Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Immigration

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

40 records in EU in 2019

All countriesIreland · 13,102United States · 9,544United Kingdom · 9,424Germany · 5,027European Union · 1,059France · 898Netherlands · 486Austria · 149Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0447_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0447decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0380_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 décembre 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid contre E.P.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Règlement (UE) 2016/399 – Code de l’Union relatif au régime de franchissement des frontières par les personnes (code frontières Schengen) – Article 6 – Conditions d’entrée pour les ressortissants de pays tiers – Notion de “menace pour l’ordre public” – Décision de retour à l’encontre d’un ressortissant d’un pays tiers en séjour irrégulier.#Affaire C-380/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0381_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 décembre 2019.#G.S. et V.G. contre Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Politique d’immigration – Directive 2003/86/CE – Droit au regroupement familial – Conditions requises pour l’exercice du droit au regroupement familial – Notion de “raisons d’ordre public” – Rejet d’une demande d’entrée et de séjour d’un membre de la famille – Retrait d’un titre de séjour d’un membre de la famille ou refus de le renouveler.#Affaires jointes C-381/18 et C-382/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0398_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 décembre 2019.#Antonio Bocero Torrico et Jörg Paul Konrad Fritz Bode contre Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social et Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale des travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Pension de retraite anticipée – Éligibilité – Montant de la pension à percevoir devant excéder le montant minimum légal – Prise en compte uniquement de la pension acquise dans l’État membre concerné – Absence de prise en compte de la pension de retraite acquise dans un autre État membre – Différence de traitement pour les travailleurs ayant exercé leur droit à la libre circulation.#Affaires jointes C-398/18 et C-428/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0610decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 26 November 2019.#AFMB Ltd and Others v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Legislation applicable — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14(2)(a) — Concept of ‘person who is a member of the travelling personnel of an undertaking’ — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 13(1)(b) — Concept of ‘employer’ — Long-distance lorry drivers normally employed in one or more Member States or States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) — Long‑distance lorry drivers who have entered into an employment contract with one undertaking but are in fact subject to the authority of another undertaking established in the Member State where those drivers reside — Determination of which undertaking is the ‘employer’.#Case C-610/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0706_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 20 novembre 2019.#X contre Belgische Staat.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 4 – Décision concernant la demande de regroupement familial – Conséquences du non-respect du délai de prise de décision – Délivrance automatique d’un titre de séjour.#Affaire C-706/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0706decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#X v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 5(4) — Decision concerning the application for family reunification — Consequences of failure to comply with the time limit for taking a decision — Automatic issue of a residence permit.#Case C-706/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0095decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#Sociale Verzekeringsbank v F. van den Berg and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#References for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 13 — Applicable law — Resident of a Member State falling within the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Allowances under the old-age pension or child benefit schemes — Member State of residence and Member State of employment — Refusal.#Joined Cases C-95/18 and C-96/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0032_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse contre Michael Moser.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 987/2009 – Article 60 – Prestations familiales – Droit au paiement de la différence entre le montant de l’allocation parentale versée dans l’État membre prioritairement compétent et l’allocation de garde d’enfant prévue par l’État membre compétent à titre subsidiaire.#Affaire C-32/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0032decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse v Michael Moser.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 60 — Family benefits — Right to payment of the difference between the parental allowance paid in the Member State having primary competence and the childcare allowance provided by the Member State having secondary competence.#Case C-32/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0398decided

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 July 2019.#Antonio Bocero Torrico and Jörg Paul Konrad Fritz Bode v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia.#References for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Early retirement pension — Eligibility — Requirement for the pension to be received to be higher than the statutory minimum — Account taken only of pension acquired in the Member State concerned — No account taken of the retirement pension acquired in another Member State — Difference in treatment of workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement.#Joined Cases C-398/18 and C-428/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0370decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 11 July 2019.#Caisse de retraite du personnel navigant professionnel de l'aéronautique civile (CRPNPAC) v Vueling Airlines SA v Vueling Airlines SA and Jean-Luc Poignant.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Bobigny and Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Legislation applicable — Article 14(1)(a) — Posted workers — Article 14(2)(a)(i) — Person normally employed in the territory of two or more Member States and employed by a branch or a permanent representation that an undertaking has in the territory of a Member State other than that where it has its registered office– Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 — Article 11(1)(a) — Article 12a(1a) — E 101 certificate — Binding effect — Certificate fraudulently obtained or relied on — Power of the courts of the host Member State to make a finding of fraud and disregard the certificate — Article 84(a)(3) of Regulation No 1408/71 — Cooperation between competent institutions — Authority in civil proceedings of res judicata in criminal proceedings — Primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-370/17 and C-37/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0447decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 11 July 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0089decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#A v Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 — Article 13 — Standstill clause — Family reunification of spouses — New restriction — Overriding reason in the public interest — Successful integration — Efficient management of migration flows — Proportionality.#Case C-89/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1191in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1191 of 8 July 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms (Budget line 04 03 01 03 — Free movement of workers, co-ordination of social security schemes and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries) (Text with EEA relevance.)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0033_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 6 juin 2019.#V contre Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) et Securex Integrity ASBL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coordination des systèmes de sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Dispositions transitoires – Article 87, paragraphe 8 – Règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 – Article 14 quater, sous b) – Travailleur exerçant une activité salariée et une activité non salariée dans différents États membres – Dérogations au principe d’unicité de la législation nationale applicable – Double affiliation – Introduction d’une demande en vue d’être soumis à la législation applicable en vertu du règlement no 883/2004.#Affaire C-33/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0302decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 6 June 2019.#X v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents – Directive 2003/109/EC – Conditions for acquiring long-term resident status – Article 5(1)(a) – Stable, regular and sufficient resources.#Case C-302/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0033decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#V v Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) and Securex Integrity ASBL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Coordination of social security systems — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Transitional provisions — Article 87(8) — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14c(b) — Worker pursuing an activity as an employed person and an activity as a self-employed person in different Member States — Derogations from the principle that the legislation of a single Member State is to apply — Dual affiliation — Submission of a request to be subject to the legislation applicable pursuant to Regulation No 883/2004.#Case C-33/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0631_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 8 mai 2019.#SF contre Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale des travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Article 11, paragraphe 3, sous e) – Ressortissant d’un État membre employé comme marin à bord d’un navire battant pavillon d’un État tiers – Employeur établi dans un État membre autre que celui de la résidence du travailleur – Détermination de la législation applicable.#Affaire C-631/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0631decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#SF v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 11(3)(e) — National of a Member State employed as a seaman on board a vessel flying the flag of a third State — Employer established in a Member State other than the worker’s State of residence — Determination of the applicable legislation.#Case C-631/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0095decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 26 March 2019.#Sociale Verzekeringsbank v F. van den Berg and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#References for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 13 — Applicable law — Resident of a Member State falling within the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Allowances under the old-age pension or child benefit schemes — Member State of residence and Member State of employment — Refusal.#Joined Cases C-95/18 and C-96/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0134decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 March 2019.#Maria Vester v Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security systems — Invalidity benefits — Articles 45 and 48 TFEU — Freedom of movement for workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Different benefit schemes in the Member States — ‘Primary period of incapacity to work’ — Duration — Benefits for incapacity for work — Disadvantages for migrant workers.#Case C-134/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0089decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 14 March 2019.#A v Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 — Article 13 — Standstill clause — Family reunification of spouses — New restriction — Overriding reason in the public interest — Successful integration — Efficient management of migration flows — Proportionality.#Case C-89/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0635_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#E. contre Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Exclusions du champ d’application de la directive – Article 3, paragraphe 2, sous c) – Exclusion des personnes bénéficiaires d’une protection subsidiaire – Extension par le droit national du droit au regroupement familial auxdites personnes – Compétence de la Cour – Article 11, paragraphe 2 – Absence de pièces justificatives officielles attestant des liens familiaux – Explications considérées comme étant insuffisamment plausibles – Obligations incombant aux autorités des États membres d’effectuer des démarches complémentaires – Limites.#Affaire C-635/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0635decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Exclusions from the scope of the directive — Article 3(2)(c) — Exclusion of persons benefiting from subsidiary protection — Extension of the right to family reunification to those persons under national law — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 11(2) — Lack of official documentary evidence of the family relationship — Explanations regarded as insufficiently plausible — Obligations on the authorities of the Member States to take additional steps — Limits.#Case C-635/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0677decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 February 2019.#M. Çoban v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Additional Protocol — Article 59 — Decision No 3/80 — Social security for migrant workers — Waiver of residence clauses — Article 6 — Invalidity benefit — Withdrawal — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Residence condition — Directive 2003/109/EC — Long-term resident status.#Case C-677/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0033decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 26 February 2019.#V v Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) and Securex Integrity ASBL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Coordination of social security systems — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Transitional provisions — Article 87(8) — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14c(b) — Worker pursuing an activity as an employed person and an activity as a self-employed person in different Member States — Derogations from the principle that the legislation of a single Member State is to apply — Dual affiliation — Submission of a request to be subject to the legislation applicable pursuant to Regulation No 883/2004.#Case C-33/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0631decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 10 January 2019.#SF v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 11(3)(e) — National of a Member State employed as a seaman on board a vessel flying the flag of a third State — Employer established in a Member State other than the worker’s State of residence — Determination of the applicable legislation.#Case C-631/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2019