Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Artificial intelligence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

8,119 records

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 3,327Ireland · 1,477European Union · 1,264United States · 654France · 621Netherlands · 377Germany · 283Austria · 107Belgium · 7Estonia · 2Search this topic

Records

Record· PetitionPetition 761728open

Review & consider the role of agentic AI in Defence, Security & Public Services

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 19 February 2026

There's no dedicated legal framework for agentic AI under UK law. It seems the government prefers adapting existing legislation to creating new AI-specific laws. The pressure to innovate is real but the government must consider if agentic AI is the right system for the job, and its governance role. AI agents are tools and agentic AI is the system that uses those tools to think, decide and act independent of human oversight. The government must address any risks like: data leaks, hallucinations, compliance failures, misleading content, reinforcing systemic inequities and distorting decision-making. While protecting democratic integrity, economic stability, human relationships, and societal well-being. As capabilities grow, so does the need for careful governance, security and oversight, for any use of agentic AI in critical National Infrastructure, Public Services, National Defence and highly regulated environments. The government should review how to address the aforementioned risks and ensure compliance is built in from the start.

Question· writtenPQ 220asked

220. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Defence the opportunities for Ireland to participate in dual-use technology developments, such as drones and AI, under the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [13825/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

220. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Defence the opportunities for Ireland to participate in dual-use technology developments, such as drones and AI, under the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [13825/26]

Question· writtenPQ 87asked

87. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will provide for the development of a national AI risk register within the national AI office to identify and monitor systemic risks across sectors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12950/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

87. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will provide for the development of a national AI risk register within the national AI office to identify and monitor systemic risks across sectors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12950/26]

Question· writtenPQ 86asked

86. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if his Department’s emphasis on promoting AI will influence how the proposed Oifig Intleachta Shaorga na hÉireann, or the AI Office of Ireland, approaches its co-ordinating role under the EU AI Act; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13311/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

86. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if his Department’s emphasis on promoting AI will influence how the proposed Oifig Intleachta Shaorga na hÉireann, or the AI Office of Ireland, approaches its co-ordinating role under the EU AI Act; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13311/26]

Question· writtenPQ 83asked

83. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he would support the establishment of a citizens’ assembly on artificial intelligence digitalisation and technology to facilitate inclusive public dialogue and democratic input on AI policy and ethics; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12897/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

83. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he would support the establishment of a citizens’ assembly on artificial intelligence digitalisation and technology to facilitate inclusive public dialogue and democratic input on AI policy and ethics; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12897/26]

Question· writtenPQ 80asked

80. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the measures being put in place to help businesses, particularly SMEs, identify their supervisory authority under the distributed regulatory model in the general scheme of the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13253/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

80. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the measures being put in place to help businesses, particularly SMEs, identify their supervisory authority under the distributed regulatory model in the general scheme of the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13253/26]

Question· writtenPQ 75asked

75. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will ensure that the national AI office will have the necessary levels of independence, technical experts and resourcing to ensure that there are no conflicts between the State’s supports for industry to harness AI, the State’s own deployment of AI, and the design, implementation and enforcement of regulations to govern AI, and to support other AI regulators and fundamental rights bodies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12899/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

75. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will ensure that the national AI office will have the necessary levels of independence, technical experts and resourcing to ensure that there are no conflicts between the State’s supports for industry to harness AI, the State’s own deployment of AI, and the design, implementation and enforcement of regulations to govern AI, and to support other AI regulators and fundamental rights bodies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12899/26]

Question· writtenPQ 71asked

71. Deputy Shay Brennan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will ensure the national AI office has a dedicated role for, or a board with members from, disabled people’s organisations and disability organisations, to ensure that the benefits and risks posed by AI for people with disabilities are at the forefront of any policy decisions, particularly the development of AI ethical regulations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12902/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

71. Deputy Shay Brennan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will ensure the national AI office has a dedicated role for, or a board with members from, disabled people’s organisations and disability organisations, to ensure that the benefits and risks posed by AI for people with disabilities are at the forefront of any policy decisions, particularly the development of AI ethical regulations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12902/26]

Question· writtenPQ 68asked

68. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the legislative measures he is planning to implement to ensure that artificial intelligence adaptation does not lead to job loses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13129/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

68. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the legislative measures he is planning to implement to ensure that artificial intelligence adaptation does not lead to job loses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13129/26]

Question· writtenPQ 65asked

65. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the reasons the proposed Oifig Intleachta Shaorga na hÉireann, or the AI Office of Ireland, has been placed under the remit of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13312/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

65. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the reasons the proposed Oifig Intleachta Shaorga na hÉireann, or the AI Office of Ireland, has been placed under the remit of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13312/26]

Question· writtenPQ 62asked

62. Deputy Cormac Devlin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will be recommending that the State explore publicly owned AI resources and technologies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12957/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

62. Deputy Cormac Devlin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will be recommending that the State explore publicly owned AI resources and technologies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12957/26]

Question· writtenPQ 60asked

60. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps his Department is taking to ensure that social media artificial intelligence tools cannot be used by sexual predators to generate naked images of people, including child abuse imagery; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3863/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

60. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps his Department is taking to ensure that social media artificial intelligence tools cannot be used by sexual predators to generate naked images of people, including child abuse imagery; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3863/26]

Question· writtenPQ 42asked

42. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if the proposed national AI office will be up and running by August 2026; if it will provide the immediate, coordinated, all-of-government approach to AI that is required; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12898/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

42. Deputy Seán Ó Fearghaíl asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if the proposed national AI office will be up and running by August 2026; if it will provide the immediate, coordinated, all-of-government approach to AI that is required; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12898/26]

Question· writtenPQ 35asked

35. Deputy Sinéad Gibney asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment to provide an update on the setting up of the proposed national AI office; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13369/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

35. Deputy Sinéad Gibney asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment to provide an update on the setting up of the proposed national AI office; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13369/26]

Question· writtenPQ 31asked

31. Deputy Catherine Ardagh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment his views on whether the EU should be treated as a minimum baseline for national AI regulation, and not a maximum standard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12953/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

31. Deputy Catherine Ardagh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment his views on whether the EU should be treated as a minimum baseline for national AI regulation, and not a maximum standard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12953/26]

Question· writtenPQ 30asked

30. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if the national AI office will have advisory panels in place for routinely collaborating with young people, older people and disabled people and including representation from those groups and also civil society groups that can provide routine expertise and insights into AI harms and benefits; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12900/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

30. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if the national AI office will have advisory panels in place for routinely collaborating with young people, older people and disabled people and including representation from those groups and also civil society groups that can provide routine expertise and insights into AI harms and benefits; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12900/26]

Question· writtenPQ 23asked

23. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he plans to put the AI advisory council, which currently operates on a voluntary basis, on a permanent footing and provide it with State funding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12951/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

23. Deputy Sean Fleming asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he plans to put the AI advisory council, which currently operates on a voluntary basis, on a permanent footing and provide it with State funding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12951/26]

Question· writtenPQ 18asked

18. Deputy Shay Brennan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he considers that the AI advisory council should have a dedicated role for, or membership of, civil society organisations, such as disabled people’s organisations, human rights advocates and people representing marginalised groups and communities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12901/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

18. Deputy Shay Brennan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he considers that the AI advisory council should have a dedicated role for, or membership of, civil society organisations, such as disabled people’s organisations, human rights advocates and people representing marginalised groups and communities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12901/26]

Question· oralPQ 16asked

16. Deputy Grace Boland asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment in light of reports that generative artificial intelligence tools can produce highly realistic child sexual abuse imagery, the specific engagement his Department has had on the online safety and cultural implications of such technologies for children and young people; the concrete actions being taken to ensure child protection and online safety frameworks are adequate to address these risks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4132/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

16. Deputy Grace Boland asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment in light of reports that generative artificial intelligence tools can produce highly realistic child sexual abuse imagery, the specific engagement his Department has had on the online safety and cultural implications of such technologies for children and young people; the concrete actions being taken to ensure child protection and online safety frameworks are adequate to address these risks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4132/26]

Question· writtenPQ 15asked

15. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps being taken to build national capacity within regulators and industry in advance of the full commencement of the EU AI Act; the way in which this will support Ireland’s position as a competitive and innovation-focused location for AI development; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13254/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

15. Deputy Naoise Ó Cearúil asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps being taken to build national capacity within regulators and industry in advance of the full commencement of the EU AI Act; the way in which this will support Ireland’s position as a competitive and innovation-focused location for AI development; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13254/26]

Question· oralPQ 11asked

11. Deputy Cormac Devlin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment his views on whether action is necessary to mitigate against an over-reliance on the private sector with regard to AI; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12956/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

11. Deputy Cormac Devlin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment his views on whether action is necessary to mitigate against an over-reliance on the private sector with regard to AI; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12956/26]

Question· oralPQ 10asked

10. Deputy Catherine Ardagh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will establish an AI observatory to complement the national AI office, and track real-time issues and project future impacts on jobs and skills to provide independent forecasting and policy advice; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12952/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

10. Deputy Catherine Ardagh asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if he will establish an AI observatory to complement the national AI office, and track real-time issues and project future impacts on jobs and skills to provide independent forecasting and policy advice; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12952/26]

Question· oralPQ 7asked

7. Deputy Joanna Byrne asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps he will take to tackle harmful AI tools (details supplied) and the online platforms that host them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4109/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 19 February 2026

7. Deputy Joanna Byrne asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps he will take to tackle harmful AI tools (details supplied) and the online platforms that host them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4109/26]

Record· PetitionPetition 761473closed

Ban AI usage in education by teachers and students

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 18 February 2026

To impose a consequence or discouragement for teachers who are using AI to educate, provide feedback and mark students work. Encourage educational lessons on the harms behind AI and when it should be used. Give records to students who are found to be repeatedly using it in their education. Many teachers across educational institutions are using AI to mark, provide feedback and teach students. We believe this entirely unsettles the system behind education that promotes students to do better and prepare them for work from someone who knows them personally and what would aid their work. Similarly I find many schools and colleges to be using AI imagery to promote their institution. This is a clear missed opportunity as many have groups of fine art students who need work experience.

Record· PetitionPetition 761307open

Make a mandatory ‘no ai’ logo for products and companies

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 17 February 2026

The use of ai has become widespread and more often than not, people will accidentally buy a product which uses ai as it can be hard to spot. By introducing this, people would be more encouraged to buy products and it would help people of all walks of life detect ai much more efficiently. Furthermore, I have seen an example of this working. One creator had put a no ai logo on their product and majority of the feedback was people saying they would be more encouraged to buy the product despite them not having any real interest in it. This ‘no ai’ logo would bring back life to packing and designing and would make ‘art’, art again.

Record· PetitionPetition 761304closed

Make it illegal for doorbell footage to be used by companies for AI training

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 17 February 2026

Make it illegal for companies to use doorbell or home CCTV footage to train AI on recognisable people without permission. Only footage that is fully anonymised, with strict limits on use and storage, regular checks, and fines for breaking the rules should be allowed for this use. People can be filmed by doorbell cameras as they walk down their own streets, then that footage can be used to by the company who made the doorbell camera to build AI tools which those filmed may never have consented to. We think that this is unfair and undermines trust in both technology and neighbours. In our view home security should protect homes, not turn the public into unpaid test data, and we do not think the law has kept up. Parliament should set clear limits so people’s faces, movements and daily routines cannot be used for AI training without real permission and proper safeguards.

Question· Question écrite13035answered

Question 13035 — télécommunications

France · National Assembly · 17 February 2026

Mme Prisca Thevenot attire l'attention de Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle, énergétique et numérique, chargée de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique, sur les difficultés structurelles et désormais chroniques rencontrées dans le cadre du déploiement et de la maintenance des réseaux de fibre optique sur plusieurs communes des Hauts-de-Seine. Depuis 2022, de nombreux administrés, associations de riverains et élus locaux ont alerté Mme la députée, non plus sur des dysfonctionnements ponctuels, mais sur les limites profondes du modèle économique et organisationnel actuellement en vigueur. Interventions inachevées ou non conformes, malfaçons récurrentes au niveau des armoires de rue et des chambres de tirage, reprises tardives, dégradations des raccordements existants : ces désordres témoignent moins de défaillances isolées que d'un problème systémique. La fragmentation des responsabilités entre opérateurs d'infrastructure, opérateurs commerciaux et chaînes de sous-traitance successives conduit à une dilution manifeste des responsabilités, au détriment de la qualité du service rendu aux usagers et sans réel levier d'action pour les collectivités territoriales, pourtant sollicitées quotidiennement sur ces sujets. La situation observée dans la commune de Vaucresson illustre de manière particulièrement préoccupante ces dérives. Alors que seulement 55 % du parc est actuellement raccordé, les difficultés rencontrées sont déjà nombreuses et persistantes. Cette situation interroge directement la soutenabilité du dispositif actuel : si des fragilités structurelles apparaissent à ce stade du déploiement, la capacité du modèle en place à absorber le raccordement de la moitié restante du parc pose question, d'autant plus que les raccordements à venir seront les plus complexes. L'analyse des causes de ces dysfonctionnements met en lumière le rôle central du modèle économique de rémunération des prestataires, fondé principalement sur l'acte de raccordement. Ce mode de rémunération crée des incitations à des pratiques inacceptables : interventions réalisées dans l'urgence, branchements non conformes, débranchement d'usagers existants pour en raccorder de nouveaux, absence de remontée des anomalies et atteintes à l'intégrité des infrastructures. Il en résulte une instabilité chronique du réseau, une dégradation accélérée des équipements et une perte de confiance durable des usagers. Les mécanismes de contrôle actuellement mis en œuvre, y compris certaines expérimentations locales, telles que la sécurisation physique des armoires ou l'usage de solutions technologiques innovantes, se révèlent à ce stade insuffisamment efficaces. Dans ce contexte, plusieurs élus locaux s'interrogent sur la nécessité de faire évoluer en profondeur l'organisation actuelle. À titre d'exemple, une piste mérite d'être examinée : le renforcement du rôle des opérateurs d'infrastructure, qui pourraient se voir confier, au-delà de l'installation et de l'entretien, la mission de raccordement jusqu'au client final, les opérateurs commerciaux conservant un rôle centré sur la commercialisation et la relation avec l'abonné. Une telle évolution permettrait de clarifier la chaîne de responsabilité, de limiter les effets pervers de la sous-traitance en cascade et de garantir une meilleure qualité et traçabilité des interventions. Alors que la fibre optique constitue désormais une infrastructure essentielle à la vie économique, sociale et administrative des territoires, il apparaît indispensable d'ouvrir une réflexion de fond sur l'adéquation du modèle économique actuel avec les exigences de qualité, de continuité et de fiabilité du service public numérique. Elle souhaiterait donc connaître la position du Gouvernement sur ces enjeux et savoir si une évolution du cadre réglementaire et organisationnel du déploiement et de la maintenance des réseaux de fibre optique est envisagée, en lien étroit avec les collectivités territoriales et les autorités de régulation.

Question· Question écrite12909answered

Question 12909 — défense

France · National Assembly · 17 February 2026

M. Hadrien Clouet attire l'attention de Mme la ministre des armées et des anciens combattants sur l'avenir du système de combat aérien du futur (SCAF), symbole théorique de la coopération franco-allemande, mais exemple pratique d'intérêts divergents et d'enlisement diplomatique. Ainsi, planifié conjointement depuis 2017, puis élargi à l'Espagne, le SCAF est dans une impasse totale, malgré un budget global de 100 milliards d'euros et son importance stratégique. Les accords prévoyaient des plateformes aériennes interconnectées, des drones, un cloud tactique avec de l'intelligence artificielle, ainsi que le développement d'un avion de combat commun pour la France et l'Allemagne, remplaçant le Rafale français et l'Eurofighter allemand à l'horizon 2040. Cependant, malgré les 3 milliards d'euros dépensés jusqu'à présent, le contrat pour la prochaine phase n'a pas été conclu en raison de divergences majeures et de visions contraires sur la répartition des responsabilités, le mode de pilotage du projet ainsi que sur l'architecture et la réalisation du prototype. Plusieurs forces industrielles allemandes appellent même à cesser la coopération avec Dassault car cette entreprise nationale refuse, à raison, de laisser piller les brevets et le savoir-faire aéronautique français. Réalistes, les syndicalistes d'IG Metall souhaitent cesser la coopération SCAF sur le modèle unifié d'avion et en développer deux différents. Malgré les réaffirmations récentes des responsables politiques français et allemands quant à leur volonté de mener à terme le projet SCAF, l'absence de solution aux divergences actuelles et l'incertitude sur le calendrier montrent que le partenariat est caduque la poursuite de ce partenariat. Le contrat pour la phase 2, initialement prévu fin 2025, n'a pas été conclu. Selon des informations médiatiques parues début février 2026, le gouvernement fédéral allemand souhaite en réalité rejoindre le programme concurrent GCAP ( Global Combat Air Programme ) mené par le gouvernement italien de Mme Meloni, ainsi que le Royaume-Uni et le Japon - un contre-projet atlantiste. Dans un contexte géopolitique marqué par les agressions étasuniennes à l'égard de pays souverains, sa menace sur le Groenland et le risque d'un accord sans consultation des populations en Ukraine, l'échec de ce programme montre le besoin d'indépendance stratégique hors de la tutelle de Washington. L'industrie aéronautique française et ses dizaines de milliers de salariés sont dans l'attente de clarifications. En conséquence, il lui demande comment elle entend développer un avion de sixième génération. Quelles seraient les exigences budgétaires, industrielles et opérationnelle pour que la France poursuive le programme SCAF en configuration réduite, y compris de manière autonome ? Entend-elle élargir la coopération en cours avec l'Espagne vers d'autres pays volontaires, y compris hors de l'OTAN, afin de signer le contrat de la phase 2 du SCAF avec de nouveaux partenaires ? Quelles alternatives le Gouvernement a-t-il identifiées pour garantir le remplacement de la flotte de Rafale et assurer la pérennité des capacités aériennes françaises dans l'hypothèse d'un échec définitif du programme SCAF ? Quelle est sa position concernant la proposition formulée par certains acteurs industriels et syndicaux allemands de dissocier le développement de l'avion de combat des autres piliers du SCAF et une telle dissociation lui paraît-elle compatible avec la cohérence opérationnelle du système global ? Il lui demande enfin si elle dispose d'une stratégie pour ramener le gouvernement fédéral allemand à des sentiments plus coopératifs et à défaut, si elle tournera la page de la coopération franco-allemande sur le char du futur, où Rheinmetall entend évincer Nexter.

Question· writtenPQ 567asked

567. Deputy Albert Dolan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether any artificial intelligence tools or systems were used at any stage in the drafting, analysis, consultation, or preparation of the general scheme of the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026 (details supplied); if so, the nature of those tools, the purposes for which they were used and the safeguards in place to ensure accuracy, accountability and human oversight; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12220/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 17 February 2026

567. Deputy Albert Dolan asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether any artificial intelligence tools or systems were used at any stage in the drafting, analysis, consultation, or preparation of the general scheme of the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026 (details supplied); if so, the nature of those tools, the purposes for which they were used and the safeguards in place to ensure accuracy, accountability and human oversight; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12220/26]

Question· writtenPQ 564asked

564. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department is considering measures to compel watermarking on AI-generated images and videos;; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12088/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 17 February 2026

564. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment whether his Department is considering measures to compel watermarking on AI-generated images and videos;; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12088/26]

Record· PetitionPetition 761191closed

Require browsers & social media to include AI off switch for UK residents

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 15 February 2026

I believe users of all browsers and social media platforms should have an option to turn off AI in applications like, Snapchat, Instagram/Facebook, Google, Firefox etc etc I believe AI is making us dumber and lazier it's also bad for the environment. However, there are some key advantages to the use of AI. That's why it should be a mandatory feature to turn off AI. You could be using AI that is locally run this is the safer and better option.

Record· PetitionPetition 761052rejected

Consider the safety of Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Super Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 February 2026

An urgent review into the progress of Ai and Super Ai, whether sufficient evidence exists to demonstrate that it is future proof and safe, and what is the plan in the instance of Ai replacement of human labour. There is enough evidence of concern in the public domain to consider that safety is not sufficient to match the progress, and there doesn’t appear to be an active discussion or plan to consider the replacement of human labour and the impact on the working populace in terms of replacement income, self worth and this needs to be considered in light of past knowledge of advancements, such as the luddites. There is no objection to Ai implementation with Safe progress

Question· writtenPQ 207asked

207. Deputy Aindrias Moynihan asked the Minister for Education and Youth if digital literacy can be added to school curriculums to ensure responsible use of AI; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10989/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 12 February 2026

207. Deputy Aindrias Moynihan asked the Minister for Education and Youth if digital literacy can be added to school curriculums to ensure responsible use of AI; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10989/26]

Question· writtenPQ 183asked

183. Deputy Aindrias Moynihan asked the Minister for Education and Youth the measures being adopted to not just protect, but to include education for young people on online safety and dangers of AI; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10990/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 12 February 2026

183. Deputy Aindrias Moynihan asked the Minister for Education and Youth the measures being adopted to not just protect, but to include education for young people on online safety and dangers of AI; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10990/26]

Question· writtenPQ 146asked

146. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Education and Youth the way in which her Department intends to address recent findings that education policy-making in Ireland remains cautious and fragmented, and is not keeping pace with rapid technological changes including artificial intelligence; and the reforms planned to ensure schools can respond effectively to emerging challenges. [11014/26]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 12 February 2026

146. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Education and Youth the way in which her Department intends to address recent findings that education policy-making in Ireland remains cautious and fragmented, and is not keeping pace with rapid technological changes including artificial intelligence; and the reforms planned to ensure schools can respond effectively to emerging challenges. [11014/26]

Question· Written questionHL HL14636answered

Financial Services: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 February 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the role of financial services firms in promoting the adoption of AI tools among UK small and medium-sized enterprises; and how this is being considered in government policy on SME digitali

Question· Written questionHL HL14635answered

New Businesses: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 February 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the development of UK-based startups focused on AI safety and governance technologies; and what steps they are taking to support innovation in AI assurance and security.

Question· Written questionHL HL14637answered

Recruitment: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 February 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government, what steps they are taking to ensure that the use of AI in recruitment processes does not lead to unfair exclusion, bias, or reduced transparency for job applicants.

Question· Written questionHL HL14555answered

Financial Services: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 11 February 2026

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the implications of the increased use of AI to drive cost efficiencies in banking for financial stability, competition and consumer outcomes in the financial services sector.

PreviousPage 48 of 163Next