Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Climate

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesIreland · 26,211France · 3,567Netherlands · 3,063United Kingdom · 2,558United States · 1,880European Union · 515Germany · 375Austria · 359Belgium · 135Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0442decided

__[unreferenced:arret-c-ii-ext]__ du 12 novembre 2026.#République de Pologne contre Parlement européen et Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en annulation – Règlement (UE) 2023/839 – Modification du règlement (UE) 2018/841 – Prise en compte des émissions et des absorptions de gaz à effet de serre résultant de l’utilisation des terres, du changement d’affectation des terres et de la foresterie dans le cadre d’action en matière de climat et d’énergie à l’horizon 2030 – Modification du règlement (UE) 2018/1999 – Gouvernance de l’union de l’énergie et de l’action pour le climat – Mesures visant la neutralité climatique de l’Union européenne – Base juridique du règlement 2023/839 – Détermination – Prise en compte des effets de ce règlement – Article 192, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Amélioration de la qualité de l’environnement – Article 192, paragraphe 2, premier alinéa, sous b) et sous c), TFUE – Mesures changeant l’affectation des sols, à l’exception de la gestion des déchets – Mesures affectant sensiblement le choix d’un État membre entre différentes sources d’énergie ainsi que la structure générale de son approvisionnement énergétique – Principes d’attribution des compétences, de proportionnalité et d’égalité des États membres – Contenu et motivation d’une analyse d’impact.#Affaire C-442/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0098decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 November 2026.#Ypothalassios Agogos Fysikou Aeriou Elladas – Italias – Poseidon AE (YAFA Poseidon) v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Energy – Connecting Europe Facility – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 347/2013 – Calls for proposals – Cross-border energy infrastructure projects – Proposal for the construction of a pipeline in the eastern Mediterranean Sea – Rejection of the proposal as inadmissible – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-98/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 November 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0327decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2026.#„VETS Svoge“ EOOD v Predsedatel na Upravitelnia savet na Fond „Sigurnost na elektroenergiynata sistema“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 6(1) – Cap on market revenues obtained by producers of electricity using certain energy sources – Article 8 – Earlier national measure – National contribution calculated on the total revenues of electricity producers, levied in order to finance a public entity responsible for ensuring financial stability and the security of the energy market – Measure not coming within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Article 3(1), (3) and (4) – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Article 3(a), (b), (h) and (p) and Article 10(1), (4) and (5) – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Common rules for the internal market for electricity – Article 5(1), (3) and (4) – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 – European Climate Law – Articles 2 and 4 – Non-discrimination – Proportionality – Article 63 TFEU – Lack of sufficient information – Inadmissibility – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No implementation of EU law – No jurisdiction on the part of the Court.#Case C-327/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0120_RESdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre élargie) du 2 septembre 2026.#Global Legal Action Network et Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe) contre Commission européenne.#Environnement – Règlement (UE) 2018/842 – Réductions annuelles des émissions de GES – Révision des quotas annuels d’émissions de GES des États membres pour la période 2023-2030 – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2023/1319 – Rejet de la demande de réexamen interne – Article 10, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Convention d’Aarhus – Motifs de réexamen dirigés contre les règlements (UE) 2021/1119 et (UE) 2023/857 fixant les objectifs de réduction des émissions de GES de l’Union pour 2030 – Pouvoir d’exécution de la Commission – Article 291, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Motifs de réexamen dirigés contre une analyse d’impact – Initiative législative.#Affaire T-120/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0120decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.#Global Legal Action Network and Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe) v European Commission.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2018/842 – Annual greenhouse gas emission reductions – Review of annual greenhouse gas emission allocations of the Member States for the period from 2023 to 2030 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1319 – Refusal of the request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Aarhus Convention – Grounds for review of Regulations (EU) 2021/1119 and (EU) 2023/857 setting out the European Union’s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2030 – Implementing power of the Commission – Article 291(2) TFEU – Grounds for review directed against an impact assessment – Legislative proposal.#Case T-120/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0575_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 March 2026.#Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives.#Case T-575/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0575decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 March 2026.#Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives.#Case T-575/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0391_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Braila Winds SRL v DGRFP București - Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii București and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 191(2) TFEU – EU policy on the environment – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 – EU climate-neutrality objective – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Common rules for the internal market for electricity – National legislation imposing an income tax on producers of electricity from renewable sources – Exemption for producers of electricity from fossil fuels and biomass.#Case C-391/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0391decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Braila Winds SRL v DGRFP București - Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii București and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 191(2) TFEU – EU policy on the environment – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 – EU climate-neutrality objective – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Common rules for the internal market for electricity – National legislation imposing an income tax on producers of electricity from renewable sources – Exemption for producers of electricity from fossil fuels and biomass.#Case C-391/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0637_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 October 2025.#Rimorchiatori Riuniti Panfido & C. Srl v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Appeal – Article 58a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union. – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Formal requirements for an appeal – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed submitted out of time – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-637/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0579decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Bioenergy activities – Forest biomass – Manufacture of organic basic chemicals – Manufacture of plastics in primary form – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Article 10 of Regulation 2020/852 – Transitional activities – Quantitative threshold – Conclusive scientific evidence – Life cycle – Precautionary principle – Principle of ‘do no significant harm’ to environmental objectives – Article 17 of Regulation 2020/852 – Circular economy – Water and marine resources – Pollution.#Case T-579/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0579_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Bioenergy activities – Forest biomass – Manufacture of organic basic chemicals – Manufacture of plastics in primary form – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Article 10 of Regulation 2020/852 – Transitional activities – Quantitative threshold – Conclusive scientific evidence – Life cycle – Precautionary principle – Principle of ‘do no significant harm’ to environmental objectives – Article 17 of Regulation 2020/852 – Circular economy – Water and marine resources – Pollution.#Case T-579/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0625decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of ‘low-carbon activity’ – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with droughts and climate hazards – Precautionary principle – Technical screening criteria – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – Article 290 TFEU – Concept of ‘essential elements’ of a legislative act – Scientific evidence – Commission’s margin of discretion – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-625/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0583_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Fédération environnement durable and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Electricity generation from wind power – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Substantial contribution to climate change adaptation – No significant harm to other environmental objectives.#Case T-583/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0583decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Fédération environnement durable and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Electricity generation from wind power – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Substantial contribution to climate change adaptation – No significant harm to other environmental objectives.#Case T-583/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0625_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of ‘low-carbon activity’ – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with droughts and climate hazards – Precautionary principle – Technical screening criteria – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions – Article 290 TFEU – Concept of ‘essential elements’ of a legislative act – Scientific evidence – Commission’s margin of discretion – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-625/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0287decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0287_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Page 1 of 2Next