Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

501 records in EU in 2023

Records

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0564_SUMdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 28 September 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the name of a natural person on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those measures – Suspension of the process of ‘re-listing’ that person – Publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union – Obligation to take measures on visas granted by Member States – Measures which may be adopted by the judge hearing the application for interim measures.#Cases C-564/23 P(R).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0564decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 28 September 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the name of a natural person on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those measures – Suspension of the process of ‘re-listing’ that person – Publication of a note in the Official Journal of the European Union – Obligation to take measures on visas granted by Member States – Measures which may be adopted by the judge hearing the application for interim measures.#Cases C-564/23 P(R) and C-564/23 P(R)-R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0470(01)decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 September 2023.#La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Ministère de la Culture.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Confidentiality of electronic communications – Protection – Article 5 and Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – National legislation aimed at combating, through action by a public authority, counterfeiting offences committed on the internet – ‘Graduated response’ procedure – Upstream collection by rightholder organisations of IP addresses used for activities infringing copyright or related rights – Downstream access by the public authority responsible for the protection of copyright and related rights to data relating to the civil identity associated with those IP addresses retained by providers of electronic communications services – Automated processing – Requirement of prior review by a court or an independent administrative body – Substantive and procedural conditions – Safeguards against the risks of abuse and against any unlawful access to or use of those data.#Case C-470/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0692decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 September 2023.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Judgment of the Court finding a failure to fulfil obligations – Failure to comply with the judgment – Directive 95/60/EC – Fiscal marking of gas oils – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland – Continuation of the infringement after the end of the transition period as regards Northern Ireland – Article 260(2) TFEU – Pecuniary penalties – Lump sum – Gravity of the infringement – Payment capacity.#Case C-692/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0276_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 28 September 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-276/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0274_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 28 September 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-274/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0123_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 September 2023.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of tartaric acid originating in China – Determination of normal value – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(7) – Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) – Article 15 – Determination of the state of vulnerability of the European Union industry – Determination of the existence of a threat of injury.#Case C-123/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0123decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 September 2023.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of tartaric acid originating in China – Determination of normal value – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(7) – Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) – Article 15 – Determination of the state of vulnerability of the European Union industry – Determination of the existence of a threat of injury.#Case C-123/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0275_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 28 September 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-275/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0058_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 September 2023.#Y.N. v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Articles 22 and 23 – Right to legal assistance and representation – Articles 46(4) – Reasonable period of time for lodging an appeal – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal – Rejection of an application for international protection as manifestly unfounded by accelerated procedure.#Case C-58/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0250_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 27 September 2023.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-250/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0250decided

Order of the Court of 27 September 2023.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-250/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0058decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 September 2023.#Y.N. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Articles 22 and 23 – Right to legal assistance and representation – Articles 46(4) – Reasonable period of time for lodging an appeal – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal – Rejection of an application for international protection as manifestly unfounded by accelerated procedure.#Case C-58/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0321decided

Order of the Court of 26 September 2023.#Grzegorz Mordalski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request not demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-321/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0321_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 26 September 2023.#Grzegorz Mordalski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request not demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-321/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2023

Report· XGCELEX 52023XG0914(04)R(01)open

Corrigendum to Notice concerning the suspension, subject to certain conditions, of the restrictive measures against Mr Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin, provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 , concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 and as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 (Official Journal of the European Union C 324 of 14 September 2023) 2023/C 339/14

European Union · Council of the European Union · 26 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0831decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘aid’ – Condition relating to selective advantage – Tax treatment of operators of public casinos in Germany – Levy on the profits – Partial deductibility of the amounts paid in respect of that levy from the tax base for income or corporation tax and trade tax – Decision of the European Commission – Rejection of a complaint at the end of the preliminary examination stage on the ground that that deductibility does not constitute State aid – Separate finding of no economic advantage and no selectivity – Action before the General Court of the European Union limited to the finding of no selectivity – Action deemed ineffective – Identification by the Commission of the reference system or ‘normal’ tax system – Interpretation for that purpose of the applicable national tax law – Classification of the levy on the profits as a ‘special tax’ deductible in respect of ‘costs associated with commercial transactions’ – Principle ne ultra petita.#Case C-831/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 September 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0605decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 21 September 2023.#Heureka Group a.s. v Google LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 102 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of competition law provisions – Directive 2014/104/EU – Late transposition of the directive – Temporal application – Article 10 – Limitation period – Detailed rules for the dies a quo – Cessation of the infringement – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the summary of the European Commission’s decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a Commission decision that is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period for the duration of the Commission’s investigation or until the date when its decision becomes final.#Case C-605/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0248_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2023.#Alexey Mordashov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Article 2 (1)(a), (d), (f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Right to effective legal protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property.#Case T-248/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0248decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2023.#Alexey Mordashov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Article 2 (1)(a), (d), (f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Right to effective legal protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property.#Case T-248/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0648decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 September 2023.#YD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Staff of the FRA – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Loss of nationality of a Member State – Contract for an indefinite period – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(ii) of the CEOS – Application for an exception to the condition of engagement laid down in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS – Refusal to grant an exception – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Interests of the service – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-648/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0648_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 September 2023.#YD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Staff of the FRA – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Loss of nationality of a Member State – Contract for an indefinite period – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(ii) of the CEOS – Application for an exception to the condition of engagement laid down in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS – Refusal to grant an exception – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Interests of the service – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-648/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D1796in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/1796 of 18 September 2023 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom`s withdrawal from the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0445_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 September 2023.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Article 263 TFUE – Action for the annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFUE – Request to suspend the operation of that act – Decision (EU) 2023/852 – Market stability reserve for the EU greenhouse gas emission trading scheme – Increase in the number of allowances placed in reserve – Urgency – Energy security – Deterioration in the economic and social situation of a Member State.#Case C-445/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0445decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 September 2023.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Article 263 TFUE – Action for the annulment of an EU act – Article 278 TFUE – Request to suspend the operation of that act – Decision (EU) 2023/852 – Market stability reserve for the EU greenhouse gas emission trading scheme – Increase in the number of allowances placed in reserve – Urgency – Energy security – Deterioration in the economic and social situation of a Member State.#Case C-445/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0071_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#KT v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Agreement on the surrender procedure between, on the one hand, the Member States of the European Union and, on the other hand, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway – Article 1(3) – Fundamental rights – Refusal by a Member State to execute an arrest warrant issued by the Kingdom of Norway – Issuing of a new arrest warrant by the Kingdom of Norway against the same person for the same acts – Examination by another Member State – Taking into account of the refusal to execute the first arrest warrant.#Case C-71/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0071decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#KT v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Agreement on the surrender procedure between, on the one hand, the Member States of the European Union and, on the other hand, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway – Article 1(3) – Fundamental rights – Refusal by a Member State to execute an arrest warrant issued by the Kingdom of Norway – Issuing of a new arrest warrant by the Kingdom of Norway against the same person for the same acts – Examination by another Member State – Taking into account of the refusal to execute the first arrest warrant.#Case C-71/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0820decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#'Vinal' AD v Direktor na Agentsia 'Mitnitsi'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 16 – Tax warehouse arrangements – Conditions for the grant of an authorisation for the opening and operation of a tax warehouse by an authorised warehousekeeper – Failure to satisfy those conditions – Final withdrawal of the authorisation, together with the imposition of a financial penalty – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Ne bis in idem principle – Proportionality.#Case C-820/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0359decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 14 September 2023.#AHY v Minister for Justice.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Article 17(1) – Discretionary clause – Article 27(1) and (3) and Article 29(3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Suspensive effect.#Case C-359/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2023

PreviousPage 10 of 11Next