Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

251 records in EU in 2025

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0535_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#CEE Bankwatch Network z.s. and Ökobüro - Allianz der Umweltbewegung v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-535/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0534_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#Föreningen Svenskt Landskapsskydd and Others v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-534/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0303_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0303decided

Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0019_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 November 2025.#Kingdom of Denmark v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2022/2041 – Adequate minimum wages in the European Union – Article 153(1)(b) TFEU – Article 153(2)(b) TFEU – Respect for the competences conferred on the Union by the Treaties – Article 153(5) TFEU – Exclusions of competence – ‘Pay’ and ‘right of association’ – Direct interference by EU law in the determination of pay within the European Union and in the right of association – Partial annulment – Article 5(1), in part, (2) and (3) in fine.#Case C-19/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0019decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 November 2025.#Kingdom of Denmark v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2022/2041 – Adequate minimum wages in the European Union – Article 153(1)(b) TFEU – Article 153(2)(b) TFEU – Respect for the competences conferred on the Union by the Treaties – Article 153(5) TFEU – Exclusions of competence – ‘Pay’ and ‘right of association’ – Direct interference by EU law in the determination of pay within the European Union and in the right of association – Partial annulment – Article 5(1), in part, (2) and (3) in fine.#Case C-19/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0391(01)decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2025.#DLF Beet Seed ApS and United Beet Seeds v European Chemicals Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘information [which] relates to emissions into the environment’ – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case.#Case T-391/25 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0386(01)decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2025.#DLF Beet Seed ApS and United Beet Seeds v European Chemicals Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘information [which] relates to emissions into the environment’ – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case.#Case T-386/25 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2374in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2374 of 4 November 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the eighth session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention regarding communications ACCC/C/2015/128 concerning access to justice regarding State aid decisions, ACCC/C/2013/96 concerning Projects of Common Interest, ACCC/C/2014/121 concerning Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and ACCC/C/2010/54 concerning National Energy Action Plans

European Union · EUR-Lex · 4 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0146_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0348_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista, SA v Administración General del Estado.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Customs warehousing procedure – Release for free circulation – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Article 112(3) – Determination of the customs value – Article 214(1) – Relevant point in time for the purpose of determining the customs value – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 97n(2) – Proof of origin of the goods – Article 118(1) and (3) – Period for submission of proofs of origin – Loss of the benefit of preferential treatment – Validity of documents proving the origin of the goods – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-348/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0500_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administración General del Estado.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-500/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0002_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Effectiveness – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 6(6) and (7) – Article 7(1) – Directive 2019/1/EU – Empowering the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market – Article 31(3) – Scope – Mechanism for mutual administrative and judicial assistance between national authorities – Transfer of the file from a competition authority to an authority conducting a criminal investigation – Addition to the file of a criminal investigation of leniency statements and settlement submissions and their annexes – Access to those documents by persons under investigation and other parties to such proceedings.#Case C-2/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0146decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0500decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-500/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0002decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Effectiveness – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 6(6) and (7) – Article 7(1) – Directive 2019/1/EU – Empowering the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market – Article 31(3) – Scope – Mechanism for mutual administrative and judicial assistance between national authorities – Transfer of the file from a competition authority to an authority conducting a criminal investigation – Addition to the file of a criminal investigation of leniency statements and settlement submissions and their annexes – Access to those documents by persons under investigation and other parties to such proceedings.#Case C-2/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0348decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista, SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Customs warehousing procedure – Release for free circulation – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Article 112(3) – Determination of the customs value – Article 214(1) – Relevant point in time for the purpose of determining the customs value – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 97n(2) – Proof of origin of the goods – Article 118(1) and (3) – Period for submission of proofs of origin – Loss of the benefit of preferential treatment – Validity of documents proving the origin of the goods – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-348/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0373decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#NI v Republika Hrvatska.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 1(3) – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘working time’ – Activities of public prosecutors – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Characteristics peculiar to certain specific public service activities – Periods of time on stand-by at the workplace and periods of time on stand-by according to a stand-by system carried out outside of the workplace – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fair and just working conditions.#Case C-373/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0611_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark THERMATEC – Earlier EU figurative mark Termatek – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-611/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0270(01)decided

Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of the applicant’s funds and economic resources – Applicant for leave to intervene mentioned by name, as a company owned and then formerly owned by that applicant, in the statement of reasons underlying the restrictive measures adopted against it – Effect of those measures on the applicant for leave to intervene – Leave to intervene granted.#Case C-270/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0554decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing warning lights – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-554/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0554_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing warning lights – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-554/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0345decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Arina Evgheni Corşicova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Undermining of the democratic political process and destabilisation of the constitutional order – Dissemination of false statements and disinformation – Article 1(1)(a)(i) and Article 2(1)(a)(i) of Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 – Article 2(3)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2023/888 – Association with a person included on the lists – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(b) of Decision 2023/891 – Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation 2023/888 – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Errors of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Freedom of association – Freedom of expression – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-345/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0550decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing a part of a warning light – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-550/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0565decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Itron, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ITRON – Earlier EU word marks ITRON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distance between the goods and services in question.#Case T-565/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0550_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing a part of a warning light – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-550/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0565_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Itron, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ITRON – Earlier EU word marks ITRON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distance between the goods and services in question.#Case T-565/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0590decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council concerning two legislative proposals pending at the time of the request for access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Action for annulment – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents to which access was granted pursuant to a request – Absence of a challengeable act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-590/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0590_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council concerning two legislative proposals pending at the time of the request for access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Action for annulment – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents to which access was granted pursuant to a request – Absence of a challengeable act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-590/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0351_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DEVIN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to be heard following an annulment judgment of the General Court – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-351/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

PreviousPage 5 of 6Next