Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Healthcare

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

37 records in EU in 2021

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0151_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Field of public health – Calculation of length-of-service increments – National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category.#Case C-151/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0151decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Field of public health – Calculation of length-of-service increments – National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category.#Case C-151/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0636decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Y v Centraal Administratie Kantoor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Concept of ‘insured person’ – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 1(c) – Article 2 – Article 24 – Right to the benefits in kind provided by the Member State of residence at the expense of the Member State responsible for paying the pension – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(b)(i) – Article 7 – Reimbursement of the costs of healthcare received in a Member State other than the Member State of residence and the Member State responsible for paying the pension – Conditions.#Case C-636/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0538decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#TS and Others v Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate and Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Health insurance – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 20(1) and (2) – Medical treatment received in a Member State other than the insured person’s Member State of residence – Prior authorisation – Conditions – Requirement for a report by a doctor in the national public health insurance system prescribing a treatment – Recommendation, by way of a second medical opinion, in a Member State other than the insured person’s Member State of residence, of an alternative treatment having the advantage of not creating a disability – Full reimbursement of the medical expenses relating to the alternative treatment – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU.#Case C-538/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0633decided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2021.#Coordination nationale médicale santé - environnement (CNMSE) and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Public health – Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 – Conduct of clinical trials with medicinal products for human use containing GMOs – Treatment or prevention of the coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) – Concept of legislative act – Concept of regulatory act – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-633/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0633_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2021.#Coordination nationale médicale santé - environnement (CNMSE) and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Public health – Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 – Conduct of clinical trials with medicinal products for human use containing GMOs – Treatment or prevention of the coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) – Concept of legislative act – Concept of regulatory act – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-633/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0355decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of public health and food safety – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to four languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-355/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0355_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of public health and food safety – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to four languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-355/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0836_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Toropet Ltd. v Landkreis Greiz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Article 9(d) and Article 10(a) and (f) – Classification of products – Decomposition, deterioration and presence of foreign bodies in the material – Effect on the initial classification.#Case C-836/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0836decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Toropet Ltd. v Landkreis Greiz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gera.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Article 9(d) and Article 10(a) and (f) – Classification of products – Decomposition, deterioration and presence of foreign bodies in the material – Effect on the initial classification.#Case C-836/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0160decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 15 July 2021.#Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Rotterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Products not complying with the maximum emission levels – Prohibition on placing on the market – Measurement method – Filter cigarettes with small ventilation holes – Measurement of the emissions on the basis of ISO standards – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Compliance with the publication requirements laid down in Article 297(1) TFEU read in the light of the principle of legal certainty – Compliance with the principle of transparency.#Case C-160/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0220decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 24 June 2021.#ratiopharm GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Directive 2001/83/EC – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Dexmedetomidine Accord – dexmedetomidine – Dismissal.#Case C-220/21 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 June 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0220_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 24 June 2021.#ratiopharm GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Directive 2001/83/EC – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Dexmedetomidine Accord – dexmedetomidine – Dismissal.#Case C-220/21 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 June 2021

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0103decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid and Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) ‐ Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ – Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ – Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff – Permanent need for temporary regulated staff.#Case C-103/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2021

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0103_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Sindicato Único de Sanidad e Higiene (SUSH) de la Comunidad de Madrid and Sindicato de Sanidad de Madrid de la Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) v Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) ‐ Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ – Concept of ‘equivalent legal measures to prevent abuse’ – Substitution of the status of occasional regulated staff for that of interim regulated staff – Permanent need for temporary regulated staff.#Case C-103/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0223_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0223decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2021

Decision· DCELEX 32021D0885in force

Decision (EU) 2021/885 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece and France in relation to natural disasters and to Albania, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain in relation to a public health emergency

European Union · EUR-Lex · 20 May 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0836decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 20 May 2021.#Toropet Ltd. v Landkreis Greiz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gera.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Article 9(d) and Article 10(a) and (f) – Classification of products – Decomposition, deterioration and presence of foreign bodies in the material – Effect on the initial classification.#Case C-836/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Decision· BUD2021/0077(BUD)voted

Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece and France in relation to natural disasters and to Albania, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain in relation to a public health emergency

European Union · European Parliament · 26 April 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0636decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 22 April 2021.#Y v Centraal Administratie Kantoor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Concept of ‘insured person’ – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 1(c) – Article 2 – Article 24 – Right to the benefits in kind provided by the Member State of residence at the expense of the Member State responsible for paying the pension – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(b)(i) – Article 7 – Reimbursement of the costs of healthcare received in a Member State other than the Member State of residence and the Member State responsible for paying the pension – Conditions.#Case C-636/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2021

Proposal· PCCELEX 52021PC0201open

Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece and France in relation to natural disasters and to Albania, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain in relation to a public health emergency

European Union · European Commission · 24 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0096_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Article 168 TFEU – Directive 2002/98/EC – Standards of quality and safety of human blood and of blood components – Objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health – Article 4(2) and Article 9(2) – Blood establishments – Responsible person – Minimum conditions of qualification – Option for a Member State to provide for a more stringent regime – Discretion afforded to the Member States.#Case C-96/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0096decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ordine Nazionale dei Biologi and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Article 168 TFEU – Directive 2002/98/EC – Standards of quality and safety of human blood and of blood components – Objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health – Article 4(2) and Article 9(2) – Blood establishments – Responsible person – Minimum conditions of qualification – Option for a Member State to provide for a more stringent regime – Discretion afforded to the Member States.#Case C-96/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2021