Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,551 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,750Ireland · 23,761United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,721France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0566decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 June 2016.#Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament.#Appeal — Member of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of undue payments — Recovery — Implementing measures of the Statute for Members of the Parliament — Observance of the rights of the defence — Principle of impartiality — Limitation — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Articles 78 to 81 — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 — Articles 81, 82 and 93 — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Reasonable time.#Case C-566/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2016

Record· FJCELEX 62015FJ0133decided

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 June 2016.#HI v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Article 11 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of loyalty — Article 11a — Conflict of interests — Official responsible for monitoring a project funded by the European Union — Family connection between that official and an employee recruited for the purposes of the project by the company responsible for that project — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Downgrading — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Board — Obligation to state reasons — Duration of the proceedings — Reasonable time — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Ne bis in idem principle — Manifest error of assessment — Commensurate nature of the disciplinary penalty — Mitigating circumstances.#Case F-133/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0276decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Association — Members not directly concerned — Inadmissibility — Countrywide anti-dumping duty — Individual treatment — Sampling — Rights of the defence — Non-discrimination — Duty of diligence.#Case T-276/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0426decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 June 2016 (Extracts).#Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for prestressing steel — Price fixing, market sharing and the exchange of commercially sensitive information — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Economic unit — Direct participation in the infringement — Secondary liability of parent companies — Succession of undertakings — Complex infringement – Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Principle of non-retroactivity and principle that penalties must be lawful — Mitigating circumstances — Ability to pay — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Request for reconsideration — No change in the factual circumstances — Letter of rejection — Inadmissibility.#Cases T-426/10 to T-429/10 and T-438/12 to T-441/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0034decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 1 June 2016.#Wolf Oil Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CHEMPIOIL — Earlier figurative mark CHAMPION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-34/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0240decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 June 2016.#Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Application for three-dimensional European Union trade mark — Shape of a bar with four circles — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-240/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0262decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 May 2016.#GD European Land Systems – Steyr GmbH v Zollamt Eisenstadt Flughafen Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Classification of goods — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Combined Nomenclature — Heading 8710 and Subheading 9305 91 00 — Note 3 to Section XVII and point (c) of note 1 to Chapter 93 — Tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles — Military weapons — Classification of a turret system.#Case C-262/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0496decided

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 13 May 2016.#CX v European Commission.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Downgrading — Rights of the defence — Articles 4 and 6 of the Staff Regulations — Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Principle of proportionality — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-496/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0693decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 May 2016 (Extracts).#Aliaksei Mikhalchanka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Belarus — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on entry into, or transit through, the territory of the European Union — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Journalist — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Case T-693/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0052decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2016.#Sharif University of Technology v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Support for the Government of Iran — Research and technical development in military or military-related fields — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of law and error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages.#Case T-52/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 April 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0200decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 April 2016.#Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Inclusion of the name of the applicant on the basis of new grounds following the annulment of the earlier freezing of funds measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to property — Proportionality — Error of fact — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of powers — Right to life — Right to a family life — Non-contractual liability.#Case T-200/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0161decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2016.#Abdelhafid Bensada Benallal v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2004/38/EC — Decision withdrawing residence authorisation — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Admissibility of grounds of appeal on a point of law — Plea based on public policy.#Case C-161/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0103decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2016.#Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission.#State aid — Excise duties — Partial remission of a tax debt in the context of an arrangement — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Rights of the defence — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Private creditor test — Burden of proof.#Case T-103/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 March 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0254decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 February 2016.#Kühne + Nagel International AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Surcharges and charging mechanisms affecting the final prices — Whether trade between Member States affected — Errors of assessment — Duration of the infringement — Amount of the fine — Point 13 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Mitigating circumstances — Proportionality — Rights of the defence.#Case T-254/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2016

Record· TOCELEX 62013TO0279(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 February 2016.#Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt — Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and against associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicants on the list of persons targeted — Legal basis — Failure to fulfil the criteria for listing — Error of law — Error of fact — Right to property — Damage to reputation — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons — Amendment of the claims and pleas in law — Lis pendens — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-279/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 February 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0427decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2016.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#State Aid — Banking sector — Aid implemented by Germany and Austria for the benefit of Bayerische Landesbank in the course of its restructuring — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market, provided that certain conditions met — Repeal of the initial decision drawn up in a language other than that of the Member State — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Definition of State aid — Advantage — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-427/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0443decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 January 2016.#Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private life — Proportionality.#Case T-443/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0404decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2016.#Toshiba Corp. v European Commission.#Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — New decision taken following annulment in part of the initial decision by the Court — Fines — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement.#Case T-404/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2016

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0566decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 19 January 2016.#Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament.#Appeal — Member of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of undue payments — Recovery — Implementing measures of the Statute for Members of the Parliament — Observance of the rights of the defence — Principle of impartiality — Limitation — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Articles 78 to 81 — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 — Articles 81, 82 and 93 — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Reasonable time.#Case C-566/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0409decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2016.#Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — New decision taken following annulment in part of the initial decision by the Court — Fines — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Erroneous application — Starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement — Deterrence multiplier.#Case T-409/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0094decided

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 14 January 2016.#Ioannis Ntouvas v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).#Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Reports procedure — Career development report — 2010 appraisal procedure — Dismissal of the action at first instance — Time-limit for submission of the defence — Extension — Exceptional circumstances — Article 39(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service tribunal — Lawfulness of the appraisal procedure.#Case T-94/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2016

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0161decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 13 January 2016.#Abdelhafid Bensada Benallal v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2004/38/EC — Decision withdrawing residence authorisation — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Admissibility of grounds of appeal on a point of law — Plea based on public policy.#Case C-161/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0419decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2015.#WebMindLicenses kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Kiemelt Adó- és Vám Főigazgatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 2, 24, 43, 250 and 273 — Place of supply of electronically supplied services — Artificial fixing of that place by means of an arrangement not reflecting economic reality — Abuse of rights — Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8, 41, 47, 48, 51(1) and 52(1) and (3) — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Use by the tax authorities of evidence obtained without the taxable person’s knowledge in the context of a parallel criminal procedure that has not been concluded — Interception of telecommunications and seizure of emails.#Case C-419/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-015532open

Food defence and TTIP

European Union · European Parliament · 8 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0159decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2015.#HK Intertrade Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with a view to preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Admissibility — Right to be heard — Obligation to notify — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Manifest error of assessment.#Joined Cases T-159/13 and T-372/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2015

PreviousPage 31 of 32Next