Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

351 records in EU

All countriesIreland · 75,027United States · 19,023Austria · 8,878France · 7,984Netherlands · 6,597United Kingdom · 5,226European Union · 3,736Germany · 2,182Belgium · 60Estonia · 15Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0173_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 19 – Compensation for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of baggage – Assignment to a commercial company of the passenger’s claim against the air carrier – Contractual clause prohibiting such an assignment – Directive 93/13/EC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Review of its own motion of the unfairness of the clause prohibiting the transfer of passengers’ rights – Detailed rules for that review in the context of a dispute between the assignee company and the air carrier – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of audi alteram partem.#Case C-173/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0076_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier.#Case C-76/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0703_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception.#Case C-703/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0076decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier.#Case C-76/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0703decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception.#Case C-703/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0582decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#Die Länderbahn GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Access to railway infrastructure – Charges – Article 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Powers – Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired – Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges.#Case C-582/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0582_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#Die Länderbahn GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Access to railway infrastructure – Charges – Article 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Powers – Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired – Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges.#Case C-582/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0259_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Mostovdrev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for wood products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-259/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0258_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of ‘Byelorussian Metallurgical Company’ holding (BSW - management company of ‘BMC’ holding) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for iron and steel products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-258/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0258decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of ‘Byelorussian Metallurgical Company’ holding (BSW - management company of ‘BMC’ holding) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for iron and steel products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-258/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0259decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Mostovdrev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for wood products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-259/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0011_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) and (3) – Article 7(1) – Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights – Nature and basis of the right to compensation – Transfer to a company of the passengers’ claim against the air carrier – Contractual clause that prohibits such a transfer – Article 15 – Exclusion of waiver.#Case C-11/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0299_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#M. D. v UAB „Tez Tour“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – No official recommendation against travel – Consideration of personal circumstances relating to the individual situation of the traveller concerned – Significant consequences on the performance of the package or on the transport of passengers to the place of destination – Circumstances existing or foreseeable on the date of conclusion of the package travel contract concerned – Possibility of taking into account consequences occurring at the place of departure or return as well as at other places.#Case C-299/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0011decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Palma de Mallorca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) and (3) – Article 7(1) – Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights – Nature and basis of the right to compensation – Transfer to a company of the passengers’ claim against the air carrier – Contractual clause that prohibits such a transfer – Article 15 – Exclusion of waiver.#Case C-11/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0085_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Landkreis Jerichower Land v A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Health rules applicable to animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Approval – Article 24(1)(i) – Concept of ‘storage of animal by-products’ – Interruption of a transport operation for up to eight hours.#Case C-85/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0085decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Landkreis Jerichower Land v A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Health rules applicable to animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Approval – Article 24(1)(i) – Concept of ‘storage of animal by-products’ – Interruption of a transport operation for up to eight hours.#Case C-85/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2024-000547answered

Wastewater infrastructure

European Union · European Parliament · 20 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0514_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time.#Case C-514/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0515_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to a maritime transport undertaking – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive length of the procedure – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case C-515/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0514decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time.#Case C-514/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0515decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to a maritime transport undertaking – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive length of the procedure – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case C-515/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0471_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Cohesion Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Articles 99 and 101 – Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities – Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Financial corrections made by the Commission – Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47, first subparagraph – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-471/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0471decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Cohesion Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Articles 99 and 101 – Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities – Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Financial corrections made by the Commission – Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47, first subparagraph – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-471/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0722_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Proceedings brought by Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, justice and security – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Third indent of Article 1 – Concept of ‘instrumentality’ – Article 2(1) – Obligation for Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities from criminal offences – Vehicle used to transport excise goods without a tax marking in breach of the law.#Case C-722/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0474decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Laudamotion GmbH v Flightright GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(2)(a) – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Requirement to present oneself for check-in in good time.#Case C-474/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0722decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Proceedings brought by Sofiyski gradski sad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, justice and security – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Third indent of Article 1 – Concept of ‘instrumentality’ – Article 2(1) – Obligation for Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities from criminal offences – Vehicle used to transport excise goods without a tax marking in breach of the law.#Case C-722/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0390decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Obshtina Pomorie v 'ANHIALO AVTO' OOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Public service contracts – Public service obligations – Public service compensation – Article 4(1)(b) – Mandatory content of public service contracts – Parameters for calculating public service compensation – Determination of prior, objective and transparent parameters – Absence of competitive tendering procedure – Application of the rules for calculating compensation contained in the annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Conditions laid down by the national legislation for the payment of compensation – Determination of the amount of compensation in the law approving the State budget for the year concerned and payment of that amount to the competent national authority – Setting parameters for calculating compensation by reference to general rules.#Case C-390/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0054decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0390_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Obshtina Pomorie v 'ANHIALO AVTO' OOD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Public service contracts – Public service obligations – Public service compensation – Article 4(1)(b) – Mandatory content of public service contracts – Parameters for calculating public service compensation – Determination of prior, objective and transparent parameters – Absence of competitive tendering procedure – Application of the rules for calculating compensation contained in the annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Conditions laid down by the national legislation for the payment of compensation – Determination of the amount of compensation in the law approving the State budget for the year concerned and payment of that amount to the competent national authority – Setting parameters for calculating compensation by reference to general rules.#Case C-390/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0054_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0227decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2024.#IL v Regionalna direktsia ‘Avtomobilna administratsia’ Pleven.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Gabrovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Article 7(1) and (3) – Driving licences – Issue, validity and renewal – Physical and mental fitness for driving – Medical examinations – Frequency – Document certifying the psychological fitness of drivers.#Case C-227/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0451decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2024.#RTL Nederland BV and RTL Nieuws BV v Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aviation Transport – Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 – Follow-up of occurrences endangering aviation safety – Article 15 – Confidentiality of details relating to those occurrences – Scope of that confidentiality – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression and of information – Freedom of the media – Request for disclosure of information on the downing of an aircraft flying over eastern Ukraine, made by undertakings operating in the media sector – Article 52(1) – Limitation – Conditions.#Case C-451/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0227_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2024.#IL v Regionalna direktsia ‘Avtomobilna administratsia’ Pleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Article 7(1) and (3) – Driving licences – Issue, validity and renewal – Physical and mental fitness for driving – Medical examinations – Frequency – Document certifying the psychological fitness of drivers.#Case C-227/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0451_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2024.#RTL Nederland BV and RTL Nieuws BV v Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aviation Transport – Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 – Follow-up of occurrences endangering aviation safety – Article 15 – Confidentiality of details relating to those occurrences – Scope of that confidentiality – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression and of information – Freedom of the media – Request for disclosure of information on the downing of an aircraft flying over eastern Ukraine, made by undertakings operating in the media sector – Article 52(1) – Limitation – Conditions.#Case C-451/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0440_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Air transport – Romania – Rescue aid to TAROM – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections on the ground that the measures constitute aid compatible with the internal market.#Case C-440/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0624decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 January 2024.#BP France SAS v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'état (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Directive 2009/28/EC – Articles 17 and 18 – Directive 2018/2001/EC – Articles 25, 29 and 30 – Sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria – Verification of compliance with those criteria – Biofuels used for transport – Production of fuels using the co-processing procedure – Evidence of compliance with those sustainability criteria – Mass balance method – Methods for evaluating the content of hydrotreated vegetable oils (HVO) in fuels produced using that procedure – Member State’s legislation requiring a physical carbon-14 analysis – Article 34 TFEU – Free movement of goods.#Case C-624/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0440decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Air transport – Romania – Rescue aid to TAROM – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections on the ground that the measures constitute aid compatible with the internal market.#Case C-440/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0167_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2023.#European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – International road haulage – Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 – Articles 8 and 9 – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Rest periods – National legislation introducing a maximum parking time at public rest areas of 25 hours along the motorway network of a Member State – Restriction on the freedom to provide road transport services – Burden of proof.#Case C-167/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0421_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2023.#SIA 'DOBELES AUTOBUSU PARKS' and Others v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and VSIA 'Autotransporta direkcija'.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 1(1) – Article 2a(2) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(1) – Article 6(1) – Contract for public passenger transport services by bus – Procedure for the award of a public services contract – Open, transparent and non-discriminatory tendering procedure – Specifications – Amount of compensation granted by the competent national authority – Indexation limited in time and categories of specific costs – Allocation of risks.#Case C-421/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0066_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2023.#Infraestruturas de Portugal, SA and Futrifer Indústrias Ferroviárias, SA v Toscca - Equipamentos em Madeira Lda.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 57(4) – Award of public contracts in the transport sector – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 80(1) – Facultative grounds for exclusion – Obligation to transpose – Economic operator entering into agreements aimed at distorting competition – Competence of the contracting authority – Impact of an earlier decision of a competition authority – Principle of proportionality – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Principle of sound administration – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-66/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2023

PreviousPage 7 of 8Next