Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

751 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 142United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0205decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 11 July 2024.#Engie România SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 3(1) – Obligations of Member States towards natural gas undertakings – Consumer protection – Articles 40 and 41 – Powers of the regulatory authority – Breach by a natural gas undertaking of its duty of transparency towards consumers – Duplication of penalties for the same unlawful conduct – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence – Ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations on the exercise of that fundamental right – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-205/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0265_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against DM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Infringements of procedural rules affecting the indictment which are substantive but which are capable of being remedied – Right of the accused person to bring to an end the criminal proceedings initiated against him or her.#Case C-265/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0196decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#CL and Others v DB and Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1)(a) and Article 2 – Obligation to inform and consult workers’ representatives – Scope – Termination of employment contracts on the ground of the employer’s retirement – Articles 27 and 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-196/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0265decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against DM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad - Sliven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Substantive infringements of procedural rules, but which are capable of being remedied, affecting the indictment – Right of the accused person to have the criminal proceedings against him or her brought to an end.#Case C-265/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0419decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 July 2024.#CN v Nemzeti Földügyi Központ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Right of usufruct over agricultural land – National legislation extinguishing, without compensation, the rights of usufruct – Judgment establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Reinstatement in the land register of a previously deleted right of usufruct, without examination of the lawfulness of the original registration – Finality of the original registration.#Case C-419/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0632decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-632/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0632_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#AB Volvo v Transsaqui S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Action for compensation for damage caused by a practice prohibited by Article 101(1) TFEU and by Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Document instituting proceedings served at the seat of a subsidiary of the defendant – Validity of the writ of summons – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-632/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0248decided

Order of the Court of 11 July 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-248/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0369decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 11 July 2024.#'Vivacom Bulgaria' EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad and Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Liability of a Member State for damage caused to individuals by an infringement of EU law – Infringement by a national court adjudicating at last instance in relation to value added tax (VAT) – Jurisdiction of a court adjudicating at last instance while having the capacity of defendant in the dispute – Composition of the adjudicating panel.#Case C-369/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0196_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#CL and Others v DB, héritière universelle de FC and Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1)(a) and Article 2 – Obligation to inform and consult workers’ representatives – Scope – Termination of employment contracts on the ground of the employer’s retirement – Articles 27 and 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-196/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0248_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 July 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-248/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0541_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Laura Food Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Thé Vert de Chine AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011 – Earlier EU figurative mark Grand Lion 4011 B552 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-541/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0541decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Laura Food Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Thé Vert de Chine AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011 – Earlier EU figurative mark Grand Lion 4011 B552 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-541/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0473_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Bartex Bartol sp. z o.o sp. k. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark duch puszczy – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 16(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-473/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0123_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Ecocert India Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-123/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0473decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Bartex Bartol sp. z o.o sp. k. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark duch puszczy – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 16(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-473/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0309decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Vladimir Rashevsky v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(a), (f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a), (f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Cases T-309/22 and T-739/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0123decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Ecocert India Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-123/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0104decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 July 2024.#Hungary v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the correspondence addressed to the Commission by the Hungarian authorities concerning a draft call for proposals co-financed by the European Union within the framework of European structural and investment funds – Documents originating from a Member State – Objection by the Member State – Objection relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Concept of ‘document relating to a matter where the decision has not been taken by the institution’ – Obligation to state reasons – Sincere cooperation.#Case T-104/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0104_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 July 2024.#Hungary v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the correspondence addressed to the Commission by the Hungarian authorities concerning a draft call for proposals co-financed by the European Union within the framework of European structural and investment funds – Documents originating from a Member State – Objection by the Member State – Objection relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Concept of ‘document relating to a matter where the decision has not been taken by the institution’ – Obligation to state reasons – Sincere cooperation.#Case T-104/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0732_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2024.#Rǎzvan-Eugen Nicolescu and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Absence of the required unanimity – Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-732/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0732decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2024.#Rǎzvan-Eugen Nicolescu and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Absence of the required unanimity – Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-732/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0787_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Required unanimity not achieved – Manifest inadmissibility in part of the action at first instance – Request for a time limit capable of allowing the appeal to be ‘resumed’ – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part of the General Court of the European Union – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-787/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0786_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Obligation to adopt a decision pursuant to the Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-786/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0295decided

Order of the Court of 4 July 2024.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-295/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0295_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 4 July 2024.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-295/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0787decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Required unanimity not achieved – Manifest inadmissibility in part of the action at first instance – Request for a time limit capable of allowing the appeal to be ‘resumed’ – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part of the General Court of the European Union – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-787/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0786decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Obligation to adopt a decision pursuant to the Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-786/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0597_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Sophienwald AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Sw Sophienwald – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-597/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0329decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Canalones Castilla, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing water-collection guttering or a waterspout – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of disclosure.#Case T-329/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0329_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Canalones Castilla, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing water-collection guttering or a waterspout – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of disclosure.#Case T-329/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0294decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Siberian Coal Energy Company AO (Suek) v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-294/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0293(01)decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#EuroChem Group AG v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-293/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0358decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#AC Marca Brands, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Sanitix – Earlier EU figurative mark SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Increased distinctiveness of the earlier mark.#Case T-358/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0345decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#AC Marca Brands, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SANITIEN – Earlier EU figurative and word marks SANYTOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Increased distinctiveness of earlier marks.#Case T-345/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0294_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Siberian Coal Energy Company AO (Suek) v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Reference to the applicant’s name in the grounds for including another person’s name on the list – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-294/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0742_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-742/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2024

PreviousPage 15 of 16Next