Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Nuclear energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

4,361 records

Records

Question· Question écrite5054answered

Question 5054 — énergie et carburants

France · National Assembly · 18 March 2025

M. Christophe Blanchet interroge M. le ministre auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle et numérique, chargé de l'industrie et de l'énergie, sur la place du nucléaire civil en Europe et la nécessité impérieuse de garantir la souveraineté énergétique des États membres de l'Union européenne. Le contexte géopolitique actuel met en évidence une reconfiguration mondiale des approvisionnements énergétiques, soulignant la dépendance préoccupante de l'Union européenne en la matière. Tandis que les États-Unis, sous l'impulsion du Président Donald Trump, ont réaffirmé leur ambition de domination énergétique par le biais de politiques favorisant l'exploitation intensive des ressources fossiles et nucléaires, la Russie poursuit également une stratégie de contrôle des ressources minérales et énergétiques, rendant ses entreprises comme Rosatom et Gazprom incontournables sur le marché mondial. Face à ces dynamiques, l'Union européenne affiche une vulnérabilité énergétique manifeste. Selon Eurostat, en 2023, les États membres importaient en moyenne 58 % de leur énergie, certains pays comme l'Allemagne, l'Italie ou l'Espagne dépassant même les 65 %, voire 75 % pour d'autres. La France, grâce à son parc nucléaire, limite cette dépendance à 44 %, démontrant ainsi le rôle essentiel du nucléaire dans la garantie de sa souveraineté énergétique. Pourtant, malgré cette réalité, le plan industriel du Pacte vert présenté par la Commission européenne en février 2025 néglige largement la question de l'indépendance énergétique des États membres et sous-évalue le rôle crucial du nucléaire décarboné, alors même que celui-ci constitue un atout stratégique pour répondre aux objectifs de réduction des émissions de CO2 tout en assurant une production énergétique stable et compétitive. Historiquement, l'Union européenne a pourtant reconnu l'importance du nucléaire civil, comme en témoigne le traité Euratom signé en 1957. Or, aujourd'hui, l'absence de volonté claire au niveau européen menace l'équilibre énergétique du continent et pourrait exposer l'UE à une double dépendance accrue, tant à l'égard des États-Unis que de la Russie. Dans ce contexte, quelles actions le Gouvernement entend-il mener pour affirmer avec force, auprès des instances européennes, la nécessité de reconnaître pleinement le nucléaire civil comme un pilier de la souveraineté énergétique de l'Union européenne ? Il souhaite savoir si la France envisage de proposer une initiative européenne visant à consolider et développer la filière nucléaire sur le continent, tant pour la production d'électricité que pour la recherche et l'innovation technologique dans ce domaine.

Question· Written questionUIN 38982answered

Iran: Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 18 March 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, if he will make an assessment of the potential implications for his policies of the outcome of the Iranian nuclear talks undertaken by Iran, China and Russia in March 2025; a

Question· Written questionUIN 38553answered

Iran: Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 17 March 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what discussions he has had with other signatories to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on the future of the Iran nuclear deal, in the context of the withdrawal of the U

Question· Written questionUIN 37706answered

Clean Energy: Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 March 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, pursuant to the Answer of 3 March 2025 to Question 32098 on Nuclear Power, what estimate he has made of the proportion of clean electricity generated by nuclear energy by 2030.

Resolution· Selbständiger Entschließungsantrag121/A(E)selbständiger entschließungsantrag

Österreichischer Einsatz gegen Atomwaffen

Austria · National Council · 7 March 2025

Antrag der Abgeordneten David Stögmüller, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend Österreichischer Einsatz gegen Atomwaffen

Question· Written questionUIN 34957answered

Nuclear Power: Midlands

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 3 March 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he will make an assessment of the potential implications for his policies of the report by Midlands Engine entitled The nuclear industry in the Midlands, published in February 2025; and wh

Bill· HRH.R. 1800 (119th)referred

Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 2025

United States · United States Congress · 3 March 2025

Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 2025 This bill eliminates a sunset clause in the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, thereby making the act permanent. The Iran Sanctions Act requires the President, with some exceptions, to impose sanctions on certain individuals or entities engaged in specified transactions related to Iran's energy sector or Iran's efforts to acquire or develop certain weapons (such as chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons).

Bill· SS. 803 (119th)referred

Keep Americans Safe Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 February 2025

Keep Americans Safe Act This bill establishes a new criminal offense for the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD). The bill does not prohibit certain conduct with respect to an LCAFD, including the following: importation, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession related to certain law enforcement efforts, or authorized tests or experiments; importation, sale, transfer, or possession related to securing nuclear materials; and possession by a retired law enforcement officer. The bill permits continued possession of, but prohibits sale or transfer of, a grandfathered LCAFD. Newly manufactured LCAFDs must display serial number identification and the date of manufacture. Additionally, the bill allows a state or local government to use Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program funds to compensate individuals who surrender an LCAFD under a buy-back program.

Bill· HRH.R. 1674 (119th)referred

Keep Americans Safe Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 February 2025

Keep Americans Safe Act This bill establishes a new criminal offense for the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD). The bill does not prohibit certain conduct with respect to an LCAFD, including the following: importation, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession related to certain law enforcement efforts, or authorized tests or experiments; importation, sale, transfer, or possession related to securing nuclear materials; and possession by a retired law enforcement officer. The bill permits continued possession of, but prohibits sale or transfer of, a grandfathered LCAFD. Newly manufactured LCAFDs must display serial number identification and the date of manufacture. Additionally, the bill allows a state or local government to use Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program funds to compensate individuals who surrender an LCAFD under a buy-back program.

Question· Written questionUIN 34010answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Gloucestershire

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 26 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether he will visit the decommissioning power stations at (a) Oldbury and (b) Berkeley (Severn Edge); and if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of (i) deploying Small Modula

Question· Written questionUIN 33114answered

Nuclear Power: Dungeness B Power Station

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 24 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what discussions he has had with Great British Nuclear on the potential merits of developing new nuclear power generation on the site of the Dungeness Power Station.

Question· Written questionUIN 32092answered

Nuclear Power Stations

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 21 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what estimate his Department has made of the cost of small-scale nuclear production relative to larger plants.

Question· Written questionUIN 32098answered

Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 21 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment his Department has made of the emissions reduction potential of nuclear energy for the Clean Power 2030 plan.

Question· Written questionUIN 32097answered

Nuclear Power: Costs

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 21 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what estimate the Government has made of the cost of nuclear energy relative to renewable sources of power.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 139 (119th)referred

Calling on the United Kingdom, France, and Germany (E3) to initiate the snapback of sanctions on Iran under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).

United States · United States Congress · 14 February 2025

The resolution urges the E3 (the United Kingdom, France, and Germany) to invoke the snapback of United Nations (UN) sanctions against Iran under UN Security Council Resolution 2231 before the option expires on October 18, 2025.  This resolution also (1) recognizes that Iran's possession of a nuclear weapon would threaten U.S. and global security, (2) condemns Iran's repeated violations of certain international commitments related to nuclear weapons, and (3) reaffirms that the United States maintains the right to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Bill· HRH.R. 1374 (119th)referred

Securing the Cities Improvement Act

United States · United States Congress · 14 February 2025

Securing the Cities Improvement Act This bill makes changes to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office's (CWMD's) Securing the Cities program, which seeks to detect nuclear or radiological materials to prevent terrorist attacks and other events posing a risk to cities in the United States. Specifically, the bill requires the CWMD to establish performance metrics and milestones for the program and to track performance against them. Also, under current law, in carrying out the Securing the Cities program, the CWMD may only partner with cities that are high-risk urban areas , which are designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency under a different program. Instead, the bill requires the CWMD to designate the jurisdictions it may partner with for the program, and the designations must be based on the capability and capacity of the jurisdiction relating to preparedness and response, as well as the relative threat to, vulnerability of, and consequences for, such jurisdiction regarding terrorist attacks and other high-consequence events utilizing nuclear or radiological materials. Additionally, within two years of enactment of the bill, the CWMD must submit a report to Congress regarding participation in the Securing the Cities program, the establishment of metrics and milestones, performance against such metrics and milestones, and plans for any changes to the program.

Question· Written questionUIN 31645answered

Nuclear Power Stations: Public Consultation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he will make an assessment of the adequacy of the accessibility to people who are digitally excluded of the consultation on the Draft National Policy Statement for nuclear energy generatio

Question· writtenPQ 122asked

122. Deputy Pa Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications to report on his engagements with the British government on its plans to build eight new nuclear power stations in Britain; what measures are in place to ensure that there is no safety risk posed to Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5279/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 13 February 2025

122. Deputy Pa Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications to report on his engagements with the British government on its plans to build eight new nuclear power stations in Britain; what measures are in place to ensure that there is no safety risk posed to Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5279/25]

Resolution· SRESS.Res. 81 (119th)referred

A resolution calling on the United Kingdom, France, and Germany (E3) to initiate the snapback of sanctions on Iran under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).

United States · United States Congress · 13 February 2025

The resolution urges the E3 (the United Kingdom, France, and Germany) to invoke the snapback of United Nations (UN) sanctions against Iran under UN Security Council Resolution 2231 before the option expires on October 18, 2025.  This resolution also (1) recognizes that Iran's possession of a nuclear weapon would threaten U.S. and global security, (2) condemns Iran's repeated violations of certain international commitments related to nuclear weapons, and (3) reaffirms that the United States maintains the right to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Record· Commissie2024-2025-0held

Kernenergie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 12 February 2025

Troelstrazaal

Bill· SS. 510 (119th)referred

Financing Our Energy Future Act

United States · United States Congress · 11 February 2025

Financing Our Energy Future Act This bill allows a publicly traded partnership to derive income from certain clean energy-related activities and still be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As background, a publicly traded partnership is a partnership whose interests are traded on an established securities market (or readily tradable on a secondary market). A publicly traded partnership generally is treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes unless 90% or more of such partnership’s gross income is qualifying income. Under current law, qualifying income includes  interest and dividends; real property rents; gain from the sale (or disposition) of real property; income from certain activities related to minerals and natural resources, source carbon dioxide, and the transportation or storage of certain fuels; and gain from the sale (or disposition) of a capital asset or commodities. Under the bill, the qualifying income is expanded to include income derived from   electric power (or thermal energy) generated from renewable energy sources (e.g., wind and solar energy), qualified gasification projects, or advanced nuclear facilities; accepting or processing open-loop biomass or municipal solid waste (by certain facilities); the storage of electric power or thermal energy using certain energy storage technology; the generation, storage, or distribution of electric power (or thermal energy) using combined heat and power system property; fuels that use certain carbon oxides as primary feedstock; certain renewable chemicals; transportation or storage of liquefied or compressed hydrogen; the conversion of renewable biomass; and certain carbon capture and sequestration facilities.

Question· Written questionHL HL4845answered

Nuclear Power Stations

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 7 February 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government what was the outcome of the prior information notice (PIN) exploring building a further large-scale nuclear power station, published in May 2024; whether they will list the potential vendors who expressed an interest; and w

Question· Written questionHL HL4846answered

Nuclear Power: Skilled Workers

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 7 February 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government why the civil nuclear new build sector was not identified as a key sector to be included within their Energy Skills Passport, launched on 22 January; and what plans they have to include it, given the UK's nuclear sector nee

Bill· HRH.R. 1108 (119th)referred

Diagnostics Testing Preparedness Plan Act of 2025

United States · United States Congress · 7 February 2025

Diagnostics Testing Preparedness Plan Act of 2025 This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to develop and publish a plan for the rapid development and distribution of diagnostic tests in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear threat, including an emerging infectious disease, that causes or has significant potential to cause a declared public health emergency. Specifically, HHS must coordinate with any relevant public and private entities, such as government entities and device manufacturers, in creating the plan and facilitating its collaborative implementation. The plan must take into consideration certain factors specified in the bill, including domestic testing capacity, novel technologies, and medical supply needs. HHS must publish the plan within one year after enactment of the bill and then update the plan every three years.

Report· Written statementUIN HCWS419published

Consenting and Regulation of Nuclear Energy

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

The UK’s nuclear sector is at the beginning of a significant expansion in both civil and defence nuclear programmes and will play a key role in delivering the Government’s Clean Energy Superpower Mission. Given the sector’s contribution to economic growth...

Report· Written statementUIN HLWS415published

Consenting and Regulation of Nuclear Energy

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

My Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero (Ed Miliband MP) has today made the following statement:The UK’s nuclear sector is at the beginning of a significant expansion in both civil and defence nuclear programmes ...

Question· Written questionUIN 29469answered

Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of using the UK’s plutonium stockpile to generate electricity.

Question· Written questionUIN 902712answered

Nuclear Power: Innovation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what discussions he has had with the devolved Administrations on innovation in nuclear technology.

Question· Written questionUIN 29480answered

Nuclear Power: Skilled Workers

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether the Energy Skills Passport will encourage oil and gas workers to find opportunities in the nuclear industry.

Question· Written questionUIN 29479answered

Nuclear Power: Training

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, how much investment his Department plans to allocate to (a) training centres, (b) training courses and (c) training advisors in the nuclear industry.

Question· Written questionUIN 29471answered

Nuclear Power

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, with reference to the Written Statement of 6 February 2025 on Consenting and Regulation of Nuclear Energy, HCWS419, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of using the UK’s pluto

Question· Written questionUIN 29485answered

Nuclear Power: Public Consultation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 February 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps his Department is taking to engage with the public on the nuclear energy industry.

Resolution· SRESS.Res. 61 (119th)referred

A resolution expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces.

United States · United States Congress · 5 February 2025

This resolution condemns Russia's nuclear escalatory rhetoric and implied threats on the potential use of nuclear weapons in the context of its invasion of Ukraine. The resolution also (1) condemns Russia's purported suspension of participation in the New START Treaty, (2) emphasizes the value of arms control agreements between the United States and Russia, and (3) calls on the administration to continue pursuing nuclear arms control and risk reduction with Russia and China.

Question· Question écrite3663answered

Question 3663 — énergie et carburants

France · National Assembly · 4 February 2025

M. Romain Daubié attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la transition écologique, de la biodiversité, de la forêt, de la mer et de la pêche au sujet de la circulaire du 17 février 2010 relative à la maîtrise des activités au voisinage des installations nucléaires de base (INB) susceptibles de présenter des dangers à l'extérieur du site, dite circulaire « Borloo ». En droit, la loi n° 2006-686 du 13 juin 2006 relative à la transparence et à la sécurité en matière nucléaire, dite loi TSN, fixe le cadre juridique nécessaire à la maîtrise des activités autour des installations nucléaires de base. La maîtrise de l'urbanisation et des activités dans l'environnement des installations nucléaires de base doit notamment être réalisée par des servitudes d'utilité publique, conformément à l'article 31 de loi susmentionnée. La circulaire en date du 17 février 2010, dite circulaire « Borloo », a complété la loi du 13 juin 2006 en précisant les modalités de maîtrise des activités autour des installations nucléaires. Concrètement, sur la base des informations techniques communiquées par la division territoriale de l'autorité de sûreté nucléaire à propos des zones de danger, les préfets doivent informer les communes ou les établissements publics de coopération intercommunale ayant compétence en matière d'urbanisme concernés. La circulaire indique de privilégier un développement des activités à l'extérieur de cette zone. À l'intérieur de cette zone, le texte permet de refuser les projets qui s'avéreraient incompatibles avec les objectifs de sécurité des populations concernées ou de prescrire des conditions les rendant acceptables en application de l'article R. 111-2 du code de l'urbanisme. Reste que si cette circulaire n'était mise en place que de façon transitoire à l'origine, à ce jour, elle perdure et engendre des difficultés pour les projets d'urbanisme des communes ayant des centrales ou des établissements nucléaires implantés sur leur territoire. Ces communes, regroupées au sein de l'association des représentants des communes d'implantation de centrales et établissements nucléaires (ARCICEN), font l'objet de nombreux recours administratifs vis-à-vis des projets d'urbanisme qu'elles souhaitent mettre en place, alors même que ceux-ci sont nécessaires pour la création de logements, d'écoles, de gendarmeries ou encore de maisons de santé, face à la hausse d'habitants aux abords des centrales. Dans l'attente du rapport sur la circulaire dite « Borloo» attendu pour le mois de juin 2024 et compte tenu de la mise en application de la loi n° 2023-491 du 22 juin 2023 relative à l'accélération des procédures liées à la construction de nouvelles installations nucléaires à proximité de sites nucléaires existants et au fonctionnement des installations existantes, il semble également nécessaire de prendre des mesures s'agissant de la circulaire dite « Borloo » afin que les communes d'implantation et d'établissements nucléaires puissent mener à bien les projets d'urbanisme utiles à la collectivité publique. Il lui demande de prendre les mesures nécessaires pour faire face aux difficultés engendrées par cette circulaire pour les communes d'implantation et d'établissements nucléaires et souhaite connaître ses intentions à ce sujet.

PreviousPage 9 of 88Next