Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

551 records in EU in 2026

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 134Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0618_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Athom Holding BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark athom Smart Home – Earlier international word mark ATHOM – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-618/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0693_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Re-inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-693/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0694_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 10 February 2026.#Princesse de Paris v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-694/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0214decided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0447_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 February 2026.#jundado GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark jundado – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Late filing of the statement of grounds of appeal – Request for restitutio in integrum – Duty of care – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-447/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0572_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Institutional law – Members of the European Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity of Members of the Parliament – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs – Requirement that the rapporteur be impartial.#Case C-572/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0572decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Institutional law – Members of the European Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity of Members of the Parliament – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs – Requirement that the rapporteur be impartial.#Case C-572/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0364_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – Measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in the environment – Directive 2001/18/EC – Article 26c(1) and (3) – Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/321 – Prohibition of the cultivation of MON 810 GMO maize in Italy – Validity – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 114 TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom to conduct a business – Articles 16 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-364/24 and C-393/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0364decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – Measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in the environment – Directive 2001/18/EC – Article 26c(1) and (3) – Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/321 – Prohibition of the cultivation of MON 810 GMO maize in Italy – Validity – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 114 TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom to conduct a business – Articles 16 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-364/24 and C-393/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0337_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Application for the EU figurative mark APE TEES – Earlier non-registered figurative trade marks representing a monkey, protected in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) – Relative ground for refusal – Opposition – Appeal before the Board of Appeal – Dismissal – Action before the General Court – Article 50(1) and (3) TEU – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Articles 126 and 127 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Transition period – Expiry – Circumstances prior to the adoption of the decision at issue – Relevant moment for assessing the existence of an earlier mark – Principle of territoriality – Territorial scope of the EU trade mark – Existence of a conflict.#Case C-337/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0337decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Application for the EU figurative mark APE TEES – Earlier non-registered figurative trade marks representing a monkey, protected in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) – Relative ground for refusal – Opposition – Appeal before the Board of Appeal – Dismissal – Action before the General Court – Article 50(1) and (3) TEU – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Articles 126 and 127 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Transition period – Expiry – Circumstances prior to the adoption of the decision at issue – Relevant moment for assessing the existence of an earlier mark – Principle of territoriality – Territorial scope of the EU trade mark – Existence of a conflict.#Case C-337/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0572_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Prohibition on providing specialised financial messaging services to certain Russian credit institutions and their Russian subsidiaries – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(b) and (d) and Annex – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(b) and (d) and Annex I – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 1e and Annex VIII – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5h and Annex XIV – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures apply – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on those lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to property – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers.#Case C-572/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0619decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#JG v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 3i(1) and (3ad) – Annex XXI – Prohibition on importing goods generating significant revenues for the Russian Federation into the European Union – Importation of a vehicle.#Case C-619/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0718decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#NP v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 33 – Grounds of inadmissibility – Article 38 – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Conditions for implementation – Connection between the applicant and the third country concerned – Criteria – Assessment methods – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-718/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0142_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0142decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0619_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0619decided

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0620decided

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0587decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0044open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union vis-à-vis the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland regarding the determination under Article 540(2) of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, of the date from which personal data under Article 537 of that Agreement may be supplied by Member States to the United Kingdom

European Union · European Commission · 30 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0811_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#European Commission v Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Zippo GmbH.#Appeal – Commercial policy – Commercial policy measures concerning certain products originating in the United States of America – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/502 – Measures adopted by the United States of America on imports of certain derivative aluminium and steel products – European Union decision to suspend equivalent trade concessions and other obligations – Additional customs duties on imports of products originating in the United States – Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Principle of ne ultra petita.#Case C-811/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0727decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#PB v Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Civil service – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants – Members of the temporary staff – Decision not to reclassify – Possibility for the administration to supplement before the Courts of the European Union the statement of reasons for the decision not to reclassify – Conditions – Exceptional cases – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the subsequent action – Action for annulment.#Case C-727/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0811decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#European Commission v Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Zippo GmbH.#Appeal – Commercial policy – Commercial policy measures concerning certain products originating in the United States of America – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/502 – Measures adopted by the United States of America on imports of certain derivative aluminium and steel products – European Union decision to suspend equivalent trade concessions and other obligations – Additional customs duties on imports of products originating in the United States – Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Principle of ne ultra petita.#Case C-811/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0286decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Meliá Hotels International, S.A. v Associação Ius Omnibus.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 5(1) – Scope – Special declaratory action for the disclosure of documents preceding a potential action for damages – Assessment of the plausibility of the claim for damages.#Case C-286/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0286_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Meliá Hotels International, S.A. v Associação Ius Omnibus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 5(1) – Scope – Special declaratory action for the disclosure of documents preceding a potential action for damages – Assessment of the plausibility of the claim for damages.#Case C-286/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1052_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0054_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Maschio Gaspardo SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing an agricultural subsoiler – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression.#Case T-54/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0046_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Land Oberösterreich v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Genussländer – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark.#Case T-46/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0246_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Ella Hotels and Resorts monoprosopi AE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ELLA RESORTS – Earlier EU figurative mark ELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Lack of due cause.#Case T-246/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

PreviousPage 11 of 12Next