Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

651 records in EU in 2018

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 6,057Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 295Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0444open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Working Party on customs questions affecting transport and in the Inland Transport Committee in connection with the envisaged adoption of a new Convention on the facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in international traffic by rail

European Union · European Commission · 8 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0072decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#Gabriele Schmid v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Revocation proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Steirisches Kürbiskernöl — Protected geographical indication — Article 15, Article 51(1)(a) and Article 55(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18, Article 58(1)(a) and Article 62(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the mark — Use as a trade mark.#Case T-72/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0300decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 7 June 2018.#Hochtief AG v Budapest Főváros Önkormányzata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures — Directive 89/665/EC — Action for damages — Article 2(6) — National rules making the admissibility of any action for damages subject to a prior and definitive determination of the illegality of the decision of the contracting authority giving rise to the damage alleged — Actions for annulment — Prior action before an arbitration committee — Judicial review of arbitral decisions — National rules excluding pleas not raised before the arbitration committee — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence.#Case C-300/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0671decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#Anastasia-Soultana Gaki v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Action for annulment — Application made to the Joint Supervisory Body of Europol regarding the issuing of a European arrest warrant and the entry of data into the Schengen Information System — Lack of jurisdiction of the Joint Supervisory Body.#Case C-671/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0807decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark N & NF TRADING — Earlier EU figurative mark NF ENVIRONNEMENT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-807/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0882decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#Sipral World, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DOLFINA — No genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-882/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0363decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#Equipolymers Srl and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in India, Thailand and Taiwan — Implementing Decision 2013/226/EU — Decision to terminate the expiry review proceeding without imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty — Non-contractual liability — Causal link — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-363/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0073decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#Cotécnica, SCCL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘cotecnica’ and ‘optima’ — Grounds for refusing enforcement — Article 8(1)(b) — Dominant character of an element of a complex mark which is weakly distinctive and laudatory — Likelihood of confusion.#Case C-73/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0803decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark SALMEX — Earlier three-dimensional national mark — Competence of the Board of Appeal to examine of its own motion whether the earlier mark had been put to genuine use — Article 64(1) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 71(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-803/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0258decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-258/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0264decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.#Uponor Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark SMATRIX — Prior EU figurative mark AsyMatrix — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Failure to assess an item of evidence produced before the Opposition Division.#Case T-264/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0210decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.#Olena Lukash v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to fulfil criteria for listing — Error of fact — Error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Right to an effective remedy — Right to property.#Case T-210/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0026decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 6 June 2018.#Birkenstock Sales GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a pattern of wavy, crisscrossing lines — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Surface pattern.#Case C-26/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0149decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 6 June 2018.#Bastei Lübbe GmbH & Co. KG v Michael Strotzer.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Compensation in the event of file-sharing in breach of copyright — Internet connection accessible by members of the owner’s family — Exemption from liability of the owner without the need to specify the nature of the use of the connection by the family member — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 7.#Case C-149/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0612decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2018.#Criminal proceedings against Nikolay Kolev and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 325 TFEU — Fraud or any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the European Union in customs matters — Effectiveness of prosecution — Closure of criminal proceedings — Reasonable time — Directive 2012/13/EU — Right of a person to be informed of the charges against him — Right of access to case materials — Directive 2013/48/EU — Right of access to a lawyer.#Case C-612/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0111decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2018.#Prada SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark THE RICH PRADA — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks PRADA — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation(EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Detriment to the distinctive character or repute — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion.#Case T-111/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0073decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 5 June 2018.#French Republic v European Parliament.#Action for annulment — Institutional law — Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union — European Parliament — Concept of ‘budget session’ held in Strasbourg (France) — Article 314 TFEU — Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session in Brussels (Belgium).#Case C-73/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0900decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 June 2018.#Casual Dreams, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Reputation — Advantage unfairly taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.#Case T-900/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0314decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 May 2018.#Nosio SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark MEZZA — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Restriction of goods — Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-314/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0626decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 31 May 2018.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Decision of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) — Decision approving the submission of a reflection paper to an international body — Admissibility — Challengeable act — Exclusive, shared or complementary competence of the European Union — Action of the European Union alone in an international body or participation of the Member States alongside it — Conservation of marine biological resources — Fisheries — Protection of the environment — Research — Marine protected areas (MPAs) — Antarctic Treaty — Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources — Weddell Sea and Ross Sea.#Joined Cases C-626/15 and C-659/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0244decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 31 May 2018.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Decision (EU) 2017/477 — Position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part, as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies — Article 218(9) TFEU — Decision establishing the positions to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in a body set up by an international agreement — Agreement some of whose provisions may be linked with the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Voting rule.#Case C-244/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0461decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 May 2018.#Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Misuse of powers — Principle of sound administration — Principle of the force of res judicata — Infringement of Article 266 TFEU — Manifest error of assessment — Fundamental rights — Proportionality — Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-461/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0483decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 31 May 2018.#Zsolt Sziber v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 7(1) — Loan agreements denominated in foreign currency — National legislation providing for specific procedural requirements when the fairness of terms is challenged — Principle of equivalence — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-483/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0259decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 31 May 2018.#Confederazione Generale Italiana dei Trasporti e della Logistica (Confetra) and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Postal services in the European Union — Directive 97/67/EC — Articles 2, 7 and 9 — Directive 2008/6/EC — Definition of ‘postal service provider’ — Haulage, freight-forwarding and express mail undertakings providing services involving the clearance, sorting, transport and distribution of postal items — Authorisation required for the provision of postal services to the public — Contribution to the costs of providing universal service.#Joined Cases C-259/16 and C-260/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0190decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 May 2018.#Lu Zheng v Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Scope — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Third-country national transporting a significant amount of undeclared cash in his luggage — Obligation to declare the sum being taken out of Spanish territory — Penalties — Proportionality.#Case C-190/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 May 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0519decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2018.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for registration of the word marks MASTER PRECISE, MASTER SMOKY, MASTER SHAPE, MASTER DUO and MASTER DRAMA — Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS — Rejection of the applications for registration — Inadequate statement of reasons — To be considered of the Court’s own motion.#Joined Cases C-519/17 P and C-522/17 P to C-525/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 May 2018

Record· TOCELEX 62016TO0664(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 May 2018.#PJ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Replacement of a party to the proceedings — Transfer of the rights of the EU trade mark applicant — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant for replacement — Inadmissibility.#Case T-664/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 May 2018

PreviousPage 13 of 14Next