Artificial intelligence

364. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55704/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

364. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55704/25]

360. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55699/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

360. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55699/25]

306. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Health if her Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [55700/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

306. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Health if her Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [55700/25]

271. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality if her Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [55691/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

271. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality if her Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [55691/25]

262. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55690/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

262. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55690/25]

237. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55702/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

237. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55702/25]

222. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Social Protection if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55705/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

222. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Social Protection if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55705/25]

200. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55701/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

200. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55701/25]

190. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55693/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

190. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55693/25]

152. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Education and Youth if her Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [55695/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

152. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Education and Youth if her Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [55695/25]

136. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55696/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

136. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55696/25]

133. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the details being considered as part of the Budget 2026 commitment to promote and leverage the productive use of AI in companies to ensure the benefits are optimised. [55580/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

133. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the details being considered as part of the Budget 2026 commitment to promote and leverage the productive use of AI in companies to ensure the benefits are optimised. [55580/25]

127. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55703/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

127. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55703/25]

119. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if the Government has benchmarked the roll-out of public service AI initiatives against similar programmes in other jurisdictions; whether lessons from international best practice have informed the adoption of AI in areas such as legal research, document summarisation, data breach identification, and high-volume disclosure; and if his Department plans to provide guidance, tools or frameworks to other public bodies to ensure the responsible, transparent and consistent deployment of AI across Government. [55597/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

119. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if the Government has benchmarked the roll-out of public service AI initiatives against similar programmes in other jurisdictions; whether lessons from international best practice have informed the adoption of AI in areas such as legal research, document summarisation, data breach identification, and high-volume disclosure; and if his Department plans to provide guidance, tools or frameworks to other public bodies to ensure the responsible, transparent and consistent deployment of AI across Government. [55597/25]

108. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Finance if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55697/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

108. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Finance if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55697/25]

85. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Transport if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55707/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

85. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Transport if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55707/25]

56. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55694/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

56. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55694/25]

34. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55692/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

34. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55692/25]

6. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55698/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

6. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [55698/25]

1. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Taoiseach if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts. [55706/25]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 15 October 2025

1. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Taoiseach if his Department is using agentic AI in the delivery of its services or operations; if it is considering the use of agentic AI, and in what contexts. [55706/25]

Sentenza del Tribunale (Settima Sezione) del 15 ottobre 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, già Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG contro Comitato di risoluzione unico.#Accesso ai documenti – Regolamento (CE) n. 1049/2001 – Documenti riguardanti l’adozione da parte del CRU di un meccanismo di risoluzione nei confronti della Sberbank banka d.d. – Decisioni della commissione per i ricorsi del CRU relative a decisioni confermative del CRU di diniego di accesso – Diniego parziale di accesso – Eccezione relativa alla tutela della politica finanziaria, monetaria o economica dell’Unione o di uno Stato membro – Articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera a), quarto trattino, del regolamento n. 1049/2001 – Eccezione relativa alla tutela degli interessi commerciali di un terzo – Articolo 4, paragrafo 2, primo trattino, del regolamento n. 1049/2001 – Eccezione relativa alla tutela della vita privata e dell’integrità dell’individuo – Articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera b), del regolamento n. 1049/2001.#Causa T-291/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Discussion

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 14 October 2025

Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence

Question 10275 — retraites : fonctionnaires civils et militaires

France · National Assembly · 14 October 2025

M. Laurent Mazaury attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la transformation et la fonction publiques, de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique sur la prise en compte de la réduction d'activité pour l'éducation d'un enfant dans le cadre de la retraite des agents publics. Le code des pensions civiles et militaires de retraite fait aujourd'hui une distinction entre les enfants nés avant le 1er janvier 2004 et ceux nés après cette date. Pour les deux, la loi et les décrets d'application permettent aujourd'hui aux parents, père ou mère, d'obtenir une bonification en fonction du pourcentage et de la durée de la période de temps partiel effectué. Néanmoins, l'article R. 13 pris en application du b de l'article 12, en vigueur entre 1964 et 2004, ne prévoyait la bonification prévue qu'en faveur des femmes fonctionnaires. Aussi, M. le député a été alerté sur le fait que cet article, bien que modifié à différentes reprises, pénalisait toujours des pères qui avaient décidé avant 2004 de réduire leur activité professionnelle pour s'occuper de leur enfant. Dans ce contexte, il lui demande quelles mesures le Gouvernement pourrait porter pour que ces inégalités cessent et que toutes les réductions d'activité, pour les enfants nés avant ou après le 1er janvier 2004, soient prises en compte et bonifiées.

Question 10249 — lieux de privation de liberté

France · National Assembly · 14 October 2025

Mme Élise Leboucher attire l'attention de M. le ministre d'État, garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice, sur la situation des services pénitentiaires d'insertion et de probation. Depuis leur création en 1999, les services pénitentiaires d'insertion et de probation (SPIP) sont un maillon essentiel de la politique pénale du pays. Ces services reconnus pour l'expertise de leurs professionnels, assurent des missions d'accompagnement et de suivi social de proximité auprès des personnes placées sous-main de justice (PPSMJ). Ces missions viennent répondre à l'objectif majeur recherché par la sanction pénale, à savoir sa finalité curative. Il s'agit d'accompagner l'individu dans sa réinsertion sociale et ainsi protéger la société en prévenant la récidive. Dans un contexte où l'objectif doit être de donner la priorité aux actions les plus efficaces pour empêcher la reproduction d'actes délictuels ou criminels, les SPIP devraient donc voir leurs missions confortées et leurs moyens renforcés. Or depuis plusieurs mois, les professionnels du secteur et leurs organisations syndicales font part des fortes inquiétudes quant aux orientations politiques du ministère. Si M. le ministre déclare publiquement vouloir donner toute leur place aux personnels de l'insertion et de la probation au sein du service public de l'administration pénitentiaire, leurs représentants déplorent une totale inadéquation de cette annonce avec leurs réalités quotidiennes et l'absence de moyens humains et financiers permettant de poursuivre leurs missions avec efficacité. Ils déplorent un dévoiement de plus en plus visible de l'objectif premier de la politique pénale, avec des arbitrages budgétaires abandonnant progressivement les missions curatives et de réhabilitation des PPSMJ, au bénéfice d'un renforcement de la seule dimension sécuritaire, au détriment de l'efficacité réelle de la lutte contre la récidive. Dans les faits, les choix budgétaires sont venus réduire de manière notable les capacités d'actions des SPIP et la qualité du suivi des PPSMJ. Cela peut ainsi se traduire par des limitations de formation des personnels, la suppression de postes ou l'annulation d'embauches de travailleurs sociaux supplémentaires, une limitation des actions menées pour le maintien du lien familial avec les détenus, pourtant essentiel à la réinsertion, ou encore à l'annulation d'initiatives sur le thème de la prévention de la délinquance. De manière générale, les moyens humains disponibles au sein des SPIP demeurent largement insuffisants pour répondre à l'ensemble des besoins. Selon les chiffres de la direction de l'administration pénitentiaire, ce sont 520 postes de conseillers pénitentiaires d'insertion et de probation (CPIP) qui demeurent vacants au sein des différents ressorts départementaux. Selon les organisations syndicales, ce sont en réalité près de 1 200 postes toutes professions confondues qui seraient nécessaires pour répondre aux besoins minimaux. Elle lui demande si une inflexion est à l'étude afin de débloquer des crédits budgétaires nouveaux pour que les SPIP puissent recevoir les moyens humains et financiers indispensables à l'exercice de leurs missions. Si tel est le cas, elle lui demande de lui indiquer comment cela va se traduire dans le futur projet de loi de finances.

Question 10241 — impôts et taxes

France · National Assembly · 14 October 2025

Mme Gabrielle Cathala interroge M. le ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle et énergétique sur les outils numériques employés par la direction générale des finances publiques (DGFiP) dans sa lutte contre la fraude fiscale. Cette dernière passe notamment par l'exploitation des données d'autres agences publiques, au premier rang desquelles la Caisse d'allocations familiales (CAF). Or cette méthode contient deux biais majeurs. D'une part, le rapport d'information du Sénat n° 485 (mars 2024) indique qu'à la CAF, le recours aux algorithmes, tels qu'ils sont programmés, aboutit à cibler en priorité les foyers monoparentaux, le plus souvent des mères élevant seules leurs enfants. Pourtant, les familles monoparentales ne fraudent pas davantage que d'autres foyers. Rien ne justifie donc cette attention particulière portée sur elles, mais l'algorithme utilisé associe mécaniquement signes de précarité et risques de flux administratifs anormaux. Le déséquilibre est manifeste et même assumé dans la manière dont le système cible ces profils précaires. Cette pratique ne se limite pas à la CAF. Elle est à l'œuvre également à la DGFiP avec le dispositif « ciblage de la fraude et valorisation des requêtes (CFVR) ». D'autre part, les outils numériques développés pour lutter contre la fraude fiscale laissent dans l'angle mort les ultra-riches alors même qu'ils sont les plus enclins à la fraude. L'existence de montages opaques ( offshore , trusts , sociétés écrans) empêche l'accès aux données, un privilège rare qui confère une forme d'impunité fiscale face aux outils numériques. Au-delà de cette opacité, cette fraction de la population dispose d'un avantage bien plus redoutable : l'accès à des conseils de haut niveau, à une connaissance fine des contrôles, à des avocats fiscalistes ou encore à des « family offices ». Ces conseillers privés, souvent mieux formés que les inspecteurs publics, connaissent parfaitement les seuils de déclenchement des contrôles, les règles de redressement et les failles dans les grands algorithmes. Ils offrent dès lors à leurs clients une véritable invisibilité face aux radars classiques. Certes, le budget de la DGFiP a augmenté dans ce domaine tandis que les contrôles automatisés de la CAF s'améliorent. Pour autant, l'opacité du 1 % le mieux protégé demeure car les techniques de dissimulation évoluent plus rapidement que les technologies classiques utilisées par l'administration. En définitive, les biais des algorithmes mis en œuvre pour lutter contre la fraude fiscale produisent donc de la discrimination sociale et altèrent l'efficacité du dispositif. Ceci n'est pas une fatalité. Derrière l'apparente neutralité informatique, ce sont en réalité des arbitrages politiques qui amènent à traquer la fraude chez les plus vulnérables plutôt que chez les plus aisés du pays. Il est en effet tout à fait possible d'inverser les biais susmentionnés et de réintroduire des indicateurs d'équité. Pour ce faire, Mme la députée propose deux solutions. Premièrement, il est indispensable d'augmenter les dotations humaines et matérielles des organismes non automatisés les plus efficaces en matière de chasse à l'évasion fiscale, à l'instar de Tracfin. Deuxièmement, il existe un moyen efficace de décupler l'observation, la compréhension et l'interception des schémas complexes développés par les ultra-riches : une intelligence artificielle utilisée à bon escient et répondant à toutes les règles en matière de protection des données notamment. Aussi, elle lui demande ce qu'il compte apporter comme solution pour en finir avec la discrimination et l'inefficacité engendrée par le système actuel.

Question 10207 — assurance maladie maternité

France · National Assembly · 14 October 2025

M. Jonathan Gery attire l'attention de Mme la ministre du travail, de la santé, des solidarités, des familles, de l'autonomie et des personnes handicapées sur les conséquences préoccupantes des baisses tarifaires prévues pour l'imagerie médicale dans le cadre de la dernière loi de financement de la sécurité sociale. Depuis le 1er octobre 2025, de nombreux groupes de radiologie libérale, notamment dans le Rhône, ont rejoint le mouvement national de grève de la permanence des soins, initié par la Fédération nationale des médecins radiologues (FNMR). Ce mouvement fait suite à l'instauration d'une économie de 300 millions d'euros sur l'imagerie, mise en œuvre principalement via des baisses brutales des forfaits techniques, qui financent pourtant l'essentiel des coûts de fonctionnement des structures (équipements, maintenance, salaires, énergie...). Les professionnels de santé dénoncent une décision unilatérale qui met gravement en péril l'équilibre économique des cabinets de radiologie, en particulier ceux de proximité, et qui risque à terme de réduire l'accès aux soins pour les patients. Ils rappellent que la radiologie joue un rôle fondamental dans les parcours de soins, qu'il s'agisse de dépistage, de diagnostic ou d'alternatives thérapeutiques à la chirurgie grâce à la radiologie interventionnelle. Par ailleurs, les engagements pris par la CNAM dans le cadre de la réforme des produits de contraste n'ont pas été respectés. Les professionnels, qui avaient accepté de prendre en charge ces produits à condition qu'aucune baisse tarifaire brutale ne soit imposée, constatent aujourd'hui un retour en arrière préjudiciable pour leur activité et pour les patients. Le récent rapport de l'IGAS et de l'IGF, sur lequel s'appuie cette politique, est vivement critiqué par la profession pour ses approximations, son absence de regard médical et sa méconnaissance du terrain. Les radiologues alertent sur les effets de cette approche strictement comptable, qui freine l'innovation, met en danger l'accès équitable aux soins et compromet le développement de technologies telles que l'intelligence artificielle ou la tomosynthèse mammaire. Il lui demande donc quelles garanties le Gouvernement peut apporter pour préserver une offre de soins en radiologie de qualité sur l'ensemble du territoire et quelles sont ses intentions quant à une éventuelle réouverture du dialogue avec les représentants de la profession, afin de définir une trajectoire financière à la fois soutenable pour les praticiens et compatible avec les impératifs d'innovation et de santé publique.

Artificial Intelligence: Child Sexual Abuse Material

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 14 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether her Department plans to introduce statutory safeguards to help prevent AI chatbots from being used to simulate sexual (a) activity and (b) scenarios involving children.

Unemployment: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 14 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will make and assessment of the potential impact of AI related job losses on the level of unemployment benefit.

Artificial Intelligence: Employment

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 14 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions he has had with business leaders on the potential impact of AI on the number of jobs in the next five years.

AI Security Institute

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 14 October 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to expand the advisory role of the AI Security Institute to include binding regulatory functions.

Artificial Intelligence: Foreign Investment in UK

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 14 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help ensure the UK is a global hub for (a) relocation and (b) investment by generative artificial intelligence firms seeking to license creative c

Monitor and have restrictions on AI generated pictures and videos

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

Monitor the use of AI in the UK and have a potential law that limits AI image and/or video generation to protect children and people from false accusations Because as the rise of AI usage becomes a thing it is becoming harder and harder to determine what looks like AI and what is real, the UK needs to protect its citizens it takes 5 minutes max on the Internet to see deep fakes of random people with children which could ruin someone's life over a "joke" and we need the government to protect us as we elected them to do so.

Social Rented Housing: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether any respondents to the consultation on the Competence and Conduct Standard for Social Housing, updated on 30 September 2025, raised concerns about the potential implicati

Artificial Intelligence: Copyright

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to ensure that existing copyright law is (a) upheld and (b) enforced in relation to the scraping and use of creative content by generative artificial intelligen

Artificial Intelligence: Copyright

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of stimulating a licensing market for the use of copyrighted creative content by generative artificial intelligence firms.

Artificial Intelligence: Copyright

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions her Department has had with representatives of the UK’s creative industries on (a) the Government’s proposed exception to copyright for text and data mining and (b) the

Artificial Intelligence: Intellectual Property

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what recent discussions her Department has had with international counterparts on approaches to protecting intellectual property rights in the context of generative artificial intellige

Artificial Intelligence: Copyright

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the feasibility of introducing mandatory transparency obligations requiring generative artificial intelligence developers to disclose which co

Artificial Intelligence: Copyright

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what recent assessment she has made of the potential impact of the level of copyright protections in relation to the use of creative works for training generative artificial intelligenc

Artificial Intelligence: Child Sexual Abuse Material

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to introduce statutory safeguards to ensure that AI chatbots cannot be used to simulate sexual activity or scenarios involving children.

Artificial Intelligence: Regulation

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 13 October 2025

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the adequacy of current regulation of AI chatbots.

Honorering EU-financiering voor de AI-fabriek in Groningen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 13 October 2025

Honorering EU-financiering voor de AI-fabriek in Groningen

All AI generated media (videos, photos & audio) to be marked as such.

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 October 2025

The UK government must pass a law requiring any website displaying media influenced wholly, or partly, by artificial intelligence, to state so immediately on the media being displayed. An example of this being; a Watermark top left of all media, such as “AIM” Artificial Intelligence Manipulated. We find ourselves in a digital world, where the truth has the potential to lose almost all meaning. Children and adults alike do not know what to believe as they watch videos, see pictures and read articles shaping their reality. The narratives being written within social media, the news an all types of media, is now subject to a type of manipulation never witnessed before. This manipulation is on a scale never witnessed before and with repercussions more severe than ever before.

Ban the use of AI generating the arts

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

Thousands of photos, pictures, songs, vocals, lyrics and writing pieces get generated by AI daily. We feel this is disrespecting the thousands of real people who could be paid to do the same thing. In the short term, AI seems fantastic, but scientists have studied what it does to your brain if you use it often. Recent discoveries report that the use of AI frequently in your life can reduce the ability to think straight or use short term memory.

Defence: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of placing (a) transparency, (b) testing and (c) accountability requirements on private defence contracts for the development of AI systems.

Defence: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what ethical frameworks are in place to guide the (a) development and (b) deployment of AI technologies in defence.

Defence: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to recommendation 29 of the Strategic Defence Review 2025, what progress he has made on establishing a protected Defence AI Investment Fund.

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology: Education

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what progress her Department has made in delivering the TechFirst programme; and what discussions her Department has had with organisations in Ealing Central and Acton constituency on s

Performing Arts: Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the potential implications for her policies of the use of acting performances to train AI-generated performers without (a) permission and (b)

Artificial Intelligence

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 October 2025

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of the importance of developing transformative AI capability as a domain of strategic competition.