Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2013

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0239decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2013.#Siemens AG and Others v European Commission.#Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — Market sharing — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Proof of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Distortion of the evidence — Probative value of statements which run counter to the interests of the declarant — Fines — Starting amount — Reference year — Deterrent multiplier — Powers of unlimited jurisdiction — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Duty to state reasons.#Joined Cases C‑239/11 P, C‑489/11 P and C‑498/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2013

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0448decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 December 2013.#SNIA Spa in amministrazione straordinaria v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputation of liability in the field of competition — Economic continuity test — Infringement of the rights of defence — Duty to state reasons.#Case C‑448/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0107decided

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 4 December 2013.#European Training Foundation (ETF) v Gisela Schuerings.#Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision terminating the contract — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — Articles 2 and 47 of the CEOS — Duty of care — Concept of interests of the service — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita — Rights of defence.#Case T‑107/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0108decided

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 4 December 2013.#European Training Foundation (ETF) v Gustave Michel.#Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision terminating the contract — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — Articles 2 and 47 of the CEOS — Duty of care — Concept of interests of the service — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita — Rights of defence.#Case T‑108/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2013

Record· FJCELEX 62011FJ0124decided

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) 30 September 2013.#Daniele Possanzini v European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex).#Civil service — Frontex staff — Temporary staff — Career development report containing negative assessments of the reporting officer not communicated to the person concerned — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Decision based on the opinion of the reporting officer — Rights of defence — Infringement — Dispute of a financial character — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case F‑124/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2013

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0179decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013.#The Dow Chemical Company v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct of a subsidiary to its parent company — Joint control by two parent companies — Decisive influence — Rights of defence — Increase in the fine — Deterrent effect.#Case C‑179/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2013

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0418decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 26 September 2013.#Texdata Software GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck.#Company law — Freedom of establishment — Eleventh Directive 89/666/EEC — Disclosure of accounting documents — Branch of a capital company established in another Member State — Pecuniary penalty in the event of failure to disclose within the prescribed period — Right to effective judicial protection — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive nature of the penalty.#Case C‑418/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0496decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2013.#Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades, SA, formerly Repsol Lubricantes YPF y Especialidades, SA and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Annual market-sharing and price-fixing agreements — Rights of defence — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Principle that penalties must be specific to the offender — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Res judicata.#Case T‑496/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0008decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2013.#Bank Kargoshaei and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Legitimate expectations — Review of the restrictive measures adopted — Error of assessment — Equal treatment — Legal basis — Essential procedural requirements — Proportionality — Right to property.#Case T‑8/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0284decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2013.#Oro Clean Chemie AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PROSEPT — Earlier national word mark Pursept — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑284/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0379decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2013.#Keramag Keramische Werke AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Attributability of unlawful conduct.#Joined Cases T‑379/10 and T‑381/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0376decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 16 September 2013.#Mamoli Robinetteria SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information — Rights of the defence — 2002 Leniency Notice — Plea of illegality — Concept of agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Calculation of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity — Application of a multiplier to the additional sum.#Case T‑376/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0563decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2013.#Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Burden of proof — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Procedure by default — Application to intervene — No need to adjudicate.#Case T‑563/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0383decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 13 September 2013.#Eyad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on entry into, or transit through, the territory of the European Union — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Fundamental rights.#Case T‑383/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0548decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2013.#Total SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Paraffin waxes market — Slack wax market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Rights of the defence — Principle of the legality of criminal offences and penalties — Presumption of innocence — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Liability of a parent company for infringements of the competition rules committed by its subsidiaries — Decisive influence exercised by the parent company — Presumption where the parent company holds nearly 100% of the shares.#Case T‑548/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2013

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0383decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 10 September 2013.#M. G. and N. R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands).#Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Immigration policy — Illegal immigration and illegal residence — Repatriation of illegal residents — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Removal process — Detention measure — Extension of detention — Article 15(2) and (6) — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Infringement — Consequences.#Case C‑383/13 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0035decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 6 September 2013.#Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Legitimate expectations — Review of the restrictive measures adopted — Error of assessment — Equal treatment — Legal basis — Essential procedural requirements — Proportionality.#Cases T‑35/10 and T‑7/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0483decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013.#Sepro Europe Ltd v European Commission.#Plant-protection products — Active substance flurprimidol — Non-inclusion of flurprimidol in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑483/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0012decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013.#Iran Insurance Company v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Infringement of international law — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Non-discrimination.#Case T‑12/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0013decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013.#Post Bank Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Infringement of international law — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Non-discrimination.#Case T‑13/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0004decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013.#Export Development Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T‑4/11 and T‑5/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0434decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 6 September 2013.#Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank AG v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality.#Case T‑434/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0493decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 6 September 2013.#Persia International Bank plc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment.#Case T‑493/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2013

Report· XGCELEX 52013XG0726(02)open

Notice for the attention of the ‘Hizballah Military Wing’ (a.k.a. ‘Hezbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbullah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hezballah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hisbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbu'llah Military Wing’ a.k.a. ‘Hizb Allah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Jihad Council’ (and all units reporting to it, including the External Security Organisation)), included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annex I to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 714/2013)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 26 July 2013

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0584decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 18 July 2013.#European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi.#Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person included in a list drawn up by a body of the United Nations — Listing of that person’s name in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Fundamental rights — Rights of the defence — Principle of effective judicial protection — Principle of proportionality — Right to respect for property — Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C‑584/10 P, C‑593/10 P and C‑595/10 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 July 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0459decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2013.#Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in China, Vietnam, Pakistan and the Philippines — Expiry of anti-dumping measures — Review — Like product — Data used to determine the injury — Similar country — Community interest — Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑459/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0406decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 18 June 2013.#Industries chimiques du fluor (ICF) v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — World market in aluminium fluoride — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Evidence of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on fines — Euro-Mediterranean Agreement.#Case T‑406/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0404decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 18 June 2013.#Fluorsid SpA and Minmet financing Co. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — World market in aluminium fluoride — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Out of time — Inadmissibility — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Evidence of the infringement — Rights of defence — Definition of the relevant market — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — 2006 Guidelines on fines.#Case T‑404/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0431decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 June 2013.#Riccardo Nencini v European Parliament.#Rules Governing the Payment of Expenses and Allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Travel and parliamentary assistance expenses — Recovery of undue payments — Limitation period — Reasonable period — Rights of the defence — Principle of audi alteram partem — Proportionality.#Joined Cases T‑431/10 and T‑560/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2013

Regulation· RCELEX 32013R0517in force

Council Regulation (EU) No 517/2013 of 13 May 2013 adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, trans-European networks, judiciary and fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security, environment, customs union, external relations, foreign, security and defence policy and institutions, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · EUR-Lex · 13 May 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0119decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 April 2013.#Simone Gbagbo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Freezing of funds — Alteration of heads of claim — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of power — Rights of the defence — Right to property.#Case T‑119/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2013

Page 1 of 2Next