Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

901 records in EU in 2022

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0603decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Access to the international road haulage market – Cabotage – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition according to which an applicant must be individually concerned – Trade association – Effective judicial protection – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-603/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0673decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#EP v Préfet du Gers and Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire d’Auch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – National of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland residing in a Member State – Article 9 TEU – Articles 20 and 22 TFEU – Right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections in the Member State of residence. – Article 50 TEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Consequences of the withdrawal of a Member State from the Union – Removal from the electoral roll in the Member State of residence – Articles 39 and 40 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Validity of Decision (EU) 2020/135.#Case C-673/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0203decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 9 June 2022.#Criminal proceedings against DELTA STROY 2003.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Applicability – Imposition of a financial penalty on a legal person for non-payment of tax debts – Concept of ‘confiscation’ – Articles 48, 49 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Penalties of a criminal nature – Principles of the presumption of innocence and the legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded – Proportionality.#Case C-203/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0673_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#EP v Préfet du Gers and Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – National of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland residing in a Member State – Article 9 TEU – Articles 20 and 22 TFEU – Right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections in the Member State of residence. – Article 50 TEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Consequences of the withdrawal of a Member State from the Union – Removal from the electoral roll in the Member State of residence – Articles 39 and 40 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Validity of Decision (EU) 2020/135.#Case C-673/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0293_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022 (Extracts).#Ulrike Muschaweck v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark UM – Genuine use of the mark – Use with the consent of the proprietor – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark – Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set.#Case T-293/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0026_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Apple Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT – No genuine use of the marks – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0738_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8 (1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-738/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0026decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Apple Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT – No genuine use of the marks – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0293decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022 (Extracts).#Ulrike Muschaweck v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark UM – Genuine use of the mark – Use with the consent of the proprietor – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark – Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set.#Case T-293/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0738decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-738/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0355decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB, DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 – Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0621_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#EMCS ltd. v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Equal treatment – Principle of transparency – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-621/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0433decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Vitronic Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Enforcement Trailer – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-433/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0433_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Vitronic Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Enforcement Trailer – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-433/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0621decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#EMCS ltd. v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Equal treatment – Principle of transparency – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-621/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0355_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 – Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0255open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Sub-Committee on Geographical Indications established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the Sub-Committee on Geographical Indications

European Union · European Commission · 8 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0194_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 June 2022.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-194/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0212decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 June 2022.#SES Astra SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Article 40, second paragraph, second sentence, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Dispute between a Member State and an Institution of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Dismissal.#Case C-212/22 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0194decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 June 2022.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-194/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0212_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 June 2022.#SES Astra SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Article 40, second paragraph, second sentence, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Dispute between a Member State and an Institution of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Dismissal.#Case C-212/22 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0545_SUMdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-545/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0547_SUMdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Romania v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-547/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0545decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-545/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0547decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Romania v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-547/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0353_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Air traffic services provider – Decision to close airspace – Exercise of the powers of a public authority – Airspace user – Airlines – Right of appeal against a decision to close airspace – Article 58 TFEU – Freedom to provide services in the field of transport – Articles 16 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-353/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0299_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#EM v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – European Parliament – Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 7 – Transfer – Article 12 and Article 12a(3) – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Failure to assign tasks – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Request for assistance – Loss or harm – Compensation.#Case C-299/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0299decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#EM v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – European Parliament – Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 7 – Transfer – Article 12 and Article 12a(3) – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Failure to assign tasks – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Request for assistance – Loss or harm – Compensation.#Case C-299/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0353decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de l’Entreprise du Hainaut, division de Charleroi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Air traffic services provider – Decision to close airspace – Exercise of the powers of a public authority – Airspace user – Airlines – Right of appeal against a decision to close airspace – Article 58 TFEU – Freedom to provide services in the field of transport – Articles 16 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-353/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0241decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 June 2022.#I. L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 15(1) – Detention – Grounds for detention – General criterion based on the risk that the effective enforcement of the removal would be compromised – Risk that the person concerned would commit a criminal offence – Consequences of the establishment of the offence and the imposition of a penalty – Complication of the removal process – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restriction of the fundamental right to liberty – Requirement of a legal basis – Requirements of clarity, predictability and accessibility – Protection against arbitrariness.#Case C-241/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0001decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 2 June 2022.#MC v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT – Article 325(1) TFEU – Obligation to counter illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the European Union – VAT debts of a taxable legal person – National legislation which provides for the joint and several liability of the non-taxable manager of the legal person – Transfers made in bad faith by the manager – Depletion of the legal person’s assets leading to insolvency – Failure to pay the amounts of VAT payable by the legal person within the prescribed time limits – Default interest – Proportionality.#Case C-1/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0363decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyj Octyabr" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-363/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0355decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyj Octyabr" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-355/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0723decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Initial inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Errors of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Foreseeability of acts of the European Union.#Case T-723/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0363_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyj Octyabr" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-363/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0355_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyj Octyabr" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0723_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Initial inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Errors of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Foreseeability of acts of the European Union.#Case T-723/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0246open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on proposals for modifications to UN regulations Nos 12, 13, 13-H, 22, 24, 48, 49, 51, 53, 54, 74, 79, 85, 86, 90, 100, 106, 109, 117, 127, 129, 131, 135, 136, 137, 141, 145, 148, 149, 150, 157 and 162, on a proposal for modifications to UN global technical regulation (GTR) No 2, on a proposal for a new UN regulation on reverse warning, on a proposal for a new UN GTR on durability of pollution control devices for two and three-wheelers, on a proposal for a new consolidated resolution concerning exhaust ultra-fine particle numbers measurement for heavy duty vehicles, and on a proposal for authorisation to develop amendment 4 to UN GTR No 3

European Union · European Commission · 31 May 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0193decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 May 2022.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case – No urgency.#Case T-193/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 May 2022

PreviousPage 18 of 19Next