Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Climate

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

47 records in EU in 2025

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0391_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Braila Winds SRL v DGRFP București - Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii București and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 191(2) TFEU – EU policy on the environment – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 – EU climate-neutrality objective – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Common rules for the internal market for electricity – National legislation imposing an income tax on producers of electricity from renewable sources – Exemption for producers of electricity from fossil fuels and biomass.#Case C-391/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0391decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Braila Winds SRL v DGRFP București - Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii București and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 191(2) TFEU – EU policy on the environment – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 – EU climate-neutrality objective – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Common rules for the internal market for electricity – National legislation imposing an income tax on producers of electricity from renewable sources – Exemption for producers of electricity from fossil fuels and biomass.#Case C-391/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0637_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 October 2025.#Rimorchiatori Riuniti Panfido & C. Srl v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Appeal – Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union. – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Formal requirements for an appeal – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed submitted out of time – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-637/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0579decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Bioenergy activities – Forest biomass – Manufacture of organic basic chemicals – Manufacture of plastics in primary form – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Article 10 of Regulation 2020/852 – Transitional activities – Quantitative threshold – Conclusive scientific evidence – Life cycle – Precautionary principle – Principle of ‘do no significant harm’ to environmental objectives – Article 17 of Regulation 2020/852 – Circular economy – Water and marine resources – Pollution.#Case T-579/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0579_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Bioenergy activities – Forest biomass – Manufacture of organic basic chemicals – Manufacture of plastics in primary form – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Article 10 of Regulation 2020/852 – Transitional activities – Quantitative threshold – Conclusive scientific evidence – Life cycle – Precautionary principle – Principle of ‘do no significant harm’ to environmental objectives – Article 17 of Regulation 2020/852 – Circular economy – Water and marine resources – Pollution.#Case T-579/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0625decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of ‘low-carbon activity’ – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with droughts and climate hazards – Precautionary principle – Technical screening criteria – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – Article 290 TFEU – Concept of ‘essential elements’ of a legislative act – Scientific evidence – Commission’s margin of discretion – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-625/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0583_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Fédération environnement durable and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Electricity generation from wind power – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Substantial contribution to climate change adaptation – No significant harm to other environmental objectives.#Case T-583/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0583decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Fédération environnement durable and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Electricity generation from wind power – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Substantial contribution to climate change adaptation – No significant harm to other environmental objectives.#Case T-583/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0625_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of ‘low-carbon activity’ – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with droughts and climate hazards – Precautionary principle – Technical screening criteria – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – Article 290 TFEU – Concept of ‘essential elements’ of a legislative act – Scientific evidence – Commission’s margin of discretion – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-625/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0287decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0287_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0335_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria, SA v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – Transport – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Call for proposals CEF‑T‑2023‑COREGEN – ‘Tren de Gran Canaria’ project – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal for failure to comply with the conditions of admissibility – Late submission of a document required by the call for proposals – Request for review – Circumscribed powers – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-335/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0110_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 May 2025.#Hungary v European Commission and European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Interim relief – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Grant agreement – ‘Connecting Core Network elements in the transport sector: Rhine-Danube corridor – Komárom-Komárno cross-border bridge’ project – Debit note – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-110/25 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2025