Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Aviation

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 3,596United Kingdom · 3,142Ireland · 2,084Austria · 1,195European Union · 1,066Netherlands · 909France · 571Germany · 297Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0266decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 November 2026.#European Commission and Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v Ryanair DAC.#Appeal – Aid granted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – State guarantee for a loan and a subordinated loan by the State – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections on the ground that the measures constitute aid compatible with the internal market – Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies – Judicial review of the Commission’s assessment.#Joined Cases C-266/24 P and C-269/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0857decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc and Others v Irish Aviation Authority and Airport Coordination Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 – Allocation of slots at European Union airports – Article 6 – Coordination parameters – Determination taking account of relevant technical, operational and environmental constraints – Urban planning rules – Limit on the annual number of air passengers – Article 8 – Process of slot allocation – Historic slots – Grandfather rights – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-857/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0482decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Global 8 Airlines v European Commission.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) 2022/334 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Articles 3d and 3e – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the Union – Rejection of a flight plan – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Act amenable to review.#Case C-482/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0482_RESdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 8 octobre 2026.#Global 8 Airlines contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises au regard de l’agression militaire contre l’Ukraine – Règlement (UE) 2022/334 modifiant le règlement (UE) no 833/2014 – Articles 3 quinquies et 3 sexies – Interdiction à tout aéronef non immatriculé en Russie détenu, affrété ou contrôlé d’une autre manière par une personne physique ou morale, une entité ou un organisme russe d’atterrir sur le territoire de l’Union européenne, d’en décoller ou de le survoler – Rejet de plan de vol – Recours en annulation – Recevabilité – Acte susceptible de recours.#Affaire C-482/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0449decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Dryade VZW and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2485 – Maritime and aviation sectors – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Precautionary principle – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-449/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0876decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0538decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-538/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0268(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.#Case T-268/21 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0522(01)_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0522(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0401decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition ‘by object’ – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment.#Case C-401/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0385_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-385/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0385decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-385/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0379_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-379/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0379decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-379/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition ‘by object’ – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment.#Case C-401/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0375decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a ‘worldwide’ cartel.#Case C-375/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0381_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-381/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0375_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a ‘worldwide’ cartel.#Case C-375/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0381decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-381/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0408_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 12 février 2026.#Republik Österreich contre Austrian Airlines AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 549/2004 – Ciel unique européen – Règlement (CE) no 550/2004 – Fourniture de services de navigation aérienne dans le ciel unique européen – Article 8 – Prestataires de services de la circulation aérienne – Articles 14 et 15 – Redevances à la charge des usagers de l’espace aérien – Défaillance d’un serveur de télécommunications aéronautiques – Annulation de vols – Manquement fautif allégué de la part du prestataire concerné – Usagers de l’espace aérien – Protection de ces usagers contre les préjudices économiques causés par un tel manquement.#Affaire C-408/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0408decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Page 1 of 2Next