Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,713France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0382_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court.#Case C-382/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0382decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court.#Case C-382/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0403_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion.#Case C-403/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0403decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion.#Case C-403/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Report· XGCELEX 52026XG00745open

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/263 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/262 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region

European Union · Council of the European Union · 30 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0271decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility.#Case C-271/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0271_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility.#Case C-271/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2026

Record· DEA2026/2536(DEA)rdg1

Commission Delegated Regulation establishing a derogation from Article 43(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council as regards the import conditions for introduction into the Union of wood packaging material in the form of ammunition boxes, originating in the United States of America, under the control of the United States Department of Defense, and manufactured before 1 September 2007

European Union · European Parliament · 21 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0174_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Djchem Chemicals Poland S.A. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-174/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0174decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Djchem Chemicals Poland S.A. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-174/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0588decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of undertakings concerned – General principle of the right to good administration – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of effective judicial protection – Rights of defence of undertakings – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-588/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0491_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to commence the inter partes investigation stage of the procedure within a time limit of 90 days, starting from the moment it has knowledge of the infringement – Annulment of the decision of that authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Revocation of the power to penalise the practice concerned – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-491/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0769_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence aspects – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0769decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0643decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Manuel Costa Filhos, Lda. v Oü Wine Port of Paldiski.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Rights of the defence – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 20 – Enforcement procedure – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of enforcement – Articles 21 and 23 – Grounds for the refusal, stay or limitation of enforcement – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Article 8 – Refusal to accept the document – Failure to provide a translation into either a language which the addressee understands or the official language of the Member State of enforcement or, as the case may be, one of the official languages of the place where service of the document is to be effected – Omission of the standard form set out in Annex II to Regulation No 1393/2007 – Consequences – Assessment by the courts of the Member State of origin.#Case C-643/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 November 2025

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-10-2025-004706answered

Program Military Mobility

European Union · European Parliament · 26 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0607decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-607/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0173_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#DI v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing a reprimand on a Member of the Parliament – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Procedural deadlines – Misuse of powers – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-173/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next