Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

501 records in EU in 2026

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 134Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0150decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#AlfaStrakhovanie AO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Entry and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(b) and (f) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-150/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1180decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#BW v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Cooperation between police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of Member States – Sky ECC encrypted communications service – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Action for annulment – Act not subject to review – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Processing of personal data by Member States and transfer of such data to Europol – Transfer of personal data by Europol to a Member State – Transfer of personal data from Eurojust to a third country – Non-contractual liability – Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Joint and several liability of Europol and the Member States for unlawful data processing – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Actual damage – Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 – Insufficient coordination by Eurojust of criminal proceedings between a Member State and a third country – Articles 71, 72, 89, 91 and 92 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.#Case T-1180/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1180_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#BW v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Cooperation between police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of Member States – Sky ECC encrypted communications service – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Action for annulment – Act not subject to review – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Processing of personal data by Member States and transfer of such data to Europol – Transfer of personal data by Europol to a Member State – Transfer of personal data from Eurojust to a third country – Non-contractual liability – Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Joint and several liability of Europol and the Member States for unlawful data processing – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Actual damage – Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 – Insufficient coordination by Eurojust of criminal proceedings between a Member State and a third country – Articles 71, 72, 89, 91 and 92 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.#Case T-1180/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0079open

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on individual agreements between the European Union and Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, KosovoFMT:Style_footnote reference,Superscript,Style>* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence., Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia and the Republic of Serbia on roaming on public mobile communications networks

European Union · European Commission · 25 February 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D0792in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/792 of 24 February 2026 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of a broad package of agreements between the European Union, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other part, to consolidate, deepen and expand their bilateral relations, and on the provisional application of the Agreement on the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union Agency for the Space Programme

European Union · EUR-Lex · 24 February 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0103open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee of the Parties of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, on the participation of non-governmental organisations as observers in meetings of the Committee, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 23 February 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0104open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee of the Parties of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, on the participation of non-governmental organisations as observers in meetings of the Committee, with regard to matters related to institutions and public administration of the Union

European Union · European Commission · 23 February 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0089open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Specialised Committee on Level Playing Field for Open and Fair Competition and Sustainable Development established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision to establish a list of individuals who are willing and able to serve as members of the panel of experts established under Article 409 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement

European Union · European Commission · 23 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0158_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Fédération européenne d'associations et d'industries pharmaceutiques (EFPIA) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-158/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0158decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Fédération européenne d'associations et d'industries pharmaceutiques (EFPIA) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-158/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0156decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Accord Healthcare France SAS and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annexes I and III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-156/25, T-157/25, T-159/25 to T-168/25, T-170/25 and T-171/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0169decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Cosmetics Europe - The Personal Care Association v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 9 and 10 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-169/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 February 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0039open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Directive 2006/118/EC on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration and Directive 2008/105/EC on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy

European Union · European Commission · 18 February 2026

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0861_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#MB v Societatea Națională [U].#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Protection against dismissal – National provisions more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers – Parental leave – National rule laying down a general and absolute prohibition on the dismissal of a worker in receipt of a reintegration incentive – Article 16 and Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No implementation of EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-861/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0634_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0056_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Criminal proceedings against MA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Principle of the primacy of EU law – National law alleged to be incompatible with the national Constitution and with EU law – Conditions for referring a matter to a constitutional court – Reasoned assessment of the consequences of the application of EU law – Prior reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling – Article 94(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Determination of the national law applicable to the dispute – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Obligation or entitlement to refer a matter to a constitutional court before making a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling – None.#Case C-56/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0634decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0056decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Criminal proceedings against MA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Principle of the primacy of EU law – National law alleged to be incompatible with the national Constitution and with EU law – Conditions for referring a matter to a constitutional court – Reasoned assessment of the consequences of the application of EU law – Prior reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling – Article 94(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Determination of the national law applicable to the dispute – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Obligation or entitlement to refer a matter to a constitutional court before making a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling – None.#Case C-56/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0212_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 100 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-212/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0210_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 300 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-210/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0209_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Nutris We care about you, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ProbioDefend – Earlier EU word mark Defendyl – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-209/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0211_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 200 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-211/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0213_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 100 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-213/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0693decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Re-inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-693/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0209decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Nutris We care about you, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ProbioDefend – Earlier EU word mark Defendyl – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-209/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0618decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Athom Holding BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark athom Smart Home – Earlier international word mark ATHOM – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-618/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

PreviousPage 10 of 11Next