Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Environment

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2019

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0592_SUMdecided

Rozsudek Soudního dvora (devátého senátu) ze dne 19. prosince 2019.#Darie BV v. Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Nařízení (EU) č. 528/2012 – Článek 3 odst. 1 písm. a) a c) – Pojem ‚biocidní přípravek‘ – Pojem ‚účinná látka‘ – Výrobek s obsahem bakterií, který obsahuje druh bakterie Bacillus Ferment – Působení, které není pouhým fyzickým nebo mechanickým působením – Nepřímé působení – Doba působení výrobku.#Věc C-592/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0752_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0752decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0592decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Darie BV v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Article 3(1)(a) and (c) — Concept of ‘biocidal product’ — Concept of ‘active substance’ — Bacterial product containing the bacterial species Bacillus ferment — Mode of action other than mere physical or mechanical action — Indirect action — Period within which effect takes place.#Case C-592/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0568decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2019.#Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), first indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 6(1) — Application of the exceptions concerning requests for access to environmental information — Documents drawn up by the European Commission under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Refusal of access — Subsequent transmission of the documents requested — Article 149 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — No further interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate.#Case C-568/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0568_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2019.#Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), first indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 6(1) — Application of the exceptions concerning requests for access to environmental information — Documents drawn up by the European Commission under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Refusal of access — Subsequent transmission of the documents requested — Article 149 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — No further interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate.#Case C-568/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0752decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 November 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0261_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 November 2019.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Directive 85/337/EEC — Consent for, and construction of, a wind farm — Project likely to have significant effects on the environment — Absence of a prior environmental impact assessment — Obligation to regularise — Article 260(2) TFEU — Application for an order to pay a penalty payment and a lump sum.#Case C-261/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0535decided

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 12 November 2019.#IL and Others v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment – Public participation in the decision-making process – Irregularities vitiating the procedure for approval of a project – Access to justice – Limitations laid down by national law – Directive 2000/60/EC – EU action in the field of water policy – Deterioration of a body of groundwater – Arrangements for assessment – Right of individuals to take measures in order to prevent pollution – Standing to bring proceedings before the national courts.#Case C-535/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0261decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 November 2019.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Directive 85/337/EEC — Consent for, and construction of, a wind farm — Project likely to have significant effects on the environment — Absence of a prior environmental impact assessment — Obligation to regularise — Article 260(2) TFEU — Application for an order to pay a penalty payment and a lump sum.#Case C-261/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0280decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice — Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run.#Case C-280/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0212_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Prato Nevoso Termo Energy Srl v Provincia di Cuneo and ARPA Piemonte.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2008/98/EC — Waste — Used vegetable oils having undergone chemical treatment — Article 6(1) and (4) — End-of-waste status — Directive 2009/28/EC — Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources — Article 13 — National authorisation, certification and licensing procedures that are applied to plants for the production of electricity, heating or cooling from renewable energy sources — Use of a bioliquid as a power source for an electric power plant.#Case C-212/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0636decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#European Commission v French Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of the limit values for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in certain French zones and agglomerations – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-636/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0145(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Jap Energéticas y Medioambientales, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Grant agreement concluded under the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) — Debit note — Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable — No reclassification of the action — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-145/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0592decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 October 2019.#Darie BV v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Article 3(1)(a) and (c) — Concept of ‘biocidal product’ — Concept of ‘active substance’ — Bacterial product containing the bacterial species Bacillus ferment — Mode of action other than mere physical or mechanical action — Indirect action — Period within which effect takes place.#Case C-592/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0197_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Proceedings brought by Wasserleitungsverband Nördliches Burgenland and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Objective of reducing pollution — Waters affected by pollution — Maximum nitrate level of 50 mg/l — Action programmes adopted by the Member States — Rights of individuals to have such a programme amended — Locus standi before the national authorities and courts.#Case C-197/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0197decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Proceedings brought by Wasserleitungsverband Nördliches Burgenland and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Objective of reducing pollution — Waters affected by pollution — Maximum nitrate level of 50 mg/l — Action programmes adopted by the Member States — Rights of individuals to have such a programme amended — Locus standi before the national authorities and courts.#Case C-197/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0616_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 October 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Mathieu Blaise and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Validity — Precautionary principle — Definition of the concept of ‘active substance’ — Combination of active substances — Reliability of the assessment procedure — Public access to the dossier — Tests of long-term toxicity — Pesticides — Glyphosate.#Case C-616/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0616decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 October 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Mathieu Blaise and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Foix.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Validity — Precautionary principle — Definition of the concept of ‘active substance’ — Combination of active substances — Reliability of the assessment procedure — Public access to the dossier — Tests of long-term toxicity — Pesticides — Glyphosate.#Case C-616/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0119_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Italian Republic and Eurallumina SpA v European Commission.#State aid — Directive 2003/96/EC — Excise duties on mineral oils — Mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production — Exemption from excise duty — Selective nature — Guidelines on regional State aid — Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection of 2001 — Legitimate expectations — Presumption of legality attaching to measures of the institutions — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons — Contradictory reasoning.#Joined Cases T-119/07 and T-207/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0129_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Ireland and Aughinish Alumina Ltd v European Commission.#State aid — Directive 2003/96/EC — Excise duties on mineral oils — Mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production — Exemption from excise duty — Selective nature of the measure — Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection of 2001.#Joined Cases T-129/07 and T-130/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0129decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Ireland and Aughinish Alumina Ltd v European Commission.#State aid — Directive 2003/96/EC — Excise duties on mineral oils — Mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production — Exemption from excise duty — Selective nature of the measure — Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection of 2001.#Joined Cases T-129/07 and T-130/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0119decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Italian Republic and Eurallumina SpA v European Commission.#State aid — Directive 2003/96/EC — Excise duties on mineral oils — Mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production — Exemption from excise duty — Selective nature — Guidelines on regional State aid — Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection of 2001 — Legitimate expectations — Presumption of legality attaching to measures of the institutions — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons — Contradictory reasoning.#Joined Cases T-119/07 and T-207/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0082decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019.#TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Environment — Genetically modified products — Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 10(1) — Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making — Rejection of the request.#Case C-82/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0290decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Wild fauna and flora — Conservation of natural habitats as well as wild fauna and flora — Article 4(4) — Annexes I and II — Sites of Community importance — Non-designation — Special areas of conservation — Necessary measures — Failure to adopt.#Case C-290/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0290_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Wild fauna and flora — Conservation of natural habitats as well as wild fauna and flora — Article 4(4) — Annexes I and II — Sites of Community importance — Non-designation — Special areas of conservation — Necessary measures — Failure to adopt.#Case C-290/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0411decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL and Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen ASBL v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Espoo Convention — Aarhus Convention — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(3) — Definition of ‘project’ — Assessment of the effects on the site concerned — Article 6(4) — Meaning of ‘imperative reasons of overriding public interest’ — Conservation of wild birds — Directive 2009/147/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — Directive 2011/92/EU — Article 1(2)(a) — Definition of ‘project’ — Article 2(1) — Article 4(1) — Environmental impact assessment — Article 2(4) — Exemption from assessment — Phasing out of nuclear energy — National legislation providing, first, for restarting industrial production of electricity for a period of almost 10 years at a nuclear power station that had previously been shut down, with the effect of deferring by 10 years the date initially set by the national legislature for deactivating and ceasing production at that power station, and second, for deferral, also by 10 years, of the date initially set by the legislature for deactivating and ceasing industrial production of electricity at an active power station — No environmental impact assessment.#Case C-411/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0411_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL and Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen ASBL v Conseil des ministres.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Espoo Convention — Aarhus Convention — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(3) — Definition of ‘project’ — Assessment of the effects on the site concerned — Article 6(4) — Meaning of ‘imperative reasons of overriding public interest’ — Conservation of wild birds — Directive 2009/147/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment — Directive 2011/92/EU — Article 1(2)(a) — Definition of ‘project’ — Article 2(1) — Article 4(1) — Environmental impact assessment — Article 2(4) — Exemption from assessment — Phasing out of nuclear energy — National legislation providing, first, for restarting industrial production of electricity for a period of almost 10 years at a nuclear power station that had previously been shut down, with the effect of deferring by 10 years the date initially set by the national legislature for deactivating and ceasing production at that power station, and second, for deferral, also by 10 years, of the date initially set by the legislature for deactivating and ceasing industrial production of electricity at an active power station — No environmental impact assessment.#Case C-411/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0395decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 July 2019.#Tim SpA - Direzione e coordinamento Vivendi SA v Consip SpA and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement of supplies, works or services — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 18(2) — Article 57(4) — Optional grounds for exclusion — Ground for exclusion of a subcontractor mentioned in the economic operator’s tender — Subcontractor’s failure to comply with environmental, social and labour law obligations — National legislation providing for automatic exclusion of the economic operator for such a failure.#Case C-395/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0624decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 July 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Tronex BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Article 2(1) — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 3(1) — Concepts of ‘shipment of waste’ and ‘waste’ — Consignment of goods initially intended for retail sale, returned by consumers or become redundant in the seller’s product range.#Case C-624/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0212decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 20 June 2019.#Prato Nevoso Termo Energy Srl v Provincia di Cuneo and ARPA Piemonte.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2008/98/EC — Waste — Used vegetable oils having undergone chemical treatment — Article 6(1) and (4) — End-of-waste status — Directive 2009/28/EC — Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources — Article 13 — National authorisation, certification and licensing procedures that are applied to plants for the production of electricity, heating or cooling from renewable energy sources — Use of a bioliquid as a power source for an electric power plant.#Case C-212/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0682decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Natural gas processing installation — Sulphur recovery — ‘Claus process’ — Production of electricity in a secondary facility — Production of heat — Emission of inherent carbon dioxide (CO2) — Article 2(1) — Scope — Annex I — Activity of ‘combustion of fuels’ — Article 3(u) — Concept of ‘electricity generator’ — Article 10a(3) and (4) — Transitional arrangements for the harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Scope — Article 3(c) — Concept of ‘heat benchmark sub-installation’.#Case C-682/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0261decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 13 June 2019.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Directive 85/337/EEC — Consent for, and construction of, a wind farm — Project likely to have significant effects on the environment — Absence of a prior environmental impact assessment — Obligation to regularise — Article 260(2) TFEU — Application for an order to pay a penalty payment and a lump sum.#Case C-261/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0043decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Decree — Designation of a special area of conservation pursuant to Directive 92/43/EEC — Setting of conservation objectives and provision of certain preventive measures — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Obligation to carry out an environmental assessment.#Case C-43/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0321decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2019.#Terre wallonne ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Decree — Establishment of conservation objectives for the Natura 2000 network, in accordance with Directive 92/43/EEC — Definition of ‘plans and programmes’ — Obligation to undertake an environmental assessment.#Case C-321/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0462decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2019.#TO v European Environment Agency.#Civil service — Contract staff — Contract for a fixed period — Dismissal during sick leave — Article 16 of the CEOS — Article 48(b) of the CEOS — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Processing of personal data — Article 84 of the CEOS — Psychological harassment.#Case T-462/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2019

Regulation· RCELEX 32019R1010in force

Regulation (EU) 2019/1010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the alignment of reporting obligations in the field of legislation related to the environment, and amending Regulations (EC) No 166/2006 and (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 2002/49/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2007/2/EC, 2009/147/EC and 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 338/97 and (EC) No 2173/2005, and Council Directive 86/278/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 5 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0634decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#ReFood GmbH & Co. KG v Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Oldenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Shipments of waste within the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Article 1(3)(d) — Scope — Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 — Shipments of animal by-products.#Case C-634/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0280decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 May 2019.#Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice — Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run.#Case C-280/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0204decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) v European Commission.#Appeal — Environment — Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species — Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 — Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of Union concern — Inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii.#Case C-204/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0689decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#Conti 11. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS "MSC Flaminia" v Land Niedersachsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Shipment of waste — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure — Shipments within the European Union — Article 1(3)(b) — Exclusion from the regulation’s scope — Waste generated on board ships — Waste on board a ship following damage at sea.#Case C-689/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2019

Page 1 of 2Next