PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Aviation

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 3,113United Kingdom · 2,832Ireland · 2,039European Union · 1,058Netherlands · 861Germany · 278France · 16Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0538decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-538/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0268(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.#Case T-268/21 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0522(01)_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0522(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-10-2026-001884answered

Aviation fuel shortage

European Union · European Parliament · 7 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0401decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition ‘by object’ – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment.#Case C-401/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0385_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-385/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0385decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-385/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0379_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-379/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0379decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-379/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition ‘by object’ – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment.#Case C-401/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0375decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a ‘worldwide’ cartel.#Case C-375/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0381_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-381/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0375_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a ‘worldwide’ cartel.#Case C-375/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0381decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-381/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0408_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European Sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the Single European Sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Fees payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged wrongful breach on the part of the service provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of these users against economic damage caused by such a breach.#Case C-408/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0408decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0045_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1) – Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought – Conditions for inclusion – Amount of commission allegedly fixed without the air carrier’s knowledge – Burden of proof.#Case C-45/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0045decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1) – Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought – Conditions for inclusion – Amount of commission allegedly fixed without the air carrier’s knowledge – Burden of proof.#Case C-45/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Page 1 of 2Next