Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

451 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 123Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0004decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#M.-A.A. v Direcţia de Evidenţă a Persoanelor Cluj and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 6 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Articles 7 and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Union citizen who has lawfully acquired, during the exercise of that right and his residence in another Member State, a change of his first name and gender identity – Obligation on the part of that Member State to recognise and enter in the birth certificate that change of first name and gender identity – National legislation which does not permit such recognition and entry, obliging the party concerned to bring new judicial proceedings for a change of gender identity in the Member State of origin – Effect of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-4/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0365decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 4 October 2024.#SIA 'A' v C and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Article 2(b) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(2) – Article 5 – Article 6(1) – Article 8a – Pre-formulated standard contract – Contract between a supplier providing services for development and career support for sportspersons and a ‘rising star’ sportsman of minor age represented by his parents – Term establishing the obligation to pay to that supplier remuneration equal to 10% of the income received by that sportsman over the following 15 years – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 17 and 24 – Right to property – Rights of the child.#Case C-365/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0633decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Real Madrid Club de Fútbol and AE v EE and Société Éditrice du Monde SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Articles 34 and 45 – Recognition and enforcement of judgments – Revocation of a declaration of enforceability of judgments – Grounds for refusal – Public policy in the State in which recognition is sought – Penalty imposed on a newspaper and one of its journalists for harm caused to the reputation of a sports club – Damages – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of the press.#Case C-633/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0633_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Real Madrid Club de Fútbol and AE v EE and Société Éditrice du Monde SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Articles 34 and 45 – Recognition and enforcement of judgments – Revocation of a declaration of enforceability of judgments – Grounds for refusal – Public policy in the State in which recognition is sought – Penalty imposed on a newspaper and one of its journalists for harm caused to the reputation of a sports club – Damages – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of the press.#Case C-633/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0535_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA – Article 18(1) – Conditions for the adoption of a resolution scheme – Obligations of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Duty of diligence – Obligation to state reasons – Article 88 – Obligation of confidentiality – Article 14 – Resolution objectives – Sale of business of the entity concerned – Conditions of sale under which an offer may be accepted – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Shareholders’ right to property – Validity of Regulation No 806/2014.#Case C-535/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0535decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA – Article 18(1) – Conditions for the adoption of a resolution scheme – Obligations of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Duty of care – Obligation to state reasons – Article 88 – Obligation of confidentiality – Article 14 – Resolution objectives – Sale of business of the entity concerned – Conditions of sale under which an offer may be accepted – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Shareholders’ right to property – Validity of Regulation No 806/2014.#Case C-535/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0548decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#C.G. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘processing’ – Article 4 – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Article 4(1)(c) – Principle of ‘data minimisation’ – Articles 7, 8, 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement that a limitation on the exercise of a fundamental right must be ‘provided for by law’ – Proportionality – Assessment of proportionality in the light of all the relevant factors – Prior review by a court or independent administrative authority – Article 13 – Information to be made available or given to the data subject – Limits – Article 54 – Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor – Police investigation in relation to narcotics trafficking – Attempt, by the police, to unlock a mobile telephone in order to gain access, for the purposes of that investigation, to the personal data stored in that telephone.#Case C-548/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0541_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – First package of mobility measures (‘Mobility Package’) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of drivers in such a way that they are able to return every three or four weeks, as the case may be, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to start or spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period there – Prohibition of regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicle – Time limit for the installation of second generation (V2) intelligent tachographs – Date of entry into force – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment – Obligation to return the vehicle to the operational centre in the Member State of establishment – Obligation concerning the number of vehicles and drivers normally based at the operational centre of the Member State of establishment – Cabotage – Waiting period of four days for cabotage – Derogation for cabotage as part of combined transport operations – Directive (EU) 2020/1057 – Specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector – Transposition period – Internal market – Specific regime applicable to the freedom to provide transport services – Common transport policy – Articles 91 and 94 TFEU – Fundamental Freedoms – Principle of proportionality – Impact assessment – Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Protection of the environment – Article 11 TFEU – Consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions.#Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0541decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – First package of mobility measures (‘Mobility Package’) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of the drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to return every three or four weeks, depending on the case, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to begin and spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period – Prohibition on taking regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicle – Time limit for the installation of second generation (V2) smart tachographs – Date of entry into force – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment – Obligation to return the vehicle to the operational centre in the Member State of establishment – Obligation concerning the number of vehicles and drivers normally based at the operational centre of the Member State of establishment – Cabotage – Cooling-off period of four days for cabotage – Derogation for cabotage as part of combined transport operations – Directive (EU) 2020/1057 – Specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector – Transposition period – Internal market – Specific regime applicable to the freedom to provide transport services – Common transport policy – Articles 91 and 94 TFEU – Fundamental freedoms – Principle of proportionality – Impact assessment – Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Protection of the environment – Article 11 TFEU – Consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions.#Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0004_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#M.-A.A. v Direcţia de Evidenţă a Persoanelor Cluj and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Articles 7 and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Union citizen who has lawfully acquired, during the exercise of that right and his residence in another Member State, a change of his first name and gender identity – Obligation on the part of that Member State to recognise and enter in the birth certificate that change of first name and gender identity – National legislation which does not permit such recognition and entry, obliging the party concerned to bring new judicial proceedings for a change of gender identity in the Member State of origin – Effect of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-4/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0779decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario).#Appeals – External action – International agreements – Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part – Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to that agreement – Concluding act – Allegations of infringements of international law resulting from the applicability of that second agreement to the territory of Western Sahara – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings – Locus standi – Condition that an applicant must, in certain cases, be directly and individually concerned by the measure in question – Principle of the relative effect of treaties – Principle of self-determination – Non-self-governing territories – Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations – Discretion of the Council of the European Union – Customary international law – General principles of EU law – Consent of the people of a non-self-governing territory which holds a right to self-determination as a third party to an international agreement.#Joined Cases C-779/21 P and C-799/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0779_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario).#Appeals – External action – International agreements – Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part – Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to that agreement – Concluding act – Allegations of infringements of international law resulting from the applicability of that second agreement to the territory of Western Sahara – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings – Locus standi – Condition that an applicant must, in certain cases, be directly and individually concerned by the measure in question – Principle of the relative effect of treaties – Principle of self-determination – Non-self-governing territories – Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations – Discretion of the Council of the European Union – Customary international law – General principles of EU law – Consent of the people of a non-self-governing territory which holds a right to self-determination as a third party to an international agreement.#Joined Cases C-779/21 P and C-799/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0778decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario).#[As rectified by order of 15 January 2025] Appeal – External action – International agreements – Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco – Decision on the conclusion of that agreement and the implementation protocol thereto – Allegations of infringements of international law resulting from the applicability of that agreement to the waters adjacent to Western Sahara – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings – Locus standi – Condition that an applicant must, in certain cases, be directly and individually concerned by the measure in question – Principle of the relative effect of treaties – Principle of self-determination – Non-self-governing territories – Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations – Discretion of the Council of the European Union – Customary international law – General principles of EU law – Consent of the people of a non-self-governing territory which holds a right to self-determination as a third party to an international agreement.#Joined Cases C-778/21 P and C-798/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0778_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario).#Appeals – External action – International agreements – Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco – Decision on the conclusion of that agreement and the implementation protocol thereto – Allegations of infringements of international law resulting from the applicability of that agreement to the waters adjacent to Western Sahara – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings – Locus standi – Condition that an applicant must, in certain cases, be directly and individually concerned by the measure in question – Principle of the relative effect of treaties – Principle of self-determination – Non-self-governing territories – Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations – Discretion of the Council of the European Union – Customary international law – General principles of EU law – Consent of the people of a non-self-governing territory which holds a right to self-determination as a third party to an international agreement.#Joined Cases C-778/21 P and C-798/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0387decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#C v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border control, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15(2)(b) – Detention of a third-country national for the purpose of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Detention of an applicant for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28(2) – Detention for the purpose of transfer – Unlawful detention – Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-387/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0240_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Herbaria Kräuterparadies GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Organic production rules – Article 16 – Labelling – Article 30 – Terms referring to organic production – Article 33 – Organic production logo of the European Union – Conditions of use – Compliance of the product with Regulation 2018/848 – Articles 45 and 48 – Import of products from a third country for the purpose of placing them on the market within the European Union as organic products – Equivalence of the production rules of that third country with the rules of Regulation 2018/848 – Use of the third country’s organic production logo.#Case C-240/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0292decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 4 October 2024.#Criminal proceedings against I.R.O. and F.J.L.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Central de Instrucción n° 6 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-292/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0548_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#C.G. v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘processing’ – Article 4 – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Article 4(1)(c) – Principle of ‘data minimisation’ – Articles 7, 8 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement that a limitation on the exercise of a fundamental right must be ‘provided for by law’ – Proportionality – Assessment of proportionality in the light of all the relevant factors – Prior review by a court or independent administrative authority – Article 13 – Information to be made available or given to the data subject – Limits – Article 54 – Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor – Police investigation in relation to narcotics trafficking – Attempt, by the police, to unlock a mobile telephone in order to gain access, for the purposes of that investigation, to the personal data stored in that telephone.#Case C-548/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0444decided

Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Valeria Converso v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-444/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0240decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Herbaria Kräuterparadies GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Organic production rules – Article 16 – Labelling – Article 30 – Terms referring to organic production – Article 33 – Organic production logo of the European Union – Conditions of use – Compliance of the product with Regulation 2018/848 – Articles 45 and 48 – Import of products from a third country for the purpose of placing them on the market within the European Union as organic products – Equivalence of the production rules of that third country with the rules of Regulation 2018/848 – Use of the third country’s organic production logo.#Case C-240/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0134decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Somateio 'Elliniko Symvoulio gia tous Prosfyges' and Astiki Mi Kerdoskopiki Etaireia 'Ypostirixi Prosfygon sto Aigaio' v Ypourgos Exoterikon and Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Granting of international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 38 – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Classification of the Republic of Türkiye as a ‘safe third country’ – Readmission of applicants for international protection in third countries – Refusal.#Case C-134/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0429open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, establishing the general requirements on proofs of origin issued electronically according to Article 17(4) of Appendix A to Protocol 4 to that Agreement

European Union · European Commission · 3 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0428open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, as regards the amendment of Protocol 4 to that Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of 'originating products' and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 3 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0828_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#ACE-Avocats, ensemble v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-828/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0335_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 2 October 2024.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-335/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0362_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 2 October 2024.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-362/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0798_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers.#Case T-798/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0362decided

Order of the Court of 2 October 2024.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-362/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0335decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 October 2024.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-335/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0126decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#VC v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.#Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-126/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0126_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#VC v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.#Public supply contracts – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of the exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Serious professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-126/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0624(01)_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#European Food SA and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral investment treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Advantage – Selective nature – Whether imputable to the State – Whether compatible with the internal market – Aid facilitating the economic development of disadvantaged regions – Recovery – Concept of ‘economic unit’ – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard.#Cases T-624/15 RENV, T-694/15 RENV and T-704/15 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0797_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0797decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0798decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers.#Case T-798/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0828decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#ACE-Avocats, ensemble v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-828/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0624(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#European Food SA and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral investment treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Advantage – Selective nature – Whether imputable to the State – Whether compatible with the internal market – Aid facilitating the economic development of disadvantaged regions – Recovery – Concept of ‘economic unit’ – Legitimate expectations – Right to be heard.#Cases T-624/15 RENV, T-694/15 RENV and T-704/15 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0047_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2024.#CN v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-47/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0047decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2024.#CN v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-47/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D2657in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/2657 of 26 September 2024 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community as regards the adoption of a decision adding a newly adopted Union act to Annex 2 to the Windsor Framework

European Union · EUR-Lex · 26 September 2024

PreviousPage 9 of 10Next