Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

551 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 124Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0820_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#'Vinal' AD v Direktor na Agentsia 'Mitnitsi'.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 16 – Tax warehouse arrangements – Conditions for the grant of an authorisation for the opening and operation of a tax warehouse by an authorised warehousekeeper – Failure to satisfy those conditions – Final withdrawal of the authorisation, together with the imposition of a financial penalty – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Ne bis in idem principle – Proportionality.#Case C-820/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0027_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#Volkswagen Group Italia SpA and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Penalty imposed concerning unfair commercial practices – Criminal nature of the penalty – Criminal penalty imposed in a Member State after the adoption of a penalty concerning unfair commercial practices in another Member State but which became final before the latter penalty – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Conditions – Coordination of proceedings and penalties.#Case C-27/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0055decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#NK v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Feldkirch.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Vorarlberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Final termination of a first set of proceedings brought for an infringement of a provision of national legislation on games of chance – Administrative penalty of a criminal nature imposed for the same acts for an infringement of a different provision of that legislation – First set of proceedings terminated on account of an incorrect legal classification of the offence committed.#Case C-55/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0124_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#Zoi Apostolopoulou and Anastasia Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Grant agreements concluded in the context of various European programmes – Judgments of the General Court finding a breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company – Partnership governed by Greek law – Company placed under liquidation – Proceedings before the national courts brought against the partners in the beneficiary company, seeking enforcement of the judgments of the General Court ordering recovery of the grants – Allegedly false assertions made by the European Commission in the national proceedings – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Rule of EU law.#Case C-124/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0523_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Alexander Evgenevich Shatrov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.#Cases T-523/21 and T-216/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0097_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Synesis TAA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.#Cases T-97/21 and T-215/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0065(01)_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Prohibition on the sale, supply, transfer or export of certain goods and services – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Material inaccuracy of the facts – Manifest error of assessment – Public international law.#Case T-65/18 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0488_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Kaufdas.online sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark KAUFDAS ONLINE – Earlier EU word mark KAUFLAND and earlier figurative mark Kaufland – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-488/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0163_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Transformers Manufacturing Company Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TMC TRANSFORMERS – International registration of the earlier figurative mark TMC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0328decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Korres AE - Fysika Proionta v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME – Earlier national word mark HYDRABIO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – First sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-328/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0324decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Ecoalf Recycled Fabrics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark BECAUSE THERE IS NO PLANET B – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment.#Case T-324/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0097decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Synesis TAA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.#Cases T-97/21 and T-215/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0745decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen - DGNB eV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved white line in a dark square – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-745/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0065(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Prohibition on the sale, supply, transfer or export of certain goods and services – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Material inaccuracy of the facts – Manifest error of assessment – Public international law.#Case T-65/18 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0552decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#mataharispaclub s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SpaClubMatahari – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Inadmissibility – Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.#Case T-552/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0549decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Prolactal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PROLACTAL – Earlier national figurative mark Prolàctea – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 and Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-549/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0167decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Transformers Manufacturing Company Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TMC TRANSFORMERS – International registration of the earlier figurative mark TMC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-167/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0305decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Viktor Filippovich Rashnikov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Listing and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Notion of ‘leading businessperson’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-305/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0163decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Transformers Manufacturing Company Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TMC TRANSFORMERS – International registration of the earlier figurative mark TMC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0305_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Viktor Filippovich Rashnikov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Listing and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Notion of ‘leading businessperson’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-305/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0328_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Korres AE - Fysika Proionta v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME – Earlier national word mark HYDRABIO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – First sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-328/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0167_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Transformers Manufacturing Company Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TMC TRANSFORMERS – International registration of the earlier figurative mark TMC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-167/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0745_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen - DGNB eV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved white line in a dark square – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-745/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0549_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Prolactal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PROLACTAL – Earlier national figurative mark Prolàctea – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 and Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-549/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0324_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Ecoalf Recycled Fabrics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark BECAUSE THERE IS NO PLANET B – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment.#Case T-324/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0552_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#mataharispaclub s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SpaClubMatahari – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Inadmissibility – Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.#Case T-552/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0473_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ – Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-473/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0523decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Alexander Evgenevich Shatrov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Error of assessment.#Cases T-523/21 and T-216/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0488decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Kaufdas.online sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark KAUFDAS ONLINE – Earlier EU word mark KAUFLAND and earlier figurative mark Kaufland – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-488/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0473decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ – Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-473/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2023

Proposal· PCCELEX 52023PC0522open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the adaptation of technical specifications of the smart tachograph 2

European Union · European Commission · 13 September 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0524decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2023.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sberbank Europe AG v Council of the European Union and Others.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme – Identification of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-524/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0523decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2023.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v Council of the European Union and Others.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme – Identification of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-523/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0411decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2023.#YS v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Interim relief – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Derived unlawfulness – Candidates nominated by Greece – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-411/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0524_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2023.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sberbank Europe AG v Council of the European Union and Others.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme – Identification of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-524/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0411_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2023.#YS v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Interim relief – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Derived unlawfulness – Candidates nominated by Greece – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-411/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0015_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#RF v Finanzamt G.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Development cooperation – Direct taxation – Income tax – Exemption granted to employees assigned to development aid projects financed from national budgetary resources – Difference in treatment of employees assigned to a project financed by the European Development Fund – Article 63(1) TFEU – Free movement of capital – Article 4(3) TEU – Duty of sincere cooperation – Facilitating the tasks of the European Union – Articles 208 and 210 TFEU – Development cooperation – Obligation to promote policies in the area of development cooperation – Invocability.#Case C-15/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0209_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Criminal proceedings against.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Directive 2013/48/EU – Scope – National legislation which does not refer to the concept of a suspect – Preliminary stage of the criminal proceedings – Coercive measure of personal search and seizure – Retrospective authorisation by the court having jurisdiction – Lack of judicial review of measures to obtain evidence – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective exercise of the rights of defence of suspects and of accused persons during the judicial review of measures to obtain evidence.#Case C-209/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0216decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” and YN v Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Ploieşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Independence of judges – National legislation altering the scheme for the promotion of judges.#Case C-216/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0291decided

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 7 September 2023.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Appeal – Medicinal products for human use – Application for marketing authorisation – Independence of experts consulted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to good administration – Requirement of objective impartiality – Criteria for verifying the absence of conflict of interest – EMA’s policy on competing interests – Activities as a principal researcher, consultant or strategic adviser for the pharmaceutical industry – Rival products – Re-examination procedure – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 56, Article 62, Article 63 – EMA Guidelines – Consultation of a scientific advisory group (SAG) or an ad hoc expert group.#Case C-291/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0135decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Patrick Breyer v European Research Executive Agency (REA).#Appeal – Access to documents of the institutions of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – First indent of Article 4(2) – Exception to the right of access – Protection of commercial interests – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Documents relating to the ‘iBorderCtrl: Intelligent Portable Border Control System’ research project – Decision of the European Research Executive Agency (REA) refusing access to certain information – Overriding public interest.#Case C-135/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0303decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 September 2023.#CROSS Zlín, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procedures for the review of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Access to review procedures – Articles 2(3) and 2a(2) – Obligation for Member States to provide for a review procedure with suspensive effect – Review body of first instance – Review relating to a contract award decision – Article 2(9) – Body responsible for review procedures of a non-judicial character – Conclusion of a public contract before lodging of a judicial action against a decision by that body – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-303/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0226decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Nexive Commerce Srl and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal services in the European Union – Directive 97/67/EC – Fourth indent of the second subparagraph of Article 9(2) and Article 9(3) – Article 22 – Undertakings in the postal sector – Contribution to the operational costs of the regulatory authority for the postal sector – Obligation – Financial burden borne exclusively by market participants, without distinction according to the type of services provided – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination.#Case C-226/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0234decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 September 2023.#Défense Active des Amateurs d’Armes ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 91/477/EEC – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Firearms prohibited or subject to authorisation – Semi-automatic firearms – Directive 91/477, as amended by Directive (EU) 2017/853 – Article 7(4a) – Power of Member States to confirm, renew or prolong authorisations – Presumed impossibility of using that power in respect of semi-automatic firearms converted to fire blanks or into salute or acoustic weapons – Validity – Article 17(1) and Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-234/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2023

PreviousPage 11 of 12Next