Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

301 records in EU in 2025

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0351decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DEVIN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to be heard following an annulment judgment of the General Court – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-351/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0305_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0305decided

Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2418in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2418 of 27 October 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the amount and modalities of the United Kingdom’s financial contribution to certain road transport information systems managed by the Union and the amendment to Decision No 1/2022 of the Specialised Committee on Road Transport

European Union · EUR-Lex · 27 October 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2416in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2416 of 27 October 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on a list of categories, types and degrees of seriousness of serious infringements which may lead to the loss of good repute for a road haulage operator

European Union · EUR-Lex · 27 October 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0305(01)decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 October 2025.#DLF Beet Seed ApS and United Beet Seeds v European Chemicals Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘information [relating] to emissions into the environment’ – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case.#Case T-305/25 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0281decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne S.A. and Others v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Articles 20, 21 and 37 – Balancing electricity – Transmission system operators – Establishment of European platforms for the exchange of balancing energy – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation (mFRR platform) – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation (aFRR platform) – Development and approval of the implementation frameworks for those platforms – Functions required to operate those platforms – Cross-zonal capacity for the exchange of balancing energy – ACER decision rejecting the common proposal of the system operators.#Joined Cases C-281/23 P and C-282/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0281_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne S.A. and Others v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Articles 20, 21 and 37 – Balancing electricity – Transmission system operators – Establishment of European platforms for the exchange of balancing energy – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation (mFRR platform) – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation (aFRR platform) – Development and approval of the implementation frameworks for those platforms – Functions required to operate those platforms – Cross-zonal capacity for the exchange of balancing energy – ACER decision rejecting the common proposal of the system operators.#Joined Cases C-281/23 P and C-282/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0221_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0221decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Mark- och miljööverdomstolen.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0482_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 October 2025.#Danger Group Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Danger – Earlier national figurative mark Danger – Lack of consent on the part of the proprietor of the earlier mark to registration of the mark – Article 60(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-482/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0482decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 October 2025.#Danger Group Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Danger – Earlier national figurative mark Danger – Lack of consent on the part of the proprietor of the earlier mark to registration of the mark – Article 60(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-482/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0491decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 October 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CMS Italy – Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left – Relative ground for refusal – Injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Strength of reputation – Obligation on EUIPO expressly to take into account the best-case scenario for the losing party before it – Duty of diligence.#Case T-491/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0491_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 October 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CMS Italy – Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left – Relative ground for refusal – Injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Strength of reputation – Obligation on EUIPO expressly to take into account the best-case scenario for the losing party before it – Duty of diligence.#Case T-491/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0233_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2025.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-233/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0233decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2025.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-233/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0805_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States.#Case C-805/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0805decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States.#Case C-805/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0510_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0510decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0295decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 (Extracts).#WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to exercise due care – Liability.#Cases T-295/23 and T-1176/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0291decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the adoption by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of a resolution scheme for Sberbank banka d.d. – Decisions of the SRB Appeal Panel concerning confirmatory decisions of the SRB refusing access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State – Fourth indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – First indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001.#Case T-291/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0295_EXTdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 (Extracts).#WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to exercise due care – Liability.#Cases T-295/23 and T-1176/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0295_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 (Extracts).#WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to exercise due care – Liability.#Cases T-295/23 and T-1176/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0290decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the adoption by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of a resolution scheme for Sberbank d.d. – Decisions of the SRB Appeal Panel concerning confirmatory decisions of the SRB refusing access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State – Fourth indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – First indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Third indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001.#Case T-290/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0235_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefiting from leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-235/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0235decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefiting from leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Directive 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-235/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0381_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Frutaria – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-381/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0381decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Frutaria – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-381/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0637_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 October 2025.#Rimorchiatori Riuniti Panfido & C. Srl v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Appeal – Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union. – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Formal requirements for an appeal – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed submitted out of time – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-637/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 October 2025

PreviousPage 6 of 7Next