Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

96 records in EU in 2026

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0386_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Martinair Holland NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-386/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0370decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air France-KLM v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Parent company and subsidiaries – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in force in third countries – Equal treatment – Duration of participation in the single and continuous infringement – Evidence – Participation in the various components of the single and continuous infringement.#Case C-370/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0370_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air France-KLM v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Parent company and subsidiaries – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Inbound airfreight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in force in third countries – Equal treatment – Duration of participation in the single and continuous infringement – Evidence – Participation in the various components of the single and continuous infringement.#Case C-370/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0386decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Martinair Holland NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-386/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0401decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition ‘by object’ – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment.#Case C-401/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0385_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-385/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0385decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects.#Case C-385/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0379_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-379/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0379decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-379/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0369decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Société Air France SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in force in third countries – Equal treatment – Duration of participation in the single and continuous infringement – Evidence – Participation in the various components of the single and continuous infringement.#Case C-369/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0369_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Société Air France SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound airfreight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in force in third countries – Equal treatment – Duration of participation in the single and continuous infringement – Evidence – Participation in the various components of the single and continuous infringement.#Case C-369/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0382_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court.#Case C-382/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction of competition ‘by object’ – Examination of the legal and economic context – Scope – Criteria for characterising a single and continuous infringement – Liability for all the forms of conduct comprising that infringement – Conditions – Duration of participation in such an infringement – Lack of evidence of participation in an element of that infringement during significant periods of time – Equal treatment.#Case C-401/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0375decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a ‘worldwide’ cartel.#Case C-375/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0381_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-381/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0378_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Characterisation – Single and continuous infringement – Taking into account the effects of the single and continuous infringement as a whole.#Case C-378/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0367_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-367/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0367decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a matter of public policy.#Case C-367/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0380_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-380/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0382decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court.#Case C-382/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0403_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion.#Case C-403/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0380decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-380/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0378decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Characterisation – Single and continuous infringement – Taking into account the effects of the single and continuous infringement as a whole.#Case C-378/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0375_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Finding of a ‘worldwide’ cartel.#Case C-375/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0381decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case C-381/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0403decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion.#Case C-403/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0680_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principles of non-discrimination and transparency.#Case C-680/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0680decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principle of non-discrimination and principle of transparency.#Case C-680/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0408decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0439decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#OMV Petrom Marketing v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Road transport infrastructure – Article 19(d) – Parking areas – Article 39(2)(c) – Rest areas – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 8a – Information about safe and secure parking areas – National legislation prohibiting the construction of motorway service areas, including secure parking areas, on private land – Article 56 TFEU – Inapplicability – Purely internal situation.#Case C-439/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0439_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#OMV Petrom Marketing v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Road transport infrastructure – Article 19(d) – Parking areas – Article 39(2)(c) – Rest areas – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 8a – Information about safe and secure parking areas – National legislation prohibiting the construction of motorway service areas, including secure parking areas, on private land – Article 56 TFEU – Inapplicability – Purely internal situation.#Case C-439/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0413decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Vlaams Gewest v P&O North Sea Ferries Limited and P&O Ferries Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Gent, afdeling Oostende.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Application of the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries – Article 56 TFEU – Article 191 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – National legislation providing for the payment of a charge for the mandatory use of a vessel traffic services system (‘Verkeersbegeleidingssysteem’), depending on the length of the vessel concerned – Legislation applying to maritime traffic that is bound for ports of Vlaams Gewest (Flemish Region (Belgium)) covered by that system and that departs from a port of a Member State other than the Kingdom of Belgium, but not applying to the traffic between those Flemish ports – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (Brexit).#Case C-413/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0134decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 January 2026.#D S.A. v P S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance.#Case T-134/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0045_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1) – Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought – Conditions for inclusion – Amount of commission allegedly fixed without the air carrier’s knowledge – Burden of proof.#Case C-45/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0045decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1) – Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought – Conditions for inclusion – Amount of commission allegedly fixed without the air carrier’s knowledge – Burden of proof.#Case C-45/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

PreviousPage 2 of 2