Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2025

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0136decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0136_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0679decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0679_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0448_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0448decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0776decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CJ v Service fédéral des Pensions (SFP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Annex VIII – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Transfer request of the worker – Irrevocability of that transfer – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-776/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0417_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0417decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0182decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation under which the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the joint holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work is conditional on all the joint holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0182_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation making the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the co-holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work conditional on all of the co-holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0320_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0320decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0268_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Igor Rotenberg v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from Russian decision-makers or from the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (f) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-268/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1113_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘benefiting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-1113/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0487(01)_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2025.#Neoperl AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert – Tactile position mark – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-487/21 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1114_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-1114/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0222_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Freixenet, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark CB – Earlier national word mark C.B. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-222/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0058decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Transportes Centrais de Vergadela, Unipessoal, Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark iTEC SKYNEX – Earlier EU word mark SKYNET – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-58/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0268decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Igor Rotenberg v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘benefitting from Russian decision-makers or from the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (f) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-268/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1113decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘benefiting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-1113/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1114decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-1114/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0057decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Transportes Centrais de Vergadela, Unipessoal, Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark iTEC SkyNex – Earlier EU word mark SKYNET – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-57/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0057_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Transportes Centrais de Vergadela, Unipessoal, Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark iTEC SkyNex – Earlier EU word mark SKYNET – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-57/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D1884in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/1884 of 15 December 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the EPA Council, in the Committee of Senior Officials and in the EPA Consultative Committee, established by the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Kenya, Member of the East African Community, of the other part, as regards the Recommendation of the Committee of Senior Officials to the EPA Council on participation in the EPA Consultative Committee, the Decision of the EPA Council on participation in the EPA Consultative Committee, the Decision of the Committee of Senior Officials on its agreement with the EPA Consultative Committee’s adoption of its Rules of Procedure and the Decision of the EPA Consultative Committee on the adoption of its Rules of Procedure

European Union · EUR-Lex · 15 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0433_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 15 December 2025.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-433/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0610_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 15 December 2025.#Abacus Research AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-610/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0756open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the EU-Republic of Moldova Association Council as regards the establishment of the Public Administration Reform Sub-Committee under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova of the other part, and on the endorsement of the establishment of the Joint Consultative Committee between the European Committee of the Regions and the Republic of Moldova

European Union · European Commission · 15 December 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0755open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the EU-Ukraine Association Council as regards the establishment of the Public Administration Reform Sub-Committee under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine of the other part, and on the endorsement of the establishment of the Joint Consultative Committee between the European Committee of the Regions and Ukraine

European Union · European Commission · 15 December 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0764open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the EU-Ukraine Association Council on the participation of Ukraine as an observer in the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights’ work and the respective modalities, within the framework set in Articles 4 and 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007, including provisions relating to the participation in initiatives undertaken by the Agency, to the financial contribution and to the staff

European Union · European Commission · 15 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0372decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025.#B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Rijeci.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Requirement that remuneration is commensurate with the importance of the functions carried out – Obligation to take into account the national socio-economic context.#Case C-372/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2025

Page 1 of 2Next