and Careers Service.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risks posed by the deployment of autonomous AI agents by businesses, in particular for governance, security and data protection; and what steps they are taking to mitigate those risks.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government how they plan to inform the public if their data held in public administrative datasets is used for AI development; and which departments are already using public data for AI development.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure regulatory frameworks on the use of AI in consumer financial services protect users and support innovation.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that AI governance and safety frameworks remain effective as AI systems develop in autonomy and complexity.
United States · United States Congress · 9 February 2026
United States · United States Congress · 9 February 2026
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2026
I want the Government to support the Bill proposed by Lord Holmes on the regulation of Artificial Intelligence. AI is Already Impacting, yet key questions around data use, liability, copyright, safety standards and transparency remain unresolved. If passed, the Bill will help with this. We believe this lack of resolution is bad for trust, bad for competitiveness, and bad for the UK’s ambition to lead in responsible AI. “Wait and see” isn’t a strategy. If the UK Govt wants growth, trust and sovereign capability, we believe we need to move from confusion to clarity, consistency and coherence and enable meaningful, sustained public engagement and participation, as citizen, consumer, creative, cross-society, cross-business. Such an approach is far more likely to deliver legislation fit for the AI age. Our data, our decisions, our AI futures.
European Union · European Parliament · 6 February 2026
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 6 February 2026
Het artikel ‘Snelgroeiende autonome AI-assistent is een ‘disaster waiting to happen’’.
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 5 February 2026
143. Deputy Sinéad Gibney asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade her Department’s position on the digital omnibus, particularly relating to the proposed changes to the EU AI Act; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [1737/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 5 February 2026
65. Deputy Sinéad Gibney asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade whether her Department has concerns regarding the ability of citizens to exercise their rights under GDPR and the EU AI Act being undermined by the provisions currently proposed in the digital omnibus simplification packages; whether these concerns have been raised in early discussions on the packages; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [8708/26]
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential role of artificial intelligence and smart data technologies in modernising energy networks and forecasting operational capacity; and how this assessment informs policy on nati
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 February 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which the AI-Driven Innovation Centre, announced at the World Economic Forum in January, aligns with the UK’s artificial intelligence strategy and wider policy objectives.
United States · United States Congress · 5 February 2026
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 5 February 2026
Verzoek van de leden Martens-America en Van Lanschot om een genodigde toe te voegen aan blok 2 of 3 van het rondetafelgesprek over kansen voor AI
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 4 February 2026
1215. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the plans to increase AI training places on Springboard+, Skillset, and Solas micro-credential courses in 2026. [8741/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 4 February 2026
1211. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the work underway to support third level institutions to actively support students to develop digital and AI skills to better equip the workforce of future. [8249/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 4 February 2026
1205. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science how the proposed AI and digital skills initiatives will address regional and sectoral skills gaps; whether specific provision will be made for construction, manufacturing, retail, and SMEs; and how regional disparities identified by the National Skills Observatory will be acted upon. [7639/26]
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 4 February 2026
1203. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the evidence base used to support the target of upskilling one million people in AI and digital skills; the data sources relied upon, including reports from Ibec, OECD and the National Skills Council; and whether the Department has set interim targets or timelines for delivery. [7637/26]