Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,151 records in EU in 2023

Records

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0912in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/912 of 25 April 2023 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 25 April 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0605decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 April 2023.#RT France v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Temporary prohibition of broadcasting and suspension of authorisations for the broadcasting of content by certain media outlets – Letter informing the applicant of the continued inclusion of its name on the list of entities to which restrictive measures apply – Act not open to challenge – Reclassification of the action – Rejection of the plea of inadmissibility.#Case T-605/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0605_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 April 2023.#RT France v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Temporary prohibition of broadcasting and suspension of authorisations for the broadcasting of content by certain media outlets – Letter informing the applicant of the continued inclusion of its name on the list of entities to which restrictive measures apply – Act not open to challenge – Reclassification of the action – Rejection of the plea of inadmissibility.#Case T-605/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0306_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2023.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant – Requirement of independence – Lawyer practising in the same office as the applicant.#Case C-306/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0306decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2023.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant – Requirement of independence – Lawyer practising in the same office as the applicant.#Case C-306/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0204(04)decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 21 April 2023.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Application to cancel or vary an order for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Non-execution – Change in circumstances – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-204/21 R-RAP.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0413_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Council of the European Union v Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of Ms El-Qaddafi’s name on the lists – Sufficiently solid factual basis – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-413/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0413decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Council of the European Union v Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of Ms El-Qaddafi’s name on the lists – Sufficiently solid factual basis – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-413/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0548decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 20 April 2023.#C.G. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘processing’ – Article 4 – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Article 4(1)(c) – Principle of ‘data minimisation’ – Articles 7, 8, 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement that a limitation on the exercise of a fundamental right must be ‘provided for by law’ – Proportionality – Assessment of proportionality in the light of all the relevant factors – Prior review by a court or independent administrative authority – Article 13 – Information to be made available or given to the data subject – Limits – Article 54 – Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor – Police investigation in relation to narcotics trafficking – Attempt, by the police, to unlock a mobile telephone in order to gain access, for the purposes of that investigation, to the personal data stored in that telephone.#Case C-548/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0637decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Luis Miguel Novais v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act brought against a national court or tribunal – Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-637/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0619decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#SIA 'Sinda & V R' v Rīgas domes Satiksmes departaments.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zemgales rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to set out the relationship between the provisions of European Union law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-619/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0637_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Luis Miguel Novais v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act brought against a national court or tribunal – Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-637/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0619_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#SIA 'Sinda & V R' v Rīgas domes Satiksmes departaments.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to set out the relationship between the provisions of European Union law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-619/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0491_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#Zitro International Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a smiley wearing a top hat – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a fantasy figure – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-491/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0749decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#Gerhard Grund Gerüste e.K. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Josef Grund Gerüstbau – Earlier national figurative mark grund – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-749/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0042decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 April 2023.#Mendes SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-42/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0042_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 April 2023.#Mendes SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-42/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0061_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#OD v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Temporary reassignment in the interests of the service – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Provisional distancing measure – Concept of ‘act adversely affecting an official’ – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-61/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0749_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#Gerhard Grund Gerüste e.K. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Josef Grund Gerüstbau – Earlier national figurative mark grund – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-749/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0061decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#OD v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Temporary reassignment in the interests of the service – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Provisional distancing measure – Concept of ‘act adversely affecting an official’ – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-61/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0491decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 April 2023.#Zitro International Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a smiley wearing a top hat – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a fantasy figure – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-491/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0751_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 18 April 2023.#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-751/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0001_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#X and Others v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Right to family reunification – Article 5(1) – Submission of an application for entry and residence for the purposes of exercising the right to family reunification – Legislation of a Member State requiring the sponsor’s family members to submit the application in person to the competent diplomatic post of that Member State – Impossibility or excessive difficulty to reach that post – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7 and 24.#Case C-1/23 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0699_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#E.D.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Article 23(4) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Grounds for non-execution – Article 4(3) TEU – Duty of sincere cooperation – Postponement of the execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment – Serious, chronic and potentially irreversible illness – Risk of serious harm to health affecting the person concerned by the European arrest warrant.#Case C-699/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0699decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#E.D.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Article 23(4) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Grounds for non-execution – Article 4(3) TEU – Duty of sincere cooperation – Postponement of the execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment – Serious, chronic and potentially irreversible illness – Risk of serious harm to health affecting the person concerned by the European arrest warrant.#Case C-699/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0751decided

Order of the Court of 18 April 2023.#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-751/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0001decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#X and Others v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Right to family reunification – Article 5(1) – Submission of an application for entry and residence for the purposes of exercising the right to family reunification – Legislation of a Member State requiring the sponsor’s family members to submit the application in person to the competent diplomatic post of that Member State – Impossibility or excessive difficulty to reach that post – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7 and 24.#Case C-1/23 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0200_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#Vantage Logistics S.R.L. v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Alba and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Insolvency proceedings – Restructuring plan – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Applicability ratione temporis and ratione materiae – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-200/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0200decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2023.#Vantage Logistics S.R.L. v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Alba and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Insolvency proceedings – Restructuring plan – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Applicability ratione temporis and ratione materiae – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-200/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0780decided

Order of the Court of 17 April 2023.#Zaun Ltd v Praesidiad Holding and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-780/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0780_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 17 April 2023.#Zaun Ltd v Praesidiad Holding and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-780/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2023

PreviousPage 23 of 24Next