Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,101 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 194United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0679(01)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-679/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0645_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Bloom v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 – European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund – Financial support granted under shared management with the Member States – Ineligible operations or expenditure – Derogations from ineligibility – Association for the protection of the marine environment – Legislative act – No individual concern – No direct concern – Right to effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case T-645/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0801decided

Order of the Court of 7 April 2022.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-801/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0447decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v LM and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension – Discretion of the Member States.#Joined Cases C-447/20 and C-448/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0521decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J.P. v B.d.S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Tolls – Non-payment – Penalties – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Lack of sufficient information – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-521/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0489decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#UB v Kauno teritorinė muitinė.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Extinguishment of the customs debt – Goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the European Union – Seizure and confiscation – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties – Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax – Chargeable event – Chargeability.#Case C-489/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0163decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 7 April 2022.#AD v PACCAR Inc and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 22(2) – Applicability ratione temporis – First subparagraph of Article 5(1) – Concept of relevant evidence which lies in the control of the defendant or a third party – Article 5(2) – Disclosure of specified items of evidence or relevant categories of evidence on the basis of reasonably available facts – Article 5(3) – Review of the proportionality of the request to disclose evidence – Balancing the legitimate interests of the parties and third parties – Scope of the obligations resulting from those provisions.#Case C-163/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0460decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 7 April 2022.#TU and RE v Google LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Directive 95/46/EC – Article 12(b) – Point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 14 – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 17(3)(a) – Operator of an internet search engine – Research carried out on the basis of a person’s name – Displaying a link to articles containing allegedly inaccurate information in the list of search results – Displaying, in the form of thumbnails, photographs illustrating those articles in the list of results of an image search – Request for de-referencing made to the operator of the search engine – Weighing-up of fundamental rights – Articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations and responsibilities of the operator of the search engine in respect of processing a request for de-referencing – Burden of proof on the person requesting de-referencing.#Case C-460/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0675decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 7 April 2022.#Colin Brown v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a) and (b) – EU official who is a national of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and who during the 10 years before his entry into service habitually resided within the territory of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Acquisition by that EU official of the nationality of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the entitlement to receive an expatriation allowance – Action for annulment.#Case C-675/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0568decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#MF v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Post occupied requiring security clearance – Clearance refused by the national security authority – Termination of the contract – No request for a hearing – Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444.#Case T-568/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0208_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Dorit-DFT Fleischereimaschinen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DORIT – Earlier national company names – Relative ground for refusal – No use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-208/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0219_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Agora Invest, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAMOSA – Earlier EU figurative mark TRAMO,SA TRANSPORTE MAQUINARIA Y OBRAS,S.A. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-219/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0118_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Cilem Records International UG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS – Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-118/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0516_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0568_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#MF v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Post occupied requiring security clearance – Clearance refused by the national security authority – Termination of the contract – No request for a hearing – Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444.#Case T-568/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0219decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Agora Invest, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAMOSA – Earlier EU figurative mark TRAMO,SA TRANSPORTE MAQUINARIA Y OBRAS,S.A. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-219/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0118decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Cilem Records International UG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS – Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-118/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0370decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Biogena GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE – Earlier EU word mark NUTRIBEN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-370/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0208decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Dorit-DFT Fleischereimaschinen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DORIT – Earlier national company names – Relative ground for refusal – No use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-208/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0516decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0680decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Funline International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-680/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0335decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0634decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0680_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Funline International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-680/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0370_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Biogena GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE – Earlier EU word mark NUTRIBEN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-370/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0335_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0019decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0634_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0019_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0158open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union vis-à-vis the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland regarding the determination under Article 540(2) of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, of the date from which personal data as referred to in Articles 530, 531, 534 and 536 of that Agreement may be supplied by Member States to the United Kingdom

European Union · European Commission · 6 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0161_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Council decision, contained in the act of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) of 5 February 2020, endorsing the submission to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) concerning the introduction of life cycle guidelines to estimate well-to-tank greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable alternative fuels – Article 17(1) TEU – External representation of the European Union – Transmission of that submission to the IMO by the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, on behalf of the Member States and the Commission.#Case C-161/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0140_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of the communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Access to data – Subsequent court supervision – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Possibility for a national court to restrict the temporal effect of a declaration of the invalidity of national legislation that is incompatible with EU law – Excluded.#Case C-140/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0785_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-785/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0784_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-784/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0785decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-785/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0784decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-784/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0161decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Council decision, contained in the act of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) of 5 February 2020, endorsing the submission to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) concerning the introduction of life cycle guidelines to estimate well-to-tank greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable alternative fuels – Article 17(1) TEU – External representation of the European Union – Transmission of that submission to the IMO by the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, on behalf of the Member States and the Commission.#Case C-161/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0140decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of the communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Access to data – Subsequent court supervision – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Possibility for a national court to restrict the temporal effect of a declaration of the invalidity of national legislation that is incompatible with EU law – Excluded.#Case C-140/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0694decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 5 April 2022.#Orde van Vlaamse Balies and Others v Vlaamse Regering.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements – Directive 2011/16/EU, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/822 – Article 8ab(5) – Validity – Legal professional privilege of the lawyer – Exemption from the reporting obligation for the benefit of lawyer-intermediaries subject to legal professional privilege – Obligation on that lawyer-intermediary to notify any other intermediary who is not his or her client of that intermediary’s reporting obligations – Articles 7 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-694/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 April 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0567in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/567 of 4 April 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the adoption of the operational guidelines for the conduct of the Civil Society Forum

European Union · EUR-Lex · 4 April 2022

PreviousPage 22 of 23Next