Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2014

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0329decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2014.#Mazen Al-Tabbaa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Rights of defence — Right to an effective judicial remedy — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T‑329/12 and T‑74/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2014

Decision· DCELEX 32014D0537in force

Council Decision 2014/537/CFSP of 3 July 2014 on the signing and conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Central African Republic concerning the detailed arrangements for the transfer to the Central African Republic of persons detained by the European Union military operation (EUFOR RCA) in the course of carrying out its mandate, and concerning the guarantees applicable to such persons

European Union · EUR-Lex · 3 July 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0203decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 July 2014.#Mohamad Nedal Alchaar v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Entry of an individual on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Links with the regime — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy.#Case T‑203/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0129decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 3 July 2014.#Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Recovery of a customs debt — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Addressee of the recovery decision not heard by the customs authorities before its adoption, but only during the subsequent objection stage — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Determination of the legal consequences of non-observance of the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C‑129/13 and C‑130/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0166decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 June 2014.#Sophie Mukarubega v Préfet de police and Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Melun.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Procedure for the adoption of a return decision — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect her interests — Administrative authority refusing to grant such a national a resident permit as an asylum applicant and imposing an obligation to leave the territory — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued.#Case C‑166/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0249decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 June 2014.#Khaled Boudjlida v Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Pau.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect his interests — Return decision — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued — Extent of that right.#Case C‑249/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0260decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 18 June 2014.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Fisheries — Conservation of fishery resources — Overfishing by Spain of mackerel in zones VIII c, IX and X and in European Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 allocated for the year 2010 — Deductions from fishing quotas allocated for the years 2011 to 2015 — Rights of defence — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment.#Case T‑260/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0578decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 12 June 2014.#Deltafina SpA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Immunity from fines — Obligation to cooperate — Rights of the defence — Limits of judicial review — Right to fair legal process — Hearing of witnesses or of parties — Reasonable time — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C‑578/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0286decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition), 12 June 2014.#(publication by extracts) Intel Corp. v European Commission.#Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Microprocessors market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Loyalty rebates — ‘Naked’ restrictions — Classification as abuse — As-efficient-competitor analysis — Commission’s international jurisdiction — Obligation on the Commission to investigate — Limits — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Overall strategy — Fines — Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T‑286/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0067decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2014.#Sina Bank v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Measures against which no action may be brought — Inadmissibility — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑67/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0247decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 20 May 2014.#Argo Group International Holdings Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ARIS — Earlier Community figurative mark ARISA ASSURANCES S.A. — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Coexistence of earlier marks on the market — Principle of American law known as the ‘Morehouse defense’ — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T‑247/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0414decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014.#Bolloré v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Market in carbonless paper — Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary — Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement — Equal treatment — Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence.#Case C‑414/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0468decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014.#Tisza Erőmű kft, formerly AES-Tisza Erőmű kft v European Commission.#State aid — Aid awarded by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators — Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators — Decision declaring the State aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Selective nature — State resources — Imputability to the State — Effect on trade between Member States — Rights of the defence — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty.#Case T‑468/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0637decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 30 April 2014.#Euris Consult Ltd v European Parliament.#Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of translation services into Maltese — Rules relating to the procedure for the submission of tenders — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Failure to comply with the rules on submission designed to ensure the confidentiality of the contents of tenders before opening — Plea of inapplicability — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 98(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Article 143 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002.#Case T‑637/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2014

Report· XGCELEX 52014XG0417(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ‘Hizballah Military Wing’ (a.k.a. ‘Hezbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbullah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hezballah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hisbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbu’llah Military Wing’ a.k.a. ‘Hizb Allah Military Wing’ , including the ‘Jihad Council’ (and all units reporting to it, including the External Security Organisation)), included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism listed in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 125/2014

European Union · Council of the European Union · 17 April 2014

Record· TOCELEX 62012TO0263decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 April 2014.#Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Obligation of individual communication — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Proportionality — Competence of the Council — Misuse of powers — Error of law — Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation — Error of assessment — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T‑263/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0578decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 27 March 2014.#Deltafina SpA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Immunity from fines — Obligation to cooperate — Rights of the defence — Limits of judicial review — Right to fair legal process — Hearing of witnesses or of parties — Reasonable time — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C‑578/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0612decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 27 March 2014.#Ballast Nedam NV v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Setting of the gross price for road pavement bitumen — Setting of a rebate for road builders — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 27 — Rights of the defence — Reduction of the fine.#Case C‑612/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0029decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 13 March 2014.#Global Trans Lodzhistik OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community Customs Code — Articles 243 and 245 — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 181a — Decision amenable to review — Admissibility of legal proceedings where a prior administrative complaint has not been made — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C‑29/13 and C‑30/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0202decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 12 March 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy.#Case T‑202/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0128decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 February 2014.#(publication by extracts) LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Worldwide market for liquid crystal display (LCD) panels — Agreements and concerted practices concerning prices and production capacity — Internal sales — Rights of the defence — Fines — Partial immunity from fines — Single and continuous infringement — Ne bis in idem principle.#Case T‑128/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0256decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 27 February 2014.#Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T‑256/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0129decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 February 2014.#Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Recovery of a customs debt — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Addressee of the recovery decision not heard by the customs authorities before its adoption, but only during the subsequent objection stage — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Determination of the legal consequences of non-observance of the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C‑129/13 and C‑130/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0040decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2014.#Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Application for annulment — Rights of the defence — Late notification of Commission’s investigation — Duration of the administrative procedure — Liability of a parent company for infringements of competition rules committed by its subsidiaries — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Duration of the infringements — Limitation — Legitimate interest in finding that an infringement was committed — Fines imposed on a parent company differing in amount from those imposed on a subsidiary — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑40/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0027decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 6 February 2014.#AC-Treuhand AG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Fines — Action for annulment — Concept of undertaking — Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law — Duration of the infringement — Limitation — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Rights of the defence — Late notification of the investigation procedure — Maximum amount of 10% of turnover — Penalising of two infringements in a single decision — Concept of single infringement — Application for variation — Amount of the fines — Duration of the infringements — Duration of the administrative procedure — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Symbolic fine — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑27/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0174decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 4 February 2014.#Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank SAL v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Amendment of the form of order sought — Time-limit — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Rights of the defence.#Joined Cases T‑174/12 and T‑80/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2014

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next