Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,451 records in EU

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0442decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 June 2017.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of tartaric acid originating in China — Modification of the definitive anti-dumping duty — Partial interim review — Market economy treatment — Costs of major inputs substantially reflecting market values — Change in circumstances — Obligation to state reasons — Period for adopting a decision on market economy treatment — Rights of the defence — Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.#Case T-442/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2017

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0521decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 1 June 2017.#Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1289 — Imposition of a fine on a Member State in the context of economic and budgetary surveillance of the euro area — Manipulation of statistical data relating to the deficit of the Member State concerned — Jurisdiction — Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 — Article 8(1) and (3) — Delegated Decision 2012/678/EU — Articles 2(1) and (3) and 14(2) — Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 — Articles 3(1), 8(1), 11 and 11a — Rights of defence — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 41(1) — Right to good administration — Articles 121, 126 and 136 TFEU — Protocol No 12 on the excessive deficit procedure — Existence of an infringement — Misrepresentations — Determination of the fine — Principle that penal provisions may not have retroactive effect.#Case C-521/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0410decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 May 2017.#Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to protection of reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Proportionality.#Case T-410/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2017

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0588decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 18 May 2017.#LG Electronics, Inc. and Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices relating to prices, markets sharing, customer allocation and production limitation — Rights of the defence — Sending of the statement of objections only to the parent companies of a joint venture and not to the joint venture itself — Fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Point 13 — Determining the value of sales relating to an infringement — Intragroup sales of the relevant product outside the European Economic Area (EEA) — Account to be taken of the sales within the EEA of final products in which the relevant product has been installed — Equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-588/15 P and C-622/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 May 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0469decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2017.#FSL Holdings and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market in Greece, Italy and Portugal — Coordination in the fixing of prices — Admissibility of evidence transmitted by national tax authorities — Rights of the defence — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Scope of judicial review — Classification as an ‘agreement having as its object the restriction of competition’.#Case C-469/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2017

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0180decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 26 April 2017.#Toshiba Corporation v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — Decision taken by the European Commission following annulment in part of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Amendment of fines — Rights of the defence — No adoption of a new statement of objections — Equal treatment — Joint venture — Calculation of the starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement — Res judicata.#Case C-180/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0220decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 (Extracts).#Saremar - Sardegna Regionale Marittima SpA v European Commission.#State aid — Maritime transport — Public service compensation — Capital increase — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered — Bankruptcy of the applicant — Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings — Continued interest in bringing proceedings — Failure to find that there was no need to adjudicate — Concept of aid — Service of general economic interest — Private investor test — Manifest error of assessment — Error of law — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Decision 2011/21/EU — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty — Union framework applicable to State aid in the form of public service compensation — Altmark judgment.#Case T-220/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0219decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2017.#Regione autonoma della Sardegna v European Commission.#State aid — Maritime transport — Public service compensation — Capital increase — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered — Liquidation of the recipient undertaking — Continued interest in bringing proceedings — Failure to find that there was no need to adjudicate — Concept of aid — Service of general economic interest — Private investor test — Manifest error of assessment — Error of law — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Decision 2011/21/EU — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty — Union framework applicable to State aid in the form of public service compensation — Altmark judgment.#Case T-219/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2017

Record· COCELEX 62016CO0385decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 April 2017.#Sharif University of Technology v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Criterion relating to the material, logistical or financial support to the Government of Iran — Cooperation in research and technological development in military or military-related fields.#Case C-385/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0681decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2017.#Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Libya — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Retention of the applicant’s name — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-681/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 March 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0231decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 March 2017.#George Haswani v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Modification of the application — Obligation to state reasons –Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Non-contractual liability.#Case T-231/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2017

Report· XGCELEX 52017XG0322(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of MOHAMMED, Khalid Shaikh (a.k.a. ALI, Salem; a.k.a. BIN KHALID, Fahd Bin Adballah; a.k.a. HENIN, Ashraf Refaat Nabith; a.k.a. WADOOD, Khalid Adbul), ‘Hizballah Military Wing’ (a.k.a. ‘Hezbollah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hizbullah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hizbollah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hezballah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hisbollah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hizbu’llah Military Wing’ a.k.a. ‘Hizb Allah Military Wing’, including the ‘Jihad Council’ (and all units reporting to it, including the External Security Organisation)), ‘POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE (PFLP)’, ‘POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE-GENERAL COMMAND, (a.k.a. PFLP-General Command)’, ‘FUERZAS ARMADAS REVOLUCIONARIAS DE COLOMBIA’ — ‘FARC’ (‘Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’) — persons, groups and entities included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150 of 27 January 2017)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 22 March 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0158decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 March 2017.#A and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Inclusion of the ‘Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)’ on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Question referred for a preliminary ruling concerning the validity of that inclusion — Compliance with international humanitarian law — Concept of ‘terrorist act’ — Actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict.#Case C-158/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0194decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2017.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition — Mergers — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — International express small package delivery services in the EEA — Acquisition of TNT Express by UPS — Decision declaring the merger incompatible with the internal market — Likely effects on prices — Econometric analysis — Rights of defence.#Case T-194/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0160decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2017.#Yingli Energy (China) Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating in or consigned from China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Undertakings — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Exporting country — Scope of the investigation — Sampling — Normal value — Definition of the product concerned — Time limit for the adoption of a decision on a market economy treatment claim — Temporal application of new provisions — Injury — Causal link — Rights of the defence — Calculation of the injury margin.#Case T-160/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0014decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 February 2017.#Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Plea of illegality — Legal basis — Misuse of powers — Rights of the defence — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Ne bis in idem — Res judicata — Proportionality — Manifest error of assessment — Fundamental rights.#Joined Cases T-14/14 and T-87/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0381decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 February 2017.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Strengthened audit and monitoring measures and verification warning in the early warning system (EWS) — Decision suspending the possibility for the applicant to conclude contracts for indirect management with the Commission having regard to doubts regarding its status as an international organisation — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — No interest in bringing proceedings — Partial inadmissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Application for damages.#Case T-381/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0019decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 February 2017.#Yuleidy Caridad Gómez Echevarría v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings –EU figurative mark wax by Yuli’s — Earlier EU word mark MADWAX and earlier national figurative mark wax — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Abuse of rights — Costs of representation before EUIPO — Article 85(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-19/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0255decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 January 2017.#Joint-Stock Company "Almaz-Antey" Air and Space Defence Corp., formerly OAO Concern PVO Almaz-Antey v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Legal person supporting, materially or financially, actions which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Fundamental rights — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-255/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2017

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2017-000359answered

European defence markets

European Union · European Parliament · 24 January 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62004TJ0199(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2016.#Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan — Interest in bringing proceedings — Initiation of the investigation — Constructed normal value — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard at a hearing — Comparison between the normal value and the export price — Drawback of import duties — Adjustment — Injury — Causal link — WTO law.#Case T-199/04 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0758decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2016.#Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Smart card chips — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Rights of defence — Infringement by object — Proof — Limitation period — Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales.#Case T-758/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0549decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 December 2016.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CAFE DEL SOL — Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol — Failure to submit evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rights of the defence.#Case T-549/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0548decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 December 2016.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Café del Sol — Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol — Failure to submit evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rights of the defence.#Case T-548/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0532decided

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 1 December 2016.#Z v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Staff report — Impartiality of the Civil Service Tribunal — Application for recusal of the members of the formation of the Tribunal which delivered judgment — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-532/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 December 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0065decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 November 2016.#Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Further listing of the applicant after annulment of the initial listing by the General Court — Error in law — Error in fact — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality.#Case T-65/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0089decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 November 2016.#Export Development Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Further listing of the applicant after annulment of the initial listing by the General Court — Error in law — Error in fact — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Equal treatment.#Case T-89/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2016

PreviousPage 29 of 30Next