Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Environment

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2020

All countriesIreland · 43,209United States · 16,037Austria · 10,118France · 9,357United Kingdom · 4,942European Union · 2,386Netherlands · 1,984Germany · 1,277Belgium · 98Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0849decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special areas of conservation – Article 4(4) – Obligation to establish conservation objectives – Article 6(1) – Obligation to take conservation measures – Decision 2006/613/EC – Mediterranean biogeographical region.#Case C-849/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0849_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special areas of conservation – Article 4(4) – Obligation to establish conservation objectives – Article 6(1) – Obligation to take conservation measures – Decision 2006/613/EC – Mediterranean biogeographical region.#Case C-849/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0635_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Industrial Química del Nalón, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-635/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0636_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Tokai erftcarbon GmbH v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-636/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0645_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-645/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0638_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Deza, a.s. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-638/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0637_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Bawtry Carbon International Ltd v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-637/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0635decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Industrial Química del Nalón, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-635/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0636decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Tokai erftcarbon GmbH v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-636/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0638decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Deza, a.s. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-638/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0639decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#SGL Carbon SE v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-639/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0645decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-645/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0637decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Bawtry Carbon International Ltd v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-637/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0639_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#SGL Carbon SE v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-639/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0320decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Ingredion Germany GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme – Article 3(h) – New entrants – Article 10a – Transitional rules for free allocation of emission allowances – Decision 2011/278/EU – Article 18(1)(c) – Fuel-related activity level – Second subparagraph of Article 18(2) – Relevant capacity utilisation factor.#Case C-320/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0470decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 3 December 2020.#Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v Commissioner for Environmental Information.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information held by public authorities – Article 2, point 2 – Notion of ‘public authority’ – Bodies or institutions when acting in a judicial or legislative capacity – Information in the file of closed court proceedings.#Case C-470/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0900decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 November 2020.#Association One Voice and Ligue pour la protection des oiseaux v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Articles 5 and 8 – Prohibition of the use of any method of capture of birds – Article 9(1) – Authorisation to use, by way of derogation, a traditional method of capture of birds – Conditions – No other satisfactory solution – Preservation of that traditional method as the sole justification for the absence of an ‘other satisfactory solution’ – Selectivity of catches – National legislation authorising the capture of birds using limes.#Case C-900/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0644_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 November 2020.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of limit values for microparticles (PM10) in certain Italian zones and agglomerations – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-644/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0644decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 November 2020.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of limit values for microparticles (PM10) in certain Italian zones and agglomerations – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-644/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 November 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0798decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 29 October 2020.#Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others and Athesia Energy Srl and Others v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 10 – Applicability – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3(3)(a) – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations – Alteration of a support scheme.#Joined Cases C-798/18 and C-799/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2020

Decision· DCELEX 32020D1580in force

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1580 of 23 October 2020 amending Decision (EU) 2020/721 to include the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the International Maritime Organization’s Marine Environment Protection Committee during its 75th session and within the International Maritime Organization’s Maritime Safety Committee during its 102nd session as regards the approval of an MSC-MEPC.5 circular on a Model agreement for the authorization of recognized organizations acting on behalf of the Administration

European Union · EUR-Lex · 23 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0813decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Deza, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Regulation (EU) 2017/776 – Classification of anthraquinone – Substance suspected to have carcinogenic potential for humans – Errors of interpretation and application of Regulation 1272/2008 and the principle of legal certainty – Distortion of the facts and of the evidence – Scope of review.#Case C-813/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0813_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Deza, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Regulation (EU) 2017/776 – Classification of anthraquinone – Substance suspected to have carcinogenic potential for humans – Errors of interpretation and application of Regulation 1272/2008 and the principle of legal certainty – Distortion of the facts and of the evidence – Scope of review.#Case C-813/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0629decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 October 2020.#Sappi Austria Produktions-GmbH & Co KG and Wasserverband “Region Gratkorn-Gratwein” v Landeshauptmann von Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Directive 2008/98/EC – Article 2(2)(a), point 1 of Article 3 and Article 6(1) – Waste water – Sewage sludge – Scope – Concept of ‘waste’ – Cessation of waste status – Recovery or recycling operation.#Case C-629/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0514decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020.#Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier ministre and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Placing of plant protection products on the market – Emergency measures – Officially informing the European Commission – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations – Neonicotinoids – Protection of bees – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-514/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2020

Proposal· PCCELEX 52020PC0586open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION Amending Council Decision (EU) 2020/721 of 19 May 2020 to include the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the International Maritime Organization during the 75th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee and the 102nd session of the Maritime Safety Committee on the approval of a MSC-MEPC.5 circular on a Model Agreement for the authorisation of Recognised Organisations acting on behalf of the Administration

European Union · European Commission · 28 September 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0471decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 24 September 2020.#Federal Republic of Germany v Esso Raffinage.#Appeal – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – Articles 5 and 6 – General obligation to register substances – Articles 41 and 42 – Evaluation of registration dossiers and compliance check of information submitted by registrants – Declaration of non-compliance – Actionable measure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Respective competences of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and national authorities – Obligation on ECHA to check the compliance of additional information submitted by registrants at its request – ECHA’s power to take an appropriate decision – Article 1 – Objective of protecting human health and the environment – Articles 13 and 25 – Use of animal testing – Promotion of alternative methods.#Case C-471/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0594_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0594decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0092decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Burgo Group SpA v Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA - GSE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Promotion of cogeneration – Provision of national law establishing a support scheme – Scheme supporting non-high-efficiency cogeneration plants extended beyond 31 December 2010.#Case C-92/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0529_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#African Development Solutions (ADESO) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ – Non-eligible costs – Debit notes – Confirmation letter – Challengeable act – Contractual nature of the dispute – Act not open to challenge – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – Inadmissibility.#Case T-529/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0473decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 10 September 2020.#Föreningen Skydda Skogen and Others v Länsstyrelsen i Västra Götalands län and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Vänersborgs tingsrätt, mark- och miljödomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 12(1) – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5 – Forestry – Prohibitions intended to ensure the conservation of protected species – Plan for final felling of trees – Site hosting protected species.#Joined Cases C-473/19 and C-474/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0529decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#African Development Solutions (ADESO) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Grant contracts relating to the projects ‘Your Environment is Your Life’ and ‘Social Safety Net for Poor and Vulnerable Households in Northern Regions of Somalia/Somaliland Phase II’ – Non-eligible costs – Debit notes – Confirmation letter – Challengeable act – Contractual nature of the dispute – Act not open to challenge – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – Inadmissibility.#Case T-529/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2020

Page 1 of 2Next