Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

201 records in EU

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,788Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,241United States · 2,034Germany · 1,646European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0753decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0352decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought.#Case C-352/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0352_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamm v A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought.#Case C-352/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0753_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0563_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#SN and LN v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from refugee status – Person registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) (UNRWA) – Conditions for that person to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2011/95/EU – Cessation of UNRWA’s protection or assistance – Article 4 – General situation prevailing in a sector of UNRWA’s area of operations – Individual assessment of relevant elements – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40 – Subsequent application for international protection – New elements – Elements already examined in the final decision on the previous application.#Case C-563/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0563decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#SN and LN v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Person registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) (UNRWA) – Conditions for that person to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2011/95/EU – Cessation of UNRWA’s protection or assistance – Article 4 – General situation prevailing in a sector of UNRWA’s area of operations – Individual assessment of relevant elements – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40 – Subsequent application for international protection – New elements – Elements already examined in the final decision on the previous application.#Case C-563/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0646_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 June 2024.#K and L v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Qualification for refugee status – Article 2(d) and (e) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) and (2) – ‘Membership of a particular social group’ – Article 4 – Individual assessment of the facts and circumstances – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 10(3) – Requirements for the examination of applications for international protection – Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Best interests of the child – Determination – Third-country nationals who are minors and who identify with the fundamental value of equality between women and men by reason of their stay in a Member State.#Case C-646/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0646decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 June 2024.#K and L v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Qualification for refugee status – Article 2(d) and (e) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) and (2) – ‘Membership of a particular social group’ – Article 4 – Individual assessment of the facts and circumstances – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 10(3) – Requirements for the examination of applications for international protection – Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Best interests of the child – Determination – Third-country nationals who are minors and who identify with the fundamental value of equality between women and men by reason of their stay in a Member State.#Case C-646/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0158decided

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 6 June 2024.#T.G. v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 34 – Access to integration facilities – Obligation to pass, on pain of a fine, a civic integration examination – Beneficiary of international protection who has not passed such an examination in time – Obligation to pay a fine – Obligation to bear the full costs of civic integration courses and examinations – Possibility of obtaining a loan in order to pay those costs.#Case C-158/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D1668in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/1668 of 30 May 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 16th meeting of the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence on the adoption of a recommendation and conclusions addressed to five State Parties on their implementation of that Convention, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 30 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0406decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 30 May 2024.#CV v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Articles 36 and 37 – Concept of ‘safe country of origin’ – Designation – Annex I – Criteria – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Examination by the court of the designation of a third country as a safe country of origin.#Case C-406/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 May 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0217open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 16th meeting of the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence on the adoption of a recommendation and conclusions addressed to five State Parties on their implementation of that Convention, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 21 May 2024

Regulation· RCELEX 32024R1347in force

Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection and for the content of the protection granted, amending Council Directive 2003/109/EC and repealing Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

European Union · EUR-Lex · 14 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0359_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#AHY v Minister for Justice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Article 17(1) – Discretionary clause – Article 27(1) and (3) and Article 29(3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Suspensive effect.#Case C-359/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0359decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#AHY v Minister for Justice.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Article 17(1) – Discretionary clause – Article 27(1) and (3) and Article 29(3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Suspensive effect.#Case C-359/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0392_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Application for international protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4 – Risks of inhuman or degrading treatment – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Scope of the obligations of the Member State which has sought to have the applicant taken back by the Member State responsible and wishes to transfer the applicant to the latter Member State – Principle of mutual trust – Evidence and standard of proof of the real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, resulting from systemic flaws – Practices of pushback to a third country and detention at border control posts.#Case C-392/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0222_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v JF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification as beneficiaries of international protection – Content of that protection – Article 5 – International protection needs arising sur place – Subsequent application for recognition of refugee status – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘circumstances which the applicant has created by his or her own decision since leaving the country of origin’ – Abusive intent and abuse of the applicable procedure – Activities in the host Member State not constituting the expression and continuation of convictions or orientations held in the country of origin – Religious conversion.#Case C-222/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0392decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Application for international protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4 – Risks of inhuman or degrading treatment – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Scope of the obligations of the Member State which has sought to have the applicant taken back by the Member State responsible and wishes to transfer the applicant to the latter Member State – Principle of mutual trust – Evidence and standard of proof of the real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, resulting from systemic flaws – Practices of pushback to a third country and detention at border control posts.#Case C-392/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0222decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v JF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification as beneficiaries of international protection – Content of that protection – Article 5 – International protection needs arising sur place – Subsequent application for recognition of refugee status – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘circumstances which the applicant has created by his or her own decision since leaving the country of origin’ – Abusive intent and abuse of the applicable procedure – Activities in the host Member State not constituting the expression and continuation of convictions or orientations held in the country of origin – Religious conversion.#Case C-222/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0040_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Xavier James Hatherly v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Staff of the EUAA – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Selection procedure for posts of assistants – Job offer – Condition relating to level of post-secondary education attested by a diploma and appropriate professional experience acquired after having obtained the diploma – Withdrawal of job offer – Error of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Liability.#Case T-40/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0040decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Xavier James Hatherly v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Staff of the EUAA – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Selection procedure for posts of assistants – Job offer – Condition relating to level of post-secondary education attested by a diploma and appropriate professional experience acquired after having obtained the diploma – Withdrawal of job offer – Error of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Liability.#Case T-40/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0560_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#CR and Others v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 10(3)(a) – Family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee with his or her first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ – Minor sponsor at the time of submission of the application but who attained majority during the family reunification procedure – Relevant date for assessing minor status – Period for submitting an application for family reunification – Adult sister of the sponsor requiring the permanent assistance of her parents on account of a serious illness – Effectiveness of the right to family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee – Article 7(1) – Article 12(1), first and third subparagraphs – Possibility of making family reunification subject to additional conditions.#Case C-560/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0560decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#CR and Others v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 10(3)(a) – Family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee with his or her first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ – Minor sponsor at the time of submission of the application but who attained majority during the family reunification procedure – Relevant date for assessing minor status – Period for submitting an application for family reunification – Adult sister of the sponsor requiring the permanent assistance of her parents on account of a serious illness – Effectiveness of the right to family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee – Article 7(1) – Article 12(1), first and third subparagraphs – Possibility of making family reunification subject to additional conditions.#Case C-560/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0753decided

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 25 January 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0621_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 January 2024.#WS v Intervyuirasht organ na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite pri Ministerskia savet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Qualification for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – ‘Membership of a particular social group’ – Article 10(1)(d) – Acts of persecution – Article 9(1) and (2) – Link between the reasons for and acts of persecution or between the reasons for persecution and the absence of protection against such acts – Article 9(3) – Non-State actors – Article 6(c) – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – ‘Serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Assessment of applications for international protection for the purpose of granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Article 4 – Gender-based violence against women – Domestic violence – Threat of ‘honour killing’.#Case C-621/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0621decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 January 2024.#WS v Intervyuirasht organ na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite pri Ministerskia savet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Qualification for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – ‘Membership of a particular social group’ – Article 10(1)(d) – Acts of persecution – Article 9(1) and (2) – Link between the reasons for and acts of persecution or between the reasons for persecution and the absence of protection against such acts – Article 9(3) – Non-State actors – Article 6(c) – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – ‘Serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Assessment of applications for international protection for the purpose of granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Article 4 – Gender-based violence against women – Domestic violence – Threat of ‘honour killing’.#Case C-621/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0563decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 11 January 2024.#SN and LN v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Person registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) (UNRWA) – Conditions for that person to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2011/95/EU – Cessation of UNRWA’s protection or assistance – Article 4 – General situation prevailing in a sector of UNRWA’s area of operations – Individual assessment of relevant elements – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40 – Subsequent application for international protection – New elements – Elements already examined in the final decision on the previous application.#Case C-563/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0317_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 December 2023.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Selection procedures – External vacancy notice [confidential] 1 Confidential information redacted. – Decision not to extend the validity of a reserve list – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-317/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 December 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0228_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2023.#Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l'Immigrazione – Unità Dublino and Others v CZA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Articles 3 to 5, 17 and 27 – Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 – Article 29 – Regulation (EU) No 1560/2003 – Annex X – Right to information of the applicant for international protection – Common leaflet – Personal interview – Application for international protection previously lodged in a first Member State – New application lodged in a second Member State – Illegal stay in the second Member State – Take back procedure – Infringement of the right to information – No personal interview – Protection against the risk of indirect refoulement – Mutual trust – Judicial review of the transfer decision – Scope – Finding of the existence, in the requested Member State, of systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and in the reception conditions for applicants for international protection – Discretionary clauses – Risk of infringement of the principle of non-refoulement in the requested Member State.#Joined Cases C-228/21, C-254/21, C-297/21, C-315/21 and C-328/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0228decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2023.#Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l'Immigrazione – Unità Dublino and Others v CZA and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione, Tribunale ordinario di Roma, Tribunale Ordinario di Firenze, Tribunale di Milano and Tribunale di Trieste.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Articles 3 to 5, 17 and 27 – Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 – Article 29 – Regulation (EU) No 1560/2003 – Annex X – Right to information of the applicant for international protection – Common leaflet – Personal interview – Application for international protection previously lodged in a first Member State – New application lodged in a second Member State – Illegal stay in the second Member State – Take back procedure – Infringement of the right to information – No personal interview – Protection against the risk of indirect refoulement – Mutual trust – Judicial review of the transfer decision – Scope – Finding of the existence, in the requested Member State, of systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and in the reception conditions for applicants for international protection – Discretionary clauses – Risk of infringement of the principle of non-refoulement in the requested Member State.#Joined Cases C-228/21, C-254/21, C-297/21, C-315/21 and C-328/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0600_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 November 2023.#ST v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Actions for failure to act and for annulment – Right to asylum – Invitation to act – Invitation submitted in the name and on behalf of an anonymous person – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Article 46(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-600/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0600decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 November 2023.#ST v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Actions for failure to act and for annulment – Right to asylum – Invitation to act – Invitation submitted in the name and on behalf of an anonymous person – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Article 46(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-600/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0614_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#XXX v Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (Family unity).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Mother of minor refugee children in Belgium – Mother who is a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive – Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that mother – Rejection – No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if she does not individually qualify for it – Article 20 and Article 23(2) of that directive – Inapplicability.#Case C-614/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0374_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#XXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Father of minor refugee children born in Belgium – Father not a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive – Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that father – Rejection – No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if he does not individually qualify for it – Article 23(2) of that directive – Inapplicability.#Case C-374/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0374decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#XXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Father of minor refugee children born in Belgium – Father not a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive – Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that father – Rejection – No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if he does not individually qualify for it – Article 23(2) of that directive – Inapplicability.#Case C-374/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0614decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#XXX v Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (Family unity).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Mother of minor refugee children in Belgium – Mother who is a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive – Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that mother – Rejection – No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if she does not individually qualify for it – Article 20 and Article 23(2) of that directive – Inapplicability.#Case C-614/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0125_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#X and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 15 – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Taking into account of factors relating to the applicant’s individual position and personal circumstances and to the general situation in the country of origin – Humanitarian situation.#Case C-125/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0608decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 November 2023.#AH and FN v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be granted refugee status – Article 2(d) and (e) – Concept of ‘act of persecution’ – Level of seriousness required – Article 9 – Sufficiently severe accumulation of measures that discriminate against women – Article 9(1)(b) – Types of acts of persecution – Article 9(2) – Assessment of applications for international protection – Article 4(3) – Obligation to carry out an individual assessment – Scope.#Joined Cases C-608/22 and C-609/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0125decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#X and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 15 – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Taking into account of factors relating to the applicant’s individual position and personal circumstances and to the general situation in the country of origin – Humanitarian situation.#Case C-125/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2023

PreviousPage 4 of 5Next