Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,651 records in EU

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0009decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2015.#The National Iranian Gas Company v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Objection of illegality — Error of law — Proportionality — Right to property — Jurisdiction of the Council — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Review of the restrictive measures adopted — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment.#Case T-9/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0010decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2015.#Bank of Industry and Mine v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Time-limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Plea of illegality — Error of law — Proportionality — Right to property — Powers of the Council — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Reconsideration of restrictive measures adopted — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment.#Case T-10/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0190decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2015.#Johannes Tomana and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures imposed on certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Zimbabwe — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the European Union — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Fundamental rights — Proportionality.#Case T-190/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0527decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 April 2015.#Chafiq Ayadi v European Commission.#Referral back after setting aside — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person included on a list drawn up by a United Nations body — Inclusion of the name of that person in the list contained in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Fundamental rights — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to respect for property.#Case T-527/09 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0563decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 25 March 2015.#Central Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to reputation — Proportionality.#Case T‑563/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0286decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015.#Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v European Commission.#Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market — Coordination in the setting of quotation prices — Obligation to state reasons — Belated statement of reasons — Belated submission of evidence — Rights of defence — Principle of equality of arms — Principles governing the establishment of the facts — Distortion of the facts — Assessment of the evidence — Market structure — Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object — Burden of proof — Calculation of the fine — Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account — Sales of the same bananas counted twice.#Case C-286/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0089decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 17 March 2015.#(publication by extracts) Pollmeier Massivholz GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#State aid — State measures concerning the establishment of a sawmill in the Land of Hessen — Action for annulment — Letter sent to the complainants — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility — Decision finding no State aid — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Calculation of the aid element of State guarantees — Commission Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees — Undertaking in difficulty — Sale of public land — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑89/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2015

Record· FJCELEX 62013FJ0073decided

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015.#AX v European Central Bank.#Civil service — ECB staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Dismissal — Rights of the defence — Access to the disciplinary file — Access to information and documents on other divisions — Reasonable time — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee — Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee — Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended — Obligation to state reasons — Management of a division — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality of the disciplinary measure — Extenuating circumstances — Aggravating circumstances — Objection of illegality.#Case F-73/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0385decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2015.#Orange, anciennement France Télécom v European Commission.#State aid — Pensions — Aid for the reform of the arrangements for financing the retirement pensions of civil servants working for France Télécom — Reduction of the compensation to be paid to the State by France Télécom — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market under certain conditions — Advantage — Selective nature — Adverse effect on competition — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑385/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0509decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 January 2015.#Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to privacy — Proportionality.#Case T‑509/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0127decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 14 January 2015.#Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Referral back after setting aside of order — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person named in a list drawn up by a body of the United Nations — Naming of that person in the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Exceeded — Excusable error — Fundamental rights — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to respect for property — Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T‑127/09 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62013TO0407decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0072decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0550decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2014.#Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Paraffin waxes market — Coordination and price increases — Price fixing — 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines — Rights of the defence — Proof of the infringement — Limitation.#Case T‑550/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0269decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 December 2014.#Xeda International SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products — Active substance ethoxyquin — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance — Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations.#Case T‑269/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0544decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2014.#Hansen & Rosenthal KG and H&R Wax Company Vertrieb GmbH v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Paraffin waxes market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing — Proof of the infringement — 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines — Rights of the defence — Calculation of the value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — No retroactivity — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T‑544/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0643decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 12 December 2014 (publication by extracts).#Crown Equipment (Suzhou) Co. Ltd and Crown Gabelstapler GmbH & Co. KG v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in China — Review — Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Rights of defence — Error of fact — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑643/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0286decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 December 2014.#Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v European Commission.#Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market — Coordination in the setting of quotation prices — Obligation to state reasons — Belated statement of reasons — Belated submission of evidence — Rights of defence — Principle of equality of arms — Principles governing the establishment of the facts — Distortion of the facts — Assessment of the evidence — Market structure — Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object — Burden of proof — Calculation of the fine — Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account — Sales of the same bananas counted twice.#Case C-286/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0249decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 11 December 2014.#Khaled Boudjlida v Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Pau.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect his interests — Return decision — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued — Extent of that right.#Case C‑249/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2014

PreviousPage 33 of 34Next