Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,712France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0801decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(f) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(f) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially, … the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Obligation to state reasons – Interpretation – Right to property – Limitations – Principle of proportionality – Account to be taken of the situation and economic interests of the appellant’s customers.#Case C-801/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2026

Report· XGCELEX 52026XG03201open

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 and Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region as well as Iran’s actions undermining freedom of navigation in the Middle East

European Union · Council of the European Union · 9 June 2026

Report· XGCELEX 52026XG03199open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1226, and Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1225 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region as well as Iran’s actions undermining freedom of navigation in the Middle East

European Union · Council of the European Union · 9 June 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1078_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Meta Platforms, Inc. v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation EU 2022/1925 – Designation of gatekeepers – Concept of ‘core platform service’ – Online social networking service – Number-independent interpersonal communications service – Online intermediation service – Equal treatment – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Important gateway for business users to reach end users – Presumptions – Rebuttal of the presumptions – Article 17(1) and (3) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Conditions for opening a market investigation – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-1078/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1078decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Meta Platforms, Inc. v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation EU 2022/1925 – Designation of gatekeepers – Concept of ‘core platform service’ – Online social networking service – Number-independent interpersonal communications service – Online intermediation service – Equal treatment – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Important gateway for business users to reach end users – Presumptions – Rebuttal of the presumptions – Article 17(1) and (3) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Conditions for opening a market investigation – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-1078/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0483_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#D and Others v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Settlor of the trust included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Case C-483/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0428_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#FZ AR SpA and SX Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Dipartimento del Tesoro, Comitato di Sicurezza Finanziaria and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Trust beneficiary included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Joined Cases C-428/24 and C-476/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0483decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#D and Others v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Settlor of the trust included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Case C-483/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0428decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#FZ AR SpA and SX Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Dipartimento del Tesoro, Comitato di Sicurezza Finanziaria and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Trust beneficiary included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Joined Cases C-428/24 and C-476/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0229decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0229_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0696_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective judicial remedy – Limitations – Principles of legality and proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0294decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#UD, VO, GT et KJ, en leur nom propre et en tant qu’associés de la Società Agricola UD e co. and Others v Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti (AVEPA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Milk and milk products – Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 – Deliveries made to non-approved purchasers – Article 24(1) – Concept of ‘penalty’ – Additional levy payable by the producer – Levy calculated on the basis of the total quantity of the product delivered – Proportionality – Rights of the defence and right to an effective remedy.#Case C-294/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0696decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective judicial remedy – Limitations – Principles of legality and proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0405_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Samer Al Dibs v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Fall of the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to privacy – Damage to reputation.#Case T-405/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0008_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution of confiscation orders – Exceptional situations in which there are substantial grounds to believe, on the basis of specific and objective evidence, that the execution of the confiscation order would, in the particular circumstances of the case, entail a manifest breach of a fundamental right as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to an effective remedy and rights of the defence – No use of effective remedies in the issuing Member State.#Case C-8/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0008decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against D. d.o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution of confiscation orders – Exceptional situations in which there are substantial grounds to believe, on the basis of specific and objective evidence, that the execution of the confiscation order would, in the particular circumstances of the case, entail a manifest breach of a fundamental right as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to an effective remedy and rights of the defence – No use of effective remedies in the issuing Member State.#Case C-8/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0084decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#UAB „EM SYSTEM“ v AB SEB bankas and AS „Citadele banka“ Lietuvos filialas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus – Article 2(1) – Annex I – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures – Inclusion of the name of the shareholder of a company on that list – 50% stake in the capital of that company held by that shareholder – Freezing of the funds of the company, which is not included on the list – Control by a person or entity included on the list of a legal person not included on the list – Criteria for assessment – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence.#Case C-84/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0084_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#UAB „EM SYSTEM“ v AB SEB bankas and AS „Citadele banka“ Lietuvos filialas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus – Article 2(1) – Annex I – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures – Inclusion of the name of the shareholder of a company on that list – 50% stake in the capital of that company held by that shareholder – Freezing of the funds of the company, which is not included on the list – Control by a person or entity included on the list of a legal person not included on the list – Criteria for assessment – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence.#Case C-84/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2026

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next