Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU in 2020

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0191decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2020.#OI v Air Nostrum Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation for air passengers in the event of denied boarding — Denied boarding — Cancellation — Connecting flights — Change of the reservation in respect of one of the flights comprising the journey by air against the passenger’s will — Arrival of the passenger without delay at his or her final destination.#Case C-191/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0815decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 30 April 2020.#Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Van den Bosch Transporten BV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 1(1) and (3) and Article 2(1) – Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services – Drivers working in international road transport – Scope – Concept of ‘posted worker’ – Cabotage operations – Article 3(1), (3) and (8) – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Collective agreements declared universally applicable.#Case C-815/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0939decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2020.#Flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation for flight passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight — Long delay — Right to compensation — Distance to be taken into account — Flight with a stopover — Connecting flight — Taking into account of the total flight distance or the cancelled leg of the journey only.#Case C-939/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0401_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 avril 2020.#Herst s.r.o. contre Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Acquisition intracommunautaire de biens – Article 20 – Obtention du pouvoir de disposer d’un bien comme un propriétaire – Opérations d’achat et de revente en chaîne de biens avec un transport intracommunautaire unique – Possibilité de prendre des décisions de nature à affecter la situation juridique du bien – Imputation du transport – Transport sous régime de suspension des droits d’accise – Effet dans le temps des arrêts d’interprétation.#Affaire C-401/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0521decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 23 April 2020.#Pegaso Srl Servizi Fiduciari and Others v Poste Tutela SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procurement in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 13 – Activities relating to the provision of postal services – Contracting entities – Public undertakings – Admissibility.#Case C-521/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0028decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2020.#Ryanair Ltd and Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato - Antitrust v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato - Antitrust and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Air services — Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 — Article 23(1) — Indication of the final price to be paid — Online passenger check-in fees — VAT — Administrative fees for purchases made by means of a credit card other than that approved by the air carrier — Unavoidable and foreseeable elements of the final price to be paid — Optional price supplements — Concept.#Case C-28/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2020

Proposal· PCCELEX 52020PC0151open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009, Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector, a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs and a Directive amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and laying down specific rules with respect to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012

European Union · European Commission · 15 April 2020

Report· AGCELEX 52020AG0004(01)open

Position (EU) No 4/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific rules with respect to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector and amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 Adopted by the Council on 7 April 2020 2020/C 149/01

European Union · Council of the European Union · 7 April 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0830decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße v PF and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Children of frontier workers — Social advantages — System for reimbursement of school transport costs — Requirement of residence in a Land — Exclusion of children attending school in that Land and residing in a Member State other than that of the school attended — Exclusion of nationals residing in other Länder.#Case C-830/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 April 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0215_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 26 mars 2020.#Libuše Králová contre Primera Air Scandinavia A/S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Compétence judiciaire et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Article 5, point 1 – Compétence en matière contractuelle – Articles 15 à 17 – Compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Articles 6 et 7 – Droit à indemnisation en cas de retard important d’un vol – Contrat de transport combinant voyage et hébergement conclu entre le passager et une agence de voyages – Recours en indemnisation dirigé contre le transporteur aérien non partie à ce contrat – Directive 90/314/CEE – Voyage à forfait.#Affaire C-215/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0496_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020.#HUNGEOD Közlekedésfejlesztési, Földmérési, Út- és Vasúttervezési Kft. and Others v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Review procedures concerning the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Directive 92/13/EEC – Public procurement – Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU – Review of the application of public procurement rules – National legislation which allows certain bodies to initiate a procedure of their own motion where there has been an unlawful amendment to a contract which is in the course of being performed – Time-barring of an authority’s right to initiate a procedure of its own motion – Principles of legal certainty and proportionality.#Case C-496/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0496decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2020.#HUNGEOD Közlekedésfejlesztési, Földmérési, Út- és Vasúttervezési Kft. and Others v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Review procedures concerning the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Directive 92/13/EEC – Public procurement – Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU – Review of the application of public procurement rules – National legislation which allows certain bodies to initiate a procedure of their own motion where there has been an unlawful amendment to a contract which is in the course of being performed – Time-barring of an authority’s right to initiate a procedure of its own motion – Principles of legal certainty and proportionality.#Case C-496/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0045decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña, SA v Ayuntamiento de A Coruña.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo A Coruña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 8 — Transitional arrangements — Article 8(3) — Expiry of public service contracts — Calculation of the maximum contractual term set at 30 years — Determination of the date from which the maximum term of 30 years starts to run.#Case C-45/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0832_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2020.#A e.a. contre Finnair Oyj.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Articles 5 et 7 – Droit à indemnisation en cas de retard ou d’annulation d’un vol – Droit à indemnisation à plusieurs reprises en cas de retard ou d’annulation frappant non seulement la réservation d’origine, mais aussi la réservation suivante faite dans le cadre d’un réacheminement – Portée – Exonération de l’obligation d’indemnisation – Notion de “circonstances extraordinaires” – Pièce dite “on condition” – Défaillances techniques inhérentes à l’entretien d’un avion.#Affaire C-832/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0832decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2020.#A and Others v Finnair Oyj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5 and 7 — Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Entitlement to compensation more than once in the event of a delay or cancellation not only of the original reservation, but also of the subsequent reservation made in the context of a re-routing — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — ‘On condition’ part — Technical shortcomings inherent in aircraft maintenance.#Case C-832/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0583decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 March 2020.#Verbraucherzentrale Berlin eV v DB Vertrieb GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Scope — Service contract — Article 2(6) — Contract for passenger transport services — Article 3(3)(k) — Cards conferring entitlement to price reductions when passenger transport contracts are subsequently concluded — Online selling of such cards without informing the consumer about the right of withdrawal.#Case C-583/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0454_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 11 mars 2020.#Baltic Cable AB contre Energimarknadsinspektionen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Transport d’électricité – Notion de “gestionnaire de réseau de transport” – Règlement (CE) no 714/2009 – Interconnexion – Ligne de transport reliant les réseaux de transport nationaux des États membres – Article 16, paragraphe 6 – Champ d’application – Utilisation des recettes résultant de l’attribution de la capacité des interconnexions – Entreprise exploitant uniquement une ligne à haute tension transfrontalière assurant l’interconnexion de deux réseaux de transport nationaux.#Affaire C-454/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0056_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 March 2020.#European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o.#Appeal — State aid — Article 108(2) TFEU — Investment aid — Operating aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision of the European Commission — Aid incompatible with the internal market — Order for recovery of the aid — Annulment by the General Court of the European Union — Essential procedural requirement — Procedural rights of the interested parties.#Case C-56/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 March 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0086decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 11 March 2020.#SL v Vueling Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17(2) — Liability of air carriers in respect of checked baggage — Fact of loss of checked baggage established — Right to compensation — Article 22(2) — Limits of liability in the event of destruction, loss and delay of, or of damage to, baggage — Absence of information regarding the lost baggage — Burden of proof — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-86/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0056decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 March 2020.#European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o.#Appeal — State aid — Article 108(2) TFEU — Investment aid — Operating aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision of the European Commission — Aid incompatible with the internal market — Order for recovery of the aid — Annulment by the General Court of the European Union — Essential procedural requirement — Procedural rights of the interested parties.#Case C-56/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 March 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0766_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2020.#QE and RD v SATA International - Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation of passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Generalised interruption of an airport’s refuelling system.#Case C-766/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0766decided

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2020.#QE and RD v SATA International - Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation of passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Generalised interruption of an airport’s refuelling system.#Case C-766/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0074decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 27 February 2020.#LE v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa - Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa – Juiz 18.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Article 7(1) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Unruly passengers — Possibility of relying on the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance in respect of a flight not affected by that circumstance– Concept of ‘reasonable measures’.#Case C-74/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0606_SUMdecided

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 13 février 2020.#flightright GmbH contre Iberia LAE SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 7, point 1, sous b), second tiret – Compétence spéciale en matière contractuelle – Notion de “lieu d’exécution” – Contrat de fourniture de services – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Droit à indemnisation des passagers aériens en cas d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Vol à réservation unique confirmée et effectué en plusieurs segments par deux transporteurs aériens distincts – Annulation du dernier segment de vol – Recours en indemnisation dirigé contre le transporteur aérien chargé du dernier segment de vol devant la juridiction dans le ressort de laquelle se trouve le point de départ du premier segment de vol.#Affaire C-606/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0088decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 13 February 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0276decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 6 February 2020.#KrakVet Marek Batko sp. K. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 33 — Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out — Supply of goods with transport — Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier — Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 — Articles 7, 13 and 28 to 30 — Cooperation between the Member States — Exchange of information.#Case C-276/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0011decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Azienda ULSS n. 6 Euganea v Pia Opera Croce Verde Padova.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 10(h) – Article 12(4) – Specific exclusions for service contracts – Civil defence, civil protection, and danger prevention services – Non-profit organisations or associations – Ordinary and emergency medical transport services – Regional legislation requiring priority to be given to recourse to a partnership between contracting authorities – Freedom of the Member States to choose how services are provided – Limits – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-11/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0513_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 30 janvier 2020.#Autoservizi Giordano società cooperativa contre Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli - Ufficio di Palermo.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Directive 2003/96/CE – Article 7, paragraphes 2 et 3 – Notion de “gazole à usage commercial utilisé comme carburant” – Réglementation nationale prévoyant un taux d’accise réduit pour le gazole à usage commercial utilisé comme carburant pour le transport régulier de passagers, et non pour le transport occasionnel de passagers – Principe d’égalité de traitement.#Affaire C-513/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2020

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next