PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

other · European Union

8e01d479-c04c-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1

8e01d479-c04c-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1

Members

  • No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0428decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#FZ AR SpA and SX Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Dipartimento del Tesoro, Comitato di Sicurezza Finanziaria and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Trust beneficiary included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Joined Cases C-428/24 and C-476/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0483decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#D and Others v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Settlor of the trust included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Case C-483/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0557decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Vittorio Malacalza v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Decisions taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) concerning Banca Carige SpA – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Conflict of interest – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Grounds of the General Court’s judgment.#Case C-557/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0225decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0363decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Finansinspektionen v Carnegie Investment Bank AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Market abuse – Article 7(1) – Concept of ‘inside information’ – Article 7(2) – Information of a ‘precise nature’ – Email containing information relating to the inclusion of a person in an insider list – No statement of the reasons that led to that inclusion – Correct assessment of the circumstances – Correct information – Necessity.#Case C-363/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0770decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#DB InfraGO AG and DB RegioNetz Infrastruktur GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EC – Railway infrastructure – Management independence – Article 4(2) – Independence of the infrastructure managers – Infrastructure and services charges – Article 29(1) – Establishing, determining and collecting charges – Charging scheme for charges for the use of the German railway infrastructure – Short-distance rail passenger transport – Calculation of the amount of the charges – Multiplication of the amount of the average charges levied during a reference period by a fixed annual rate of increase laid down by law.#Case C-770/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0514decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Magyar Telekom Nyrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – First subparagraph of Article 105(4) – Right of end-users to terminate their contact without further costs due to modifications unilaterally proposed by a provider of electronic communication services – Exceptions – Modifications directly imposed by EU law or national law.#Case C-514/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0010decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use for digital television frequencies – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 8 – General objectives – Proportionality – Criterion for assessing fees linked to the collection of a predetermined amount of annual revenue with a financial objective.#Case C-10/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0680decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principle of non-discrimination and principle of transparency.#Case C-680/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0810decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Urban Vision SpA v Comune di Milano and Digital Vox Srl, anciennement A&C Network Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/23/EU – Procedure for the award of concession contracts – Project financing at the initiative of a private operator – Assessment and approval of a financing proposal – Call for tenders launched on the basis of that proposal – Pre-emption right of the economic operator that is the promoter, subject to ensuring the conditions of the best offer – Modification made after the submission of the initial offer – Article 3 – Principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency – Breach.#Case C-810/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0812decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#LIPOR – Associação de Municípios para a Gestão Sustentável de Resíduos do Grande Porto and PreZero Portugal, S.A. v Semural Waste & Energy, S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement of service, supply and works contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Award of contracts – Article 2(1)(10) – Concept of ‘economic operator’ – Inclusion of a subsidiary wholly owned by the parent company – Article 63 – Reliance on the capacities of other entities of persons linked with that undertaking – Article 59(1) – Freedom to prove that the capacities of other entities have been made available – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/7 – Annex 1 and point C of Part II of Annex 2 – Submission of several European Single Procurement Documents (ESPD) – Purpose of the ESPD.#Case C-812/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0240decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Proceedings brought by.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Notariusz w Krapkowicach Justyna Gawlica - Krapkowice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the European Certificate of Succession – Article 71 – Initiation by a notary, of his or her own motion, of the procedure for the withdrawal or modification of the European Certificate of Succession – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-240/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0272decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Conditions of admissibility of the action – Direct concern – Evidence.#Case C-272/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025