Records
36 records where Paula Forteza is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite9595open
France · National Assembly
Since April 18, Nicaragua has been experiencing a serious political and security crisis. The toll of this crisis is extremely heavy, following the violent repression which followed the holding of demonstrations and numerous incidents were noted around the blockades which block a large number of roads. The latest information indicates several hundred deaths and more than 2,000 injured. No national French was not reported among these people. France, through the spokesperson for the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs, condemned this violence and the disproportionate use of force and called on the Nicaraguan government to preserve the path of national dialogue, implemented under the auspices of the Nicaraguan Episcopal Conference. This national dialogue is essential to enable a peaceful and negotiated exit from the current crisis, and to allow discussions on democratization and justice to progress. This position was reminded of Minister Sidharta Marin, advisor to President Daniel Ortega for international affairs, who was received at his request at the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs in May. Faced with the scale of this violence and the seriousness of the facts reported by human rights organizations, Man, it is essential that investigations can be carried out to identify those responsible for these actions and bring them to justice. This is why France has also indicated its support for the establishment of an international, autonomous and independent investigation mechanism, as recommended by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). The Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs and the French Embassy in Nicaragua are fully mobilized to monitor the situation of our nationals on site. The number of our nationals registered with the services of the French embassy in Nicaragua is 811 people. The embassy regularly reminds the French community of security instructions. The travel advice sheet is regularly updated and formally advises against travel to Nicaragua and asks French tourists still present in Nicaragua to leave the country. For three months, the embassy has increased the level of implementation of its security plan. This system made it possible, directly or in conjunction with the island leaders, to assist several compatriots, particularly tourists, in order to enable them to leave Nicaragua. The embassy services also made efforts, in conjunction with the French Lycée and the Alliance French of Managua, to continue to ensure the functioning of these two structures. Finally, reinforcement was made available to the embassy. At the same time, France and the EU Member States continue to work together closely to assess the evolution of the situation, particularly on the security level, and to study the modalities that EU support could take to promote a settlement of this crisis, in connection with the Organization of American States.
Question· Question écrite5922open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza draws the attention of the Secretary of State to the Prime Minister, responsible for disabled people, to the announcement of the fourth autism plan. This question is asked on behalf of Ms. Isabelle Larelle. Le July 6, 2017, the President of the Republic announced the launch of a fourth autism plan at his side. This fourth plan was preceded by a third established for the period 2013-2017. Autism is defined as a “disorder of neurodevelopment appearing during childhood [and] which manifests itself by an alteration of the abilities to establish social interactions and to communicate” (IGAS report no. 2016-094R), is a national priority as announced by the President of the Republic during the campaign. In fact, autism spectrum disorders affect between 91,500 and 106,000 young people under the age of 20 in France and 650,000 people in France in total. However, France is the subject of numerous condemnations regarding the treatment of autism. Thus, the Council of Europe condemned France for discrimination against autistic children, lack of education, schooling, and professional training in 2004, 2007, 2008, 2012, and 2014. Likewise, in 2016, France was sanctioned by the UN for violation of children's rights on this subject. Faced with this observation, a fourth autism plan is being developed in consultation with regional health agencies and is structured around five working groups. The summary of their work as well as the announcement of concrete proposals must take place in February 2018. She asks her to please detail the follow-up given to the third autism plan, and particularly to the measures which have not been put in place. She asks him if the fourth autism plan will take up the pendant elements of the third plan.
Question· Question écrite44974open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health about complementary health insurance for minors and their registration on their parents' Vitale card. This question is asked on behalf of citizen Roger Cabot, as part of the “Citizen Questions” initiative in Government. To date, minors cannot have their own Vitale card before they turn fifteen. In the meantime, the child is attached to the card Vital of one or both parents, depending on the choice of the latter. However, the child's complementary health insurance is in principle only listed on a single Vitale card. This technical difficulty often poses problems for parents, particularly when they are separated. In fact, one of the two parents is forced to collect the Vitale card of the other before a medical procedure. Sometimes divorced couples come to to take out two complementary health insurance plans for their child, in order to have one on each Vitale card. She would therefore like to know if the Government plans to take steps so that, once a minor is attached to the Vitale card of both parents, that the complementary health insurance is informed and active on the two Vitale cards concerned, or if it would be possible to provide minors with a Vitale card without age requirements.
Question· Question écrite44469open
France · National Assembly
Mrs. Paula Forteza draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the subject of incentives for blood donation. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. On February 8, 2022, the French Blood Establishment (EFS) published for the first time in its history a “vital emergency bulletin”, the stock of blood products being below the threshold of security for several days. In support of a call for mobilization, the EFS explains that 70,000 bags of red blood cells are currently in reserve, whereas 100,000 are needed. In particular, the arrival of the omicron variant, which has affected both donors and EFS staff. To encourage citizens to donate blood, some of our European neighbors have long taken various measures aimed at encouraging blood donation. blood of employees during their working hours. In a report presented in 2006, the European Commission explained, for example, that in Slovenia, employees can be absent on the day of the donation, without impact on their remuneration (thanks to coverage by health insurance). In Latvia, this report continued, a day off is granted to employees who donate blood. In France, the employer has no legal obligation to release a employee during working time. If it can maintain the remuneration of the employee to whom it grants authorization of absence, the latter cannot exceed the time necessary for travel between place of work and place of sampling and, where applicable, return, as well as for the interview and medical examinations, sampling operations and the rest and snack period deemed medically necessary. She would like to know if the Government plans to take measures intended to encourage blood donation by employees during their working time, in light of the foreign examples mentioned above, or by providing for an authorization system for absence in principle and with continued remuneration.
Question· Question écrite43615answered
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Prime Minister about the Légifrance site, a public service for the dissemination of law via the Internet. At the beginning of January 2022, lawyers noticed the disappearance of a word - the adverb "manifestly" - which should nevertheless appear in article 6 of the law of June 21, 2004 for confidence in the digital economy. On Twitter, several citizens mobilized to try to understand the reasons for this mysterious absence. The famous word finally reappeared on Légifrance after the information site Next INpact warned the services of the Ministry of Culture, which visibly transmitted it to the general secretariat of the Government. If caring citizens mobilized this time, nothing says that this is always the case. Other errors could thus remain, which could cause serious problems in the event of a procedure judicial or administrative for example. The MP would like to have explanations on this episode, which is particularly worrying given that Légifrance is the reference source for law in France. Then, she would like to know how many material errors of this type have been rectified, for example during the year 2021. Particularly attached to ensuring that the quality of the information on Légifrance is irreproachable, she would finally like to know the measures taken to avoid these material errors.
Question· Question écrite43202open
France · National Assembly
Mrs Paula Forteza questions the Minister of National Education, Youth and Sports about the covid-19 screening policy in primary schools. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. A target of 600,000 PCR tests on saliva samples per week, throughout the country, had in fact been announced for students and staff. primary schools. However, data from the Department of Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (DREES) show that this target is far from being achieved. For the week of November 29, 2021, for example, the Ministry of National Education, Youth and Sports claims to have carried out 241,583 tests (for 470,841 proposed). Given the increase in the number of cases of contamination, she would like to know the reasons for this delay, knowing the new deadlines within which the Government intends to achieve its initial objective and why no saliva test has been offered in certain schools.
Question· Question écrite42090open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to the majority judgment vote. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the “Citizen Questions” initiative in Government. For decades, we have been accustomed to voting “for” a person, with no other alternative. However, the two-round majority vote continues to show its limits, like the place taken by the polls, which very often force voters to vote usefully or strategically. In this regard, the recurring records of abstention should alert us to the growing unsuitability of the single-member majority system. At the same time, it should be noted that in recent years, other voting methods have been imagined and tested, such as majority judgment voting. We must remember the principle: the voter votes by giving his opinion on all the candidates, based on a common scale of mentions ranging for example from “Excellent” to “Reject”, including “Good” or “Insufficient”. The candidate best evaluated by a majority of voters is then elected, possibly after a second round of voting (as was the case within the framework of the “LaPrimaire.org” initiative, which led to the designation of Charlotte Marchandise as candidate for the presidential election 2017). She would therefore like to know how the Government views majority judgment voting and whether it plans to experiment with it or even deploy it in certain elections.
Question· Question écrite41307open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health about the implementation of Law No. 2021-1017 of August 2, 2021 relating to bioethics. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. When the aforementioned law was promulgated, the President of the Republic promised that medically assisted procreation, more commonly known as PMA, would become accessible to all women “at the end of September”. However, it is clear that there is a lack of a decree, provided for in Article 1 of this law, to establish the age conditions required to benefit from medically assisted procreation. Some women are concerned about the slow implementation of this reform, fearing that they will not be able to try to have a child before being legally authorized to do so. Also, she would like to know when the Government intends to publish the texts allowing full implementation of this key five-year reform.
Question· Question écrite39701open
France · National Assembly
Ms Paula Forteza questions the Minister of the Interior about the transparency of political party financing. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the “Citizen Questions” initiative in the Government. To date, individuals can make donations to political parties, up to a limit of 7,500 euros per year. The beneficiary is then required to communicate to the National Commission of Accounts of campaign and political financing (CNCCFP) the list of people who have agreed to pay one or more donations or contributions, as well as the amount thereof, each year. However, the identity of the donors is never made public. France appears extremely late on this point, particularly compared to other democracies: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, India and Brazil, the identity of the donors and that of the recipient party are public information for donations above a certain amount (200 dollars in the United States for example). The refusal to introduce such transparency is surprising to say the least, especially since political parties are the subject of particularly pronounced mistrust on the part of citizens, as opinion studies regularly highlight. For the transparency of life political, and in order to improve citizens' confidence in public officials, she would like to know if the Government plans to ask the CNCCFP to make public the list of donors to the different political parties, possibly from a certain threshold (for example 500 euros donation).
Question· Question écrite38964open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of National Education, Youth and Sports about the connection between teachers' right to disconnect and educational continuity in a particular context of distance education. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the Government's “citizen questions” initiative. In a period marked by the alternation between face-to-face courses and distance learning, educational tools have been put in place in order to maintain school connections as much as possible and ensure the quality of teaching. However, it is sometimes difficult to maintain the boundary between “in class” and “out of class” moments: some high school students continue to ask their teachers questions by email, particularly during school vacation periods. She would like to know how the right to disconnection of teachers with the principle of educational continuity, and what are the rules transmitted on this subject to the teaching staff.
Question· Question écrite37586open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition to the consequences of road salting on biodiversity. This question is asked on behalf of citizen Nicolas Garbolino, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. The impact of salting on the environment is “undeniable”, as recognized by the services of the Ministry of Ecological Transition on the management website interdepartmental authority for Eastern roads. For example, it has been shown that salt contributes to forming a paste that suffocates plant roots or that, by deglazing, it can spread to watercourses through runoff. Various environmental defense organizations, such as WWF or France Nature Environnement, have already had the opportunity to point out the disadvantages of salting, the excessive use of which can cause the death of certain animals and living organisms, particularly in aquatic environments. She would therefore like to know if alternatives to salting are being considered by the Government.
Question· Question écrite37570open
France · National Assembly
Mrs Paula Forteza questions the Minister of the Interior on the introduction of driving aptitude tests. This question is asked on behalf of citizen Laure Chemin, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. Some countries, particularly in Europe, require drivers to undergo periodic medical examinations, sometimes from a certain age. In Belgium, for example, the driving license is renewed every ten years, supporting medical certificate. In Italy, a medical examination is compulsory from the age of fifty. In order to limit the number of deaths on the roads, she would like to know if the Government plans to impose driving fitness tests, on a regular basis or from a certain age.
Question· Question écrite35299open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery, responsible for small and medium-sized businesses, to the situation of recent business creators. As the High Social Security Financing Council points out in its September 2020 report on the social protection of self-employed workers, most self-employed people, whether they are micro-entrepreneurs or “classic” self-employed people have a low capacity to generate sufficient income during their first years of activity. These difficulties have proven even more significant this year 2020, where confinement reduced to zero the income of businesses that had sometimes only been created for a few days or weeks. The latter find themselves today faced with a situation that is all the more unfair as aid for the creation or takeover of a business (Acre), which allows people creating or taking over a business to benefit from partial exemption from social charges, only applies for twelve months. At the same time, young entrepreneurs generally cannot benefit from the solidarity fund, due to the recent nature of their activity. Also, she would like to know if it would be possible to exceptionally extend the benefit of Acre, which also prevailed for three years until December 31, 2019.
Question· Question écrite35084open
France · National Assembly
Mme Paula Forteza interpelle M. le ministre des solidarités et de la santé quant à la mise en œuvre de l'article L. 311-3-1 du code des relations entre le public et l'administration, par la Caisse nationale des allocations familiales. Cet article, issu de la loi pour une République numérique de 2016, impose aux administrations d'avertir chaque usager, par le biais d'une « mention explicite », dès lors qu'un algorithme a contribué à prendre une décision individuelle à son égard (demande de prestations sociales ou de bourses, calcul d'impôts...). Depuis le 1er juillet 2020, en application de l'article 21 de la loi n° 2018-493 relative à la protection des données personnelles, l'absence de cette « mention explicite » emporte la « nullité » de toute décision individuelle « prise sur le seul fondement d'un traitement automatisé de données à caractère personnel ». Or il semble que les allocations familiales n'affichent toujours aucune « mention explicite » relative à l'utilisation d'algorithmes, notamment s'agissant des demandes de prime d'activité. Elle souhaiterait donc savoir pourquoi cette mesure - aux implications techniques a priori mineures - n'est toujours pas appliquée, plus de quatre ans après la promulgation de la loi pour une République numérique. Cet effort de transparence permettrait pourtant aux citoyens de mieux comprendre les décisions de l'administration, et, s'ils le souhaitent, de faire valoir leurs droits. Deuxièmement, elle aimerait également savoir si la validité des décisions individuelles évoquées précédemment ne risque pas d'être remise en cause, au regard de leur automatisation manifeste.
Question· Question écrite35083open
France · National Assembly
Mme Paula Forteza interpelle M. le ministre délégué auprès du ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la relance, chargé des comptes publics, quant à la mise en œuvre de l'article L. 311-3-1 du code des relations entre le public et l'administration au sein de la direction générale des finances publiques. Cet article, issu de la loi pour une République numérique de 2016, impose aux administrations d'avertir chaque usager, par le biais d'une « mention explicite », dès lors qu'un algorithme a contribué à prendre une décision individuelle à son égard (demande de prestations sociales ou de bourses, calcul d'impôts...). Depuis le 1er juillet 2020, en application de l'article 21 de la loi n° 2018-493 relative à la protection des données personnelles, l'absence de cette « mention explicite » emporte la « nullité » de toute décision individuelle « prise sur le seul fondement d'un traitement automatisé de données à caractère personnel ». Or il semble que la direction générale des finances publiques n'affiche toujours aucune « mention explicite » relative à l'utilisation d'algorithmes, notamment sur ses avis de taxe d'habitation, de taxe foncière ou même d'impôt sur le revenu. Premièrement, elle souhaiterait donc savoir pourquoi cette mesure - aux implications techniques a priori mineures - n'est toujours pas appliquée, plus de quatre ans après la promulgation de la loi pour une République numérique. Cet effort de transparence permettrait pourtant aux citoyens de mieux comprendre les décisions de l'administration, et, s'ils le souhaitent, de faire valoir leurs droits. Deuxièmement, elle aimerait également savoir si la validité des décisions individuelles évoquées précédemment ne risque pas d'être remise en cause, au regard de leur automatisation manifeste.
Question· Question écrite34888open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza calls on the Minister of the Interior following the publication, in the Official Journal of December 4, 2020, of Decree No. 2020-1511 modifying the provisions of the Internal Security Code relating to the processing of personal data called “Prevention of attacks on public security” (PASP), of Decree No. 2020-1510 modifying the provisions of the Internal Security Code relating to the processing of personal data. personal character called “Administrative investigations linked to public security” (EASP) and finally decree no. 2020-1512 modifying the provisions of the internal security code relating to the processing of personal data called “Information management and prevention of attacks on public security” (GIPASP). These three decrees authorize the services concerned to record potentially very sensitive data : political opinions, philosophical or religious convictions, health data revealing a particular danger, activities on social networks, travel, behavior and lifestyle habits - to name just these examples. Twelve years after the removal of the so-called EDVIGE file, the considerable extension of the aforementioned files is of concern. Particularly surprised by the lack of communication around this reform, she would like firstly, understand the foundations, particularly legal, justifying these substantial developments. Secondly, she would like to know how many people were registered in each of these files, as of January 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020.
Question· Question écrite31200open
France · National Assembly
Ms Paula Forteza questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs on the situation of binational, unmarried couples, separated by travel restrictions linked to the health crisis. This question is at the center of issues raised by many citizens separated from their spouse since the start of the health crisis. Directive 2004/38/EC relating to the free movement of people within the European Union implies that without prejudice to a personal right to free movement and residence of the person concerned, the host Member State promotes, in accordance with its national legislation, the entry and stay [...] of the partner with whom the citizen of the Union has a lasting, duly attested relationship (Art.3). She asks to kindly clarify concretely the position that the ministry understands by the term "lasting relationship", with regard to couples unmarried dual nationals, in particular regarding the modalities of attestation of this relationship for couples living a long-distance relationship. She also questions him on the reading that the ministry wishes to give to the European text, by publishing a clear instruction for the attention of consular authorities.
Question· Question écrite31129open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health on the reimbursement rate for medicines for French people living abroad. The order issued by the Minister of Health dated June 25, 2019 (JO 152 of July 3, 2019), in application of article 4 of the law of December 24, 2018 relating to the reform of the Fund for French people living abroad, sets different reimbursement rates according to four zones geographical. In this period of health crisis particularly affecting Latin America with more than 100,000 deaths, many French people living in this region are wondering about the justification for such a difference in reimbursement: for the same contribution, the same medicine is likely to be reimbursed at 65% in Argentina, compared to 20% in Uruguay. The MP considers that such a gap could prove detrimental for the most precarious French people living abroad, particularly during the current sequence. She therefore invites him to clarify the position of the ministry and to indicate on which elements the differences in reimbursement of one country compared to another are based; in a context of health crisis, this differentiation questions the relevance of equal treatment in the face of such a geographic gap.
Question· Question écrite31128answered
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs on the use of funds allocated to the support plan for French people living abroad put in place as part of the management of the crisis linked to the covid-19 epidemic. This provided for an envelope of 50 million euros intended to help French people living abroad financially affected by its consequences. However, two months after this announcement made on April 30, 2020, the Secretary of State in charge of French people abroad declared to the Senate that only 2,700 compatriots around the world were able to benefit from emergency aid, totaling barely 390,000 euros, or less than one percent of this envelope. Some French people find themselves in extremely difficult situations on site: if confinement is now lifted in mainland France and the economic situation restarts, many countries in the world are currently experiencing the rise of an epidemic wave forcing States to decree confinements and with them the entire shutdown of sectors of the economy, putting a number of French nationals in these territories in real precariousness. Consequently, she wishes to know the measures that the ministry intends to take in order to facilitate access to this aid plan, and in particular the reasons causing the low use of credits despite the various questions from French people abroad about the health and social difficulties encountered on site.
Question· Question écrite26961open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Prime Minister about France's involvement in the Open Government Partnership. The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a multilateral international partnership (governments-civil society) aimed at promoting open government: transparency of public action, in particular through the opening of public data; participation of citizens in the development and evaluation of public policies; integrity of public action and public officials; use of new technologies in favor of openness and accountability. France has been a member of the steering committee since April 2014 until 2021. It co-chaired it from 2016 to 2017, on this occasion hosting the OGP World Summit in Paris in December 2016. Beyond regular representation on the various bodies, member countries undertake to put in place national action plans, responding to the challenges of the partnership. France is currently committed to a plan which it will have to justify putting into action at the end of 2020 comprising a total of 21 commitments made by 13 ministries, 3 government agencies, the Court of Auditors and the High Authority for the Transparency of Public Life (HATVP). These are organized around 5 axes: transparency of public action; the opening of digital resources and open innovation; strengthening citizen participation approaches; open government serving the global challenges of our century, development, environment and science; the opening of courts and independent administrative authorities. France's participation in the partnership demonstrates its commitment to a new form of democracy, linked to citizens' demands for development. The digital department, through the Étalab mission, has always been in charge of the operational support of France's involvement. At the institutional level, President Emmanuel Macron was present during the OGP handover ceremony, which was held on the sidelines of the 72nd United Nations General Assembly in September 2018. She would like to know the involvement that France will maintain in this partnership and which ministry and teams are responsible for carrying out the commitments made.
Question· Question écrite13297open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of State, Minister of Ecological and Inclusive Transition, on France's position following the European Parliament's proposed directive, tabled on September 12, 2018, repealing the biannual time change. This question is asked on behalf of citizen Clément Castelin, as part of the Citizen Questions to Government initiative. Directive 2000/84/EC regulates the time change for Member States and responds to a need for harmony within the European Union, made up of three different time zones. The time change is not unanimous; its effectiveness is becoming increasingly contested by the European Parliament, citizens and a growing number of Member States. The European Commission spoke directly to the citizens of the Member States, as part of a public consultation between July 4 and on August 16, 2018, having collected the opinions of 4.6 million European citizens. More than 80% of voters are in favor of removing the time change. By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, and if the proposed directive is adopted, it is up to each Member State to choose its time zone. However, the European Commission calls on Member States to adopt a unified time system. She considers that a lack of coordination “would harm the internal market by leading to an increase in the costs of cross-border trade, inconvenience in the organization of transport, communications and travel, as well as a reduction in productivity in the internal market for goods and services”. She therefore asks him to kindly make known France's position on this subject; to know if she would opt for summer time permanent (UTC +2) or for permanent winter time (UTC +1). Has an impact study been carried out on this subject? What elements justify this choice? It also asks him to specify the means by which he intends to organize consultation with the Member States, in order to establish a coherent and unified European system.
Question· Question écrite43431open
France · National Assembly · 31 October 2022
Mrs Paula Forteza questions the Secretary of State to the Minister of Solidarity and Health, responsible for children and families, about parental educational leave. This question is asked on behalf of citizen Ophélie Salle, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. To date, any employee with at least one year of seniority on the date of birth of their child has the right either to the benefit parental educational leave, during which the employment contract is suspended, or a reduction in working hours (as long as this part-time activity remains greater than or equal to sixteen hours per week). These arrangements end no later than the child's third birthday. However, some parents would like to be able to benefit from it for longer, given school schedules, in order, for example, to be able to to take care of their child on Wednesdays. Also, the MP would like to know if the Government plans to extend the benefit of parental leave or the reduction of working hours on the basis of article L.1225-47 of the labor code; she emphasizes that such a reform would have no impact on public finances, these two measures being uncorrelated from the shared child education benefit (PreParE), paid by CAF for parents who reduce their activity to look after their children.
Question· Question écrite44776open
France · National Assembly · 2 August 2022
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of Territorial Cohesion and Relations with Local Authorities about road safety. This question is asked on behalf of citizen Nicolas Lebon, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. First of all, it appears that certain communities do not respect the technical requirements applicable to pedestrian paths. That concerns, for example, sidewalks that are impassable for strollers or wheelchairs. However, the decree of January 15, 2007, implementing decree no. 2006-1658 of December 21, 2006 relating to technical requirements for the accessibility of roads and public spaces, provides that the minimum width of the path is 1.40 meters free of furniture or any other possible obstacle. On the other hand, cyclists complain about the dangerousness of certain pole-type equipment, the location of which can sometimes cause falls. She would therefore like to know what measures have been taken by the Government to support communities in securing roads and whether more restrictive measures are being considered to ensure their compliance.
Question· Question écrite44099open
France · National Assembly · 1 August 2022
Ms. Paula Forteza questions the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery about France's supply of self-tests in the context of the covid-19 crisis. This question is asked on behalf of a citizen, as part of the “citizen questions” initiative in the Government. The arrival of the omicron variant has in fact caused an explosion in the number of cases and therefore of tests, with for example nearly 12 million PCR and antigen tests the week of January 3, 2022. However, some uncertainty remains regarding self-tests. The MP would like to know the strategy for supplying and distributing the millions – or even billions – of self-tests required by the new protocols, particularly those of national education. She would also like to know the number of self-tests imported into France, as well as their place of production.
Question· Question écrite45138open
France · National Assembly · 3 May 2022
Mme Paula Forteza interroge Mme la ministre de l'enseignement supérieur, de la recherche et de l'innovation au sujet de la distribution de protections périodiques gratuites pour les étudiantes. Cette question est posée au nom de la citoyenne Valentine Bardon, dans le cadre de l'initiative des « Questions citoyennes » au Gouvernement. En février 2021, afin de faire face aux effets de la crise sanitaire, le Gouvernement annonçait la mise en place d'un accès gratuit aux protections périodiques pour les étudiantes. Cette promesse reposait sur deux tristes constats. Premièrement, que 1,7 million de femmes n'auraient pas les moyens de se procurer régulièrement des protections périodiques. Deuxièmement, que cette précarité menstruelle toucherait une étudiante sur trois. La mise à disposition de protections périodiques gratuites et respectueuses de l'environnement devait débuter dès le mois de mars 2021, dans les résidences universitaires des CROUS et les services de santé universitaires (SSU), avant d'être étendue à d'autres points de distribution « sur l'ensemble des campus universitaires » à compter de la rentrée 2021. Pourtant, certaines étudiantes affirment aujourd'hui n'avoir pas eu connaissance d'une quelconque distribution gratuite au sein de leur campus. Elle aimerait ainsi savoir quel bilan le Gouvernement tirait de cette initiative et surtout ce qui est prévu pour qu'il remplisse pleinement les objectifs qu'il s'était fixés.
Question· Question écrite38749open
France · National Assembly · 4 November 2021
Mme Paula Forteza appelle l'attention de M. le ministre des solidarités et de la santé quant à l'accompagnement prévu pour les femmes qui subissent une fausse couche. Relativement tabou et peu documenté, ce phénomène est loin d'être mineur. Certains estiment en effet que près d'une femme sur trois subirait une fausse couche au cours de sa vie. En France, 15 % des grossesses s'arrêteraient spontanément au cours du premier trimestre, ce qui représenterait environ 20 000 fausses couches par an. Pour les futurs parents, cette épreuve est souvent un choc auquel la société ne prépare guère. On observe en outre une forte disparité, dans la mesure où la femme se voit généralement prescrire un arrêt de travail, à l'inverse de son conjoint. Or si l'on veut avancer vers une plus grande égalité au sein du couple et une déconstruction des rôles et des tâches traditionnellement assignées, on doit aussi permettre au conjoint, quel que soit son genre ou son statut, de s'impliquer tout au long des évènements liés à la grossesse, de se sentir directement concerné, dans les hauts comme dans les bas. La Nouvelle-Zélande l'a bien compris et a ainsi adopté en mars 2021 une loi accordant un congé spécial de trois jours, tant à la personne traversant une fausse couche qu'à son conjoint. Elle aimerait ainsi savoir si le Gouvernement envisage d'instaurer un congé similaire en France.
Question· Question écrite39486answered
France · National Assembly · 5 August 2021
Mme Paula Forteza interroge Mme la ministre de la transformation et de la fonction publiques au sujet des services automatiques de réponse téléphonique aux citoyens au sein des services publics. Cette question est posée au nom d'une citoyenne, dans le cadre de l'initiative des « questions citoyennes » au Gouvernement. Le dialogue avec les agents administratifs est rendu difficile, voire impossible, par la création de services de répondeurs automatiques. Beaucoup de citoyens ne sont pas à l'aise avec ces serveurs vocaux, déshumanisants, et qui ne permettent pas, bien souvent, d'obtenir de réponse à leurs problèmes. Ce phénomène est d'autant plus regrettable qu'il n'existe parfois pas d'autre alternative pour parler à un agent, surtout dans la période actuelle de restrictions liées au covid-19. Aussi, certains plaident pour l'introduction d'un « droit à un service analogique », qui garantirait aux personnes le droit de communiquer avec les services compétents sans utiliser de technologie spécifique. Mme la députée aimerait ainsi connaître les mesures envisagées pour garantir aux citoyens un accès de qualité aux services publics.
Question· Question écrite40876open
France · National Assembly · 8 July 2021
Mme Paula Forteza interroge M. le ministre de l'intérieur au sujet de la fixation des jours de scrutin. Cette question est posée au nom d'un citoyen, dans le cadre de l'initiative des « questions citoyennes » au Gouvernement. Traditionnellement, dans le pays, les élections ont toujours lieu des dimanches, comme le fixent les articles L. 55 et L. 56 du code électoral, notamment pour les élections législatives et municipales. La montée de l'abstention et l'évolution du mode de vie des Français (davantage de travail le dimanche, départs en week-end, etc.) invitent toutefois à engager une réflexion sur ce moment clé de la démocratie française. Au Royaume-Uni, par exemple, les électeurs se rendent aux urnes les jeudis pour désigner leurs députés. L'élection présidentielle américaine a de son côté systématiquement lieu un mardi. Elle aimerait ainsi savoir si le Gouvernement envisage de modifier le jour de tenue des élections, ou d'ouvrir les bureaux de vote sur plusieurs jours (par exemple du dimanche au mardi).
Question· Question écrite39996answered
France · National Assembly · 6 June 2021
Mme Paula Forteza interroge M. le ministre de l'Europe et des affaires étrangères au sujet de la sécurité des employés d'ONG œuvrant à l'étranger. Cette question est posée au nom du citoyen Marc Le Brize dans le cadre de l'initiative des « questions citoyennes » au Gouvernement. L'attaque meurtrière ayant eu lieu au Niger, en août 2020, et durant laquelle sept employés de l'ONG Acted ont perdu la vie, souligne malheureusement l'importance des risques auxquels sont exposés les travailleurs humanitaires déployés dans les pays à risque. Ce drame est d'autant plus regrettable que ces Français ont été assassinés dans une zone jaune, selon la catégorisation du ministère des Affaires étrangères, soit une zone en « vigilance renforcée » qui correspond à un statut intermédiaire entre vert et orange. Se pose ainsi la question du recrutement et de la formation des personnes envoyées par certaines associations humanitaires dans des zones dangereuses, là où armée et entreprises n'envoient que des personnels hautement qualifiés. Elle aimerait dès lors savoir quels sont les dispositifs en vigueur, et si le Gouvernement envisage de prendre de nouvelles mesures à ce sujet.
Question· Question écrite39888answered
France · National Assembly · 6 June 2021
Mme Paula Forteza interroge Mme la ministre de la transformation et de la fonction publiques au sujet des services automatiques de réponse téléphonique aux citoyens au sein des services publics. Cette question est posée au nom d'une citoyenne, dans le cadre de l'initiative des « questions citoyennes » au Gouvernement. Le dialogue avec les agents administratifs est rendu difficile, voire impossible, par la création de services de répondeurs automatiques. Beaucoup de citoyens ne sont pas à l'aise avec ces serveurs vocaux, déshumanisants, et qui ne permettent pas, bien souvent, d'obtenir de réponse à leurs problèmes. Ce phénomène est d'autant plus regrettable qu'il n'existe parfois pas d'autre alternative pour parler à un agent, surtout dans la période actuelle de restrictions liées à la covid-19. Aussi, certains plaident pour l'introduction d'un « droit à un service analogique », qui garantirait aux personnes le droit de communiquer avec les services compétents sans utiliser de technologie spécifique. Elle aimerait ainsi connaître les mesures envisagées pour garantir aux citoyens un accès de qualité aux services publics .
Question· Question écrite38608open
France · National Assembly · 4 April 2021
Mme Paula Forteza interpelle Mme la ministre de la transition écologique au sujet du projet de loi « portant lutte contre le dérèglement climatique et renforcement de la résilience face à ses effets ». Cette question est posée au nom du citoyen Adrien Heinzelmeier, dans le cadre de l'initiative des « questions citoyennes » au Gouvernement. L'expérience de la Convention citoyenne pour le climat (CCC) fut intéressante à plus d'un titre, démontrant notamment qu'un consensus éclairé pouvait émerger entre des citoyens très différents, ayant eu le temps de s'instruire et de débattre de manière approfondie. Cependant, contrairement aux engagements du chef de l'État, qui avait promis de reprendre « sans filtre » les propositions de la CCC, le Gouvernement a présenté un projet de loi qui ne reprend que partiellement les conclusions des travaux des citoyens, et qui reste donc dans une large mesure insuffisant au regard des enjeux. Elle aimerait ainsi savoir quelles sont les motivations qui ont fondé un tel choix.
Question· Question écrite11504open
France · National Assembly · 7 July 2018
Mme Paula Forteza interroge Mme la secrétaire d'État, auprès du ministre de l'économie et des finances, sur le besoin de revoir le dispositif Bloctel afin de mettre fin aux appels téléphoniques intrusifs dans la vie privée des citoyens. Cette question est posée au nom du citoyen Jean François Barthale qui, comme de nombreux citoyens, reçoit régulièrement des appels téléphoniques à des fins commerciales même en étant inscrit au service Bloctel. Le dispositif Bloctel, entré en service le 1er juin 2016, semble aujourd'hui inefficace. L'association de défense des consommateurs UFC-Que Choisir a publié une étude début 2017 qui assure que pour 82 % des personnes interrogées, le dispositif n'a pas permis une réduction des démarchages téléphoniques. Les débats à l'Assemblée nationale sur la proposition de loi visant à renforcer les droits des consommateurs en matière de démarchage téléphonique témoignent de l'importance de ce sujet et de l'urgence qu'il y a à trouver une solution à cette problématique. Lors des débats parlementaires, les entreprises du secteur ont alerté sur l'impact que des mesures très restrictives pourraient avoir sur l'emploi dans de nombreuses filières (énergie, assurances, habitat). Mme la secrétaire d'État a réuni, le 23 juillet 2018, l'association UFC-Que Choisir, des entreprises et des parlementaires pour trouver des solutions contre ces pratiques abusives, sous l'égide du Conseil national de consommation. Elle lui demande donc de lui préciser, suite à cette première concertation, quelle est la position et la feuille de route du Gouvernement pour trouver un système efficace qui permette aux Français de se protéger contre le démarchage téléphonique tout en prenant en compte l'impact sur les activités commerciales et l'emploi à court terme.
Question· Question écrite6162answered
France · National Assembly · 2 June 2018
Mme Paula Forteza attire l'attention de Mme la secrétaire d'État, auprès du Premier ministre, chargée des personnes handicapées, sur l'annonce du quatrième plan autisme. Cette question est posée au nom de Mme Isabelle Larelle. Le 6 juillet 2017, le Président de la République a annoncé la préparation d'un quatrième plan autisme auprès de Mme la secrétaire d'État en charge des personnes handicapées. Ce quatrième plan a été précédé d'un troisième établi pour la période 2013-2017. L'autisme se définissant comme un « trouble du neuro-développement apparaissant au cours de l'enfance [et] qui se manifeste par une altération des capacités à établir des interactions sociales, et à communiquer » (rapport IGAS n° 2016-094R), est une priorité nationale comme l'a annoncé le Président de la République lors de la campagne. En effet, les troubles du spectre autistique touchent entre 91 500 et 106 000 jeunes de moins de 20 ans en France et 650 000 personnes en France au total. Pourtant, la France fait l'objet de nombreuses condamnations quant à la prise en charge de l'autisme. Ainsi, le Conseil de l'Europe a condamné la France pour discrimination à l'égard des enfants autistes, défaut d'éducation, de scolarisation, et de formation professionnelle en 2004, 2007, 2008, 2012 et 2014. De même, en 2016, la France a été sanctionnée par l'ONU pour violation des droits de l'enfant à ce sujet. Face à ce constat, un quatrième plan autisme est en cours d'élaboration en concertation avec les agences régionales de santé et s'articule autour de cinq groupes de travail. La synthèse de leurs travaux ainsi que l'annonce de propositions concrètes doit avoir lieu en février 2018. Elle l'a prie de bien vouloir détailler les suites données au troisième plan autisme, et tout particulièrement aux mesures n'ayant pas été mis en place. Elle lui demande quelles sont les raisons de ce retard et comment elle envisage de le pallier. Enfin, elle souhaite connaître les mesures phares du quatrième plan autisme.
Question· Question écrite6142answered
France · National Assembly · 2 June 2018
Mme Paula Forteza interroge M. le ministre de l'éducation nationale sur l'utilisation du logiciel libre dans le réseau scolaire. Cette question est posée au nom de Madame Marie-Odile Morandi. Dans la loi du 7 octobre 2016 pour une République numérique, l'article 16 demande aux administrations qu'elles « encouragent l'utilisation des logiciels libres et des formats ouverts lors du développement, de l'achat ou de l'utilisation, de tout ou partie, de ces systèmes d'information ». Dans son rapport public annuel 2018, la Cour des comptes a reconnu l'intérêt du logiciel libre, décrit comme un « puissant facteur d'efficience et d'influence » mais aussi une façon de répondre à un « enjeu de sécurité et de souveraineté ». Dans la réforme du baccalauréat, le ministre annonce l'introduction d'une nouvelle matière « humanités numériques et scientifiques » qui permettra aux étudiants d'engager une réflexion autour des enjeux de société liés aux nouvelles technologies. En outre, la mise en place du plan numérique pour l'éducation, en partenariat avec les collectivités locales, permettra aux enseignants et aux élèves de profiter de toutes les opportunités offertes par le numérique dans une philosophie de transmission et de partage. Elle lui demande de bien vouloir détailler la position du ministère quant à l'utilisation du logiciel libre dans le contexte de la numérisation du réseau éducatif en cours. Mme la députée souhaite savoir si des dispositions permettant au ministère et à ses partenaires de contribuer au développement du logiciel libre et de leurs communautés sont prévues. La citoyenne Marie-Odile Morandi propose notamment que le ministère puisse soutenir financièrement (ou sous forme de « dons ») le développement du logiciel libre dans le secteur de l'éducation. Elle souhaite savoir si M. le ministre y serait favorable.
Question· Question écrite5015open
France · National Assembly · 1 June 2018
Mme Paula Forteza alerte M. le ministre d'État, ministre de l'intérieur, sur le besoin urgent de dématérialiser l'envoi des certificats de vie. Cette question est posée au nom du citoyen Guillermo Mimica, résidant au Chili qui, comme de nombreux Français établis à l'étranger, se heurte régulièrement à l'interruption de sa pension, due au retard ou à l'égarement des certificats de vie envoyés par les services postaux aux caisses de retraite en France. Afin de verser les pensions, les caisses de retraite (légale et complémentaire) doivent s'assurer que la personne en question est toujours en vie et cette justification passe par l'envoi de ces certificats. Aujourd'hui, les caisses de retraite ne les acceptent pas sous format dématérialisé, même s'ils sont certifiés par les autorités locales ou par les postes consulaires français du pays de résidence. Les Français résidant dans des pays comme le Chili ou le Cambodge, où les services postaux sont défaillants, voient donc leur pension de retraite régulièrement suspendue. Elle le prie de bien vouloir étudier les possibilités de faire évoluer la réglementation tout en maintenant, bien sûr, un haut niveau d'exigence sur l'authentification de ces documents. Le Gouvernement s'est engagé à dématérialiser et simplifier les démarches administratives pour tous les Français et à restaurer la confiance des citoyens en leur administration : elle lui demande ce qu'il en est des certificats de vie.
Question· Question écrite8063answered
France · National Assembly · 4 January 2018
Mme Paula Forteza attire l'attention de Mme la ministre des solidarités et de la santé sur la mise en place d'un carnet de santé numérique. Cette question est posée au nom de M. Damien Di Nome. La loi de modernisation de notre système de santé du 26 janvier 2016 prévoit la mise en œuvre d'un dossier médical partagé. Ce dernier permet de fluidifier le suivi du patient en contenant notamment les comptes rendus hospitaliers, les allergies et antécédents, les médicaments prescrits, etc. Un décret d'application, entré en vigueur le 4 juillet 2016, a précisé les conditions d'application du dossier médical partagé. Toutefois, sa généralisation n'a pas encore eu lieu alors que la demande des citoyens est forte. Sa création est pour l'instant réservée aux ouvrants-droits majeurs du régime général de la sécurité sociale affiliés à la caisse d'assurance maladie du Bas-Rhin, de Bayonne, des Côtes-d'Armor, du Doubs, de la Haute-Garonne, de l'Indre-et-Loire, du Puy-de-Dôme, de la Somme, du Val-de-Marne. Elle la prie de bien vouloir détailler la généralisation du dossier médical partagé à l'ensemble du territoire et du public et lui demande à quelle échéance ce déploiement sera finalisé et si l'ensemble des publics sera concerné.