Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

551 records in EU in 2016

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0041decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 22 June 2016.#Gerard Dowling and Others v Minister for Finance.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irland).#Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 — European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism — Implementing Decision 2011/77/EU — European Union financial assistance to Ireland — Recapitalisation of national banks — Company law — Second Directive 77/91/EEC — Articles 8, 25 and 29 — Recapitalisation of a bank by means of judicial direction order — Increase in share capital without general meeting decision and without the shares issued being offered on a pre-emptive basis to existing shareholders — Issue of new shares at a price lower than their nominal value.#Case C-41/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2016

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0177decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 22 June 2016.#Nelsons GmbH v Ayonnax Nutripharm GmbH and Bachblütentreff Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer information and protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Nutrition and health claims made on foods — Transitional measures — Article 28(2) — Products bearing trade marks or brand names existing before 1 January 2005 — ‘Bach flower’ remedies — European Union mark RESCUE — Products marketed as medicinal products before 1 January 2005 and as foodstuffs after that date.#Case C-177/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0207decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 June 2016.#Nissan Jidosha KK v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Figurative mark including the element ‘CVTC’ — Requests for renewal made in respect of some of the goods or services for which the mark is registered — Further period — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 47 — Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-207/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 June 2016

Record· COCELEX 62015CO0619decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 June 2016.#Eugenia Mocek, Jadwiga Wenta KAJMAN Firma Handlowo-Usługowo-Produkcyjna v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU Trade Mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark in green, white and grey representing the design of a crocodile containing the word element ‘KAJMAN’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the EU figurative mark in black and white representing the design of a crocodile — Partial refusal to register by a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Case C-619/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2016

Proposal· PCCELEX 52016PC0429open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the Position of the Council on the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels, amending Directive 2009/100/EC and repealing Directive 2006/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

European Union · European Commission · 21 June 2016

Proposal· PCCELEX 52016PC0420open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries as regards conferring of delegated and implementing powers upon the Commission for the adoption of certain measures

European Union · European Commission · 21 June 2016

Decision· DCELEX 32016D1123in force

Council Decision (EU) 2016/1123 of 17 June 2016 establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the relevant Committees of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards the proposals for amendments to UN Regulations Nos 9, 11, 13, 13-H, 14, 16, 30, 41, 44, 49, 54, 55, 60, 64, 75, 78, 79, 83, 90, 106, 113, 115, 117, 129 and 134, the proposals for amendments to UN Global Technical Regulations Nos 15 and 16, the proposals for new UN Regulations on Brake Assist Systems (BAS), on Electronic Stability Control (ESC), on Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) and on Tyre Installation, the proposal for a new UN Global Technical Regulation on the measurement procedure for emissions of two- or three-wheeled motor vehicles and the proposal for a new Special Resolution No 2 (S.R.2) for improving the implementation of the 1998 Global Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 17 June 2016

Proposal· PCCELEX 52016PC0280R(01)open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Stabilisation and Association Council established by the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo*, of the other part, concerning a Decision of the Stabilisation and Association Council adopting its rules of procedure

European Union · European Commission · 17 June 2016

Record· COCELEX 62015CO0611decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2016.#L'Oréal SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark AINHOA — Revocation proceedings — Genuine use of a mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 15(1), second para., (a) — Article 51(1)(a) — Proof of use — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rules 22 and 40(5) — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-611/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0614decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2016.#Fútbol Club Barcelona v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark KULE — Earlier national word marks and well-known mark CULE — Relative grounds for refusal — No genuine use of the earlier trade marks — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-614/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2016

Proposal· PCCELEX 52016PC0403open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, in the Association Committee established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, as regards an amendment to Protocol 3 to that Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 16 June 2016

Record· COCELEX 62016CO0043decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2016.#Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Word mark LUCEA LED — Opposition by the proprietor of the word mark LUCEO — Rejection of the opposition — Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Article 56 — Rules of Procedure — Article 186 — Application for legal aid — Suspensive effect on the time limit for bringing an appeal — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-43/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0789decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 June 2016.#Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MEISSEN — Earlier EU and national word and figurative marks MEISSEN, MEISSENER PORZELLAN, HAUS MEISSEN, Meissen and Meissener Porzellan — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Distinctive character and reputation of the earlier marks — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-789/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0361decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 June 2016.#European Commission v Peter McBride and Others.#Appeal — Resource conservation measures and restructuring of the fisheries sector — Requests for increased safety tonnage — Annulment by the European Union judicature of the decision initially rejecting those requests — Article 266 TFEU — Repeal of the legal basis on which that initial decision was founded — Competence and legal basis to adopt new decisions — Annulment by the General Court of new decisions rejecting the requests — Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-361/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0263decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 June 2016.#European Parliament v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) –Decision 2014/198/CFSP — Agreement between the European Union and the United Republic of Tanzania on the conditions of transfer of suspected pirates and associated seized property from the European Union-led naval force to the United Republic of Tanzania — Choice of legal basis — Obligation to inform the European Parliament immediately and fully at all stages of the procedure of negotiation and conclusion of international agreements — Maintenance of the effects of the decision in the event of annulment.#Case C-263/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2016

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0380(03)decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2016.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Proof that inclusion on the list is justified — Manifestly well-founded action.#Case T-380/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2016

Record· FJCELEX 62015FJ0133decided

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 June 2016.#HI v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Article 11 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of loyalty — Article 11a — Conflict of interests — Official responsible for monitoring a project funded by the European Union — Family connection between that official and an employee recruited for the purposes of the project by the company responsible for that project — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Downgrading — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Board — Obligation to state reasons — Duration of the proceedings — Reasonable time — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Ne bis in idem principle — Manifest error of assessment — Commensurate nature of the disciplinary penalty — Mitigating circumstances.#Case F-133/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2016

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0381(03)decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2016.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Proof that inclusion on the list is justified — Manifestly well-founded action.#Case T-381/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2016

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0494(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2016.#Oleksandr Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Proof that inclusion on the list is justified — Manifestly well-founded action.#Case T-494/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2016

Record· COCELEX 62015CO0345decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 60/2012 — Import of ferro-silicon originating, inter alia, in Russia — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 11(3) and (9) — Partial interim review.#Case C-345/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0616decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Productos Asfálticos (PROAS), SA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Excessive duration of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Excessive duration of the procedure before the European Commission — Appeal on the costs.#Case C-616/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0825decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Istituto di ricerche economiche per la pesca e l'acquacoltura - IREPA Onlus v European Commission and Court of Auditors of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Fishing — Italian National Fisheries Data Collection Programme for the period 2009-2010 — Recovery of a part of the advances paid to the applicant — Court of Auditors’ preliminary report — Measure not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Pre-information letters — Debit note — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility.#Case T-825/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0608decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Compañía Española de Petróleos (CEPSA), SA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Excessive duration of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Excessive duration of the procedure before the European Commission — Appeal on the costs.#Case C-608/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0276decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Association — Members not directly concerned — Inadmissibility — Countrywide anti-dumping duty — Individual treatment — Sampling — Rights of the defence — Non-discrimination — Duty of diligence.#Case T-276/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0201decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 9 June 2016.#Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 98/59/EC — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — National legislation conferring upon an administrative authority the power to oppose collective redundancies after assessing the conditions in the labour market, the situation of the undertaking and the interests of the national economy — Acute economic crisis — Particularly high national unemployment rate.#Case C-201/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· COCELEX 62016CO0041decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 June 2016.#Min Liu v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Community designs — Article 7(2) — Registered Community design representing a case for a portable computer — Disclosure of earlier designs prior to the priority date — Application for a declaration of invalidity.#Case C-41/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2016

PreviousPage 11 of 12Next