Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2026

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0132_RESdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (chambre intermédiaire) du 30 septembre 2026.#Óbudai Egyetem contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Exécution du budget de l’Union – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2020/2092 – Régime général de conditionnalité pour la protection du budget de l’Union – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2022/2506 – Mesures de protection du budget de l’Union contre les violations des principes de l’État de droit en Hongrie – Article 2, paragraphe 2, de la décision d’exécution 2022/2506 – Interdiction pour la Commission de contracter des engagements juridiques avec une fiducie (trust) d’intérêt public ou avec une entité détenue par une telle fiducie (trust) – Article 4, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2020/2092 – Obligation de motivation – Sécurité juridique – Confiance légitime – Droits de la défense – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Proportionnalité – Droit d’opérer sur un marché non faussé – Article 16 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Principe d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Exception d’illégalité.#Affaire T-132/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0140_RESdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (chambre intermédiaire) du 30 septembre 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Exécution du budget de l’Union – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2020/2092 – Régime général de conditionnalité pour la protection du budget de l’Union – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2022/2506 – Mesures de protection du budget de l’Union contre les violations des principes de l’État de droit en Hongrie – Article 2, paragraphe 2, de la décision d’exécution 2022/2506 – Interdiction pour la Commission de contracter des engagements juridiques avec une fiducie (trust) d’intérêt public ou avec une entité détenue par une telle fiducie (trust) – Article 4, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2020/2092 – Obligation de motivation – Sécurité juridique – Confiance légitime – Droits de la défense – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Proportionnalité – Droit d’opérer sur un marché non faussé – Article 16 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Principe d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Exception d’illégalité.#Affaire T-140/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0133_RESdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (chambre intermédiaire) du 30 septembre 2026.#Állatorvostudományi Egyetem contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Exécution du budget de l’Union – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2020/2092 – Régime général de conditionnalité pour la protection du budget de l’Union – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2022/2506 – Mesures de protection du budget de l’Union contre les violations des principes de l’État de droit en Hongrie – Article 2, paragraphe 2, de la décision d’exécution 2022/2506 – Interdiction pour la Commission de contracter des engagements juridiques avec une fiducie (trust) d’intérêt public ou avec une entité détenue par une telle fiducie (trust) – Article 4, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2020/2092 – Obligation de motivation – Sécurité juridique – Confiance légitime – Droits de la défense – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Proportionnalité – Droit d’opérer sur un marché non faussé – Article 16 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Principe d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Exception d’illégalité.#Affaire T-133/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0139_RESdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (chambre intermédiaire) du 30 septembre 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Exécution du budget de l’Union – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2020/2092 – Régime général de conditionnalité pour la protection du budget de l’Union – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2022/2506 – Mesures de protection du budget de l’Union contre les violations des principes de l’État de droit en Hongrie – Article 2, paragraphe 2, de la décision d’exécution 2022/2506 – Interdiction pour la Commission de contracter des engagements juridiques avec une fiducie (trust) d’intérêt public ou avec une entité détenue par une telle fiducie (trust) – Article 4, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2020/2092 – Obligation de motivation – Sécurité juridique – Confiance légitime – Droits de la défense – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Proportionnalité – Droit d’opérer sur un marché non faussé – Article 16 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Principe d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Exception d’illégalité.#Affaire T-139/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0094decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Mohammad Reza Khiabani v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Error of law – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-94/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0133decided

Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Állatorvostudományi Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Right to operate on an undistorted market – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Plea of illegality.#Case T-133/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0140decided

Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Right to operate on an undistorted market – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Plea of illegality.#Case T-140/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0132decided

Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Óbudai Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Right to operate on an undistorted market – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Plea of illegality.#Case T-132/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0139decided

Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Right to operate on an undistorted market – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Plea of illegality.#Case T-139/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0369_RESdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#LW contre Trenitalia SpA et Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Obligation de l’employeur d’informer le travailleur des conditions applicables au contrat ou à la relation de travail – Directive 91/533/CEE – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Défense des droits – Portée de cette disposition – Protection des droits découlant de cette directive – Article 3 – Droit pour le travailleur de recevoir un document contenant des informations sur les éléments essentiels du contrat ou de la relation de travail.#Affaire C-369/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0369decided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#LW contre Trenitalia SpA et Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Obligation de l’employeur d’informer le travailleur des conditions applicables au contrat ou à la relation de travail – Directive 91/533/CEE – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Défense des droits – Portée de cette disposition – Protection des droits découlant de cette directive – Article 3 – Droit pour le travailleur de recevoir un document contenant des informations sur les éléments essentiels du contrat ou de la relation de travail.#Affaire C-369/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0459decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Roman Trotsenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-459/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2026

Report· XGCELEX 52026XG04123open

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 and Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region as well as Iran’s actions undermining freedom of navigation in the Middle East apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 27 July 2026

Report· XGCELEX 52026XG04124open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1837 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1853 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region as well as Iran’s actions undermining freedom of navigation in the Middle East apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 27 July 2026

Report· XGCELEX 52026XG04122open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1837 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1853 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region as well as Iran’s actions undermining freedom of navigation in the Middle East apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 27 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0523_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0400decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(d) – Restrictive measures taken against a natural person providing financial support to Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Ukraine – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-400/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0399decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine and Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Definition of ‘association’ in the case of two persons bound by a family relationship – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-399/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0158decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#QJ v Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA and État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether applicable – National legislation providing for a system of joint and several liability of company directors for payment of value added tax (VAT) owed by the company – Binding effect of the findings of fact and legal classifications contained in a final tax assessment – Option for the director to challenge the assessment issued against the company as an incidental question – Respect for the rights of the defence.#Case C-158/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0027decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Wild Ireland Defence CLG v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Case C-27/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0523decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0105decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS and Marlink Events SAS v European Defence Agency.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation.#Case T-105/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0105_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS and Marlink Events SAS v European Defence Agency.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation.#Case T-105/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0522_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0484_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0522decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0484decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0801_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(f) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(f) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially, … the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Obligation to state reasons – Interpretation – Right to property – Limitations – Principle of proportionality – Account to be taken of the situation and economic interests of the appellant’s customers.#Case C-801/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2026

Page 1 of 2Next