Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU in 2022

All countriesIreland · 74,985United States · 19,023Austria · 8,877France · 7,984Netherlands · 6,595United Kingdom · 5,168European Union · 3,736Germany · 2,171Belgium · 59Estonia · 15Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0603_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Access to the international road haulage market – Cabotage – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition according to which an applicant must be individually concerned – Trade association – Effective judicial protection – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-603/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0603decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Access to the international road haulage market – Cabotage – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition according to which an applicant must be individually concerned – Trade association – Effective judicial protection – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-603/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0545_SUMdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-545/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0547_SUMdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Romania v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-547/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0545decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-545/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0547decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 3 June 2022.#Romania v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFEU – Application to suspend operation of that act – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Obligation for an undertaking to return its vehicles to its Member State of establishment – Urgency – Deterioration of the economic and social situation of a Member State – Damage to the environment.#Case C-547/20 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0353_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Air traffic services provider – Decision to close airspace – Exercise of the powers of a public authority – Airspace user – Airlines – Right of appeal against a decision to close airspace – Article 58 TFEU – Freedom to provide services in the field of transport – Articles 16 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-353/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0589_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#JR v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Liability of air carriers for death or injury sustained by passengers – Concept of ‘accident’ causing death or injury – Bodily injury suffered during disembarkation – Article 20 – Exoneration of air carrier from liability – Concept of ‘damage suffered caused or contributed to by the negligence or other wrongful act or omission of that injured passenger’ – Fall of passenger not holding on to the handrail of a mobile disembarkation stairway.#Case C-589/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0353decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de l’Entreprise du Hainaut, division de Charleroi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Air traffic services provider – Decision to close airspace – Exercise of the powers of a public authority – Airspace user – Airlines – Right of appeal against a decision to close airspace – Article 58 TFEU – Freedom to provide services in the field of transport – Articles 16 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-353/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0589decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#JR v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Liability of air carriers for death or injury sustained by passengers – Concept of ‘accident’ causing death or injury – Bodily injury suffered during disembarkation – Article 20 – Exoneration of air carrier from liability – Concept of ‘damage suffered caused or contributed to by the negligence or other wrongful act or omission of that injured passenger’ – Fall of passenger not holding on to the handrail of a mobile disembarkation stairway.#Case C-589/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0112decided

Arrest van het Hof (Tiende kamer) van 2 juni 2022.#X BV tegen Classic Coach Company vof e.a.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Harmonisatie van de wetgevingen – Merken – Richtlijn 2008/95/EG – Artikel 5 – Rechten verbonden aan het merk – Artikel 6, lid 2 – Beperking van de aan het merk verbonden rechtsgevolgen – Onmogelijkheid voor de houder van een merk om een derde te verbieden om in het economisch verkeer gebruik te maken van een ouder recht van slechts plaatselijke betekenis – Voorwaarden – Begrip ‚ouder recht’ – Handelsnaam – Houder van een jonger merk die een nog ouder recht heeft – Relevantie.#Zaak C-112/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0577_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 May 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Risk of disruption to an important service.#Case T-577/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0601decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-601/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0593decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Period of six months – Extension – Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Selective nature – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-593/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0577decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 May 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Risk of disruption to an important service.#Case T-577/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0601_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-601/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0593_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Period of six months – Extension – Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Selective nature – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-593/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0718_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 May 2022.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Air transport – Support measure taken by Romania – Rescue aid to TAROM – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Status as a party concerned – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Admissibility – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Measure aiming to prevent social hardship or to address market failure – ‘One time, last time’ principle – Effect of earlier aid granted before Romania’s accession to the European Union – Serious difficulties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-718/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0718decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 May 2022.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Air transport – Support measure taken by Romania – Rescue aid to TAROM – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Status as a party concerned – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Admissibility – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Measure aiming to prevent social hardship or to address market failure – ‘One time, last time’ principle – Effect of earlier aid granted before Romania’s accession to the European Union – Serious difficulties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-718/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0221_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 May 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0221decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 May 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0597decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 28 April 2022.#Polskie Linie Lotnicze 'LOT' SA v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 16 – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation – National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to seek remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-597/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0654_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0654decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0561_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Q and Others v United Airlines, Inc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Connecting flight consisting of two flight legs – Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country – Validity of that regulation under international law.#Case C-561/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0721decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 7 April 2022.#DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Directive 2001/14/EC – Access to railway infrastructure – Article 30 – Railway regulatory body – Review of infrastructure charges – National courts – Review of charges in the light of competition law – Division of competence between the regulatory authority and the national courts.#Case C-721/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0561decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Q and Others v United Airlines, Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Connecting flight consisting of two flight legs – Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country – Validity of that regulation under international law.#Case C-561/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0294decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 7 April 2022.#État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg and Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA v Navitours SARL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 2(1) – Scope – Taxable transactions – Article 9(2)(b) – Place where transport services are supplied – Tourist trips on the Moselle – River subject to condominium status.#Case C-294/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0229decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 31 March 2022.#Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Infrabel SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Article 15(1) – Inland waterways transport infrastructure – Inland ports – Obligation of a Member State to connect inland ports with road or rail transport infrastructure – Removal of the connection with one of those two types of transport infrastructure – Conditions.#Case C-229/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0350_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022 (Extracts).#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Ne bis in idem principle – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-350/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0340_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Limitation period – Rights of the defence – Non-discrimination – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Substantially limited involvement – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-340/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0341_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022 (Extracts).#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Obligation to state reasons – Article 266 TFEU – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Duration of participation in the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-341/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0337_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022 (Extracts).#Air France-KLM v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Airfreight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Single and continuous infringement – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Conditions for granting immunity – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-337/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0324_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Article 266 TFEU – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Substantially limited involvement – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-324/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0334_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Follow‑my‑leader role – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-334/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0325_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Single and continuous infringement – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Extenuating circumstances – Anticompetitive conduct encouraged by the national authorities – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-325/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0325decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Single and continuous infringement – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Extenuating circumstances – Anticompetitive conduct encouraged by the national authorities – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-325/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0326_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Withdrawal of the leniency application – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-326/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0338decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Société Air France v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Single and continuous infringement – Conditions for granting immunity – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of the participation in the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-338/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0326decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Withdrawal of the leniency application – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-326/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0334decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Failure to send a new statement of objections – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales – Gravity of the infringement – Duration of participation in the infringement – Additional amount – Mitigating circumstances – Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities – Follow-my-leader role – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-334/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0323decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Martinair Holland NV v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Single and continuous infringement – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-323/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next