Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2015

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0250decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 December 2015.#Air France-KLM and Hop!-Brit Air SAS v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Value added tax — Chargeable event and chargeability — Air transport — Ticket purchased but not used — Provision of the transport service — Issue of the ticket — Time of payment of the tax.#Joined Case C-250/14 and C-289/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0038decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-38/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0063decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Société Air France SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-63/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0009decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-9/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0043decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-43/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0056decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-56/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0039decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-39/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0046decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-46/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0028decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-28/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0036decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Japan Airlines Co. Ltd, formerly Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-36/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0062decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Air France-KLM v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-62/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0040decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Latam Airlines Group SA, formerly Lan Airlines SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-40/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0067decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#Martinair Holland NV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-67/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0048decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2015.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European airfreight market — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) — Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-48/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0673decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 December 2015.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Action for annulment — State aid — Transport — Establishment of Airport Handling SpA — Decision to open the formal examination procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU — Measure not open to challenge — Aid measures completely implemented by the date on which the action was brought — Inadmissibility.#Case T-673/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0301decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2015.#Pfotenhilfe-Ungarn e.V. v Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Article 1(5) — Protection of animals during transport — Transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by an animal protection association — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Directive 90/425/EEC — Article 12 — Concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’.#Case C-301/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0396decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 25 November 2015.#MT Højgaard A/S and Züblin A/S v Banedanmark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Klagenævnet for Udbud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the Court — Status of the referring body as a court or tribunal — Procurement procedure in railway infrastructure sector — Negotiated procedure — Directive 2004/17/EC — Article 10 — Article 51(3) — Principle of equal treatment of tenderers — Group composed of two companies and admitted as such as a tenderer — Tender submitted by one of the two companies, in its own name, the other company having been declared insolvent — Company considered to be capable, by itself, of being admitted as a tenderer — Contract awarded to that company.#Case C-396/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 November 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-014979open

Security - transport

European Union · European Parliament · 24 November 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0198decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015.#Valev Visnapuu v Kihlakunnansyyttäjä (Helsinki) and Suomen valtio - Tullihallitus.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 TFEU and 110 TFEU — Directive 94/62/EC — Articles 1(1), 7 and 15 — Distance selling and transport of alcoholic beverages from another Member State — Excise duty on certain beverage packaging — Exemption where packaging is integrated into a deposit and return system — Articles 34 TFEU, 36 TFEU and 37 TFEU — Requirement of a licence for the retail sale of alcoholic beverages — Monopoly on the retail sale of alcoholic beverages — Justification — Protection of health.#Case C-198/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-014356open

Transport routier

European Union · European Parliament · 30 October 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0126decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2015.#Direct Way and Directway Worldwide v European Parliament.#Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Transport for Members of the European Parliament — Decision declaring unsuccessful and closing the tendering procedure and initiating a negotiated procedure — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Equal treatment — Substantial change in the original terms of the contract.#Case T-126/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0659decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2015.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Transport — Directive 2010/40/EU — Intelligent Transport Systems — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 885/2013 — Provision of information services for safe and secure parking places for trucks and commercial vehicles — Article 3(1), Article 8 and Article 9(1)(a) of Delegated Regulation No 885/2013 — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 886/2013 — Data and procedures for the provision of road safety-related minimum universal traffic information free of charge to users — Article 5(1), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) of Delegated Regulation No 886/2013.#Cases T-659/13 and T-660/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0303decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#European Commission v Jørgen Andersen.#Appeal — Competition — State aid — Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking Danske Statsbaner (DSB) — Public service contracts for the supply of passenger rail transport services between Copenhagen (Denmark) and Ystad (Sweden) — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to conditions — Temporal application of rules of substantive law.#Case C-303/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0340decided

Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 1 oktober 2015.#R.L. Trijber tegen College van burgemeester en wethouders van Amsterdam en J. Harmsen tegen Burgemeester van Amsterdam.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Richtlijn 2006/123/EG – Diensten op de interne markt – Pleziervaart – Raamprostitutiebedrijven – Artikel 2, lid 2, onder d) – Werkingssfeer – Daarvan uitgesloten – Diensten op het gebied van vervoer – Vrijheid van vestiging – Vergunningsregeling – Artikel 10, lid 2, onder c) – Vergunningsvoorwaarden – Evenredigheid – Taalvereiste – Artikel 11, lid 1, onder b) – Vergunningsduur – Beperking van het aantal beschikbare vergunningen – Dwingende reden van algemeen belang.#Gevoegde zaken C-340/14 en C-341/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0257decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 September 2015.#C. van der Lans v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Passengers’ rights in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Denied boarding and cancellation — Long flight delay — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Extraordinary circumstances.#Case C-257/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0205decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 17 September 2015.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Air transport — Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 — Allocation of slots at European Union airports — Article 4(2) — Independence of the coordinator — Concept of ‘interested party’ — Airport managing body — Functional separation — System of financing.#Case C-205/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0294decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 10 September 2015.#ADM Hamburg AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Community Customs Code — Tariff Preferences — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 74(1) — Products originating from a beneficiary country — Transport — Consignments composed of a mixture of crude palm kernel oil originating in several countries benefiting from the same preferential treatment.#Case C-294/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0301decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 10 September 2015.#Pfotenhilfe-Ungarn e.V. v Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Article 1(5) — Protection of animals during transport — Transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by an animal protection association — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Directive 90/425/EEC — Article 12 — Concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’.#Case C-301/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-011385open

Equine transport

European Union · European Parliament · 16 July 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0340decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 July 2015.#R.L. Trijber v College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van Amsterdam and J. Harmsen v Burgemeester van Amsterdam.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/123/EC — Services in the internal market — Leisure boating — Window prostitution businesses — Article 2(2)(d) — Scope — Not included — Services in the field of transport — Freedom of establishment — Authorisation scheme — Article 10(2)(c) — Conditions for granting the authorisation — Proportionality — Language requirement — Article 11(1)(b) — Duration of the authorisation — Restriction of the number of authorisations available — Overriding reason relating to the public interest.#Joined Cases C-340/14 and C-341/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0379decided

Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 16 juli 2015.#TOP Logistics BV en Van Caem International BV tegen Bacardi & Company Ltd en Bacardi International Ltd - Bacardi & Company Ltd en Bacardi International Ltd tegen TOP Logistics BV en Van Caem International BV.#Verzoek van het Gerechtshof Den Haag om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Merken – Richtlijn 89/104/EEG – Artikel 5 – Merkgoederen die zonder de toestemming van de merkhouder in het vrije verkeer zijn gebracht en onder de accijnsschorsingsregeling zijn geplaatst – Recht van die houder, zich tegen die plaatsing te verzetten – Begrip ‚gebruik in het economisch verkeer’.#Zaak C-379/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0198decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 9 July 2015.#Valev Visnapuu v Kihlakunnansyyttäjä (Helsinki) and Suomen valtio - Tullihallitus.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 TFEU and 110 TFEU — Directive 94/62/EC — Articles 1(1), 7 and 15 — Distance selling and transport of alcoholic beverages from another Member State — Excise duty on certain beverage packaging — Exemption where packaging is integrated into a deposit and return system — Articles 34 TFEU, 36 TFEU and 37 TFEU — Requirement of a licence for the retail sale of alcoholic beverages — Monopoly on the retail sale of alcoholic beverages — Justification — Protection of health.#Case C-198/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2015

Page 1 of 2Next