Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Nuclear energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

4,361 records

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 936United States · 792Austria · 783Germany · 673Netherlands · 551Ireland · 291European Union · 242France · 93Search this topic

Records

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 105 (119th)referred

Affirming the threats to world stability from a nuclear weapons-capable Islamic Republic of Iran.

United States · United States Congress · 4 February 2025

This resolution affirms that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons is a credible threat to the United States and an existential threat to Israel and other allies and partners in the Middle East.  The resolution also (1) demands that Iran cease engaging in activities such as enriching uranium and developing a nuclear warhead, and (2) asserts that all options should be considered to address the nuclear threat posed by Iran.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 100 (119th)referred

Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces.

United States · United States Congress · 4 February 2025

This resolution condemns Russia's nuclear escalatory rhetoric and implied threats on the potential use of nuclear weapons in the context of its invasion of Ukraine. The resolution also (1) condemns Russia's purported suspension of participation in the New START Treaty, (2) emphasizes the value of arms control agreements between the United States and Russia, and (3) calls on the administration to continue pursuing nuclear arms control and risk reduction with Russia and China. 

Question· Written questionHL HL4651answered

Nuclear Power: Finance

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 3 February 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government when they will publish the consultation on nuclear power being classed as environmentally sustainable in the green taxonomy; and what plans they have to make nuclear energy eligible for green financing.

Bill· SS. 369 (119th)referred

NO GOTION Act

United States · United States Congress · 3 February 2025

No Official Giveaways Of Taxpayers’ Income to Oppressive Nations Act or the NO GOTION Act This bill prohibits certain entities associated with China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or the Maduro regime of Venezuela from claiming various energy-related federal tax incentives. Specifically, certain energy-related federal tax incentives may not be claimed by the government, a government instrumentality, or an agency of China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or the regime of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela; any entity that is organized under the laws of or is headquartered in one of these countries; or any entity that is owned, controlled, directed, or influenced by or that has certain financial or contractual connections with any such government, government instrumentality, agency, or entity. Such entities may not claim the federal tax credits for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property, second-generation biofuel, biodiesel fuel, sustainable aviation fuel, renewable electricity production, carbon sequestration, zero-emission nuclear power production, clean hydrogen production, clean commercial vehicles, advanced manufacturing production, clean electricity production, clean fuel production, investments in energy property, advanced energy projects, clean electricity investment, biodiesel mixtures, alternative fuel, and alternative fuel mixtures. Further, such entities are prohibited from claiming the federal tax deduction for energy efficient improvements to commercial buildings. Finally, such entities are not entitled to a credit or refund of federal excise taxes paid on biodiesel, alternative fuel, or sustainable aviation fuel mixtures produced by the entities.

Question· Written questionHL HL4571answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Wales

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 29 January 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government what sites in Wales currently house or have in the past 20 years housed a nuclear reactor, including university and medical locations.

Resolution· SRESS.Res. 43 (119th)referred

A resolution affirming the threats to world stability from a nuclear weapons-capable Islamic Republic of Iran.

United States · United States Congress · 29 January 2025

This resolution affirms that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons is a credible threat to the United States and an existential threat to Israel and other allies and partners in the Middle East.  The resolution also (1) demands that Iran cease engaging in activities such as enriching uranium and developing a nuclear warhead, and (2) asserts that all options should be considered to address the nuclear threat posed by Iran.

Question· Written questionUIN 27019answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 28 January 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of (a) the UK's nuclear energy capacity on delivering the AI Opportunities Action Plan, (b) the costs of regulatory processes on building n

Bill· SS. 243 (119th)referred

Radiation Exposure Compensation Reauthorization Act

United States · United States Congress · 24 January 2025

Radiation Exposure Compensation Reauthorization Act   This bill reauthorizes and expands programs that compensate individuals who were exposed to radiation during certain nuclear testing or uranium mining and who subsequently developed medical conditions, including cancers. Under current law, compensation is payable to individuals based on requirements including the (1) dates when exposure occurred, (2) duration of exposure, (3) type of exposure, and (4) resulting medical condition.  Among other changes to this program, the bill (1) extends the eligible dates when qualifying atmospheric exposure occurred, (2) authorizes compensation to individuals with combined work histories in uranium mining, (3) adds core drilling as an eligible mining occupation, and (4) increases the amount of compensation awarded to qualifying individuals.  The bill also expands this program to compensate individuals located in specified areas in Alaska, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee associated with waste from the Manhattan Project and who subsequently developed specified types of cancer. The bill extends until five years after this bill's enactment the statute of limitations for the filing of claims.  The bill also expands eligibility under an existing occupational illness compensation program for former Department of Energy employees. The bill also establishes a grant program for institutions of higher education to study the epidemiological impacts of uranium mining and milling among individuals without occupational exposure. The bill directs the Government Accountability Office to study and report to Congress on the unmet medical benefits coverage for individuals who were exposed to radiation in atmospheric nuclear tests conducted by the federal government.

Question· Written questionHL HL4387answered

North Korea: Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 23 January 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the new administration in the USA about recognising the Democratic People's Republic of Korea as a nuclear power.

Bill· HRH.R. 669 (119th)referred

Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2025

United States · United States Congress · 23 January 2025

Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2025 This bill prohibits using federal funds to conduct a first-use nuclear strike unless Congress expressly authorizes such a strike pursuant to a declaration of war. A first-use nuclear strike is an attack using nuclear weapons against an enemy without confirming that there has been a nuclear strike against the United States, its territories, or its allies.

Question· Written questionUIN 25714answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Scotland

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 22 January 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, what discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on new nuclear power stations in Scotland.

Question· Written questionUIN 25718answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Construction

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 22 January 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, when the Community Benefits Package will be published.

Bill· SS. 181 (119th)referred

A bill to require agencies submit zero-based budgets.

United States · United States Congress · 22 January 2025

This bill requires federal agencies to submit zero-based budgets to the Office of Management and Budget and the congressional budget committees .  Under the bill, a  zero-based budget is a systematic budget analysis in which managers (1) examine current objectives, operations, and costs; (2) consider alternative ways of carrying out programs or activities; and (3) rank different programs or activities by order of importance. The bill also requires federal agencies to submit recommendations to reduce spending by at least 2% from the previous year's levels. The Department of Defense and the National Nuclear Security Administration are exempt from this requirement.

Bill· SS. 192 (119th)referred

Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2025

United States · United States Congress · 22 January 2025

Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2025 This bill prohibits using federal funds to conduct a first-use nuclear strike unless Congress expressly authorizes such a strike pursuant to a declaration of war. A first-use nuclear strike is an attack using nuclear weapons against an enemy without confirming that there has been a nuclear strike against the United States, its territories, or its allies.

Question· Written questionUIN 24987answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Migrant Workers

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 20 January 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, pursuant to the Answer of 19 December 2024 to Question 20338 on Nuclear Power Stations: Migrant Workers, what his Department's definition is of critical systems for nuclear power plants.

Bill· HRH.R. 509 (119th)referred

Western Hemisphere Nearshoring Act

United States · United States Congress · 16 January 2025

Western Hemisphere Nearshoring Act This bill provides assistance for corporations to relocate operations from China to Latin America or Caribbean (LAC) countries and specifies actions to expand trade and nuclear energy agreements with LAC countries.  Specifically, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation must use at least 10% of its funding to finance moving, workforce development, and facility construction costs associated with such relocations. Tariffs collected by the United States on goods manufactured in China shall be used to fund such assistance. The President must provide duty-free or other preferential treatment for goods and services produced in a LAC country by a corporation that received relocation assistance under this bill. A corporation must meet certain conditions to receive these benefits, including creating sufficient jobs in the LAC country and guaranteeing that the corporation will not be controlled by China, Russia, or other foreign adversary government. State-owned enterprises are not eligible.  Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative must start trade negotiations with each LAC country that does not have a free trade agreement with the United States if the country meets certain conditions (such as reducing economic reliance on China). The President is authorized to start negotiations with a LAC country for the sale of nuclear reactors if these same conditions are met and the sale does not threaten U.S. national security.  Neither Cuba nor Venezuela qualify as a LAC country unless the Department of State certifies that the country has taken certain actions, including holding free and fair elections.

Bill· HRH.R. 475 (119th)referred

Sanction Russian Nuclear Safety Violators Act of 2025

United States · United States Congress · 16 January 2025

Sanction Russian Nuclear Safety Violators Act of 2025 This bill requires the President to impose visa- and property-blocking sanctions on foreign persons who endanger the integrity or safety of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in southeastern Ukraine or who undermine Ukrainian operational control of the power plant. The bill provides certain exceptions to such sanctions (1) to comply with international obligations, (2) to provide humanitarian assistance, or (3) for those seeking to reestablish Ukrainian operational control of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.

Bill· HRH.R. 524 (119th)referred

NO GOTION Act

United States · United States Congress · 16 January 2025

No Official Giveaways Of Taxpayers’ Income to Oppressive Nations Act or the NO GOTION Act This bill prohibits an entity that is created in, organized in, or controlled (in the aggregate) by China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea, or an entity controlled (in the aggregate) by one or more of such entities, from claiming multiple energy-related federal tax credits and incentives. Specifically, the bill prohibits such entities from claiming the federal tax credits for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property, second-generation biofuel, biodiesel fuel, sustainable aviation fuel, renewable electricity production, carbon sequestration, zero-emission nuclear power production, clean hydrogen production, clean commercial vehicles, advanced manufacturing production, clean electricity production, clean fuel production, investments in energy property, advanced energy projects, clean electricity investment, biodiesel mixtures, alternative fuel, and alternative fuel mixtures. Further, such entities are prohibited from claiming the federal tax deduction for energy efficient improvements to commercial buildings. Finally, such entities are not entitled to a credit or refund of federal excise taxes paid on biodiesel, alternative fuel, or sustainable aviation fuel mixtures produced by the entities.

Bill· SS. 101 (119th)referred

Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act

United States · United States Congress · 15 January 2025

Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act This bill prohibits the Department of Energy (DOE) from using the Nuclear Waste Fund for certain activities related to radioactive waste disposal unless DOE has entered into a written agreement for a repository with (1) the governor of the state in which the proposed repository will be located, (2) affected local governments, (3) local governments contiguous to the affected local governments if spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will be transported through them for disposal at the repository, and (4) affected Indian tribes.

Bill· HRH.R. 466 (119th)referred

Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act

United States · United States Congress · 15 January 2025

Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act This bill prohibits the Department of Energy (DOE) from using the Nuclear Waste Fund for certain activities related to radioactive waste disposal unless DOE has entered into a written agreement for a repository with (1) the governor of the state in which the proposed repository will be located, (2) affected local governments, (3) local governments contiguous to the affected local governments if spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will be transported through them for disposal at the repository, and (4) affected Indian tribes.

Question· Written questionUIN 23757answered

Nuclear Power: Energy Supply

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 14 January 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what his Department's target is for nuclear capacity in gigawatts by (a) 2030, (b) 2040 and (c) 2050.

Bill· HRH.R. 310 (119th)referred

Restoring Energy Market Freedom Act

United States · United States Congress · 9 January 2025

Restoring Energy Market Freedom Act This bill repeals multiple business tax credits related to the production and sale of energy. Specifically, the bill repeals the renewable electricity production tax credit (for electricity using wind, solar, or other specific types of renewable energy produced by a qualified facility for which construction began before 2025); clean electricity production tax credit (for electricity produced using a qualified facility that has no greenhouse gas emissions and was placed into service in 2025 or after); advanced nuclear production tax credit (for electricity produced and sold by a qualified nuclear power facility placed into service before 2021); zero-emission nuclear power production tax credit (for electricity produced and sold by a qualified nuclear power facility between 2024 and 2032); carbon sequestration tax credit (for the capture and sequestration of carbon oxide); clean hydrogen production tax credit (for clean hydrogen produced at a qualified clean production facility); advanced manufacturing production tax credit (for the production and sale of qualified components, including solar and wind energy components); energy investment tax credit (for investments in certain qualified energy property placed into service before 2025); clean electricity investment credit (for investments in qualified energy property placed into service in 2025 or after); qualifying advance coal project tax credit (for investments in qualifying advanced coal projects), clean coal investment tax credit (for investments in qualifying gasification projects); advanced energy project tax credit (for investments in qualifying advanced energy projects); and advanced manufacturing investment tax credit (for investments in semiconductor or semiconductor manufacturing equipment).  

Question· Written questionUIN 22734answered

Nuclear Power: Regulation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 8 January 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of issuing a Regulation 12 determination under the Justification of Practices Involving Ionising Radiation Regulations 2004 co

Motion· Motie2024Z21830adopted

Motie van het lid Erkens over een onafhankelijke studie naar het optimale percentage kernenergie in 2050 waarbij betrouwbaarheid en systeemkosten van hernieuwbare energie en de synergie tussen kernenergie en hernieuwbare bronnen worden meegenomen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 19 December 2024

Motie van het lid Erkens over een onafhankelijke studie naar het optimale percentage kernenergie in 2050 waarbij betrouwbaarheid en systeemkosten van hernieuwbare energie en de synergie tussen kernenergie en hernieuwbare bronnen worden meegenomen

Question· Written questionUIN 20338answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Migrant Workers

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 16 December 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what information his Department holds on the number of foreign nationals employed at (a) Sizewell and (b) Hinckley nuclear power station by country of origin in each year from 2010 to 2024.

Question· Written questionUIN 18593answered

Nuclear Power Stations

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 December 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether his Department is taking steps to extend the operation of existing nuclear power plants beyond 2030.

Question· Written questionHL HL3213answered

Nuclear Power: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 December 2024

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the role of nuclear energy in supporting an increase in the use of artificial intelligence.

Question· Question écrite2453answered

Question 2453 — déchets

France · National Assembly · 3 December 2024

M. Alexandre Allegret-Pilot interroge M. le ministre délégué auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de l'industrie, chargé de l'industrie, sur la gestion des matières et déchets radioactifs. Les pouvoirs publics ont décidé une relance de l'utilisation de l'énergie nucléaire en France, incluant la construction de nouveaux réacteurs de puissance et le soutien à des projets de petits réacteurs modulaires. Le Conseil de politique nucléaire de février 2024 a confirmé la politique de retraitement des combustibles nucléaires usés en vue du recyclage des matières fissiles valorisables (pour supprimer à terme la dépendance de la France à l'uranium importé) avec l'objectif de parvenir à terme à la fermeture complète du cycle du combustible nucléaire. Dans son rapport n° 18 de juin 2024, la Commission nationale d'évaluation des études et recherches sur la gestion des matières et déchets radioactifs (CNE) souligne que les réacteurs à neutrons rapides (RNR) de puissance élevée sont la seule filière permettant la fermeture complète du cycle. La CNE a réalisé une revue des stratégies de gestion des déchets radioactifs de haute et moyenne activité, dont notamment les combustibles usés, dans le monde. Il en ressort que le stockage géologique est la solution de référence, même si l'avancement de la mise en œuvre de cette stratégie est très différent d'un pays à l'autre. La Commission doit remettre un avis fin 2025 sur le dossier d'autorisation de création Cigéo, un projet de centre de stockage géologique (la Finlande et la Suède sont les seuls pays ayant à ce jour autorisé la création d'une installation de stockage géologique ; la construction de l'installation finlandaise est très avancée). Face à ce constat, il lui demande quelles mesures le Gouvernement envisage de prendre pour permettre le déploiement d'un parc de RNR de puissance élevée (offrant des garanties contre les risques de crise structurelle d'approvisionnement en uranium) et l'avancement concret dans la mise en œuvre d'un centre de stockage géologique en France.

Question· Question écrite2372answered

Question 2372 — santé

France · National Assembly · 26 November 2024

M. Bastien Lachaud appelle l'attention de M. le Premier ministre sur la situation des stocks de comprimés d'iode dédiés à la protection de la population nationale en cas d'incident nucléaire majeur lié au conflit en Ukraine. Dans le contexte de la guerre en Ukraine, la centrale nucléaire de Zaporijjia, la plus grande d'Europe, s'est retrouvée à plusieurs reprises théâtre de combats et son alimentation en électricité régulièrement perturbée. En août 2024, l'Agence internationale de l'énergie atomique s'était inquiétée de la détérioration de la situation sécuritaire de la centrale. Si un incident nucléaire devait survenir, la population française risquerait d'être exposée au panache radioactif qui s'en dégagerait, avec des conséquences sanitaires catastrophiques. Le secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale, service relevant du Premier ministre, a pour mission d'organiser la réponse des pouvoirs publics en cas d'incident nucléaire grave, notamment si celui-ci survient hors des frontières. Aussi, il lui demande de bien vouloir informer la représentation nationale sur le volume de stocks d'iode disponible et les dispositions mises en œuvre par le secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale pour préparer une distribution de grande ampleur.

Question· Written questionUIN 15025answered

Nuclear Power: Vocational Education

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 19 November 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she plans to take to help increase the number of students entering the civil nuclear sector.

Question· Written questionUIN 14721answered

Nuclear Power: Skilled Workers

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 18 November 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether he has had discussions with representatives from the energy sector on extending the skills passport to people (a) working in the nuclear sector and (b) entering the nuclear sector fro

Question· Written questionUIN 14869answered

Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 18 November 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether his Department has set a target for the share of power to be provided by (a) small modular reactors and (b) other nuclear power by 2035.

Question· Written questionUIN 901230answered

Nuclear Power: Regulation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 November 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the regulatory framework for approving nuclear projects.

Question· Question écrite1425answered

Question 1425 — énergie et carburants

France · National Assembly · 29 October 2024

M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy interroge M. le ministre de l'économie, des finances et de l'industrie sur l'allongement du calendrier du chantier des deux réacteurs Hinkley Point C en Angleterre. Initialement prévue pour 2025, EDF repousse sa mise en service en 2027 puis en 2029, sans exclure l'hypothèse d'une ouverture en 2030 voire 2031. En effet, les travaux de montage électromécanique (câbles et tuyaux) devaient durer vingt-huit mois; finalement cette étape en prendra cinquante-deux. La multiplication par deux de la durée des travaux a des effets dévastateurs sur les finances, la crédibilité d'EDF et plus largement de la France. Selon l'électricien, les coûts atteindraient entre 7 à 9,3 milliards de livres supplémentaires, par rapport aux coûts estimés en 2015. À cela s'ajoute la sortie du groupe chinois China Genetal Nuclear Power Group (CGN), entraînant une hausse de contribution significative, à hauteur de 6 milliards de livres, pour le groupe français EDF, seul à supporter ces surcoûts. Une fois encore, il semble qu'aucune leçon n'ait été tirée des fiascos finlandais et de Flamanville. Personne n'est jamais responsable de rien ! Ce retard de plusieurs années pénalise à court, moyen et long terme la capacité de la France à exporter son savoir-faire par la signature de plusieurs contrats : des pays d'Europe de l'Est, l'Inde, ou encore les Pays-Bas semblent réticents à acheter des EPR d'EDF. Par exemple, en vue d'une vente, le gouvernement tchèque a retenu deux candidats à son appel d'offres : EDF et le sud-coréen KHNP. Ces commandes sont nécessaires pour remplir le plan de charge du nouveau nucléaire français, qui prévoit la construction de 1,5 à 2 EPR par an. Afin d'atteindre les objectifs qu'il s'est fixé, la filière du nucléaire devra être capable de produire en série. Il ne serait pas surprenant que le gouvernement tchèque choisisse le groupe sud-coréen, capable de construire des réacteurs nucléaires en l'espace de 7 ans contrairement au groupe français. L'accumulation des retards du projet Hinkley Point C impacte la crédibilité d'EDF, courant le risque de ne pas signer cet important contrat. Il lui demande comment le Gouvernement peut expliquer une telle dérive et les mesures qu'il entend mettre en œuvre pour l'éviter à l'avenir.

Question· Written questionUIN 11606answered

Nuclear Power: Innovation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 29 October 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps he is taking to support (a) advanced reactors, (b) nuclear fusion and (c) other innovation in nuclear technology.

Question· Written questionUIN 11275answered

Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 28 October 2024

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps he is taking to ensure that plans to achieve a net zero power grid by 2030 include the development of technologies such as nuclear power requiring (a) longer lead times and (b) sig

Question· Question écrite1057answered

Question 1057 — urbanisme

France · National Assembly · 15 October 2024

M. Romain Daubié attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la transition écologique, de l'énergie, du climat et de la prévention des risques, au sujet de la circulaire du 17 février 2010 relative à la maîtrise des activités au voisinage des installations nucléaires de base (INB) susceptibles de présenter des dangers à l'extérieur du site, dite circulaire « Borloo ». En droit, la loi 2006-686 du 13 juin 2006 relative à la transparence et à la sécurité en matière nucléaire, dite « loi TSN », fixe le cadre juridique nécessaire à la maîtrise des activités autour des installations nucléaires de base. La maîtrise de l'urbanisation et des activités dans l'environnement des installations nucléaires de base doit notamment être réalisée par des servitudes d'utilité publique, conformément à l'article 31 de loi susmentionnée. La circulaire en date du 17 février 2010, dite circulaire « Borloo », a complété la loi du 13 juin 2006 en précisant les modalités de maîtrise des activités autour des installations nucléaires. Concrètement, sur la base des informations techniques communiquées par la division territoriale de l'autorité de sûreté nucléaire à propos des zones de dangers, les préfets doivent informer les communes ou les établissements publics de coopération intercommunale ayant compétence en matière d'urbanisme concernés. La circulaire indique de privilégier un développement des activités à l'extérieur de cette zone. À l'intérieur de cette zone, le texte permet de refuser les projets qui s'avéreraient incompatibles avec les objectifs de sécurité des populations concernées, ou de prescrire des conditions les rendant acceptables en application de l'article R. 111-2 du code de l'urbanisme. Reste que si cette circulaire n'était mise en place que de façon transitoire à l'origine, à ce jour, elle perdure et engendre des difficultés pour les projets d'urbanisme des communes ayant des centrales ou des établissements nucléaires implantés sur leur territoire. Ces communes, regroupées au sein de l'ARCICEN (Association des représentants des communes d'implantation de centrales et établissements nucléaires), font l'objet de nombreux recours administratifs vis-à-vis des projets d'urbanisme qu'elles souhaitent mettre en place, alors même que ceux-ci sont nécessaires pour la création de logements, d'écoles, de gendarmeries ou encore de maisons de santé, face à la hausse d'habitants aux abords des centrales. Dans l'attente du rapport sur la circulaire dite « Borloo » qui était attendu pour le mois de juin 2024 et compte tenu de la mise en application de la loi n° 2023-491 du 22 juin 2023 relative à l'accélération des procédures liées à la construction de nouvelles installations nucléaires à proximité de sites nucléaires existants et au fonctionnement des installations existantes, il semble également nécessaire de prendre des mesures s'agissant de la circulaire dite « Borloo » afin que les communes d'implantation et d'établissements nucléaires puissent mener à bien les projets d'urbanisme utiles à la collectivité publique. Il l'appelle à prendre les mesures nécessaires vis-à-vis des difficultés engendrées par cette circulaire pour les communes d'implantation et d'établissements nucléaires.

Question· Written questionUIN 9160answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Construction

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 15 October 2024

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Office for National Statistics (a) has a role in and (b) has made representations to Government on the public sector classification of (i) Hinkley Point C and (ii) Wylfa.

PreviousPage 10 of 88Next